Full transcript, 577,794 characters — every turn. Summarised passages are
highlighted: 475 passages across 90 turns, covering
13.0% of what was said. The rest is the record itself.
Open on 475 sentences (13.0%
of the characters). 3,814 sentences in 722 stretches are folded
inline — tap a [+N sentences] to read them where they sit.
Every topic below is closed until you open it.
Land Transport and Related Matters Bill›Second Reading Bills46 turns · 30,090w
· 184 highlighted
bill-780recorded 2026-02-03
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Acting Minister for Transport.
The Acting Minister for Transport (Mr Jeffrey Siow)1333 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, I move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time". The Land Transport and Related Matters Bill is an omnibus Bill that regularises provisions across several existing Acts. It is also a joint Bill by the Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) covering several key areas. I will speak on amendments pertaining to the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) 2.0 system and increasing penalties for serious vehicular offences.[+23 sentences] Minister of State Baey Yam Keng will introduce amendments related to active mobility, including regulations on personal mobility aids (PMAs), and the keeping of unsafe personal mobility devices (PMDs). Senior Minister of State Sim Ann will address the MHA components of this Bill, including penalties for speed limiter offences. The transition to ERP 2.0 has been discussed extensively in this House before. But let me recap quickly why we need ERP 2.0 and the benefits that it will bring. The current ERP system has been in place since 1998. In combination with vehicle ownership policies, road pricing has kept traffic congestion in check during the peak hours. However, after almost three decades, the current ERP system is reaching its end of life. Replacing obsolete components and infrastructure had become unsustainably challenging and expensive. Hence, in 2013, we decided to prepare to move to a new ERP 2.0 system using Global Navigation Satellite System technology. While ERP 2.0 was intended to be a step up, providing useful features for motorists such as real-time traffic information, it was nevertheless based on prevailing technology in 2013. The implementation of ERP 2.0 took longer than initially planned. Technology has improved since 2013. Some features envisioned for the On-Board Unit (OBU), such as displaying charging information and traffic alerts, can now also be done via other means, for example, on smartphones. Nevertheless, the ERP 2.0 design, with an OBU, remained fit for purpose for accurate and efficient road charging. Since we first began the OBU installation exercise in 2024, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) has received much feedback. LTA has taken the feedback on board and this has helped to improve the user experience. For instance, after feedback, vehicle owners were given the option to choose not to have a display screen, which would be more similar to the ERP 1.0 experience. But I note that in the end, the vast majority of car owners chose to install display screens. To date, more than 90% of vehicles have the OBU installed. And having tried out the new OBU, more motorists have now given positive feedback. Motorists tell us that they find some features useful, such as car park availability, reminders on speed limits and bus lanes in operation. We have been introducing these and other new features progressively. Since September last year, motorists can use the OBU to pay for missed ERP charges by simply clicking a button. Soon, motorists will be able to use the OBU for contactless toll payments at land checkpoints as well as for roadside electronic parking. This is why we are introducing clauses 59 to 64 in this Bill to simplify settlement processes and to decriminalise missed ERP charges, which are currently an offence under the Road Traffic Act.[+12 sentences] Compared to ERP 1.0, ERP 2.0 will be more precise and finer in targeting road congestion. It allows us to introduce new charging points without the need for expensive and large physical gantries. We can also spread out ERP charges in smaller amounts across several locations as opposed to just one location and this will be fairer. At this point, let me reassure motorists that we will be judicious in adding new charging points, doing so only when needed at persistent congestion hotspots. My intent is to ensure a smooth transition so that the ERP 2.0 experience will be as similar as possible to the ERP 1.0 experience, as we switch over. This means that we will not be introducing distance-based charging in the immediate term. Distance-based charging is something that we will continue to study and explore after motorists have gotten more used to the new system and the situation is more stable. I want to thank the 93% of vehicle owners who have already installed the OBU. For the remaining ones, LTA is issuing a final reminder. These vehicle owners, who have already been previously notified, will have another three months to install their OBUs at no cost. After that, OBU installation fees will apply. So, I strongly encourage the remaining vehicle owners who are holding out to install their OBUs as soon as possible. On 1 January 2027, when the ERP 2.0 is completely rolled out and ERP 1.0 is decommissioned, the OBU will be mandatory for all Singapore-registered vehicles.[+5 sentences] This is because ERP 2.0 uses satellite technology, rather than gantries, to determine the vehicle's location for charging. Clause 65 of the Bill amends the Road Traffic Act 1961 to allow for this. For foreign-registered private vehicles, we encourage them to install OBUs for usage-based charging, although we recognise that occasional visitors may prefer not to do so. Vehicles without OBUs can still pay a daily flat fee, like cars without the In-vehicle Unit (IU) today. Malaysian taxis, however, will be required to install the OBU, as this is necessary for us to track and enforce against such vehicles if needed within Singapore. To safeguard the integrity of the ERP 2.0 system, it will be an offence to tamper with or modify OBUs without authorisation, and provide or advertise services on the OBU similarly without authorisation.[+1 sentence] And these will be set out in subsidiary legislation. For serious cases of deliberate non-compliance or misuse, the legislation provides for penalties of up to $20,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years.[+1 sentence] This Bill also covers housekeeping amendments that harmonise penalties for two categories of vehicular offences. Today, there are over 1,000 cases of illegal vehicle modifications detected annually. And to deter workshops from doing illegal modification on a large scale, clause 52 of the Bill raises the maximum penalties for such illegal alterations. Under the Bill, individuals can face fines up to $20,000 and/or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, with penalties doubled for repeat offenders. For non-individuals, first time offenders can be fined up to $40,000, and up to $80,000 for repeat offenders.[+14 sentences] Another serious vehicular offence is keeping or using of unregistered or deregistered vehicles. Clause 57 of the Bill increases the penalties for offenders, who will face fines of up to $20,000, and/or jail of up to two years for the first offence, again with penalties doubled for repeat offenders. These enhanced penalties are necessary as we are seeing a growing trend of unregistered vehicles on our roads. Some of them are used for criminal activities, such as drug trafficking. These vehicles also pose serious road safety risks, as they operate without valid insurance or inspections, and are often involved in hit-and-run accidents. Going forward, ERP 2.0 will also make it easier to detect and enforce against such vehicles. This Bill also includes a few supporting amendments. Clauses 46 and 47 will amend the Land Transport Authority of Singapore Act to expressly empower the LTA to grant financial incentives, support, grant, aid or assistance. This gives flexibility for potential future schemes where direct disbursement may be necessary. Clauses 48 to 50 will amend the Parking Places Act to enable prosecution in the case of inaccurate lodgements. Mr Speaker, Sir, let me conclude. The provisions in the Bill support the transition to ERP 2.0 and harmonise vehicular offence penalties across our regulatory system. I will now invite Minister of State for Transport to elaborate on the active mobility measures in this Bill, followed by Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs who will elaborate on the measures under MHA. Sir, I seek to move.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+1 sentence]Minister of State Baey Yam Keng.
The Minister of State for Transport (Mr Baey Yam Keng)3454 words
[+24 sentences]Mr Speaker, I will now elaborate on the active mobility components of this Bill which represent a significant strengthening of the active mobility legal framework to improve safety. First, the Bill amends the Active Mobility Act 2017 to implement the new rules on PMAs to ensure their safe and responsible use. Second, the Bill amends the Small Motorised Vehicles (Safety) Act 2020 to make it an offence to keep an unsafe active mobility device (AMD). This grants LTA greater enforcement powers against devices that pose fire safety risks. Mr Speaker, this House has returned to the issue of active mobility many times over the past decade, reflecting the persistent challenges and evolving nature of regulating active mobility. Since the landmark Active Mobility Act came into force in 2017, we have adjusted our laws multiple times to keep pace with a landscape that moves fast. We introduced the Small Motorised Vehicles (Safety) Act 2020 to stem the flow of non-compliant devices into Singapore and the Shared Mobility Enterprises (Control and Licensing) Act 2020 to bring order to the business of shared AMDs. Throughout this journey, we have witnessed a relentless desire for mobility options that are faster, cheaper and more convenient. But ever so often, this came at the direct expense of path safety. Following the ban on e-scooters from footpaths in 2019, we have seen a shift in misuse towards PMAs. Regrettably, as soon as one regulatory gap is closed, another is exploited. This underscores the need for this House to adjust our laws, not out of a desire to restrict and burden individuals with red tape, but out of a duty to curb misuse and keep our paths safe for all. Many of us have heard from residents who feel increasingly unsafe as larger, faster devices weave through our paths under the guise of being mobility aids. We need to restore the original purpose of these devices to serve their intended users. To recap, there are three main types of PMAs. First, a mobility scooter, which is a motorised device with a single seat, steered with a handlebar and typically supported by a stem at the front of the device; two, a motorised wheelchair, which is propelled by a motor that forms part of the wheelchair and usually operated by a joystick; or three, a non-motorised wheelchair, which has no motor and is usually mounted on two or more wheels. In this Bill, the first two, mobility scooters and motorised wheelchairs, will be regulated as "mobility vehicles". As our population ages and more people have to use PMAs, there is a growing need to ensure that they are used safely and responsibly. We face a concerning trend of able-bodied individuals who are misusing mobility scooters. Although the device is a replacement for walking, some ride at top speeds on paths or operate large devices that endanger other path users, especially seniors and young children. Members, disability groups and the public have consistently called for the tightening of rules on PMAs and improvement in path safety. We hear you. This Bill thus takes a holistic approach to the problem of PMA misuse, speeding and oversized devices. I will not specify the exact clauses as they span across the Bill. First, we will lower the speed limit for mobility vehicles on public paths to six kilometres an hour.[+1 sentence] Second, we will introduce dimension and weight limits for PMAs used on public paths. Third, we will require that users of mobility scooters be certified to have a medical need for the device, in order to ride a mobility scooter on public paths.[+6 sentences] Fourth, we will also go upstream and require that mobility scooters are checked for compliance and registered before they are sold. This upstream rule reduces the likelihood of users obtaining non-compliant mobility scooters. All four measures were developed following discussions with the Active Mobility Advisory Panel (AMAP) and careful study of the issue and engagement with key user groups, including PMA users, disability groups, occupational therapists, general path users and food delivery riders. Since we announced the tightening of PMA rules in 2024, we have been working with stakeholders and user groups to prepare for the shift. This includes readying the healthcare sector to conduct the assessment to grant a Certificate of Medical Need, also known as the Assessment for Mobility Scooter (AMS). We have also been encouraging retailers to shift to new stocks of PMAs that are compliant with the new rules. To give stakeholders sufficient transition time after this Bill, we intend for the rules to take effect from 1 June 2026.[+7 sentences] Let me now introduce each of the changes in order. First, we are reducing the speed limit for mobility scooters and motorised wheelchairs, also known as mobility vehicles, from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour. Today, mobility vehicles have a 10-kilometre per hour limit, even if they travel on shared paths where the path speed limit is 25 kilometres per hour. This was recommended by the AMAP in 2018 and intended to discourage able-bodied misuse. However, experience has shown this limit to be insufficient. Mobility vehicles are generally larger and heavier than bicycles. Travelling at 10 kilometres per hour may still pose a danger to other path users, as it is much faster than typical walking speed. At six kilometres per hour, mobility vehicles match the pace of a brisk walker, which meet the needs of genuine users who have difficulty walking.[+1 sentence] This will also make our paths safer. This means that from 1 June 2026, selling mobility vehicles with a device speed limit above six kilometres per hour will carry penalties of up to $20,000 or imprisonment up to 24 months, or both, with higher penalties for non-individuals and repeat offenders.[+1 sentence] Displaying and advertising such non-compliant devices will carry penalties of up to $10,000 or imprisonment up to 12 months, or both. An individual who rides or drives a mobility vehicle at a speed exceeding six kilometres per hour on a public path will face fines of up to $2,000 or up to six months' imprisonment, or both, with higher penalties for repeat violations.[+4 sentences] To ease the transition, we will allow existing mobility vehicles with a device speed limit of up to 10 kilometres per hour to be used on public paths until 31 December 2028, but they need to ride within the six kilometres per hour limit and meet all other rules. From 1 January 2029 onwards, all mobility vehicles used on public paths must have a device speed limit of six kilometres per hour and below. Second, we will introduce device dimension restrictions for PMAs to address the problem of large PMAs that inconvenience and endanger other path users. This will be aligned with the existing dimension restrictions on public transport. From 1 June 2026, PMAs must not exceed a width of 70 centimetres, a length of 120 centimetres, a height of 150 centimetres and a laden weight of 300 kilogrammes.[+2 sentences] Offenders caught riding such devices on public paths face penalties of up to $10,000 in fines or imprisonment of up to six months, or both, with penalties increasing for repea offences. Selling oversized mobility vehicles will be an offence, with penalties of up to $20,000 or imprisonment up to 24 months, or both, with higher penalties for non-individuals and repeat offenders. Third, to curb misuse, only those with genuine medical need will be allowed to ride a mobility scooter on public paths from 1 June 2026.[+15 sentences] We will require users to have a Certificate of Medical Need to ride a mobility scooter on public paths. This targets the core problem of able-bodied users misusing devices meant for those with mobility needs. When we engaged stakeholders, they welcomed the recommendations. For example, some genuine users shared that the increased misuse of mobility scooters has caused them anxiety because they have had to deal with increasing scrutiny from the public. Currently, we only intend to require certification for mobility scooters. We do not see a problem of misuse of motorised wheelchairs. So, wheelchair users do not need a Certificate of Medical Need. The certificate will be available later this month, from 27 February 2026, through the AMS process. The assessment was developed jointly with the Ministry of Health (MOH), with input from professional healthcare associations. A circular and guidelines were issued in November last year to prepare the sector. Under the AMS, users with medical conditions which result in mobility difficulties will be certified to have a medical need to drive or ride a mobility scooter. Users can approach their regular doctor or occupational therapist for the assessment or a general practitioner who offers the service. We have worked with MOH to engage the healthcare sector to encourage clinics to offer the AMS so that it will be widely available. Based on our survey of clinics, more than 140 clinics intend to offer the assessment. Users will have choices to help keep costs reasonable. Based on LTA's survey of clinics, fees are expected to range from $20 to $150, with a median fee of $50.[+22 sentences] Given that a budget mobility scooter costs around $1,000 and mid-range models can reach up to $2,000, the cost of the assessment is relatively modest compared to the price of the device itself. We hope users can understand that this would help to ensure that mobility scooters on public paths are only for those with genuine medical need. The charges will vary depending on the complexity of the consultation. We have simplified the information that assessors have to provide to LTA. They centre on three key things: first, whether the individual has a medical need to use a mobility scooter; second, whether this need is temporary or long term; and finally, whether the individual has a medical need for a device that exceeds the dimension requirements. A list of clinics that offer the AMS will be available on LTA's website from tomorrow. Users should contact their preferred clinics directly to enquire about the cost and book an appointment in advance. We encourage users to consult their regular healthcare providers who already understand their medical history, to streamline the assessment process. We recognise that going to the doctor to obtain certification will take time and cost for users. We will thus take a risk-managed approach to minimise the impact on our healthcare system and on genuine users. Seniors aged 70 and above will be exempted from the certification requirement. We recognise that as seniors age, the likelihood of mobility challenges increases. The risk of able-bodied seniors abusing mobility scooters is expected to be low. This is especially given the reduced speed limit. We will monitor the situation and calibrate accordingly, if necessary. We will also exempt users who have had their mobility needs or disability assessed and submitted relevant information to the Government. This includes existing beneficiaries of subsidised mobility scooters from the Seniors' Mobility and Enabling Fund (SMF) and Assistive Technology Fund (ATF). It also includes individuals already certified with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs in "mobility" or "transferring" who have applied for MOH disability schemes, such as the Home Caregiving Grant. These exemptions will apply automatically and users need not do anything. Agencies will issue letters to notify existing SMF and ATF beneficiaries, as well as individuals with the relevant ADL needs who have applied for MOH disability schemes previously. Moving forward, those applying to SMF for a subsidised mobility scooter will obtain the certificate as part of the subsidy application process. Those obtaining an ATF-subsidised mobility scooter and applicants for MOH disability schemes with the relevant ADL needs, will be automatically exempted. From 1 June 2026, mobility scooter users on public paths must have this Certificate of Medical Need. Users will have the next three months to obtain the certification, and enforcement officers will engage and educate users on these new rules during this transition period. Those caught riding a mobility scooter on public paths without the Certificate of Medical Need will face penalties of up to $2,000 in fines or imprisonment of up to six months, or both.[+17 sentences] Going back to our intention of introducing this rule to curb misuse, our enforcement officers will focus on visibly able-bodied individuals misusing mobility scooters. Our intention is not to inconvenience genuine users. However, some mobility challenges are not visible. So, I seek users' understanding that our enforcement officers will need to do their job and check for their certification at times. It will also be an offence for businesses to employ or permit an individual to ride a mobility scooter on public path during the course of work, without ensuring that the rider has valid Certification of Medical Need. Offenders will face penalties of up to $2,000 in fines or imprisonment of up to six months, or both. This is similar to how it is an offence for businesses employing or permitting an individual to ride a power-assisted bicycle (PAB) in the course of work, without ensuring the rider has the mandatory theory test certification. Fourth, we will require mobility scooters to be registered with LTA to strengthen upstream enforcement. Today, PABs and e-scooters need to be registered with LTA to ensure devices comply with rules and are affixed with identification marks. To strengthen upstream enforcement and improve the overall effectiveness of PMA measures, mobility scooters will need to be registered. Only mobility scooters that comply with device dimension and speed restrictions can be registered to persons with valid Certificates of Medical Need, exempted persons or whitelisted businesses, such as retailers. In addition, LTA and the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) will make clear through an industry circular that mobility scooters fall under the classification of medical devices as they are specifically designed for individuals with walking difficulties. This means that under HSA's regulations, importers must have an HSA licence and list their devices on HSA's database before import. LTA will only allow mobility scooter models that are listed on HSA's database of medical devices to be registered. Existing mobility scooters need not meet this requirement. To ensure the registration regime is effective, it must apply to all mobility scooters eventually. If we exempt existing mobility scooters, it will be challenging to distinguish new devices from existing ones. To give users time to adjust to the rule, we will implement the registration regime in phases and keep the process user-friendly. We will start by requiring registration for mobility scooters sold from 1 June 2026.[+1 sentence] The sale of an unregistered mobility scooter for use on public paths will be an offence from 1 June 2026, with individuals facing penalties of up to $20,000 or jail of up to 24 months, or both, and higher penalties for non-individuals and repeat offenders. Thereafter, from 1 January 2029, all mobility scooters will need to be registered before they can be used on a public path.[+18 sentences] Offenders face penalties of up to $2,000 or jail of up to three months, or both, with higher penalties for repeat offenders. We have designed the registration process to minimise burden on users. For devices sold from 1 June 2026, retailers will handle registration, creating a seamless experience for consumers. For existing devices, we will give some time for users to register their devices ahead of the requirement by 1 January 2029. Users will be able to register their devices, if they are compliant, at roving stations that LTA will roll out in mid-2027 at community touchpoints. Devices registered as part of this exercise need not be listed on HSA's database of medical devices. I know many users may want to rush to register their devices ahead of the rules. LTA will include a survey link on its website for users to indicate their interest in registration. This will help us to better deploy resources for the roving registration stations. I must emphasise here that only compliant mobility scooters will be allowed for registration. If you have a mobility scooter that does not comply with the six kilometres per hour device speed limit or dimension and weight limits, please replace your device. These new rules were announced two years ago in March 2024 and users should transition to compliant devices by 1 January 2029 – almost five years later. LTA has engaged retailers on the new registration requirements and we will provide guidance to roll this out smoothly. For AMD retailers, many will be familiar with the existing registration regimes for power-assisted bicycles and e-scooters. We will pay special attention to medical device retailers who may be less familiar with the process. Mr Speaker, the Bill strikes a careful balance between access and safety. We want to ensure genuine users have access to PMAs, which can significantly improve their quality of life. At the same time, we need to keep paths safe and address the problem of misuse. In designing our regulations, we also recognise the unique needs of PMA users, who have mobility challenges. This is why we will implement exemptions from the Certificate of Medical Need requirement for seniors and existing Government scheme beneficiaries.[+7 sentences] We will also keep the registration process streamlined and user-friendly. Thus far, we have focused on the PMA proposals, which are intended to strengthen path safety. Turning to fire safety, the Government takes a strict enforcement approach towards the import, sale and use of non-compliant AMDs. Since 2021, local retailers must seek LTA's approval for the import of PABs and PMDs, and they must be registered before use. These devices must also be compliant with safety standards. For PABs, it is the EN15194 standard, while for registrable PMDs, it is the UL2272 standard. Despite years of regulatory tightening since 2016, we continue to grapple with the fire safety risks from AMDs. In 2025 alone, we recorded 49 AMD-related fires.[+6 sentences] PMDs accounted for most cases at 31, and the bulk of PMD fires involve non-UL2272-certified devices. We can do more to prevent such fires and we will do more. Today, it is an offence to ride a non-UL2272-certified e-scooter on public paths or roads, but not to keep such devices. This means that if LTA enforcement officers come across a non-UL2272-certified e-scooter, no action can be taken unless it is being used. This is unlike the case for non-compliant power-assisted bicycles, where it is already an offence to keep such a device under the Road Traffic Act 1961. We will address this gap. Clauses 84 to 91 will amend the Small Motorised Vehicles (Safety) Act 2020 to prohibit the keeping of unsafe devices.[+6 sentences] Devices that do not comply with the prescribed safety requirements, such as the UL2272 safety standard for registrable personal mobility devices, will be unsafe devices. Some may ask why we are only doing this now. LTA's mandate has traditionally focused on path and road safety. However, recognising the fire safety risks of AMDs even when they are not used on paths or roads, we are extending the function and duty of the LTA to include the regulation of the keeping of unsafe devices. Clause 46 will amend the Land Transport Authority of Singapore Act 1995 to expand LTA's function and duty to include regulating the keeping of unsafe devices. The Bill will make it an offence to keep such unsafe devices. Penalties include fines up to $2,000 or imprisonment up to three months, or both, with higher penalties for non-individuals and repeat offenders.[+11 sentences] LTA will leverage feedback received via official channels and social media, surveillance as well as day-to-day operations to detect and seize non-UL2272 e-scooters. Mr Speaker, these measures represent an important shift to implement upstream controls and strengthen our laws, to make our paths safer for everyone. It will enable those with mobility needs who genuinely need to use PMAs to use them safely alongside other path users. Ultimately, Mr Speaker, we must return to the heart of this matter: the vision of a gracious "we first" society. MOT and LTA are strengthening our laws and enforcement, but they are not a panacea. We must acknowledge the reality that the "cat" – the regulator – will never be fast enough to catch every "mouse" – every errant rider. Path safety is and must always be a collective responsibility. Errant riders and device owners must realise that they are not just breaking the law but endangering themselves and our communities. Responsible riders among us must also speak up and help shape the right culture on our paths. While the Government will do its part through regulations, infrastructure and enforcement, it is the individual's behaviour and the community's social norms that will ultimately make our paths safe for everyone. I will now invite the Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs to address the MHA components of this joint Bill.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+1 sentence]Senior Minister of State Sim Ann.
The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Ms Sim Ann)1246 words
[+8 sentences]Mr Speaker, allow me to outline the amendments proposed by MHA to the Road Traffic Act and the Road Vehicles (Special Powers) Act under this Bill. MHA will be making two key amendments. First, to strengthen the regulatory framework around speed limiters to better deter and detect non-compliance. Second, to clarify that the mandatory disqualification periods prescribed for certain offences under the Road Traffic Act are minimum periods and that the Courts can impose longer disqualification periods. I will focus my remarks on these two amendments, before briefly touching on the other amendments. Members will recall that in 2024, we commenced the mandatory installation of speed limiters in lorries. This is to mitigate the risks posed by heavy vehicles, which can cause more severe consequences in the event of an accident. We have adopted a phased implementation approach, depending on the weight and registration date of the vehicle. As of 5 January 2026, around 72% of lorries required to have speed limiters installed by the various deadlines have done so.[+18 sentences] We have reviewed the existing speed limiter offences and found them to be inadequate in deterring non-compliance and there are also gaps in accountability. To close these gaps, clause 56 of the Bill introduces several new offences and raises the penalties for existing offences. First, we will hold owners and drivers liable for knowingly causing or permitting the use of non-compliant speed limiter-required lorries and for tampering with installed speed limiters. Under the current speed limiter rules, only the driver commits an offence for driving a non-compliant lorry. However, there may be situations where such non-compliance occurs under the instruction of the owner of the lorry, who is not liable under the existing rules. The proposed amendment closes this gap by extending the scope of the offence to anyone who knowingly causes or permits the use of a non-compliant lorry, including the owner. In addition, while tampering with a speed limiter is already an offence, currently, only the person who tampered with it is liable. The current law does not expressly make liable, persons who instructed or caused another person to do so, nor persons who offer to alter speed limiters. Our proposed amendment ensures that all parties who are involved in speed limiter tampering can be held accountable. Second, we will impose a duty on Authorised Agents to report suspected tampering of a speed limiter. Currently, only Authorised Agents of the Traffic Police may install or service speed limiters. With this amendment, such agents will be required to notify the Traffic Police if they know or have reason to believe that a speed limiter has been tampered with or is non-compliant. This will enable prompt investigation and removal of non-compliant lorries from the roads. Third, we will prohibit the advertising of speed limiter services by unauthorised parties. This deters the supply of illegal tampering services and reduces opportunities for tampering. The Bill will also raise the penalties for existing speed limiter-related offences. Currently, first-time offenders face a fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment of up to three months, while repeat offenders face a fine of up to $2,000 or imprisonment of up to six months. These penalties have not been updated since 1999. The Bill updates the penalty framework by increasing the maximum fines to $10,000 for a first conviction and $20,000 for subsequent convictions.[+3 sentences] The imprisonment terms will be retained. This ensures that the penalties are a credible deterrent and are commensurate with the potential harm posed by speeding heavy vehicles. Next, clauses 69 to 73, 75 and 77 of the Bill clarify that the mandatory disqualification periods prescribed for certain offences under the Road Traffic Act are minimum disqualification periods and that no special reasons are required for a Court to order a longer disqualification period. The disqualification period that the Court may impose can be any period equal to or above the prescribed minimum disqualification period, including a lifetime disqualification period if it thinks fit.[+5 sentences] These amendments seek to address the observations in the recent High Court judgment of Ng En You Jeremiah v Public Prosecutor. The High Court, in considering a sentencing framework for the relevant driving offence, noted that the offence already imposed a mandatory 12-year disqualification period, “unless the court for special reasons thinks fit to not order or to order otherwise”. The High Court also held that “special reasons” had to be exceptional and that the 12-year disqualification period should apply regardless of the applicable sentencing band for that particular driving offence. The High Court's judgment thus appears to suggest that special reasons must be present before a Court may impose a disqualification period that is longer than the prescribed minimum period. For serious road traffic offences, such as driving under the influence of drink and car racing, a mandatory minimum disqualification period is prescribed because such conduct poses a serious risk to public safety. The amendments make it clear that there is no need for special reasons before a Court may impose a disqualification period that is longer than the prescribed minimum period.[+6 sentences] Sir, I will now briefly run through several other miscellaneous amendments. Clauses 68, 74 and 79 will enhance the operational efficiency of the Singapore Armed Forces and Traffic Police. Clause 68 addresses an ambiguity under section 49 of the Road Traffic Act. Currently, the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) contracts commercial bus companies to ferry soldiers to various locations. In view of the shortage of bus drivers, SAF intends for its personnel to drive the commercial buses it leases. However, section 49 may be interpreted to limit SAF personnel holding military driving licences to driving only vehicles owned by SAF. The amendment makes it clear that the exemption applies to vehicles owned or leased by SAF.[+1 sentence] Currently, Police officers are required to manually review, themselves, images and footages captured by Police cameras and manually issue, themselves, the traffic notices, even for straightforward violations, such as red-light beating and speeding. Clauses 74 and 79 amend the Road Traffic Act to allow processing of such violations to be carried out by authorised civilians, including service providers, subject to appropriate safeguards.[+3 sentences] This would free up Traffic Police officers to focus on enforcement and complex cases. Clause 82 amends section 4 of the Road Vehicles (Special Powers) Act relating to the forfeiture of road vehicles used to commit any offence prescribed in the Schedule of the Act. Forfeiture is currently mandatory if the Court is satisfied that a road vehicle has been used to commit any scheduled offence or to convey persons to the scene or facilitate escape of any person from the scene where a scheduled offence has been committed. The amendment will make the forfeiture of road vehicles discretionary in all scenarios if it is proved to the Court's satisfaction that the person who committed the scheduled offence involving the vehicle is not the vehicle owner and had used the vehicle without the consent of its owner.[+2 sentences] Mr Speaker, in summary, the amendments proposed by MHA in this Bill will update, clarify and strengthen our road traffic laws. But these moves alone are not enough. MHA remains concerned by the road safety situation and has plans to further tighten our laws and regulatory framework.[+3 sentences] We will share more at the upcoming Committee of Supply debate. We also call upon all road users to exercise responsibility, patience and graciousness. It is possible to achieve zero road injuries and fatalities but only if we all do our part.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Tin Pei Ling.
Ms Tin Pei Ling (Marine Parade-Braddell Heights)1103 words
[+3 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, land transport affects Singaporean’ daily lives and livelihoods. Today’s debate on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill reflects this and is therefore of public importance. Our Transport Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) is giving this Bill close attention, as are many of our People’s Action Party (PAP) Parliamentary colleagues. A total of 18 PAP Members of Parliament (MPs) will speak on the new regulations on PMAs, ERP 2.0, vehicle safety and other related issues.[+17 sentences] In the course of our respective work on the ground, my PAP colleagues and I have engaged different stakeholder groups, including private hire drivers, union workers, industry representatives and, of course, our own residents. These engagements gave us precious opportunities to hear their feedback first-hand, understand their lived experiences and challenges faced and gather practical suggestions. My PAP colleagues will share more in their speeches. At the heart of our interest is the principle of ensuring fair, inclusive and safe use of our public roads and space. In a society where our people have diverse needs, co-existence is key. This means that our public infrastructure and spaces offer choices and accommodate different user groups, and that our legislations enable people yet protect the vulnerable. Overall, my fellow PAP MPs and I support the intent of the Bill and we will set out our arguments in our respective speeches. We will also be highlighting our concerns pertaining to practical implementation, costs and impact on vulnerable groups, such as low-income groups and platform workers. Here, allow me to raise a few points. Firstly, transitioning to ERP 2.0 is a step toward a smarter transport future. This is progress. Despite initial teething problems from mass OBU deployment, ERP 2.0 enables a more intelligent road use management. Real-time data collected via the OBUs can be integrated with existing systems to enable situational awareness and faster incident detection. Over time, these data can support incident and demand predictions. Removing physical ERP gantries eventually will also free up valuable land space. Hence, I support this progressive move. Second, OBUs are central to ERP 2.0, but the installation was delayed by the global chip shortage from 2021 to 2023. Although most vehicles now have OBUs, full installation is only expected to complete by 2027, at least seven-year gap from original approval to completion.[+19 sentences] Even longer, if you consider that the OBUs were based on the technology back in 2013. Given how rapidly technology evolves, how will the Government ensure that the hardware and software, including the operating system, do not become obsolete before we can achieve the smart transport management objectives? Upgrading devices is costly in manpower and money, and it places burdens on vehicle owners. So, we really do not want a situation whereby very shortly after we complete the OBU deployment in 2027, and then we have to go into another round again. Third, the use of OBUs will make distance-based ERP pricing feasible. I understand the Minister mentioned that it will not be an immediate deployment, but it is feasible. While charging by distance is fairer in principle, it also risks disproportionately affecting those who earn their living on the road, especially delivery riders and private hire drivers who often work long painful hours but also often earning just enough to make ends meet. These workers will be unable to optimise pathways and can only be “price takers” in this instance. So, in the eventual situation whereby distance-based ERP pricing is implemented, may I ask what measures will be in place to support these workers? Fourth, PMAs are increasingly important, particularly in an ageing society. Many elderly residents depend on them for mobility and well-being. But irresponsible use poses real safety risks to both the device users and others around them. Today, there are effectively no restrictions on who may use mobility scooters. I have personally seen riders moving at high speeds on pedestrian paths and instances of multiple able-bodied users on a single scooter endangering others. Just to illustrate with an example from a few years ago, I witnessed three young and able-bodied persons riding a mobility scooter along the covered walkway cutting through Circuit Road. I stopped the scooter and attempted to tell the three riders to dismount as it was dangerous. They gave me a puzzled look and then sped off. Unfortunately, I did not manage to chase them down. That was perhaps the most outrageous instance I encountered and thankfully, the only time so far. But the point is that such irresponsible use is dangerous to other pedestrians, especially when we have many frail and elderly residents using that walkway. Hence, I welcome the Bill’s measures to limit PMA speeds and to require a Certificate of Medical Need.[+5 sentences] Next, strong enforcement is critical to achieving the Bill’s objectives. Current enforcement is challenging. Officers cannot be everywhere; active mobility patrols rely heavily on volunteers and camera deployments have been piecemeal and temporary. Where cameras are present, behaviour improves. And when they are removed, problems often recur. For example, after temporary cameras were installed in 2024 on the pedestrian bridge between Paya Lebar Way and Aljunied Crescent in MacPherson, compliance improved.[+4 sentences] But the problem of riders speeding cross the bridge returned once the cameras were taken down. As such, how will the Government strengthen enforcement capacity? Will more permanent cameras be installed and can our network of cameras support intelligent, real-time monitoring to identify and act, whether it is through warnings or issuance of notices, on non-compliant PMA riders more promptly? I should add that this should include wilful cyclists and other mobility device users as well. In addition, requiring PMDs and PABs to meet the UL2272 and EN14194 standards has been a prudent safety measure that reduced fire risks from charging. This is a positive outcome, but more can be done to keep fires down further. Hence, I support making the possession of non-UL2272 e-scooters an offence.[+3 sentences] Keeping such a device tempts one to still use it. Moreover, if it cannot be used, then there is no reason to keep it. In conclusion, let me reiterate that at the heart of the Transport GPC along with fellow PAP MPs' interests, we want to ensure fair, inclusive and safe use of our public roads and spaces. Co-existence is key to living in a diverse and highly built-up Singapore. We need to keep spaces open for all to live, work and play, but we must also intervene to support or protect the vulnerable. Overall, this Bill strikes a sensible balance between enabling mobility and managing the risks that come with new usage patterns and technologies.[+1 sentence] I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Dennis Tan.
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong (Hougang)2021 words
[+7 sentences]Mr Speaker, the Land Transport Related Matters Bill introduces significant changes to our transport landscape. A key shift in this Bill is the reclassification of what we currently know as PMAs. The Bill replaces this term with a new legal category: "mobility vehicles". This category, in part, encompasses both motorised wheelchairs and mobility scooters. I will first speak briefly on ERP 2.0, while the rest of my speech will focus on the regime changes for these mobility vehicles and raising several concerns. ERP 2.0 and data protection. Mr Speaker, the shift to ERP 2.0 brings with it a significant change in how vehicle movement data is collected and used. Under clause 81, a document certified by the registrar containing transaction and location data from ERP 2.0 devices will be admissible as evidence in court.[+30 sentences] This marks the departure from the privacy-centric design of ERP 1.0. As noted in The Straits Times article on 16 April 1993, the registry of vehicles explicitly chose a system using prepaid smart card so that, I quote: "all the information is in the card and not with the authorities managing the system". While the old IU kept trip data local, the new OBUs enable continuous central logging. Can the Minister clarify what specific technical encryption and anonymisation protocols are applied to data transmitted from the OBU to the central server? Furthermore, what are the legal safeguards to prevent this data from being accessed by other agencies for purposes entirely unrelated to road pricing? Consistent enforcement and public education. Mr Speaker, I have spoken in this House many times since the 13th Parliament on the urgent need for consistent enforcement and robust public education for all AMDs. This includes bicycles, PABs, PMDs and of course, PMAs or mobility vehicles. Yet on a daily basis we still witness widespread disregard for road safety, cyclists and PAB users not keeping left, beating red lights, riding without helmets or using footpaths with little regard for pedestrians. This is notwithstanding statistics revealed by the Traffic Police, I think it was yesterday, of 650 summons issued to errant cyclists in the first half of 2025. How many cyclists or e-bike riders are aware, for example, that it is an offence riding on the right side of a motor vehicle unless they are overtaking or about to make a right turn? It is also not uncommon to see riders not riding on the left lanes. Are users of rental bikes made aware that helmets must be worn when riding on the roads? These are just examples. The human cause is evident. In December, a 71-year-old lady was severely injured by an e-bike while exiting Pasir Ris Mall, requiring jaw reconstruction. In January, another lady in her 60s suffered torn ligaments and fractures after being knocked down while crossing the road. In November last year, the Minister of State, Baey Yam Keng himself, was bumped into by a female cyclist travelling in the wrong direction. Such in these incidents underscore a poor riding culture rooted in years of inadequate public education and enforcement, points I raised repeatedly in this House since 2017. I am reminded of the Road Safety Park at East Coast launched in the 1980s. Its objective was ambitious then: to introduce road safety as a way of life. By its 20th year, more than one million students in Singapore had passed through its gates to participate in traffic games. They role played as pedestrians and drivers to internalise road courtesy. This was a society wide effort that instil safety consciousness through practical engagement. To truly change our AMD riding culture, we must move beyond static signage to immersive learning. The road safety park's success in the early years shows that when we have the will to invest, we can shape an entire generation's behaviour. Authorities have cited limited resources as far as AMDs are concerned. Recently, Minister of State Baey Yam Keng reiterated that LTA will do its best within constraints. But Mr Speaker, there should be a greater political will to invest in the resources needed for a safer riding culture and for safer footpaths. Changes to the PMA regime. Yet, even as enforcement resources remain limited, this Bill introduces more changes, more rules and changes for PMAs: implementing the Certificate of Medical Need requirement, imposing dimension limits and reducing the speed limit for mobility scooters from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour.[+4 sentences] It also mandates the registration for PMAs. While these measures directly address concerns regarding the misuse of mobility scooters by able bodied individuals, speeding and the use of oversized devices, I am again concerned about the practical execution of the measures designed in this Bill, given the inability to significantly improve safe use and riding culture for different forms of AMDs so far. How will LTA ensure non-compliant mobility scooters are not used after 2028, or unauthorised riders do not continue with their use after the passing of this Bill? The same gap worries me about clause 84 to 91, regarding the proposed banning of non UL2272 e-scooters or PMDs. In a September 2025 Parliamentary Question reply, Minister Shanmugam said that 187 fires in Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates were caused by AMDs. Of these 46% by PMDs, 42% by PABs and 12% for PMAs.[+12 sentences] It is disturbing that five years after PMDs or e-scooters were supposedly banned from mainstream use, except on park connectors, they are still the main cause of fires for all AMDs. One can imagine how many more are kept in homes and continue to be used. It is also reflective, at least to some extent, of the effectiveness of past and former enforcement efforts in curbing non-compliant use. On 20 November 2025, an island-wide operation targeted non-compliant devices. What measures were taken for units where occupants were not at home? Five years after the ban, they remain a primary fire risk. How will the offence of keeping these PMDs be enforced on a regular basis? Will there be regular door-to-door inspections? Could the Ministry consider concentrating officers in a specific zone for a sustained period for intensive enforcement? This will send a strategic message rather than spreading our limited resources too thinly. Impact on seniors and infrastructure. The change of the PMA regime. The reduction of mobility scooter speed limit to six kilometres per hour raises some concerns, and I have spoken on this in this House previously.[+4 sentences] The Government previously noted that this speed takes reference from walking speeds. However, a 40% drop in speed significantly increases travel time and exposure to the elements for seniors. Can the Minister clarify whether any studies were conducted on the impact of this reduction on the travel range of elderly users? Some of my residents who use their PMAs to travel beyond their immediate neighbourhood had provided feedback to me that the reduction in speed will increase the time they need to travel and ultimately, reduce the distance they can travel within the time that they have. At the 2024 Committee of Supply debate for MOT, I had urged the Government in the run-up to the introduction of the new PMD regime to reconsider permitting seniors aged at least 67 or 70 to be allowed to use mobility scooters, even in the absence of a formerly diagnosed musculoskeletal or medical condition. I am glad that the Government has decided to exempt seniors aged 70 and above from the certification requirement.[+15 sentences] Mobility scooters do provide seniors with confidence to be out and about, which is a good thing. So, for these individuals, mobility scooters can be invaluable at maintaining mobility, independence and quality of life during their golden years, allowing broader access to seniors above 70 would empower them to remain active and engaged in community life, promoting both physical and mental well-being. I would also like to suggest that the Government could explore expanding the capacity of occupational therapies in restructured hospitals to provide mobility scooters, assessments and training. This would ensure that seniors and others with genuine mobility needs receive proper guidance on the safe and responsible use of these devices. Such a measure would not only enhance user safety but also foster greater confidence among the public in the appropriate use of mobility scooters. Next, outreach to existing users who have to discontinue use. I am also concerned about the impact on existing mobility scooter users who have to discontinue their existing use of mobility scooters. There are some parents who use their mobility scooters to ferry their young children or some seniors who ferry their spouses with mobility or health issues on their existing PMAs. These PMAs will not be authorised under this Bill due to their sizes. We must be sensitive to understand that some of these individuals have real transportation needs that in their views are not adequately met by the proposals in this Bill or what is otherwise available out there. So, how will LTA reach out to these affected individuals effectively on the law change and get them to understand the risks perceived by the authorities as posed by such devices on the users and fellow footpath users, and to get their buy-in on the new law? Finally, Mr Speaker, I must again touch on the last mile problem for some users of mobility scooters. The law disallows PMAs from riding on the roads, presumably except when crossing roads. In 2019 and 2020, I raised in this House how narrow or blocked footpaths in, for example, private estates, would usually force PMA riders onto roads. In January 2023, I had asked in a Parliamentary Question about statistics of enforcement against PMA riders who were caught on the road and the range of punishments imposed. MHA revealed that while notices were issued and fines of up to $2,000 were imposed, the number of formal prosecutions was relatively low, often handled through compensation fines first. In another reply to my Parliamentary Question in 2024, MHA also confirmed that enforcement against PMA users on roads had increased with 10 users caught between January and August 2024, compared to four in 2023.[+14 sentences] Mr Speaker, I do often see PMAs on the road and this is not just in private estates or when they are merely crossing the road. I am surprised by the low statistics of enforcement cited. While I agree that it may not be safe for PMAs to use the road, I recognise that our infrastructure needs to catch up to ensure that there is no reason for PMA riders to use the road. Today, in 2026, we are slowing these seniors down even further to six kilometres per hour. If we are going to enforce a strict walking pace and a strict road ban, the Government must first guarantee that the last mile footpath in our private estates, for example, are actually wide enough and clear enough to be used. For example, are the pavements free of obstacles and trees to allow free access? Otherwise, it is unfair and unsafe for elderly PMA users. If our seniors are forced to use the road, they should not fear being prosecuted. On the other hand, from my conversation with many mobility scooter riders, it seems that many are still not even aware that it is illegal to use their mobility scooters on the road. This brings us to the same familiar problem of the need for more and better public education and adequate regular enforcement, as is the case for other AMDs, which I touched on earlier. I would like to ask the Minister to update the House on what public education measures it is intending with the passing of the Bill and also to enhance his efforts to improve the riding culture for all AMD users, including mobility scooters. In closing, Mr Speaker, I hope the Government will consider the proposals and suggestions I have made. Notwithstanding my concerns and reservations, I support the Bill's intent to improve safety and better regulation. I urge the Ministry to ensure strong public education, effective enforcement and thoughtful implementation so that we build a safer environment for all.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Yeo Wan Ling.
Ms Yeo Wan Ling (Punggol)1701 words
[+17 sentences]Mr Speaker, this Bill seeks to strengthen transport safety and efficiency – from improving active mobility safety, to tightening enforcement against illegally modified vehicles and streamlining the collection of missed ERP charges. These are important objectives and I support them. But as we consider these changes, we must remain clear-eyed about who will be most affected on the ground, especially our workers, many of whom depend on our transport system not just to get around, but to earn a living. I declare my interests as Assistant Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), Advisor to the National Delivery Champions Association (NDCA) and Executive Secretary to the National Transport Workers' Union. Mr Speaker, I recognise the intent behind the enhanced regulations on PMAs, including reducing the speed limit from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour, introducing size limits, mandatory registration and the Certificate of Medical Need. These measures are meant to improve safety for all footpath users and that is a goal we all share. But how we implement them matters. We must be careful not to unintentionally place additional hardship on persons with genuine, often permanent mobility impairments, many of whom rely on PMAs to undertake delivery work as their primary and sometimes, only source of income. For our riders, platform work is not a convenience. It is a hard-won pathway to financial independence. First, the reduction in PMA speed limits will lengthen delivery times. For riders who are already push themselves daily, those extra minutes compound quickly. Fewer completed jobs mean lower earnings, and for riders living close to the edge, even a modest drop in income can translate into real trade-offs between food, utilities or even medical needs. Media reports have already highlighted concerns that riders' earnings may be significantly affected and these reflect what we are hearing consistently on the ground through our union engagements. Mdm Farhana Binte Ahmad Mashon, the General Secretary of the National Delivery Champions Association, is herself a mother of six and soon to be a grandmother. She fully supports the intent behind these safety measures, especially to protect young children who may be too small to be seen easily by riders and are particularly vulnerable to careless riding. At the same time, Hana is also a full-time delivery rider who relies on her PMA for her work. Based on her experience, she expects her earnings to fall by 30% to 40% under the six kilometres per hour speed limit if incentives and work conditions are not adjusted.[+1 sentence] This illustrates the real tension we must address between improving safety and ensuring that riders who depend on this work are not pushed into financial hardship. As worker representatives, our platform work associations, including the NDCA, have raised these concerns directly with platform operators. We have since obtained commitments and in-principle agreements from platform partners through bilateral negotiations to review delivery targets and work arrangements for our full-time PMA riders, so that safety improvements do not come at the expense of livelihoods.[+14 sentences] I also urge the Government to work closely with platform operators to monitor post-implementation impacts and to be prepared to offer targeted transitional support if hardship emerges. Mr Speaker, we support the safety intent, but safety improvements should not disproportionately penalise those who depend on PMAs the most. Second, while I support the Certificate of Medical Need to prevent abuse, the criteria must not be so rigid that deserving users are excluded. Medical needs are not always binary. Mobility challenges exist on a spectrum. We should avoid overly narrow thresholds that unintentionally create new barriers for those who genuinely need PMAs for safe and independent mobility. In our engagements with our PMA riders, we see a wide range of profiles and needs. Some, like Ms Toh Bee Tin – a familiar name to many in this House as she was a Para Table Tennis athlete – are born with mobility disabilities and rely entirely on their PMAs, not just for mobility, but for their delivery livelihoods. Others, like Ms Siti Sabarinah, turned to a PMA after suffering a serious leg injury from a delivery cycling accident last year. While she is on the path to recovery, she is still unable to walk independently over longer distances. For riders like her, the concern is not just access today, but the longevity and viability of a significant PMA investment under the new regulatory framework. These examples remind us that eligibility should be guided by real functional needs, not narrow thresholds. As we tighten safeguards against misuse, we must also ensure that those who genuinely depend on PMAs for safe, independent mobility and to earn a living are not left behind. Mr Speaker, there is also the issue of cost. Medical certification can range from $50 to $100, which is significant for lower-income riders. To support our members, the NDCA will provide financial assistance to help subsidise and co-pay out-of-pocket compliance costs arising from this Act.[+14 sentences] This includes expenses, such as medical certifications and installations of attached-on speedometers. In addition, NDCA is in discussion with affiliate general practitioner (GP) partners to make medical assessments and certification more affordable and accessible. These efforts reflect our shared commitment to upholding road safety, while also protecting the dignity and sustainability of work for those who rely on PMAs to earn an honest living. I also ask the Government to consider additional support measures, especially for riders, like Siti, who are recovering from health conditions and will eventually need to transition out of PMAs. Support during this transition period is important, so that recovery does not come at the cost of livelihoods. In addition, I seek the Government's consideration for assistance with the purchase of essential equipment, such as speedometers, which will be critical in helping riders comply with this new speed limit. Finally, I ask the Ministry to clarify whether polyclinics will be able to issue the required medical certificates, so that costs remain affordable and accessible for those who need PMAs the most. Third, while I appreciate the advance notice given since 2024 and the meaningful consultations with NDCA, I urge an education-first approach during the initial enforcement. Some users will need time to adapt, whether to speed limits, device requirements or certification rules. Reasonable grace periods and room for discretion, especially for genuine mistakes, will go a long way in ensuring compliance without undue stress. Clear rules matter but compassionate implementation matters just as much. The NDCA has engaged riders extensively across Singapore not just in meeting rooms, but where our riders actually work and rest. These sessions covered recruitment, rider safety, enforcement issues, Central Provident Fund (CPF) clarifications, last-mile delivery challenges and discussions with LTA and our platform operators. This feedback is not abstract. It reflects lived realities and this is why NDCA continues to work closely with platform operators through the tripartite framework to mitigate livelihood impact while complying to these new rules. We thank our platform operators partners, like Grab, who have given in-principle assurances to adjust performance targets, and NDCA will continue to support riders through the transition to defray costs, including medical certification and device modifications.[+4 sentences] Mr Speaker, this is how lives, livelihoods, safety, dignity at work go hand in hand, the tripartite way. Turning to electric buses. I support the amendments to section 6 of the LTA of Singapore Act 1995 recognising the promotion and regulation for the safe use of electric vehicles (EVs). In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): By 2030, electric buses will make up half of our public bus fleet.[+15 sentences] This is no small matter and whether we can navigate this path steadily depends mostly on our bus captains. Currently, companies do provide training, but each has different arrangements. When manpower is tight, training is sometimes shortened. But bus captains are different. They drive large vehicles with complex systems, carrying passengers and bear heavy responsibility. Some captains have told us that driving electric buses requires not only getting used to new equipment and rules, but also constantly monitoring screens, unlike before when it is mostly monitoring through the rear mirrors. Over time, this causes eye strain and even dizziness. This is no small matter! I would like to ask LTA whether they could consider establishing a unified, clear and mandatory training for electric buses, so that captains have confidence when transitioning to electric buses, making the road safer. (In English): Mr Speaker, I now turn to the issue of speed limiters for lorries. Road safety must always remain our top priority. Measures that protect lives on our roads are necessary and I recognise fully the intent behind mandating speed limiters for heavy vehicles. This intent is also understood and broadly supported by the fleet operators and lorry owners whom I have spoken with. That said, as with many transport policies, the real test lies not in the intent, but actually, in the implementation. One key concern raised by drivers and operators relates to speed differentials on our expressways. Passenger vehicles may travel at up to 90 kilometres per hour, while heavy vehicles are capped at 60 kilometres per hour.[+2 sentences] This wide gap can disrupt traffic flow, lead to frequent overtaking, sudden braking and in some cases, paradoxically increasing accident risks rather than reduce them. Another concern is enforcement consistency. Local operators who comply with speed-limiter requirements may find themselves disadvantaged when foreign-registered heavy vehicles, which may not be subjected to the same standards, continue travelling at higher speeds.[+6 sentences] This creates uneven road behaviour and undermines both safety objectives as well as fair competition. Mr Speaker, my point is not to revisit the policy intent, but to emphasise that implementation must be holistic. Speed limiters alone cannot deliver safer roads. They must be complemented by consistent enforcement, clear lane discipline and policies that reflect the realities of mixed traffic conditions. I, therefore, urge the relevant Ministries to continue engaging drivers and operators to apply enforcement with judgement, and to ensure that implementation remains practical, fair and grounded in real-world conditions so that our roads are not just regulated, but genuinely safer for everyone. Mr Speaker, with these points raised in the spirit of fairness, safety and grounded implementation, I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Fadli Fawzi.
Mr Fadli Fawzi (Aljunied)1617 words
[+19 sentences]Mr Speaker, I have a few considerations to share on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. At the outset, let me state that I recognise the importance of ensuring safety and order for all users in Singapore. Our roads, footpaths and shared spaces must be safe for pedestrians, cyclists, persons with disabilities and motorists. As mobility patterns and technologies evolve, our laws must be updated to reflect these new realities on the ground. One of the most significant developments in recent years has been the rapid rise in the use of mobility devices, such as PMAs, PMDs and PABs. Their use is not limited to elderly Singaporeans or persons with visible disabilities. Even working adults, caregivers and delivery workers are using them, which reflects the last mile connectivity challenges they face. Mr Speaker, my point here is simple. The increased use of mobility vehicles by Singaporeans is more often than not driven by a practical need. Singaporeans rely on this informal low-cost mobility solution simply to get by and get on with their daily lives. With the Certificate of Entitlement prices shattering records year after year, a private car is now firmly out of reach for many working families. Even motorcycles, traditionally seen as an affordable alternative, have become significantly more expensive. Against this backdrop, it should come as no surprise that to meet their everyday transport needs, Singaporeans have turned to mobility vehicles that cost from a few hundred dollars, to $1,000 or $2,000 – just a fraction of the price of a motorcycle or a car. For many Singaporeans, these devices are the only viable way to bridge the last mile between their homes and essential destinations, such as workplaces, schools, markets and food centres. Mr Speaker, I fully understand and acknowledge the Government's concern about the misuse of such vehicles by able-bodied individuals in ways that compromise public safety. There have been genuine incidents involving reckless riding, excessive speeds and conflicts on footpaths. These issues must be addressed, but we must be careful not to inadvertently cause hardship to Singaporeans who rely on these devices out of necessity. Many such individuals now use mobility vehicles to earn a living, including completing food and parcel deliveries for platform companies, such as Grab. For them, these vehicles are essential tools of work rather than toys for amusement or recreation. The Bill proposes to reduce the speed limit for PMAs from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour. In an article published by Mothership on 27 January, platform workers shared that this reduction in speed limit is likely to reduce the orders they can complete by 20% to 30%, or even up to 50%.[+21 sentences] This will translate to a loss in earnings. While some workers will be able to make up for this by working longer hours, others who have caregiving needs or health problems may not be able to do so. Besides being a tool for employment, mobility vehicles can also prove to be the most convenient or practical option for some residents to get around the neighbourhood. Let me illustrate with some examples from my own ward of Kaki Bukit. Take a resident who lives at Block 530 in Bedok North Street 3, which is right next to Kaki Bukit Community Centre. To head to Red Swastika School, the resident has no direct bus route. There are indirect bus options, but this involves switching either at Bedok Interchange or at Heartbeat at Bedok. And that will take more than 35 minutes. The other option is to walk 1.2 kilometres, which Google Maps indicate will take around 17 minutes. To reach Bedok Reservoir Park or Damai Secondary School, the resident has two options to walk – 1.9 kilometres for 26 minutes or to walk one kilometre for 14 minutes to a bus stop near along Bedok North Avenue 3; and then take a three-minute bus ride for three stops. Mr Speaker, I do not mean for these examples to be comprehensive or exhaustive. Rather, they are meant to demonstrate that for certain short but significant journeys in Kaki Bukit, there are sometimes no direct or convenient public transport options. The only realistic alternative is to walk directly from point to point. This is the healthiest option, but may be challenging for the elderly, those with mobility difficulties or parents with young children who are pressed for time – not to mention the hot and humid weather in Singapore, which does not make for a comfortable walking experience. In such circumstances, a PMA can be useful, especially for caregivers with children or working workers rushing to and from shifts. Mr Speaker, regulation without viable alternative risks deepening inequality. Transport policy should be concerned with more than efficiency and safety, but also consider equity and inclusion, especially for those with the least resources. As I mentioned earlier, the increasing reliance on AMDs is driven by practical necessity. Residents turn to these devices to cope with and adapt to what they see as gaps in our public transport network, especially when it comes to last mile connectivity or travelling to neighbourhood amenities that are just slightly too far to walk to comfortably. For such persons, mobility devices are the most viable options, after taking cost, time, convenience and accessibility into account. As such, improving our public transport links, including boosting capacity for last mile connectivity must be a priority. Furthermore, Mr Speaker, I would encourage the Ministry to offer seed funding to pilot and test community bus shuttles in different towns, including Kaki Bukit, with the intention of providing coverage for those short but significant journeys around the neighbourhood that are currently underserved by our public transport operators.[+2 sentences] We can even call this the "we first" shuttle. These local shuttles should be targeted to the specific practical needs of residents and reflect how they actually get around the neighbourhood. This may reduce their reliance on mobility devices. These improvements would also make our public transport network more fit for purpose for our ageing population.[+4 sentences] Our elderly should find it easy and convenient to take a bus for a few stops to visit their friends or run errands in another part of the neighbourhood. They should not be faced with the choice of either walking that kilometre or two, or having to rely on a mobility device. And I believe we also owe it to them to make these bus journeys free-of-charge. Sir, in London, those over the age of 66 enjoy free travel across the public transport network at any time, save for the morning rush hour. Over there, they call it the "Freedom Pass". I see no reason why we cannot or should not do the same for our seniors and give them a Merdeka Pass to travel freely on our public transport.[+1 sentence] Mr Speaker, in Malay. (In Malay): We need to prioritise improvements to public transport links, including boosting capacity for last mile connectivity. I also suggest that MOT establish seed funding to study and test "community bus" services in towns like Kaki Bukit.[+13 sentences] The service is intended to provide coverage for "short but significant" journeys around the neighbourhood. Public transport is still limited for short journeys like these. The proposed community buses should target the specific practical needs of residents and reflect how they get around their neighbourhood. This can help to reduce reliance on mobility devices. These measures can align our public transport network with the needs of senior citizens. They should view taking bus rides as something very convenient. They should not have to choose between walking or using mobility devices. And I think we are responsible for providing bus journeys free of charge to senior citizens. Sir, in London, citizens over the age of 66 enjoy free travel on public transport, except during morning peak hours. Over there, they call it the "Freedom Pass". We should provide a similar service for our senior citizens and give them a "Merdeka Pass" to travel freely on our public transport. (In English): Mr Speaker, this Bill is an opportunity to consider how different modes of mobility may necessitate the long-term transformation of our last mile connectivity infrastructure. The mobility devices that we are discussing today are here to stay. Ultimately, if pedestrian safety is our concern, this is best achieved by segregating pedestrian traffic from motor-powered mobility devices. We can achieve this by moving more decisively towards a more coherent and integrated network of dedicated cycling paths that are clearly separated from pedestrian footpaths, wherever possible and then confining the use of mobility devices to these cycling paths.[+3 sentences] Currently, this is not possible in many neighbourhoods where cycling paths share space with pedestrian footpaths. Mr Speaker, other dense cities across the world have shown that this is possible. It requires us to fundamentally rethink how we allocate existing road space, rather than incrementally increasing cycling and non-pedestrian infrastructure at the margins. Since we expect private vehicle growth to be capped as car-lite policies take effect, the Government should seriously reconsider reclaiming road space currently dedicated to cars, including underutilised lanes and on-street parking – and repurposing them for cycling and walking infrastructure.[+5 sentences] In this way, we also make space for the safe use of mobility devices. Mr Speaker, I believe we need to address the underlying problems and develop a more compassionate vision of mobility in Singapore. We must address the structural gaps that drive people to rely on mobility devices in the first place. This means investing in better neighbourhood connectivity, more responsive public transport planning and infrastructure that reflects and facilitates how people actually move around their communities. Sir, notwithstanding these concerns, I support this Bill.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Poh Li San.
Ms Poh Li San (Sembawang West)1587 words
[+5 sentences]Mr Speaker, PMAs are wonderful inventions that are meant to give independence, dignity and an opportunity to earn a livelihood to seniors and people with mobility challenges. Unfortunately, self-regulation by users is weak. Over the past few years, misuse of PMAs have resulted in nuisance to pedestrians, injuries and even deaths to PMA users. They have also caused severe negative externalities including fires that result in property damage and loss of lives. It is finally time to reset the original intent of PMAs. The Bill's amendments to tighten PMA users' eligibility, operating rules and specifications are overdue.[+5 sentences] But better late than never. The Bill's amendments are well-thought out and eliminate most scenarios of misuse, while preserving as much inclusivity as possible for genuine users. Notwithstanding, I would like to raise a few concerns. I would like to address concerns of residents below their 70s, who cannot walk well or depend on PMAs for their livelihood, yet are physically unable to use PMDs or PABs. They are also worried that they are unable to get a doctor's letter. While 70 years old may be a reasonable eligible age for automatic eligibility, there are also many instances of younger people who are unable to walk far due to excessive weight or temporary conditions such as gout but are unable to obtain a doctor's certificate of eligibility.[+6 sentences] I would like to ask if age, rather than need, is a good way to delineate the eligibility? To be clear, I agree that the inclusion of all seniors above age 70 is an efficient way to implement the policy. What I am worried about is over-exclusion of a specific group; that is, a small group that needs PMAs but may now be excluded. Some of them may even have been using PMAs to earn a livelihood, such as food delivery. And given their physical limitations, it may not be possible for them to switch to using other transport modes like PABs. Also, for those in their 50s and 60s, they may not be able to secure other forms of employment. While this may be a small group, I hope that LTA will consider extending conditional PMA user eligibility to them if they have not chalked up speeding offences in the past.[+18 sentences] I do recognise that this is indeed a difficult provision to make in terms of legislation. Mr Speaker, please allow me to speak in Malay. (In Malay): Although the age of 70 may be considered reasonable for automatic eligibility, there are also many younger individuals who are unable to walk far due to being overweight or having temporary conditions like gout but are unable to obtain a certificate of eligibility from a doctor. I agree that the inclusion of all senior citizens aged 70 and above is an efficient way to implement the policy, but my concern is the possibility of over-exclusion of a specific group. There is a small group of individuals who require PMAs but may no longer be eligible. Some of them also use PMAs to earn a living, such as food delivery. Given their physical limitations, it may be difficult for them to switch to other modes of transport such as PABs. Furthermore, for those in their 50s and 60s, they may face difficulties securing other forms of employment. Although this group is small, I hope that LTA will consider extending conditional PMA user eligibility to them, provided they have no record of prior speeding offences. I do recognise that such provisions are indeed difficult to implement from a legal standpoint. (In English): Sembawang West constituency happens to have quite a lot of PMAs. Many of them are plying on shared paths with pedestrians. Several residents, especially the more elderly pedestrians, have given feedback that some PMA users are rude and dominate the shared paths, sometimes, in a dangerous way while others blast loud music even late at night. These bad behaviours cause near-accidents, especially when pedestrians are forced to make way for them. They also cause noise pollution as the loud music reverberates, sometimes, jolting residents resting at home from their sleep. However, the new rules in the Bill's amendments do not address these behaviours and I am concerned that such eligible but errant PMA users may continue to behave like they own the shared paths. Again, I recognise that it is difficult to use laws to constrain such behaviour, as eligibility criteria should be based on objective need, not social behavioural norms. Yet, the latter are the stuff of our everyday experience in our homes and towns, and they make a big difference between the safe, quiet enjoyment of our space, or an experience of risk, danger and high emotions. In addition to eligibility criteria, can LTA consider a basic workshop or course on responsible use so as to reduce instances of anti-social PMA users?[+13 sentences] Mr Speaker, I would like to say a few words in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): Within the Sembawang West constituency, the use of PMAs is quite prevalent, with a considerable portion operating on paths shared with pedestrians. I have received feedback from many residents, particularly the elderly, regarding some PMA users who are rude on shared paths and dominate lanes inappropriately, sometimes, in a dangerous way. There are also users who blast loud music late at night. These behaviours cause dangerous situations when pedestrians are forced to give way, whilst also generating noise in residential areas that affects residents' rest at home. Although these issues are isolated incidents, their impact on the community's safety and quality of life cannot be overlooked. However, the current amendments focus primarily on usage eligibility and technical specifications, and do not directly address behavioural issues. I am concerned that some PMA users who meet the eligibility criteria but engage in inappropriate behaviour may continue to use their device improperly on shared paths. I understand that it is not easy to regulate such social behaviours through legal means. Eligibility for PMA usage should be based on objective need rather than subjective behavioural assessments. Nevertheless, these behaviours represent real situations that residents face in daily life and directly affect the peace and safety of common spaces. Beyond defining usage eligibility, I would like to ask the Minister whether LTA could consider complementary measures, such as establishing courses or workshops for PMA users to guide them in responsible usage of PMAs, enhance safety awareness and thereby, better safeguard the safety of both pedestrians and users. (In English): Another concern is related to implementation challenges. The rules will kick in from 1 June 2026.[+1 sentence] Although PMAs are currently not required to be registered with LTA and hence, we do not know how many PMAs there are nation-wide. PMDs, however, do need to be registered and currently, there are about 5,100 of these. While we do not know how many PMAs there are, retailers have reported increasing sales of hundreds of PMAs each year.[+10 sentences] They are everywhere and are mobile. The success of this new rule is highly dependent on the speed and comprehensiveness of enforcement operations. Enforcement officers are usually stationed at designated locations. The ineligible users will be on alert and will avoid these officers who can be seen from far, even though they may be wearing plain clothes. Some users may be still riding their PMAs late at night, which are hard to see from far. I would like to ask the Ministry, how many enforcement officers and for how long will they be deployed following the 1 June start date. The second enforcement process is related to oversized PMAs and non-UL2722 compliant e-scooters. Over the past years, I have received many residents' feedback on their neighbours parking or even charging their oversized PMAs or non-UL2722 compliant e-scooters along HDB flats' common corridors. They are not only a source of fire hazard. They can also become obstructions during emergency escape. The neighbours of these PMAs and e-scooters owners are a useful source of accurate information of where and when these PMAs and e-scooters are parked which would be valuable information source to LTA enforcement officers.[+1 sentence] May I ask the Ministry if LTA will provide a direct channel perhaps through an app, for residents to provide feedback and photo or video evidence to LTA, so that enforcement officers can act promptly? Also, should the non-compliant PMAs or e-scooters owners refuse to remove them, are LTA enforcement officers vested with the powers to confiscate these items?[+10 sentences] Finally, following the roll-out of this new rule, we can expect many non-compliant PMAs and e-scooters may be disposed of as there may not be a viable secondary market locally. Wearing my Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment GPC hat, I hope LTA will set up collection points for these vehicles to be deposited and thereafter, arrange for them to be sold and be used in overseas markets. Alternatively, I urge LTA to arrange for these disposed PMAs and e-scooters to be scrapped and parts be recycled appropriately so that they do not create a new problem for our environment. This year, Singapore becomes a super-aged society. There will be more seniors who will need PMAs to move around. Let us reset the original intent of PMAs as a mobility aid. Let us protect and support our seniors and those with mobility challenges. Let us put a stop to unnecessary injuries and deaths due to PMA and PMD fires. Let us keep our homes safe for everyone. Mr Speaker, I support the Bill amendments.
Mr Speaker49 words
[+5 sentences]Order. I propose to take a break now. I suspend the Sitting and will assume the Chair at 4.00 pm. Sitting accordingly suspended at 3.39 pm until 4.00 pm. Sitting resumed at 4.00 pm.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Ms He Ting Ru.
Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang)995 words
[+7 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, Sengkang is one of Singapore's densest estates and our residents regularly shared with us their transport immobility experiences and challenges while going about their daily lives in the community. I support the core objectives and the amendments being tabled before us today but would like to seek clarifications relating to how the enforcement of the new regime to regulate the use of PMAs will take place and in particular, how these policies are developed in conjunction with the AMAP. One of the key questions that I have relates to how authorities propose the enforcement take place against PMA users who are potentially breaching the upcoming rules. While the amendments introduce the Certificate of Medical Need system, how would trying to catch users without the requisite certification look like in practice? For example, would enforcement officers be required to identify potential rule breakers based on clear rationale? For instance, whether the certificate or the registration mark is visible on the mobility scooter? While circumstances like having multiple people squeezing onto a mobility scooter might be a reasonable means of identification, as it is unlikely that multiple people travelling to the same location may have mobility affecting disabilities, I am concerned that casual, visual perception of able-bodiedness would be used instead. Complicating this is that I understand that LTA's OneMotoring site listed several exemptions from the Certificate of Medical Need. These include users aged 70 and above, beneficiaries of the Assistive Technology Fund and Seniors Mobility Enabling Fund, and individuals assessed to require assistance with ADL under various assessments.[+10 sentences] How will enforcement officers thus identify these users and how will we ensure that certified PMA users just trying to move about their everyday lives are not subject to constant interruption or compliance checks? Having clear published guidelines will also help with public education efforts. This is especially important given that we can see from various news reports that so many of the confrontations between PMA users and pedestrians take place without an enforcement officer present. How can we ensure that vigilante justice will not rear its ugly head with passers-by leaping to hasty or even erroneous conclusions about whether or not a PMA user is indeed eligible? Having spoken to people with disabilities and advocacy groups, it remains common in our society to visually perceive able-bodiedness, including in the national press. We must avoid such stigma being perpetuated inadvertently. In view of the concerns above, can the Government share how it proposes to address with them with a view to ensure that misconceptions about what disability means, visible or hidden, affecting young or old are not further entrenched? Mr Deputy Speaker, a further concern raised was that it appears that enforcement of the new rules may be given inadequate time to come in. Four months. There are only four months until mid-2026. The Disabled People's Association highlighted this point in their comments on this Bill, stating that a one- to two-year implementation period would be more comparable to other laws, such as the Workplace Fairness Act.[+3 sentences] With the new regulations adding quite a few requirements to the already extensive rules on active mobility, I believe it would be fair to give users more time to get used to the regime and to ensure compliance with it. Lastly, I have some comments on AMAP, which developed the review of regulations for PMAs that forms this Bill. I note that in the report, while there is consideration of other legislation in other jurisdictions, I could not find much direct analysis or assessment of the available scientific literature on the issue of PMAs, particularly in relation to road safety, for instance, on the recommendation of reducing the speed limit to six kilometres per hour from the current 10 kilometres per hour. Can the Minister of State share what is the actual data used to determine how reducing the speed limit to six kilometres an hour is significantly more likely to reduce the risk of serious injury, affect reflex time and prevent more accidents to begin with?[+11 sentences] My colleague from Hougang single member constituency, Dennis Tan, had earlier and also during the 2024 Committee of Supply, raised concerns too that the proposed six kilometre per hour speed limit appears to be tied to the average walking speed. This may be too slow and end up increasing the journey time for users and those who are reliant on it to move beyond their immediate neighbourhoods and also may have actual financial impact on those who rely on PMAs for their livelihoods. Could the Minister of State thus provide more specific details about how the new speed limit was arrived at? This is a similar issue with other reports, like the Panel's Review of Active Mobility Regulations for safer path sharing, which introduced the 10 kilometre per hour speed limit on footpaths, which I understand is based largely on work with focus groups. While such focus groups are important for understanding these issues in Singapore's urban and cultural context, we must also engage with the research material, given that we regulate primarily for safety rather than more subjective concerns. We should understand how the science factors into these recommendations and I ask whether the panel should be updated to include more representation from academia. In conclusion, while I support the Bill in principle, I hope that some of the issues I raised will be taken to account to inform enforcement. I also hope that future reviews of regulations would be driven primarily by research and that this research is communicated together with any proposed new regulations. PMAs are useful to persons with disabilities and seniors by supporting their mobility in our communities and neighbourhoods, and can be important tools for removing barriers to accessing public transport. They bring significant co-benefits in the form of promoting connections within the community, sociability, improving health and offering mobility, all with much lower carbon emissions than cars. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the Bill.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Dr Hamid Razak.
Dr Hamid Razak (West Coast-Jurong West)920 words
[+11 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill 2026. This is a timely and necessary Bill that strengthens our transport regulatory framework amid evolving user behaviours, new mobility devices and rapid technological change. The amendments relating to PMAs and PMDs, ERP 2.0 and road safety reflect a forward-looking effort to keep our public spaces safe and our system trusted. I would like to offer a few suggestions that I hope can further enhance public safety while preserving fairness and accessibility. Mr Deputy Speaker, in the weeks leading up to today's Second Reading of the Bill, me and my colleagues on the ground sat at common spaces in the Jurong Spring-Gek Poh Constituency, and just in a few evenings, we observed multiple near-misses involving PMAs: pedestrians stepping aside at the last minute, seniors hesitating before crossing paths, parents instinctively pulling their children closer. These encounters may not make the headlines, but they shape how safe residents feel in our estates. And when it comes to our common spaces and roads, safety cannot be optional. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, PMAs are now a permanent part of our mobility landscape, particularly for seniors, persons with disabilities, delivery riders and those making short, everyday trips. At the same time, misuse and unsafe behaviour remain deep concerns. Most users are responsible, but it only takes a few unsafe acts to undermine public trust and confidence for everyone. These affect not just riders, but pedestrians, families and entire communities. First, while the Bill rightly strengthens the enforcement tools and registration requirements, I suggest that we consider a more graduated and targeted approach to penalties, especially for repeat offenders who knowingly disregard safety rules.[+4 sentences] This is really not about being harsh but rather being clear, consistent and protective, particularly for those who are vulnerable. Second, to complement device identification, I propose we could explore a simple and visible rider identification system, especially for mobility devices issued for medical needs. This would help enforcement officers act with confidence, while reassuring the public that these devices are being used legitimately. Third, PMD-related fires remain deeply worrying. Many arise from uncertified batteries, unsafe modifications or prolonged overnight charging at unsuitable locations. I encourage the introduction of national charging-safety guidelines, covering approved chargers, safe charging durations, designated charging zones and clear prohibitions against corridor charging.[+17 sentences] Next, Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to speak briefly on the healthcare implications of the proposed Certificate of Medical Need. As a practising doctor, I support the intent to ensure that mobility devices and scooters are meant for those who need it and are directed to those who genuinely require them. This protects public safety and preserves trust in the system. Not too long ago, a Member in this House spoke about the effects of sarcopenia and aged-related muscle loss. If our seniors and individuals who are actually physically able to walk end up using these devices, they could inadvertently lose their muscle mass and increase the risk of frailty in our community. However, we should be mindful of the practical impact on healthcare professionals and patients, especially those with temporary mobility limitations, such as individuals recovering from surgery, fractures, strokes or acute illnesses. Clear guidance on who can certify, streamlined criteria and digital or time-limited certification pathways will be important to avoid unnecessary clinic congestion, administrative burden on doctors and healthcare professionals alike, as well as delays for patients who genuinely need short-term mobility support. I understand that MOH and LTA have issued a circular pertaining to the guidelines to this effect, and I am also happy to note that exceptions are given to those aged above 70 and those already on assistance programmes related to mobility. After all, a safety framework works best when it protects patients without overwhelming clinics. I encourage closer collaboration with healthcare providers as this framework is implemented. Next, on the ERP 2.0 and the trust-based enforcement that ensues. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I support the move to decriminalise ERP non-payment. This reflects a mature regulatory approach that recognises that most cases of non-payment are due to administrative oversight rather than intentional evasion. With the new penalty model, the Government reinforces trust with motorists while maintaining accountability. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, moving on to road safety. If there is one area where we should continue to strengthen our approach, it is in addressing dangerous, negligent or reckless driving that results in serious injury or even loss of life. The data is indeed concerning. In 2024, Singapore recorded 7,049 traffic accidents involving injuries, with more than 100 fatalities.[+2 sentences] Speeding violations continued to rise. So, too, drink-driving arrests. We have also seen cases where fatal outcomes arising from negligence or excessive speed resulted in sentences that, while legally consistent, have left the public uneasy. I, therefore, urge the Ministry to consider a comprehensive review of sentencing frameworks, particularly for causing death by dangerous or drink-driving.[+6 sentences] When harm is irreversible, our sentencing framework must reflect that gravity. A calibrated approach would reinforce our national commitment to safety. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill represents a strong and forward-looking update to our land transport laws. It tightens PMA regulation, introduces a trust-based approach to ERP 2.0 and modernises enforcement in meaningful ways. The suggestions that I have raised on calibrated deterrence, visible identification, charging safety and healthcare-sensitive certification are offered in the spirit of strengthening safety while ensuring fairness and compassion. With these observations, I support the Bill and look forward to the Minister's response.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Sylvia Lim.
Ms Sylvia Lim (Aljunied)862 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to seek clarifications on two aspects of the Bill. First, to MOT on the keeping of unsafe devices under the Small Motorised Vehicle Safety Act, and secondly, to MHA on the proposed outsourcing of traffic violations processing under the Road Traffic Act. On the new offence of possession of unsafe devices, Part 6 of the Bill will introduce a new offence of keeping an unsafe AMD by amending the Small Motorised Vehicle (Safety) Act 2020.[+7 sentences] First, let me say that I strongly support this amendment. From time to time, I have encountered AMD fires in my ward caused by overnight charging of devices suspected to have non-compliant batteries. Such fires are fierce. The damage caused is not just to property, but also to residents of nearby units who suffer from smoke inhalation injury, such as swollen eyes and respiratory airways, and carbon monoxide poisoning. There is also trauma and psychological damage. Long after the fire subsides, residents look on AMDs at the common areas with trepidation, for fear that the next fire outside their door might leave them trapped. Nationwide, the effect of AMD fires has also been sobering. On 12 January, in response to an Adjournment Motion filed by Workers' Party's Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Andre Low, MHA confirmed that AMD fires have been disproportionately fatal.[+10 sentences] The media release on this Bill by MOT also acknowledged that non-compliant e-scooters pose severe fire risk. Given this experience, I would expect LTA to take the lead in enforcement actions against non-compliant devices, especially those found at HDB blocks, where harm to many residents is most imminent. It would thus be useful for MOT to clarify how enforcement actions will change when the Bill becomes law. Based on correspondence with LTA in July last year, I was given to understand that LTA's enforcement then was focused on non-compliant devices that were being ridden on public paths. This was a point alluded to by the Minister of State in his speech earlier as well. Our Town Council was told that for non-compliant devices parked at common areas, the Town Council should do its own enforcement or review its bylaws, but clearly, Town Councils are not the subject matter experts as to whether a device is compliant or not. Two days ago, LTA had indicated to our Town Council its openness to including one of our hotspots in a possible island-wide operation against non-compliant AMDs. I welcome the Minister of State's statement earlier also, that under this Bill, the LTA's role will be enlarged in enforcement, in this area. So, Sir, with the amendments proposed today, could MOT confirm that LTA will be taking the lead in the enforcement of the new provisions in the common areas of HDB estates? Sir, next, on the outsourcing of processing of traffic violations, clause 79 of the Bill proposes to outsource processing of traffic violations from the Traffic Police and LTA. According to the MHA's media release of 12 January, civilian contractors will be tasked to process traffic notices for camera-detected violations.[+14 sentences] It was stated that such a move would enable the Traffic Police to outsource the processing of straightforward cases and hence, free up resources to focus on more complex cases. Sir, while I appreciate that outsourcing will result in cost efficiencies, it is important to elicit some details to understand how this move will affect members of the public. To this end, I have four queries that I would like the Ministry to clarify. First, it was mentioned that the outsourcing will be to civilian contractors. These civilian contractors are presumably private sector companies. What are the criteria for selection of these contractors? Will there be more than one contractor appointed concurrently? Secondly, clause 79 of the Bill provides that an assessment framework for the prescribed offences will be prepared by the Traffic Police or LTA, which these contractors must adhere to. Could the Ministry clarify at what level of detail these assessment frameworks will be pitched? A case example using a specific offence would be useful to understand this. Thirdly, residents may wish lodge appeals for offences to be waived or reduced. Although camera-detected violations might seem straightforward and not appealable, I have not found this to be true in all cases. For instance, in one case, a resident of mine was initially charged with beating a red light. After appealing to the Police, the charge was reduced to a lesser one of not forming up correctly when making a right turn, which carried a lower fine and less demerit points. When the provisions on outsourcing are activated, who will decide on appeal cases?[+5 sentences] It seems to me that some human judgement and discretion is required, which is better exercised by our public servants in the Police and the LTA. Fourthly, on viewing of camera footage. So far, the Police have been forthcoming in arranging for the public to view camera footage to confirm if they have indeed committed certain traffic offences. Will the contractors similarly make such arrangements when requested? So, Sir, in summary, while I support the Bill, I look forward to the clarifications from the two Ministries.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Cai Yinzhou.
Mr Cai Yinzhou (Bishan-Toa Payoh)1396 words
[+5 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, between July and October last year, I walked through the aftermath of three major fires in Toa Payoh Central. I stood alongside neighbours during chaotic moments of evacuation, offering immediate aid and a listening ear. In one of these fires, we faced the ultimate tragedy – the loss of two of our own residents. Post fires, residents shared insecurities of living in their own homes. One major concern involved living near neighbours with AMDs. Since debates commenced in this House in September, I have asked seven Parliamentary Questions on AMD safety, six Parliamentary Questions on electrical battery safety and three Parliamentary Questions on fire safety. I filed a total of 16 questions across MOT, MHA and MTI, because one fire is a fire too many, especially in what is supposed to be a safe abode.[+12 sentences] And it is given this context that I respond to the Bill. I rise in support of the Bill and commend its decisive measures to improve the safety of our public paths and roads for all. In particular, it addresses common concerns of Singaporeans about the misuse of PMAs. By strengthening enforcement powers against AMDs, the Bill ensures safer roads, fairer usage of transport infrastructure and more sustainable mobility for all. To better aid enforcement and implementation of the Bill, and to support vulnerable demographics that may be impacted, I would like to raise four points of clarification for the Ministry's consideration. First, there is a need to complement the implementation of the new regulations with community education to avoid inadvertent violations by genuine PMA users, particularly on the new rules regarding medical certification and registration. Some users, such as the elderly, are already not familiar with existing regulations. For instance, the AMAP noted during their focused group discussions, that several participants were confused about the distinction between PMAs and PMDs. This points to a potential gap between legislative intent and user awareness. Thus, changes brought about in this Bill must be communicated effectively to ensure compliance. In addition, some of the changes introduced requires active steps to be taken by existing PMA users, such as visiting their healthcare provider for a certification that they are eligible to use or registering and obtaining an identification mark for their PMA. Genuine users have raised concerns and questions as to what this will entail. The Disabled People's Association has recommended that the Ministry optimise inclusivity and ease the process for obtaining medical certification and registration for genuine users, such as by: (a) ensuring that grants or subsidies be established to cover any potential costs of certification and registration; (b) clarifying that the relevant "certification" needed does not require a formal medical diagnosis, but simply documentation from an assessor noting the need for the use of a PMA; and (c) ensuring that "medical need" to ride a PMA is assessed on a broad and inclusive basis.[+12 sentences] I would like to ask the Minister, what specific plans will be put in place to ensure the proper dissemination of information to existing PMA users, such as the elderly and the disabled? How can these groups, particularly the elderly, be supported in navigating changes such as obtaining medical certification and registering their PMAs, in time before the enforcement of the new rules? I would like to highlight that the Disabled People's Association has published a very comprehensive commentary on the Bill and I hope that the Ministry will consider their perspective for genuine users of PMAs. My second question relates to the disposal of non-compliant PMAs. The Bill introduces new size and design requirements of a PMA, such as requiring it to only have one seat and to not exceed the maximum dimensions stated. I note that the Bill will also make it illegal to keep unsafe devices at home and those who currently possess non-compliant PMAs will have to dispose of it. I would like to ask the Minister for clarifications on the disposal process, especially for some owners who may fear reproach or penalties and instead discreetly dump it. When the Government introduced regulations against PMDs in 2019, LTA worked with e-waste recyclers to set up designated disposal points across HDB estates, which facilitated the disposal of PMDs at no cost to existing owners. Moreover, to incentivise early disposal, registered owners who stepped forward for disposal qualified for an early disposal incentive. Separately, weeks before etomidate was classified as a Class C illegal drug, the "Bin the Vape" Campaign offered a form of amnesty period – voluntary, no-questions-asked disposal of vape devices and related products. I would like to ask whether the Ministry will consider setting up similar initiatives this year in partnership with agencies like HDB, Town Council and People's Association for the disposal of non-compliant AMDs. My third point relates to the enforcement and implementation of speed limits. A key development in this Bill lowering of the speed limit from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour for PMAs.[+11 sentences] I support this move, as it better reflects the intended use of PMAs to replace walking for users with mobility challenges. For vehicles on the road, there are cameras to track when vehicles go past the speed limit. Will the Ministry also install similar cameras along walkways and shared paths to ensure that errant PMAs are properly fined for speeding offences? While members of the public may report incidents of errant device users on public paths to LTA, it is more often difficult to do so practically. Similar to how the Police and NEA has volunteers with enforcement powers, will the Ministry consider empowering LTA volunteers instead to check on PMA licences? Enforcement of the new rules should not just focus on the behaviour of PMA users in our communities, but actions should also be considered to be taken against retailers and sellers of these non-compliant PMAs and illegal PMDs. In this vein, I would like to clarify whether the Ministry will move beyond physical patrols to collaborating with community marketplaces, like Carousell, to automatically flag and delist these devices, and whether a proactive social media monitoring unit or public whistle-blowing mechanism will be established to identify users and retailers of modified devices. How does the Ministry intend to address the issue of platform workers who currently use PMAs for food delivery, who are concerned that the lowered speed limit would affect the number of deliveries they can make and their livelihoods directly? Platform workers are a valued part of the Singapore workforce, many of them work tirelessly to make ends meet. Does the Ministry have plans to work together with platform operators like Grab and Foodpanda, to introduce initiatives that will ease the burden of the impact of new regulations on their livelihoods? My fourth point relates to fire safety. The disproportionate fire risk and danger of AMDs is widely recognised, with data shared by MHA revealing that while such devices accounted for less than 5% of residential fires in the past five years, they caused more than 25% of fatalities. I note that the bulk of these fires occurred from devices that were illegally modified, or those that were not tested and certified.[+1 sentence] This highlights the significance of robust fire safety standards and enforcement measures. To this end, LTA has implemented a series of regulations, such as the UL2272 standard and periodic inspections every two years for PMDs and the EN15194 standard for PABs.[+6 sentences] These comprehensive measures have undoubtedly prevented many fires and greatly improved the safety of AMDs. In my Parliamentary Question filed on 23 September last year on having PMAs to undergo periodic inspections, the reply noted that there are currently no commonly recognised international fire safety standards for PMAs. However, the fire risk posed by PMAs is no less serious than that posed by PMDs and PABs. Furthermore, PMAs are used by individuals like seniors with walking difficulties, who may not be able to escape to safety without substantial assistance in the event of a fire. For this vulnerable demographic, fire regulations should be even more stringent, as commensurate with the increased vulnerabilities of the persons involved. Considering the potentially long wait for an internationally recognised fire standard for PMAs to be established, I call upon the Ministry to strengthen fire regulations for PMAs with periodic inspections. Notwithstanding these clarifications, I support this Bill and look forward to the implementation on 1 June 2026.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Dr Wan Rizal.
Dr Wan Rizal (Jalan Besar)1257 words
[+21 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill which seeks to improve the safe usage of transportation modes on our roads and footpaths as well as the storage within our homes and neighbourhoods. Transport safety does not begin only at home. It does start the moment we step on the road too. It begins at home with our families, our neighbours and the choices we make in shared spaces. Electric-powered PMDs have gained popularity as an affordable and efficient means of travel for many. However, these devices also pose higher fire risks in our homes and neighbourhoods. As such, fires are often more severe and more likely to result in serious injuries and fatalities. This is why Singapore has placed strong emphasis on the use of PMDs that comply with UL2272 fire safety standards. Even so, improper use of unsafe charging practices can still pose significant risk to device owners, family members, neighbours and of course, our firefighters. A firefighter once shared with me that the e-scooter battery fires are unlike the typical fires that they face. They can reignite, generate intense heat and spread rapidly, especially in confined spaces. The most distressing moments are when families are trapped behind close doors while corridors are filled with toxic smoke from burning lithium ion batteries. I, the,refore commend our Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) officers for continuously upskilling our firefighters to respond to fires involving PMDs. But at the same time, prevention must remain our first line of defence. In this regard, I support the move to go beyond banning the use of non-UL2272-certified e-scooters on public paths and roads and to make it an offence to keep such devices. I urge all owners to check their devices and to use only UL2272-certified models to protect the safety of themselves and their loved ones. And in a neighbourhood where we all live together, it is especially important that we remain vigilant and support each other in such a manner. Mr Speaker, the use of AMDs on public paths has been a challenging issue in many neighbourhoods. In land scarce Singapore, pedestrians and device users must share our limited space. When accidents occur, the consequences can be serious, especially for elderly pedestrians who often sustain even more severe injuries and take much longer to recover. I recall when I was a grassroots leader in Pasir Ris many years ago, I was distraught at the thought and sight of an elderly lady being hit by an e-scooter. That memory is still fresh in my mind and I do not want that to occur anymore. I note that this Bill seeks to strengthen the operating safety of PMAs by reducing the limit from 10 kilometres per hour to six kilometres per hour by January 2029, extending size restrictions, requiring registration and introducing a Certificate of Medical Need for the use of PMDs on public paths.[+4 sentences] While these regulatory changes aim to improve pedestrian safety, which I really support, you must recognise that PMDs are medical devices that support persons with mobility impairments too. So, for many PMDs like those in my constituency, which is aged and we have many elderly residents, PMDs are not merely a means of transport but an essential enabler for independence and dignity. They allow my residents to move about in their neighbourhoods, attend medical appointments, purchase daily necessities and manage personal errands independently. I therefore call on the Ministry to implement these regulations in a manner that does not place additional burden or hardships on those with genuine needs. In particular, Sir, I seek clarification on whether assessments for the Certificate of Medical Need can be conducted at polyclinics so as to help manage costs and ensure accessibility.[+1 sentence] Sir, this Bill also sends a clear signal on the importance of road safety for all road users. In 2024, speeding violations reached a 10-year high, with the number of cases doubling compared to the previous year.[+5 sentences] More than 6,000 cases involve lorries and other heavy vehicles. When I was an SCDF officer many years ago, I witnessed an accident where a lorry was hit and the workers who were in the vehicle were thrown all over the road. At the site of that, being a part of the SCDF team, it just reminds me that we cannot allow these things to happen. I really support this part of the Bill. Sir, I support the increased penalties for breaches involving failure to install speed limiters by the compliance deadline as these are important measures to protect heavy vehicle drivers, the workers conveyed on such vehicles and other road users. I also welcome the strengthening of penalties for illegal vehicle modifications, including the tampering with speed limiters which undermine the intent of safety regulations. I urge companies to comply fully with the speed limit rules, including early installation ahead of the 1 July 2027 deadline.[+17 sentences] At the same time, I ask whether the Ministry is studying the challenges companies may face, whether cost, operational or technical to ensure that enforcement is effective and sustainable. Mr Deputy Speaker, in Malay, please. (In Malay): Sir, I recently met a resident who uses a PMA due to permanent mobility constraints. The PMA enables him to leave home independently, buy food, go for medical appointments and manage daily needs without relying entirely on family members. He moves slowly, carefully and complies with regulations. His concern is not about safety, but about access – whether the process and cost of obtaining a Certificate of Medical Need will complicate something that is essential to his daily life. Sir, safety is not merely a matter of regulations. It is a matter of shared values and responsibility. Safety begins at home. When mobility devices are not safely stored or charged, the risk falls not only on one individual but on the entire family as well as neighbours around them. Fire and smoke know no boundaries of housing units. On the issue of PMAs, we must be clear that these devices are medical necessities for individuals with mobility constraints. For them, PMAs are not a luxury. Rather, it is a device for independent living, for mobility and for continuing to contribute to as a member of society. Many PMA users are also our platform workers. They leave early in the morning and return late at night, not by choice, but out of their duty to support their families. This kind of work is employment with dignity; livelihood earned through one's own effort. As a labour movement, NTUC takes seriously the impact of implementing these regulations on our workers' daily lives. Through continuous engagement on the ground, NTUC and workers' associations, such as the National Delivery Champions Association (NDCA), have met delivery workers at their workplaces, where they rest, where they work, listening directly to concerns and worries they have about income, compliance costs and changes to their work routines. Their feedback will form the basis for ongoing discussions with platform operators and relevant agencies, so that safety can be enhanced without sacrificing livelihoods. Fair safety is safety that takes into account the reality of workers' lives.[+4 sentences] Sir, in conclusion, this Bill requires us to find a balance between safety and social justice. Protecting lives, without denying the dignity of work and the right to earn a living. When we care for the most vulnerable, the families, the senior citizens, persons with disabilities and workers, we are building a society that is safer, more humane and more resilient. I support this Bill.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Haresh Singaraju.
Dr Haresh Singaraju (Nominated Member)1087 words
[+18 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, this is an omnibus Bill that amends six Acts. I rise to speak on the Certificate of Medical Need for driving or riding mobility vehicles. I am a family physician. I run a polyclinic. Some of our residents need mobility scooters. My team and I know who they are. The ah ma with severe arthritis. Her knees have given way, but her spirit has not. She still wants to go to the market, she still wants to choose her vegetables. The uncle who has lost his leg to diabetes. He is not asking for pity, he is asking to get around. The pakcik recovering from stroke. Six months ago he was walking, now he is learning to live differently. These are the people this provision is meant to protect. I support this Bill. I have three points. The first two are practical, the third is a reflection. First, guide residents to their primary provider. The Bill requires a Certificate of Medical Need, but it does not specify which doctor should assess.[+18 sentences] This matters. A certificate is only as good as the assessment behind it and an assessment is only as good as the information available to the assessor. When a resident needs a Certificate of Medical Need, my advice is simple: see their regular doctor, their family physician, their enrolled Healthier SG clinic. Why? Because they know the resident. They have the medical history. They have watched the residents' mobility change over time. They understand the home environment, the daily routine, their goals, their values. That is the doctor best place to certify need. I therefore ask that public messaging reinforces this clearly, not just see a doctor, but see your doctor. And for those who do not yet have a regular doctor to enrol into Healthier SG, start building their relationship. It will serve them well, not just for this, but for their health over the long term. Right doctor, right records, right outcome. For those already using scooters and unsure if they qualify, we should encourage them to have an honest conversation with their doctor. For some, this may be the first medical review in years. Conditions change, some may have improved, some may benefit from intervention. This is not just certification, it is an opportunity for care. And for those who may not qualify, our role is to help them understand their options, including alternatives that may serve them better. Second, the guidelines are sound, but refinement will be needed.[+1 sentence] Mr Speaker, I have read the guidelines. These were developed after consulting 11 professional bodies.[+12 sentences] The guidelines give us a foundation. We are not starting from zero, but clinical practice will surface grey zones conditions that do not fit neatly. Residents whose function fluctuates, residents whose needs are hard to access in a clinic room. Consider the resident in her 60s who can walk but has fallen three times this year. She is not immobile, but is she safe? These are the cases that do not fit neatly into "yes" or "no". Without clear guidance, different doctors may reach different conclusions and residents may learn to shop around. Consistency protects both the resident and the system. For some of these cases, we welcome the option to tap on our occupational therapists. They assess function where it matters: in the home, on the path, in real life. That said, we will need supplementary guidance over time, learning from real cases, refining our approach. I ask that the Ministry gathers feedback after roll-out and convenes sessions where practitioners can learn from case studies. The Singapore Medical Association's guidelines on medical assessment of fitness to drive is a good model. It matured over years, it is now a trusted reference. I note that the "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ) clarifies that assessors acting in good faith will not be second guessed.[+26 sentences] We welcome that assurance. These consultations may be difficult, especially when a resident wants a scooter but does not qualify. But this is not new to us, we navigate these conversations every day. I encourage my fellow clinicians to approach these assessments with confidence. These are opportunities for meaningful conversation to understand our residents' needs, review their conditions and help them move forward safely. Third, a reflection on the system. Mobility scooters have been around for years. They serve those who needed them, often under funding safeguards that ensured appropriate use. But as these devices became commercially available, usage grew far beyond the intended population. And now, we respond with certification, with healthcare as gatekeepers. I understand why this response is necessary and I credit the Ministry for consulting the professional bodies and developing guidelines before roll-out. But I ask the Government: how did we get here, reacting downstream instead of having built in safeguards upstream from the start? Healthcare will do her part for public safety and the public good. We always have. But let me name what such a reactive policy costs. Ideal implementation in healthcare takes time. In the meantime, there will be workarounds, goodwill, clinicians doing what needs to be done. This is added to existing responsibilities. Workarounds in our systems, goodwill is not infrastructure. The question now is: how do we avoid being here again? This is not the first time across-Ministry policy has landed at healthcare door. It will not be the last. So, I say this: continue to consult healthcare at design. We know what good design looks like, driving licensed medical assessments where verification is needed before you drive, work permit medical examinations where clearance is needed before the permit, disabled parking labels, where need is verified upfront. These systems work because they are tied upstream with verification built in from the start. For mobility scooters, the gap was the commercial market. When devices became available commercially, there was no equivalent gate. I am glad to note that mobility vehicles will now need to be registered with LTA.[+8 sentences] Pegged with healthcare certificate or medical need, this creates a system that is tight at entry. This is good design and I welcome it. Prevention is better than cure. This is true in medicine. It is true in policy too. Mr Deputy Speaker, I return to where I started – the ah ma, the uncle, the pakcik. Let us set up this policy well for them. The assessors, let us continue refining our guidelines and supporting our clinicians and occupational therapists to do their work with confidence and let us learn from this for what may come next.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Elysa Chen.
Ms Elysa Chen (Bishan-Toa Payoh)1095 words
[+18 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. Mobility is freedom. Thus, I appreciate Minister of State Baey's acknowledgment of the Bill's attempt to balance access and safety. Both access and safety are critical for this freedom that mobility offers us. Under this Bill, pedestrians have freedom from injury and neighbours, freedom from PMD-related fires. And the gracious use of our transport system helps to increase this sense of freedom. Recently, I met with parents of young children together with my fellow Group Representation Constituency MP Cai Yinzhou, to hear about their struggles on commuting, whether it is carrying strollers onto public buses or whether they are fearful of sharing paths with fast-moving personal mobility devices. As a mother myself who takes public transport, I completely understand the struggle. Singapore's transport infrastructure is a shared space. It is built on a social compact and understanding that we move through the city as members of one community, not merely as separate individuals seeking to reach our destinations. This is where graciousness comes in. We need to show grace, patience and kindness to one another as we travel together. This Bill addresses three critical areas where that graciousness is tested. Firstly, on disabled persons and mobility aids. The amendments to mobility scooters and PMAs do not punish disabled persons. They protect them and they protect our shared spaces. The issue is misused. Able-bodied individuals operating mobility devices unsuitable for pedestrian paths have created genuine hazards for the elderly and young children. The measures proposed – requiring medical certification, reducing speed limits and establishing device registration – serve to ensure that those with genuine needs can move safely and with dignity.[+7 sentences] When someone who cannot walk risks collision because an able-bodied person misuses a scooter, this affects the community. When an oversized device occupies space meant for a young child, the dignity of the disabled user is compromised alongside the safety of others. Good regulation is an expression of grace toward all, including our disabled citizens. It communicates that all our needs are real, that our dignity is protected and those around us will be safer when sharing space with us. This Bill affirms that commitment. Secondly, on accountability for heavy vehicles and PMDs without UL2272 certification, which are illegal on our roads, but can still be kept in our homes. The speed limiter, amendments for lorries between 3.5 and 12 tonnes will reduce road fatalities and protect our communities. The substantially increased penalties for illegal alteration of motorised vehicles, up to $10,000 for individuals and $40,000 for corporates, send a clearer signal on the non-negotiable ability of safety.[+1 sentence] The same can be said for PMDs without UL2272, which remain fire hazards. Seventy-two percent of AMD-related fires in the last three years were related to non-compliant devices, and I am glad that we are removing those safety hazards from our homes.[+3 sentences] Thirdly, regarding the ERP 2.0 system and the decriminalisation of charges. This change reflects a mature, refined approach to accountability. Vehicle owners will face real consequences, helping us to ensure compliance without the bluntness of criminal prosecution. If vehicle owners do not pay what they owe, they would not be able to renew their road tax or sell their vehicle until the payments are settled.[+23 sentences] These measures protect the community by ensuring that those who use our roads do so responsibly and the enforcement mechanisms serve the broader good. These three areas share a common thread. They are all expressions of a single principle: when we use shared transport infrastructure, we do so as members of a community, not in isolation. That community comprises the elderly gentleman on a mobility scooter, the young mother with a child, or a lorry driver navigating a residential area, the casual road user and all of us who depend on moving safely through Singapore. Graciousness does not mean the absence of rules. Graciousness means rules that protect the vulnerable while serving the legitimate needs of all. As this Bill moves towards debate and implementation, I wish to invite all members of our community to consider two commitments. First, a commitment to graciousness towards the young, disabled and elderly persons on our transport systems – the people whom we should be looking out for. They deserve safe and dignified passage. This is not charity. It is recognition of the equal standing in our community. They deserve the same freedoms that we enjoy, the same access to the transport infrastructure that we use and the same dignity as we commute together. One of my volunteers also shared about a time when he was unable to enter a lift after waiting 15 minutes even though he had a young child in a stroller with him. This was because the lift was full of able-bodied commuters. He eventually had to take the escalator even though it posed a safety risk. Can we do better for such commuters? I encourage members of the public to show graciousness towards them and others like them to understand that the disabled person on a mobility scooter, navigating a crowded path, or an elderly uncle lumbering on a public sidewalk are not obstacles to go around, but people exercising their right to move independently. Second commitment regarding noise levels from PMAs using paths near residential areas. I have received several complaints from residents about PMA users who play music very loudly throughout the day, disrupting online meetings, children's naps and our residents' rest. As our city becomes busier, the noise in our environment, where the buses, trains, stations or footpaths has deteriorated. This is not merely aesthetic. Noise is a form of pollution that affects the well-being of all commuters, particularly the elderly and those with sensory sensitivities. Transport operators and enforcement officers should be empowered to enforce reasonable conduct standards. Commuters can be mindful that personal music, loud phone conversations and unnecessary noise in public are intrusions on the shared space. This is graciousness in its most equal form, the recognition that the time another person spent on public transport is as valuable as your own and that you have an obligation to protect their experience of that journey, that our homes and communities are places of rest and should be safe from noise and disruption.[+1 sentence] Accordingly, Mr Deputy Speaker, I commend this Bill to the House. May we move forward with the understanding that a gracious transport system is one that accommodates all of our citizens, young and old, disabled and able-bodied, with equal care for their safety and dignity.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Ng Shi Xuan.
Mr Ng Shi Xuan (Sembawang)1777 words
[+10 sentences]Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of this amendment Bill and its intent to improve safety on our public paths, reduce fire risks from unsafe devices and strengthen accountability in the personal mobility space. I will be addressing the active mobility provisions in my clarification and I would like to frame my comments around three topics: first, users and their caregivers; second, consistent enforcement; and lastly, device safety, storage and the role of our community. The certificate of medical need is well-intentioned. It ensures PMAs are used appropriately and by those who genuinely need them. But on the ground, situations are rarely black and white. A resident in my Naval Base constituency is medically weak due to multiple complications and relies on her husband to accompany her on her PMD. In another case, a couple shared that the wife would ride the PMD after the husband completes his dialysis as he is too weak to do so himself. They are concerned that such arrangements may now face penalties under the new framework. Under the existing Active Mobility Act 2017, a "mobility scooter" is defined to mean a vehicle that has a seat and is designed to carry a single individual. Arguably, it does not extend to a scooter that is designed for two persons, for example, where a caregiver rides the scooter with an incapacitated pillion rider. Clause 2(g) of the amendment Bill introduces certain amendments to the definition of a "mobility scooter", which emphasises that the mobility scooter should only have a "single seat behind the footboard". However, clause 2(h) of the amendment Bill introduces a new definition of "mobility vehicles" to include "any other motor vehicle designed to carry an individual who is unable to walk or has difficulty in walking and prescribed for the purpose of this definition". In addition, clause 16 of the Amendment Bill introduces a new section 23I, which, in subsection (2), creates an exception to the offence of driving or riding a mobility vehicle without a certificate of medical need in circumstances prescribed in regulations.[+13 sentences] Taken together, these provisions leave open the possibility that certain vehicles, such as the two-seater vehicles that I have mentioned as an example, being prescribed as mobility vehicles and permitted for use under certain circumstances. Would the Ministry further study such practical needs when developing the subsidiary legislation? There may be circumstances where it may be necessary or convenient for an incapacitated individual and his caregiver to use a two-seater vehicle for legitimate mobility purposes, for example, if the individual is exhausted from dialysis or otherwise temporarily incapacitated from operating the vehicle. While enforcers may exercise discretion, policy clarity gives confidence to families and certainty to enforcement officers. In addition, I would like to ask: one, how does the Ministry to balance the risk of "assessor shopping" with the provision of avenues for applicants to seek a second opinion in good faith? Two, what are the proposed timelines from application to clinical assessment and issuance of the certificate? And three, how will the Ministry ensure that fees are affordable? For example, would individuals with permanent and irreversible medical conditions be granted certificates with an indefinite validity period to minimise the inconvenience of periodic renewals? Sir, in addition to permanent conditions, we also see many time-bound mobility issues in our community. Residents recovering from surgery, fractures, stroke, chemotherapy or dialysis may only need a mobility scooter for a few weeks or months, not permanently. In this regard, I note that clause 16 of the Amendment Bill introduces a new section 23K of the Active Mobility Act, which contemplates that each certificate will have a validity period. So, I would like to ask: will the framework allow for short-duration certificates and can validity periods be proportionate to medical need, instead of a fixed renewal cycle? Ultimately, clarity on the form of the certificates would be helpful as this avoids over-medicalising temporary conditions and repeated clinic visits for residents who are already unwell. The reduction of the PMA speed limit from 10 kilometres per hours to six kilometres per hour is sensible.[+23 sentences] Lower speeds do reduce injury severity. Furthermore, PMAs will now be required to carry registration marks which allow for enforcement. But enforcement consistency and deterrence matter. Recently, LTA installed a temporary enforcement camera right outside Canberra Primary School. Parents welcomed it. School leaders supported it. However, residents were surprised when it was removed after just three weeks. So, I would like to ask, can LTA publish clearer criteria on where cameras are likely be deployed, for how long and what conditions trigger removal or extension? Visibility of such cameras builds trust and acts as an effective deterrent and assures road users that we are doing our best to keep our roads and pathways safe for all. My suggestion is to consider permanent cameras at school zones, downward slopes and high foot-traffic areas; temporary cameras to rotate between key junctions and supported by roving enforcement elsewhere. While PMDs are still in its nascency in Singapore, it is consistency in enforcement that will likely change behaviour. Should there be a lack of resources or funding for such permanent cameras, could we also explore a co-funding model between local Town Councils and LTA for estates which want to participate in enforcement? Making it an offence to keep unsafe devices is necessary. Fire risks are real, and we have seen tragic consequences. Under the Active Mobility Act, there is already provision for authorised officers and public path wardens, including volunteers. Enforcement exists today, but residents' feedback that coverage and visibility can feel uneven, especially at hotspots. My question is, can MOT and LTA expand the use of this existing framework to educate, identify high-risk devices and prevent incidents early? For example, strengthening public path warden presence, partnering Town Councils and Community Emergency and Engagement (C2E) Committees and empowering our Active Mobility Community Ambassadors (AMCA). Today, residents can already report illegal vehicle parking through OneMotoring. So, I would like to suggest for MOT to explore a similar structured reporting channel, perhaps through OneService, for PMD and PMA issues. For example, uploading your photo, tagging your location and simple categorisation. This will allow for faster response, active community eyes on the ground and early detection of unsafe devices. It strengthens safety without over-reliance on enforcement alone. MHA shared recently that in the past three years, 77, or 72%, of the AMD-related fires in HDB estates involved PMDs and PABs which were either non-UL2272 compliant or non-EN15194 compliant; or had been modified, rendering them non-compliant. This means that a significant 28% or more than one in four AMD-related fires involved compliant devices.[+2 sentences] As the Government has noted previously, although AMD-related fires form a small proportion of fires in HDB estates, such fires are typically more severe and more likely to result in fatalities and injuries. While registration and the requirement for devices to be UL2272-compliant are useful in reducing the risk of fires, they do not adequately address the fire risk of compliant devices. How can the Government reduce the threat to safety and property, given that more than one in four fires are caused by these compliant devices? I encourage the agencies to conduct a feasibility study and share the study with public on allowing these devices to be parked at HDB Multi-storey Car Park (MSCP) as an option and to build fire-resistant charging infrastructure in MSCPs for users to charge their PMDs and PMA batteries.[+29 sentences] Alternatively, we could consider sandboxes in MSCPs where usage is low. This idea is not plucked out from thin air. I deal with batteries on a daily basis and last Saturday, also had a chat with a retailer on the sideline of our fire safety talk. Similarly, they agreed that with three to four connectors head and three to four voltages, the permutation is not that many for such a sandbox to be deployed quickly. In Mandarin, Sir. (In Mandarin): Mr Speaker, I would like to briefly present my views in Mandarin. This amendment Bill is heading in the right direction, but the real key lies in how to implement the policy effectively. First, on Certificate of Medical Need. This system is heading in the right direction, but real life is often more complex than legal provisions. In the community, there are many elderly people who are temporarily weak after dialysis, chemotherapy or surgery, and need family members or caregivers to assist them in using mobility aids. I hope the policy can provide clear guidance so that caregivers do not have to worry about enforcement risks in reasonable circumstances. At the same time, we also see many residents who are only temporarily mobility-impaired, such as after surgery or fracture. I hope the system can allow short-term or time-limited medical certificates, whilst for permanent medical conditions, consideration could be given to longer validity periods which needs less frequent updating, to reduce the burden of repeated medical consultations for patients. Second, regarding speed limits and enforcement consistency. Reducing the speed limit for mobility aids to six kilometres per hour is reasonable, but the key to truly changing behaviour lies in consistent and sustained enforcement. Taking school areas as an example, if enforcement is only short-term, it easily creates a mentality of "things will be fine once the attention dies down". I hope the authorities can clearly explain the deployment principles for speed cameras and consider establishing permanent enforcement points at high-risk locations, with roving enforcement in other areas, to give the public a stable sense of security. Third, regarding registration and fire safety. The registration system is important, but for many elderly people, digital processes are not user-friendly. If registration responsibility could be moved forward to points of sale, ensuring compliance from the source, this would both reduce pressure on the elderly and lower subsequent enforcement costs. Regarding fire prevention, even compliant equipment still poses certain risks. I hope the Government can study setting up fire-resistant charging or parking solutions in HDB multi-storey car parks and, through pilot testing, further reduce threats to residents' lives and property. Mr Deputy Speaker, laws are only the start. Implementation is the key. As long as the policy can truly accommodate family needs, be feasible for businesses and allow community participation, this Bill can achieve a better balance between safety and inclusiveness. (In English): Sir, this Bill sets the right direction. But laws succeed only when families feel supported, users and companies can comply and communities feel safe. My intent today is to help make this policy work better on the ground. I look forward to the Minister's clarifications and how we can refine implementation together.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Dr Choo Pei Ling.
Dr Choo Pei Ling (Chua Chu Kang)791 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to declare that I am a registered member of the Allied Health Professions Council, and my work involves accessing, treating and educating on disability. This Land Transport and Related Matters Bill is important for its impact on safeguarding lives and preparing our transport system for the future. Speeding remains one of the leading causes of fatal crashes.[+1 sentence] The mandatory speed limiter regime is necessary. I commend EnterpriseSG for stepping in with support, covering 50% of eligible costs for small and medium enterprises through the Productivity Solutions Grant.[+7 sentences] Yet, as of early January, more than 140 lorry owners had not complied. This is not a trivial figure. It points to real challenges in implementation. I would like to ask if the Government has identified the obstacles faced by these lorry owners. Where genuine difficulties exist, can more assistance be rendered? Safety should never be compromised because of affordability or administrative hurdles. Mr Deputy Speaker, fire tragedies involving AMDs have been unfolding in our estates, sometimes right at the doorsteps of our neighbours. Between 2022 and 2025, over 70% of such fires involved uncertified or illegally modified devices.[+12 sentences] The Bill rightly prohibits even the possession of non-UL2272 e-scooters. Yet, enforcement will be the true test. With thousands of devices in circulation and illegal spare parts easily available online, accountability must extend beyond users to the platforms that enable such risks. The question before us is this: how can enforcement be scaled sustainably across our estates? How can agencies work with communities to build awareness and vigilance? And how can we ensure that online marketplaces take responsibility, so that unsafe devices are not just removed from our paths but from our homes altogether? PMAs are essential for those with genuine walking difficulties. But misuse by otherwise mobile individuals can create new problems. Over-reliance on mobility scooters may lead to muscle wasting, loss of balance and reduced independence. Instead of preserving mobility, unnecessary use can erode it. This is why the prescription requirement, through a Certificate of Medical Need issued by doctors or occupational therapists, is so important. It ensures that PMAs remain tools of necessity, not convenience, protecting both the safety of our shared paths and the health of our residents. The reduction of PMA speed limits from 10 kilometres per hour to six – the pace of brisk walking – is a welcome move.[+1 sentence] It directly addresses concerns in towns with young children and seniors. Dimension limits of 120 centimetres by 70 centimetres, harmonised with public transport standards, will prevent oversized devices from dominating shared paths.[+26 sentences] Yet, enforcement on the ground remains the challenge. In Tengah, residents have raised concerns about riders whizzing past pedestrians, with near-miss collisions involving young children along Plantation Plaza's retail street. With our ageing population, we can expect more PMAs on our paths too. Doctors provide the vital role of diagnosis, ensuring medical conditions are properly identified. Physiotherapists, however, are the movement experts, the mobility experts. They specialise in biomechanics, gait analysis and functional rehabilitation. As part of their work, they prescribe wheelchairs and mobility aids for persons with disabilities, and they work daily with patients to help restore movement – to stand, to walk and to carry out their ADLs with dignity and independence. For residents already under physiotherapy care, requiring a separate doctor consultation for certification may create duplication and inconvenience. Could the Minister of State explain the rationale for excluding physiotherapists from issuing Certificates of Medical Need, particularly for patients already under their care? The exclusion warrants reconsideration. For continuity of care, patients already receiving physiotherapy should not require separate consultations solely for certification purposes. Doctors diagnose, but physiotherapists help people move again – to stand, to walk and to live. Additionally, while these measures improve safety, infrastructure remains a concern. Shared paths of two metres are dwarfed by roads spanning 18 metres. If active mobility is to grow, will the Government commit to expanding pedestrian‑only path infrastructure proportionately? Safety is not just about rules; it is also about space. ERP 2.0 represents a fairer, usage-based model, charging only for actual road use. That principle is sound. But fairness must be felt across income groups and vehicle types. How will lower‑income families who rely on private‑hire vehicles for essential transport be protected from disproportionate burdens under future distance‑based models? And while decriminalising missed payments is sensible, shifting liability from drivers to vehicle owners may create complications for shared vehicles. How will these be addressed? Mr Deputy Speaker, this Bill advances safety and modernisation on our roads. It is a step forward. But as always, the true measure lies in implementation, in enforcement, in fairness and in infrastructure. I support the Bill and I look forward to the Minister's clarifications.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Joan Pereira.
Ms Joan Pereira (Tanjong Pagar)663 words
[+7 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill's objectives to enhance safety for all path users and road users. However, I would like to seek clarifications from the Minister of State on several implementation matters that will affect our residents and businesses. First, medical certification for PMAs. The new regulation requiring valid medical certification for mobility scooters is necessary. It addresses legitimate public concerns about misuse by able-bodied individuals and preserves these devices for those with genuine mobility challenges. However, I ask the Minister of State to consider a special category of users who may fall into a grey area. They are delivery riders who may not meet strict medical certification criteria but have genuine mobility problems that make cycling or walking long distances very difficult. In 2019, when e-scooters were banned from footpaths, approximately 7,000 delivery riders were affected. Recognising the impact on livelihoods, the Government provided a $7 million transition assistance package.[+2 sentences] Today, delivery platforms acknowledge that a portion of their riders rely on PMAs. The Government had expressed its commitment to inclusivity for riders with mobility challenges. Would the Minister of State clarify if there will be transition support for affected riders?[+1 sentence] What constitutes mobility issues sufficient for certification? Must it be a diagnosed medical condition, or can occupational factors be considered?[+37 sentences] For riders performing physically demanding work who experience joint pain or fatigue but lack formal diagnoses, is there recourse? Second, dimension limits, speed limits and enforcement. I fully support the new dimension limits and speed limits for PMAs. These measures harmonise public path and public transport regulations while addressing safety concerns, particularly for seniors and young children. However, enforcement effectiveness remains a question. Residents have shared that despite numerous feedback, uncertified and modified PMAs continue to be out and about. Could the Minister of State define what "good enforcement" will look like? Will LTA expand mobile closed-circuit television (CCTV) deployment beyond the current hotspot rotation? Will plainclothes operations increase in frequency and coverage? Public feedback suggests enforcement officers may be too conspicuous. Will LTA adopt more covert tactics to deter violations effectively? Sir, in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): Residents have shared that despite feedback, uncertified and modified PMAs continue to be out and about. Could the Minister of State explain what "good enforcement" will look like? Will LTA expand CCTV deployment beyond the current hotspot rotation? Will plainclothes officers’ operations increase in frequency and coverage? Public feedback suggests enforcement officers may be too conspicuous. Will LTA adopt more covert tactics to deter violations effectively? (In English): Third, ban on keeping non-UL2272 e-scooters. Prohibiting the possession of non-compliant e-scooters will greatly enhance fire safety in our residential estates. However, enforcement of this "keeping" offence raises practical questions. How will authorities detect possession within private homes without infringing on privacy? Could the Government consider leveraging existing home visit programs? Officers are currently already doing inspections. With appropriate legislative amendments and officer training, could these existing touchpoints be utilised to identify non-compliant e-scooters during routine visits? This would expand enforcement capacity without creating a separate inspection regime. What safeguards will be implemented to protect residents' privacy while ensuring fire safety compliance? Will there be disposal programmes to encourage voluntary surrender? Fourth, speed limiters for heavy vehicles. I am gratified that the Government has decided to introduce a series of firm measures for speed limiters for heavy vehicles. These include increasing penalties for violations, including tampering. Since 2017, I had asked for speed limiters for motor vehicles in this House a few times. I hope we will be able to progress to higher-risk passenger cars to improve safety on our roads too. Finally, may I ask about speed limiters for foreign heavy vehicles on our roads? What are the regulations and enforcement measures for them? In conclusion, I seek the Minister's assurance that all these measures will be implemented with adequate support, clear timelines and proportionate enforcement. I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Jackson Lam.
Mr Jackson Lam (Nee Soon)985 words
[+14 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise to speak on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. I do so not only as a Member of this House, but as someone like many Singaporeans who uses our transport system every day – walking through neighbourhoods, sharing footpaths and relying on our roads and common spaces to feel safe and predictable. Transport policy may be debated here, but its impact is felt outside this Chamber. It is felt on our footpaths, in lift lobbies and in the confidence that people have when they move around their neighbourhoods. In that sense, this Bill is not just technical or administrative. It is about how we update our rules to reflect how people live today, while continuing to keep everyone safe and included. Over the past years, many Members would have seen reports of mobility devices colliding with pedestrians, or fires linked to unsafe or modified devices stored in residential blocks. These incidents are unsettling. Not because mobility aids are the problem – they are not. But because they show that our rules have not fully kept up with how these devices are being used and sometimes misused, in shared public spaces. Mobility devices today are more powerful and more widely available than before. If used properly, they make a real difference to people's lives. If used irresponsibly or without safeguards, they can pose risks to others. This Bill is timely in addressing that gap. The clearer definitions of mobility vehicles, together with mandatory registration and the requirement for a Certificate of Medical Need for certain devices, strike a careful balance.[+16 sentences] They recognise that many seniors and persons with disabilities, these devices are not conveniences. They are essential tools that allow people to remain independent, mobile and connected to the community. At the same time, the Bill reinforces an important principle: our footpaths and common spaces are shared. As devices become faster or heavier, greater responsibility must follow. Clear rules protect pedestrians, but they also protect responsible users who rely on these devices and do not want to be unfairly judged because of the actions of a few. When I speak with residents, the concern is rarely about seniors who truly need these aids. More often, it is about uncertainty. People ask: what is allowed? What is safe? And if something goes wrong, who is accountable? When there is uncertainty, trust in shared spaces begins to erode. This Bill provides much-needed clarity. That said, rules alone are not enough. Implementation will matter just as much. Seniors navigating medical assessments, online systems or registration processes should not feel anxious or overwhelmed. I encourage the Ministry to continue pairing regulation with strong outreach through community centres, healthcare providers and grassroots organisations, especially during the transition period. Compliance should come from understanding and support, not fear. I also welcome the Bill's focus on upstream responsibility, particularly the stronger controls on the sale, advertisement and possession of unsafe or non-compliant devices.[+7 sentences] Too often, enforcement falls mainly on end-users, even when powerful devices are marketed without proper safeguards or clear information. This does not feel fair. By placing clearer responsibility on sellers and platforms, the Bill improves accountability and sends a clear message that safety must be built in from the start. Related to this are the provisions dealing with unsafe devices, including those that are modified or uncertified. Many of us will recall reports of fires in residential blocks linked to such devices. These incidents are frightening because they do not affect just one household. They put neighbours, families and the entire block at risk. The introduction of an offence for keeping unsafe devices, even when they are not actively used, reflects an important reality that risks often arise long before an incident occurs.[+2 sentences] At the same time, I welcome the reasonable-excuse safeguards and transitional arrangements. These ensure enforcement remains proportionate and humane. Clear public education will be essential so that people understand what is expected of them.[+1 sentence] Mr Speaker, Sir, the Bill also addresses road safety more broadly, particularly through amendments to the Road Traffic Act. I welcome the clarification that mandatory disqualification periods are minimum periods, restoring the original legislative intent following recent judicial interpretation.[+15 sentences] Too often, attention comes only after something bad happen – when lives are lost or permanently changed. Clearer statutory guidance strengthens deterrence, while still allowing Judges the discretion to respond fairly to the seriousness of each case. The enhanced speed limiter regime for heavy vehicles is also timely. When safeguards are bypassed, the harm caused can be severe and irreversible. Tightening these controls reflects lessons learned through experience and reinforces our commitment to road safety. Finally, Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to touch on a broader theme that runs through this Bill – trust in systems, especially as Singapore relies more heavily on automation and digital enforcement. From speed cameras to electronic charging systems, technology now plays a central role in transport management. The Bill updates evidentiary and enforcement provisions to reflect this reality. But even as systems become more efficient, it is important that people continue to have access to clear explanations and meaningful recourse. Systems must not only work well, they must also be fair, transparent and understandable. Singapore has always done well because people trust that our systems are designed with care, applied proportionately and corrected when they fall short. This Bill helps to maintain that trust by modernising our laws while keeping people at the centre. Mr Speaker, this Bill is not about regulation for its own sake. It is about responding responsibly to technological, demographic and social change. It seeks to protect seniors, support mobility, improve safety and modernise enforcement, without losing sight of fairness and common sense. With careful implementation and continued engagement, the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill 2026 will strengthen, not just our transport system, but also the confidence Singaporeans place in it.[+1 sentence] I therefore support the Bill.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Melvin Yong.
Mr Melvin Yong Yik Chye (Radin Mas)1249 words
[+3 sentences]Mr Speaker, I stand in support of the Bill, which seeks to make amendments to various pieces of legislation to empower LTA to improve active mobility and vehicular safety and to enable the transition to the ERP 2.0 system. However, I have some questions and suggestions. Sir, firstly, I support the Bill's proposal to strengthen the regulation of PMAs. Preventing the misuse of PMAs by seemingly able-bodied individuals, tackling speeding and restricting the use of overly large devices, are good proposals by the AMAP and I am glad that the Government has adopted these recommendations.[+10 sentences] We must not compromise the safety of other path users, especially seniors and young children, when allowing AMDs to share our paths. Beyond the measures proposed, I would like to urge the Government to do more to tackle the occurrences of fires caused by these AMDs. In my Radin Mas constituency, I have seen our fair share of fires caused by PMDs. I understand that some of these fires were due to the use of unapproved PMDs, or in some cases, modifications to battery packs to improve the devices' range. In addition to endangering themselves, the owners of unapproved or illegally modified devices can cause harm to their neighbours in the event that these devices catch fire. Electrical fires can spread far more rapidly and the damage to surrounding HDB flats also tend to be more excessive. Sir, the Bill proposes to make it an offence to keep non-UL2272 certified e-scooters. I would like to ask if the same certification standard applies to all other forms of AMDs. According to a 2024 research article published in the Journal of Burn Care and Research, burn injuries related to lithium-ion batteries from PMDs can often be more severe than other types of burns, due to the thermal runway caused by such electrical fires. The British Safety Council has also issued a warning that, once a chemical reaction causes thermal runway, the lithium-ion batteries found in these PMDs could spontaneously ignite and such fires are hard to extinguish. Members may also remember the unfortunate 2021 incident, where a man died after his modified PMD burst into flames while he was inside a lift.[+24 sentences] This means that we do not need to be charging the batteries for them to catch fire. We must therefore do all we can to prevent people from possessing devices that have been illegally modified, due to the risk of devastating electrical fires that can result in the unfortunate loss of lives. Sir, I support the provisions in the Bill related to Singapore's transition to the ERP 2.0 system. I would like to ask if the Minister could provide greater clarity on when the existing ERP gantries would be removed. I note that LTA had previously said that these gantries would be progressively removed once ERP 2.0 begins and I am wondering if the Minister could provide more information on the timeline. Workers who travel extensively on our roads for their livelihoods, are rightfully concerned about the impact of distance-based congestion pricing that would be enabled by the ERP 2.0 system. I urge the Ministry to consider in its implementation the disproportionate impact that distance-based congestion pricing would have on these workers and their livelihoods. Sir, the Bill also proposes that vehicle owners, instead of drivers, will be responsible for unpaid ERP charges. Those with outstanding payments would be unable to transact with LTA on some essential services, such as road tax renewal, until the missed ERP charges are settled. I think this is a sound move. However, in the event where the vehicle owner fails to renew his road tax due to outstanding ERP payments, and the driver, who is an employee, is unaware of this and drives the vehicle, who would be liable for the resulting offence? Should we therefore align the current framework to also hold the vehicle owner liable, instead of the driver? Mr Speaker, the proposals under the Bill are timely in enhancing the safety of our roads and in reducing disamenities to other users who share our roads. I support the proposal to increase penalties for several road traffic offences, such as the illegal alteration of motor vehicles and taking to task those who allow illegal modifications to take place within their premises. I also support the proposal to increase penalties for keeping or using unregistered or deregistered vehicles. Absent from the stipulated vehicle inspections, these unregistered or deregistered vehicles can pose a safety risk to other road users. I would therefore like to ask how many cases did the Police investigate regarding the use of unregistered or deregistered vehicles on our roads in the past three years and how do we intend to do better enforcement to catch the users of such non-registered vehicles? Can the ERP 2.0 system be used to monitor and locate these vehicles? And if so, would the Police be able to use this system, so that they can take prompt enforcement actions? Mr Speaker, thus far, I have spoken about my support for the Bill and how I think that the measures would improve the safety of our shared paths and our roads. I therefore thank the two Ministries – MOT and MHA – for working on this comprehensive Bill to make our roads and shared paths safer for everyone. However, in my view, this omnibus Bill was a missed opportunity to strengthen legislation to improve workers' safety. Sir, if you would indulge me, I would like to once again raise the plight of workers transported at the back of lorries. We have seen numerous traffic accidents involving workers being transported at the back of lorries happen over the years. More recently, an accident on 28 January 2026, that was just last week, involving a lorry along Orchard Road, resulted in 12 workers being sent to the hospital.[+7 sentences] Thankfully, there were no fatalities. Accidents like this remind us time and time again that more needs to be done to improve the safety of workers being transported at the back of lorries. NTUC and the Migrant Worker Centre have previously called for clearer restrictions on the co-mingling of workers with goods. Carrying passengers alongside goods and machinery is dangerous. When loads are not properly secured, workers face the risk of being struck or crushed during collisions or sudden braking. This is a foreseeable and preventable risk and the co-mingling of goods and passengers should be prohibited by law. Ideally, we should use proper transportation, such as buses, to transport our workers to and from their worksites. In the meantime, we should, at the very least, mandate seat belts to protect passengers from being flung out of the vehicle in the event of an accident.[+5 sentences] Sir, I have been raising these key points about workers' safety and workers' transportation over the years, and I will continue to do so at every opportunity. I therefore urge the Government to adopt these proposals because the lives of every worker matters. Mr Speaker, in conclusion, the Bill makes important legislative amendments to strengthen the safety of our active mobility landscape, helps reduce the risk of non-compliant devices catching fires within our homes and is timely in aiding our transition to the new ERP 2.0 system. I hope that the Government could consider my proposals to strengthen enforcement against unsafe deregistered vehicles from plying our roads and to improve the safety of workers, currently being transported at the back of lorries. Sir, notwithstanding that, I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Gho Sze Kee.
Ms Gho Sze Kee (Mountbatten)1565 words
[+3 sentences]Mr Speaker, the biggest part of this Bill is about making our roads, public paths and neighbourhood, safer. Public safety is of utmost importance and I welcome and support the Bill. Some of the measures introduced in this Bill, I feel are long overdue. There are, however, a few points I would like to raise.[+1 sentence] Firstly, speed limits. So, the Bill will cap PMAs at six kilometres per hour on public paths.[+2 sentences] That is only about brisk walking speed. While I share the same reservations with my Parliamentary colleagues, that this may penalise some PMA users, specifically those who make use of their device to make a living as platform delivery workers, I can understand this from a perspective of public policy. While we have restrained that one group of people with real medical needs to this relaxed pace, I must note that on our shared paths, bicycles, PMDs and PABs are still allowed to go 25 kilometres per hour, and I wonder why.[+18 sentences] I had raised a Parliamentary question on this issue previously and had an exchange with the hon Minister of State for Transport before. I remember, I noted in that exchange that 25 kilometres per hour is essentially a fit person running at full throttle or sprinting all out. To give a more easily perceived perspective, that is about a 100-metre sprint in 14.4 seconds. Mr Speaker, both yourself and the hon Minister of State for Transport acknowledged then that speed was beyond the both of you. Indeed, I doubt that there is anyone in this House who could have done so. And I know that there are some very fit Members in this House. And this reinforces my point – 25 kilometres per hour is a very fast speed on our shared paths. The momentum of a person holding down at this speed on our shared paths, whether he be on two legs or a bicycle, or even a PMD, has the potential to make any accidents a serious and even a very deadly one. Someone dashing and crashing into you at 25 kilometres per hour is no joking matter. This is an issue in my ward, and I have received many residents feedback on speeding bicycles and SMVs in the Tanjong Rhu area. Our shared paths are used by many of our elderly residents, young children and even pets. Mr Speaker, I credit the progressive steps taken by LTA previously, including the banning of PMD and PABs from footpaths, and lowering bicycle speeds from five to 10 kilometres per hour. It did much to improve public safety. But in the same interest of public safety, I must also call on LTA to review the speed limit for these devices on our shared paths. Next, I turn to enforcement. I am glad to know that expanded powers that will be given to LTA officers under this new Bill. Currently, the active mobility act allows LTA enforcement officers to enter and inspect business premises suspected of committing offences, such as illegally modifying devices and selling non-compliant devices, and to seize such devices. But yet, I cannot help but note that majority of the AMD-related fires occurred not in commercial and business premises but private residential homes. With this Bill, mere possession of non-UL2272 PMDs will also be an offence.[+28 sentences] I would like to clarify with the Minister of Sate if the intent of this portion of the amendment was also informed by fire safety considerations in private homes and, if so, how does the Ministry plan to exercise enforcement in this context? Mr Speaker, any piece of legislation without effective enforcement is meaningless and becomes a mere suggestion. Allow me to share a quote from Cesare Beccaria, one of the founding figures of modern criminology and criminal law, "Crimes are more effectively prevented by certainty than severity of punishment." While I am in no way equating possession of an illegal modified PMD to say rape and robbery, this truism is universally applicable. Punishment and sanctions are only half of the deterrence, and the other half is the certainty of getting caught. I commend the LTA wardens that I and my activists work at the Tanjong Rhu bridge. They are excellent at their job. But the problem we have with bicycles and PMDs persist despite their efforts. Simply put, they could not be everywhere all the time. Errant PMDs and PABs are still a sight in our neighbourhoods, especially at night. For this Bill to be meaningful and to make our shared spaces safer, the enforcement efforts must be sustained, persistent and adequately resourced. But I do not think that enforcement alone is enough to comprehensively address this issue. While enforcement is critical, we must also examine why risky behaviour persists. Why do so many still obtain illegal devices, modify them and travel at unsafe speeds on our public paths? So far, most of our previous efforts at addressing this problem have been focused on enforcement and the throttling of the supply of equipment. We have not quite succeeded, otherwise we would not be here debating this Bill. But it is certainly not for lack of trying. I believe we did not succeed because we have never really addressed the root of what drives such unsafe behaviour. It is time that we address the elephant in the room. Mr Speaker, for many PMD and PAB users, their devices are not simply a means of commute but a tool to make a living. Indeed, I believe performing platform delivery is the primary reason why people acquire these devices. For these users, public and personal safety becomes not just an issue of personal responsibility but also systemic pressures. In reality, platform riders operate under constant time pressures driven by targets, bonuses and performance-based incentives. Earnings are linked to the number of orders completed, delivery speed and acceptance rates. It also rises non-linearly, with significant jumps once certain quotas are met. Platform riders are under pressure to hit these time limited quotas to substantially boost their earnings. For many of them, the only path to a viable income is by hitting these targets. This pressure cooker environment in which riders are driven to move faster and faster, under such models, speed and output are rewarded while safety is left to individual discretion. A device illegally and unsafely modified to go faster translates directly into faster deliveries, shorter turnaround times and more completed orders and higher earnings.[+8 sentences] In this context, risky behaviour may not be explicitly encouraged, but it is effectively incentivised. All this represents a challenging dynamic. The Government enacts and enforces rules to protect public safety, including the safety of the rider themselves, yet the riders run the risk and bear the effect of these rules. The Government gets the blame for trying to keep everyone safe, meanwhile platform companies reap the rewards. Mr Speaker, this must change. Public safety cannot be the Government's concern alone. It is time to hold platform companies more accountable for the safety of their workers and the communities that they serve. Without the delivery platform stepping up and taking greater responsibility, the powerful motivation and incentive to unsafe behaviour will always be present. The problem of errant AMDs on our public spaces will remain intractable. I am particularly pleased to note that sections 23E and 23J of the Bill, which will hold platform companies responsible for their workers using a mobility vehicle without a valid Certificate of Medical Need.[+4 sentences] It seems we have finally started to address the elephant in the room. But there is so much more that the platforms can do and should do. It is clear that the platforms already have the technological means to flag unsafe behaviour. We know that platforms can and do track riders in real time and track distance travelled. Simple matrix, such as distance over time and turnaround time between delivery and pick-up, can easily flag excessive speed or unsafe behaviour.[+4 sentences] These simple measures could address much of the problem and platforms clearly have the means to significantly improve safety for both their riders and the public. Mr Speaker, delivery platforms must recognise that they also have a civic duty. They are stakeholders in the communities that they operate in. We must recognise that safety on the roads and public paths is a shared responsibility. While the Government can make and enforce rules, platforms should ensure that their operational models do not systematically reward unsafe riding at the expense of public safety.[+3 sentences] Their systems should protect their workers from unreasonable pressure and protect the public from unnecessary risk. At the same time, this must not become an excuse for platforms to shift responsibility or cost onto their workers. Our delivery workers deserve to be compensated fairly and sustainably. For their efforts, a system that pressurises riders to take risks just to earn a decent income is neither fair nor acceptable and I am glad to hear from the hon Member Ms Yeo Wan Ling that the NDCA is in discussion with such delivery platforms for a fairer deal.[+3 sentences] I look forward to hearing more about the outcome. Our delivery workers should not have to choose between earning a viable living and obeying the law and everyone deserves safety on our roads and public paths. We all deserve to return home safely to our loved ones at the end of the day.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Foo Cexiang.
Mr Foo Cexiang (Tanjong Pagar)1253 words
[+10 sentences]Mr Speaker, in preparation for today's debate, I partnered the Institute of Policy Studies to convene a "Citizens Reflections" session with my residents in Tanjong Pagar-Tiong Bahru. I hoped that through the session, my residents would develop a deeper understanding of our Parliamentary proceedings and a stronger sense of engagement viz these debates. Hence, after the Bill was tabled in Parliament for the First Reading in January, I met residents who responded to an open call for a full-day session on 17 January where we had robust and enriching discussions on the active mobility segments of the Bill. Following the session, the participants spent an additional week to co-develop a close to 60-page report synthesising our discussion and I will highlight the key points in the report in my speech today. Mr Speaker, my residents took many positives from the proposed changes in the Bill. At they same time, they also raised several practical considerations and suggestions that were all people-centred, focused on the needs of fellow citizens with mobility challenges. I will cover four key areas today. First, the introduction of the medical certificate requirement for the driving or riding of mobility vehicles on public paths. We agree that this is reasonable to ensure that the use and the space associated with the use of mobility vehicles is safeguarded for those amongst us with genuine mobility challenges, and coupled with the other specifications on size and speed, this will curb the misuse of such mobility vehicles, which endangers the safety of all path users, especially pedestrians. However, we would like to seek clarification from the Ministry. Will the Government consider providing subsidies for those in need to cover the cost of the clinical assessment? In addition, there were concerns that different medical practitioners may have differing practices in ascertaining the need, so how will MOH ensure standardised clinical practice?[+8 sentences] Will there be training for practitioners? Because on the one hand, we want to ensure that those with genuine mobility challenges are able to get the certification with minimum hassle. But on the other hand, we also hope that in making the assessments, our practitioners do not inadvertently encourage the over-reliance on the mobility vehicles for those who are still able to move about relatively independently. Second, the introduction of the need to register mobility vehicles. We agree that this facilitates greater accountability and can help with enforcement as, currently, the lack of identification marks constrains enforcement even when offences may be detected by the Active Mobility Enforcement Cameras. However, we would like to highlight that this may not fully address the challenge of enforcing against those who do not register and therefore, continue to run around without identification marks on their mobility vehicles. So, therefore, despite the changes in the legislation, adequate presence on the ground continues to remain critical to enforcing against this group. At the same time, while we acknowledge the potential benefits of registration, several residents asked if the need to register would be too onerous for those with genuine medical need given that they would already have had to obtain the medical certificate and many of whom may be facing financial challenges. Will the Government be able to streamline the process to minimise the hassle for these persons and will the Government also consider the provision of subsidies or grants to cover the registration and associated fees for those among them that face financial challenges?[+13 sentences] We would also like to highlight one particular provision in the Act and seek clarification. Specifically, why is an additional identification mark required at the registered responsible person's expense when there will already be a registration mark issued by LTA? What information will be placed on the marks? Several of my residents were particularly concerned about this. Will there be any personal data and privacy concerns as the marks may allow the public to identify people with mobility challenges based on the marks on the mobility vehicle alone even if nobody is using the vehicle? Finally, we would also like to understand how the registration framework will cover vehicles which are shared amongst families, rented commercially and transferred or sold. Will these modes still be allowed, as these could be more cost-effective options for those in need? Third, the introduction of greater platform operator responsibilities. As a good number of mobility vehicle users we encounter on the paths are delivery workers, we support these changes. The secondary level of oversight placed on platform operators will complement the medical certificate requirement. However, we hope that these additional responsibilities do not lead to platform operators deciding to deprioritise or stop onboarding mobility vehicle users onto their platforms. In fact, with the lower allowable speeds of such vehicles, it is even more important that our platform operators continue to support those with mobility challenges as they seek to earn a livelihood. In this regard, I was very glad to hear Ms Yeo Wan Ling's update that the platform workers have been working very closely with NDCA and the union to ensure that this is done. In addition, though, will the Government consider a seamless digital link between LTA's register and the platform operator systems to facilitate automatic verification so that there is less doubt in between the processes?[+6 sentences] Fourth, the new rules on the selling and advertising of mobility vehicles. We support commercial regulation as this helps to ensure upstream accountability. We note, however, that the current Bill does not extend to regulating against the advertising of illegal repairs and modifications to mobility vehicles. I repeat that. It is the advertising of these illegal repairs. Is this an area that the Ministry intends to cover? And finally, given that the intent is for mobility vehicles to only be used by those with mobility challenges, did the Ministry consider centralising the supply through healthcare institutions only, for example?[+1 sentence] Finally, I would just want to make a quick point on the six-kilometre-per-hour speed limit. I support the reduction to six kilometres per hour, similar to Members like Mr Ng Shi Xuan.[+2 sentences] I believe it is reasonable and sensible. And, in fact, it is not only Singapore that believes so. A quick check online will show that while there is not a single global standard on what the speed should be, many jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, including France, certain jurisdictions in Australia, in fact, Slovenia as well, recently ruled a new six-kilometre-per-hour for the use of mobility aids on pathways.[+1 sentence] And I think many of the jurisdictions have all considered that this is based on the fact that it is a brisk walking speed. So, that is, I believe a scientific consideration in the ascertainment of what the speed is. But the positive effect of all the changes we have in this Bill will only be felt by our residents on the ground if there is effective enforcement.[+2 sentences] And I think that is something that all Members so far have raised as of critical input to the Bill. So, Mr Speaker, in closing, I would like to acknowledge the valuable input and perspectives of my residents on the Bill once again and I look forward to engaging them on more Bills, especially those under the Ministries that I am a GPC Member of – the Ministry of National Development, and the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment – as well as those impacting our built environment in general, such as this Bill, because it affects all of us. Notwithstanding the points I have raised, I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Acting Minister for Transport.
Land Transport and Related Matters Bill›Second Reading Bills19 turns · 13,695w
· 80 highlighted
bill-781
Speaker not recorded37 words
[+2 sentences], (proc text)] . (proc text)]
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Valerie Lee.
Ms Valerie Lee (Pasir Ris-Changi)1305 words
[+16 sentences]Mr Speaker, I rise as the first speaker today to continue this debate on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. Yesterday's debate covered a wide range of issues – from safety to enforcement and lived experience. I hope to build on those contributions, beginning with my experience with enforcement on the ground before turning to specific provisions of the Bill. Just a couple of weeks ago, I witnessed a joint enforcement operation conducted by the Traffic Police, the National Environment Agency (NEA) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) in the northeastern part of Singapore in Tampines East and Changi. The operation took place between 2.00 am and 5.00 am. While most Singaporeans were asleep, officers were out on the roads, conducting checks, managing risks and keeping our communities safe. I and, I am sure, hon Member Dr Charlene Chen, would like to place on record our appreciation for these officers who work late nights, often unseen, so that our roads are safe. After I shared a short post about the experience, intended mainly for my residents, I was struck by the response from across Singapore, with many asking for more of such enforcements in their own neighbourhoods. That reaction is telling. Singaporeans care deeply about road safety, public order and fair enforcement and they expect these to be applied consistently. It is in this context that the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill is timely. The Bill strengthens enforcement, clarifies powers and responds to realities on the ground. I support its intent and direction. I will touch on four areas: illegal vehicle modifications, Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) reforms, active mobility and speed limiters for lorries. Across all four, the common thread is simple: rules must be clear, enforceable, credible and implementation is fair. I begin with illegal vehicle modifications. Clause 52 strengthens penalties for unauthorised modifications and this is necessary.[+3 sentences] Excessively loud exhausts and unsafe aftermarket parts are not minor lifestyle choices. They create safety risks, public nuisance and enforcement challenges. And in Changi, residents regularly tell me how late-night noise from illegally modified vehicles disrupts sleep, affecting the elderly, young children and working adults. By raising penalties to fines of up to $20,000 and/or imprisonment, the Bill sends a clear message – personal preference cannot come at the expense of public safety and community well-being.[+14 sentences] This need to align policy with reality also applies to ERP 2.0. I welcome the move to decriminalise missed ERP charges and treat them as administrative matters. In an automated system, this avoids unnecessary criminalisation for what are often genuine technical lapses. At the same time, accountability should be fair. Holding vehicle owners liable in all cases may not reflect actual usage, particularly in legitimate shared-use contexts such as large families. A more nuanced approach could better align responsibility with behaviour. Trust also depends on reliability. A motorcyclist in my constituency experienced a faulty On-Board Unit (OBU) that was initially eligible for a replacement. However, after a minor hairline crack was detected, he was required to bear the full replacement cost despite no major accident or misuse. This raises questions about durability standards, especially in Singapore's climate. Beyond enforcement, OBUs can also enhance safety. Existing alerts on bus lanes and speed limits are useful. The Ministry could also explore further features such as alerts for flood-prone roads during heavy rain to support drivers. Mr Speaker, nowhere is the gap between rules and lived experience more visible than on our shared paths. Last December, a 71-year-old resident, Mrs Malar Singam, was knocked down by a power-assisted bicycle (PAB) near Pasir Ris Mall.[+14 sentences] She suffered serious injuries, required jaw reconstruction surgery and continues to undergo follow-up care with the dentist and speech therapists. She is still unable to consume solids. I want to be clear. This incident involved a PAB, even though this Bill focuses on personal mobility aids (PMAs). I raise it not to conflate device types but to highlight a fundamental reality – on shared paths, pedestrians bear the greatest risk when this risk is mismanaged. Following the incident, Mr Frank Singam, Malar's husband, conducted a ground-up public survey which attracted over 600 responses. The aim was not to centre in one case but to see if it reflected a broader pattern. The findings are clear. More than half feel unsafe walking. Over three quarters have experienced or witnessed unsafe incidents. There is strong rejection of fast-moving devices on pavements and an overwhelming view that pedestrian safety must come first. What is striking is that respondents are not calling for extreme measures. They are just asking for three things: clear prioritisation of pedestrians, proper enforcement of existing rules and alignment between policy intent and daily experience. This Bill moves us in that direction. Clause 16 introduces a Certificate of Medical Need for PMA users, which is an important safeguard.[+12 sentences] To work well, the process must be clear, accessible and affordable. Excessive or opaque cost or administrative burden risks penalising genuine users. A transparent appeal mechanism is also important, especially for temporary or borderline conditions. Safeguards should protect the vulnerable and not overwhelm them. Speed limits on shared paths matter only if they are enforced. Public concern is less about the precise number – whether it is 10 or six – and more about excessive speed in crowded, high-risk areas. Any speed limit, no matter how well designed, is meaningless if it is not enforced. Several hon Members yesterday suggested permanent enforcement measures such as fixed cameras near schools, bus stops and high-traffic pedestrian areas. These are all sensible suggestions. Visible, location-focused enforcement supported by design-based speed calming is how speed limits move from policy intent to real safety. Without enforcement, speed limits are just suggestions. Enforcement aside, it is also meaningless and unfair to users of PMAs who do not have speedometers for their own awareness of the speed they are going at in the first place. As enforcement tightens, we should also support compliance. This Bill makes it an offence to keep non-compliant devices. I hope we can consider transitional measures such as buy-back or trade-in schemes that could help users shift to compliant devices, particularly where earlier purchases were made in good faith.[+4 sentences] Fire safety related to PMD- and PMA-charging remains a serious concern. Designated charging and parking areas under residential blocks, also suggested by many hon Members yesterday, could reduce unsafe home charging while improving orderliness in shared spaces. Finally, Mr Speaker, on speed limiters for lorries. I had raised this issue through a Parliamentary Question in November 2025 and I thank the Minister for Home Affairs for his response. I support the safety intent behind this requirement, but at the same time, I wish to share feedback from a resident of mine who is also a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) operator. She highlighted that further differentiation of speed limits by vehicle class could allow some more operational flexibility, especially for lower-weight lorries, specifically for those between 3,500 and 5,000 kilogrammes maximum laden weight, whose drivers often face punishing work schedules or reactive work orders.[+2 sentences] Uptake also remains a concern. A more targeted outreach and hands-on installation support could help smaller operators comply. On subsidies for encouraging installations, I would also like to point out that the Productivity Solutions Grant should be meant for genuine productivity uplift and not regulatory compliance like this one.[+5 sentences] Using productivity grants for mandatory requirements risks diluting their purpose. Mr Speaker, notwithstanding the above suggestions and clarifications, I support this Bill because it strengthens safety while reflecting realities on the ground. At its heart, it challenges all of us to improve safety without making daily life harder for those already trying to comply and do the right thing. I look forward to the Ministry's response. And to Mrs Malar Singam, I wish you a smoother path to full recovery.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr David Hoe.
Mr David Hoe (Jurong East-Bukit Batok)1866 words
[+9 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, let me first begin by saying that I am speaking in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. Specifically, I welcome the Bill's active mobility provisions with respect to those on mobility devices and e-scooters. This is because in my role as a Member of Parliament (MP), I have received multiple emails from different Clementi residents about personal mobility devices (PMDs) travelling too fast on walkways, near misses and the anxiety this causes for pedestrians, especially for our seniors and our young children. Furthermore, other residents in Clementi have also shared with me their concerns seeing seemingly able-bodied users riding oversized devices and also clarifying with me, asking whether it is all right to have more than one passenger on the same device. I am certain that I am not the only MP in this House who has received such feedback. At the heart of this feedback, I can understand the anxiety and concern for the wider community. But beyond supporting this Bill, I have three broad clarifications and concerns. The first is on how do we ensure a high compliance with this new regulation. While the intent of the Bill is definitely a positive one, it is worth noting that for someone who wants to be able to ride a mobility scooter, there are a few hurdles for them to cross. On this note, I am glad that seniors aged 70 and above will be exempted from the medical certification requirement. However, for those that are not exempted, such as those who are slightly below 70, the first hurdle that they would have to clear is having a valid Certificate of Medical Need to use a mobility scooter on public paths.[+13 sentences] The fact that time and effort is required to make an appointment, to find a doctor or occupational therapist who could assess and issue the certification; then, they have to pay for the consultation. These are hurdles that individuals who need mobility scooters have to cross. If this process is not implemented well, it may deter people who genuinely need a mobility scooter. Medical certification aside, individuals who need a mobility scooter will also need to cross another hurdle, which is registering and waiting for the approval of their PMA. In the event that the individual is still using a non-UL2272 e-scooter, time and resources will be required to find a compliant e-scooter. My main point is this: if we put ourselves in the user journey, it appears that there are a few hurdles that they will have to go through. Furthermore, if you happen to be a senior who is just slightly below 70 years old, and happen to be not fluent in English and perhaps not great at navigating the online space to register your mobility scooter, your user journey will end up to be significantly longer than expected as you have to rely on the goodwill of others to help you through this process. Hence, I hope that the implementation of this Bill will take into account these anticipated challenges and hopefully, prioritise the user experience by keeping the process as straightforward and simple as possible. For instance, information should be made accessible. It should not only be made available in English, but in all other official languages. Beyond the digital space and in light of the target population that I have just mentioned, there is a need to roll out information on this policy shift using physical materials placed at face-to-face touchpoints such as our polyclinics, community centres or even general practitioner (GP) clinics. I know we are serious about implementing this, but I hope that we will be able to reduce the friction involved in navigating the compliance process. At the end of day, we want to ensure that our vulnerable populations who need the mobility scooters will not be deterred by the process. Against this backdrop, I am also heartened to know that the Bill also states that LTA has the power to provide financial incentives, support, grants, aid and assistance.[+4 sentences] With this in mind, the Government should consider how financial support and aid will be operationalised in the active mobility compliance context. For example, whether there will be means-tested assistance and transitional support for those who are moving from non-compliant devices? In this regard, would the Ministry of Transport (MOT) or LTA be able to share details on when and who can qualify for such financial assistance and the extent of financial assistance so that those who need this more will have this assurance that we are designing this with them in mind? Beyond financial means, allow me to speak further a little bit about the medical certification. As we move towards mandatory data sharing for National Electronic Health Record (NEHR) system, will LTA consider working with the Ministry of Health (MOH) on how medical certification for mobility scooter can be generated based on previous records so that it reduces the friction or the need to see a physical doctor?[+27 sentences] Presently, the use of NEHR is only limited to specific purposes or circumstances. MOH should also perhaps consider allowing NEHR access to streamline the certification of need. And what this means is that for our seniors, they can just go to the Active Ageing Centre, find a staff who can help them to navigate through the process, generate the medical certification that they need if they have already met the criteria. At the heart of it, we want to make compliance smooth, not difficult. If the perceived expected costs incurred in terms of time and effort are too significant, compliance will be challenging. Second, allow me to speak on matters pertaining to enforcement. In order to ensure that compliance within speed limits and good behaviour with mobility vehicles on footpaths, the certainty of enforcement plays an important role. If not, to the mobility vehicle user, this new speed limit is really nothing more than just head knowledge and may not be taken into heart. Against this backdrop, I wonder how can we ensure enforcement will be more effective. While I think we can deploy manpower to deter mobility vehicle users from speeding in this interim period, I wonder, will LTA consider a technology-enabled enforcement solution, especially at high-traffic nodes at our Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and also mall linkways. This could include targeted pilots using speed detection sensors, camera-supported enforcement and other pragmatic tools. It could involve working closely with Home Team technology partners, including the Home Team Science and Technology Agency so that detection and responses can become faster and more consistent. A good thing is this: in Singapore, we fortunately have a strong foundation to build on. For instance, given our extensive Police Camera (PolCam) network deployed across neighbourhoods and transport nodes, this raises a practical question of whether we can leverage on the camera infrastructure and analytics to identify wrong behaviour more quickly, such as speeding of mobility vehicles or even pillion riders on mobility scooters, so that we can ensure enforcement can be carried out more swiftly. Beyond enforcement, our behaviour is also shaped by our infrastructure. Just as vehicles drive on roads, where we often have speed limits to remind us drivers of what are the permissible speeds, could we also do something similar for our mobility vehicle users? The broader question is really how do we ensure that the education of this new speed limit is not just one-off, but repeated periodically and ingrained into our behaviour? Finally, I would also need to put out this point that we need to assure and secure the trust and acceptance of users who depend on these mobility devices. Because for many of these residents, mobility vehicles are not a lifestyle choice. This is a lifeline. If the new regulatory regime is perceived as one that is making daily living more difficult, more stigmatising, more uncertain, then compliance will be a lot harder and the policy intent may not be fully achieved. In one of my recent house visits, two of my residents who are wheelchair-bound and they use mobility vehicles to get around, raised a valid concern and I hope the Ministry can give some assurance to this. One of these residents mentioned to me saying that if she were to be travelling at six kilometres per hour upslope, their fear is that they will roll backwards given the slower speed. From a layman’s perspective as she was sharing that during my house visit, I could understand why she raised this concern, because it is quite easy to conflate two concepts, power and velocity, together. So, what I then did was I raised this concern with my volunteers at my Meet-the-People Session and my Clementi running group. We sat down together using concepts we learnt from physics and engineering, we drew a free body diagram to simulate whether this concern is valid. Using our very simple physics model, the motors of the mobility vehicle must be able to overcome the downhill component gravity of mg sin θ. Our back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that for a 90-kilogramme system on a typical 4.8-degree ramp, 158 watts is needed to maintain at six kilometres per hour.[+3 sentences] Let me just say this: I fully acknowledge that this is a simplified model. The point is not about academic precision. The point is about perception. For many users, this fear is real: will I roll backwards at a slower speed? It would be helpful if LTA could also provide reassurance in terms of public communication that devices designed for public paths will not roll backwards on typical gradients, even at lower speeds.[+4 sentences] Another concern is the issue of being unfairly judged or confronted. Some have shared that they fear being stopped or challenged in public, not because they have done anything wrong, but because they “do not look disabled”. This has been highlighted by disability advocates and rightly so because disability comes in many forms. For instance, some users can still walk a short distance but rely on mobility aid intermittently. If the new regime unintentionally results in more public suspicion or harassment of legitimate users, it will undermine social trust. I therefore hope LTA’s communications will be clear that the intent is to prevent unsafe misuse, not to encourage policing by all of us and by the public, and that enforcement will be guided by training and clear protocols.[+4 sentences] Mr Speaker, all these concerns that I raised today really do sound operational, but they go at the heart of public acceptance. Ultimately, this Bill is more than just enforcement, it is about how we live together in a dense, compact city with shared spaces. A "we first" transport culture must mean that pedestrians feel safe. It also means that legitimate mobility aid users also feel respected and supported. Our safety rules must not only be stated but enforced consistently, supported with the right resources and technology, applied with fairness so that vulnerable users are not priced out of mobility.[+1 sentence] Mr Speaker, in closing, this Bill advances a simple "we first" principle in my opinion: those who operate powered devices and vehicles hold greater capacity to cause harm and with that capacity comes greater responsibility.
Mr Speaker25 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Hoe, we have some students from St Hilda's Secondary School and from their looks I think your calculations are correct. Ms Lee Hui Ying.
Ms Lee Hui Ying (Nee Soon)1477 words
[+7 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. This introduces new and important regulations. It is so important that despite my broken voice today, I wish to share my thoughts, my residents' thoughts on this Bill to ensure safer paths for all. The growth in the use of PMAs in Singapore shows how our city has evolved – from an ageing population with greater needs for independence to a broader expectation that our public spaces accommodate different forms of mobility. But as PMAs become a common sight, it is our duty to strike the right balance of safety, clarity and responsibility between the different users of our public paths. On this Bill, I have a few clarifications regarding the enforceability and impact of these new measures. First, focusing on the most impacted group: the PMA users. From June this year, users must have the Certificate of Medical Need to own a PMA, which can only be obtained after completing the Assessment for Mobility Scooter (AMS) from doctors or occupational therapists.[+12 sentences] Given that these PMA users would need the vehicle for basic mobility, the AMS should and must remain affordable for all. Will MOT be coordinating with MOH and the Ministry of Social and Family Development to ensure accessibility and affordability of these services by public and private GPs and occupational therapists that can offer AMS for existing and also new PMA users? Will there be a fee cap to avoid opportunistic price hiking to obtain the AMS? As users’ medical conditions change over time, it is important to ensure PMA users continue to be fit to operate PMAs to reduce the likelihood of accidents. Assessment to Own does not mean Assessment to Operate. I have seen some PMA users, while medically allowed to own a PMA, may not have the ability to safely operate their devices and this jeopardises other path users. PMA users should meet baseline requirements of eyesight, dexterity and mental state to safely operate their devices. I would like to ask if the AMS will include an assessment test to determine if the patient is able to safely operate a PMA? This may also change with time if health conditions worsen or simply from ageing. Will there be a validity of each AMS to ensure continued assessment on safe riding of PMAs? For example, a reassessment once every three years for those with severe chronic conditions. Second, the effectiveness of the regulations in making our footpaths and roads safer for everyone. From 2023 to Q3 2025, MOT said there were around 710 reported accidents involving PMAs, PMDs or PABs that resulted in injuries. And approximately 590 were on the roads and 120 were off-road, inclusive of public paths.[+5 sentences] There may have been much much more accidents that went unreported. The new regulations aim to reduce accidents involving pedestrians due to reckless speeding on footpaths and shared paths. However, the prevalence of motorised PMA users might make it difficult to enforce penalties against many cases, with some riders who decide to hit and run after the collision to avoid punishment. So, enforcement is extremely key here. Most will comply but there may still be recalcitrant users who disregard the rules. Can the Ministry consider establishing a demerit system for PMA users to deter repeat offenders who fail to consider the safety of others?[+24 sentences] Will there be physical features installed, similar to red light cameras on the roads, on shared paths to track speed limits? There are still some confusion on regulations surrounding active mobility vehicles such as the speed limit and which paths or roads each vehicle is allowed to ride on. Just as we are getting used to the terms of PMA, PMD and PAB, we are now hearing new terms from the Ministry – motorised vehicles, motorised wheelchairs, motorised scooters. Will the Ministry consider increasing better and fuller public communications efforts, such as placing visible signages on speed limits and designating which vehicles are allowed on footpaths, shared paths and roads? This will reduce the number of accidents due to some riders and pedestrians who unintentionally use the wrong paths. Additionally, which I think has been highlighted in this Chamber by some Members, there are other factors other than speed that pose safety risks and public disturbance. Sometimes, you hear them before you see them. Some active mobility users play loud music on their devices, almost like a mobile disco blasting through the Housing and Development Board (HDB) blocks and footpaths. And sometimes, during wee hours of the night. Will the Ministry look into restricting the playing of loud music on such devices to minimise disturbance and to show consideration for the community? Third, some delivery riders switched to PMAs after PMDs were banned from footpaths in 2019. The new regulations on speed limit and vehicle registration are likely to result in loss of income for many delivery riders who depend on the device for their livelihoods. So, the transition support is crucial. Has the Ministry consulted with major food delivery platforms on changes in compensation structures or job allocations due to the new regulations? This could include allocating shorter distance deliveries to more PMA delivery riders to mitigate potential fall in earnings. Or will there be career transition assistance for those who wish to switch out of their delivery jobs? Additionally, delivery riders who switch to PABs or PMDs would not be able to legally ride on pedestrian paths, making it challenging for them to complete their deliveries in HDB estates. So, those who do so illegally might pose an even greater risk to pedestrians due to the higher speed limit. Therefore, could the Minister or the Ministry share on plans to improve last mile connectivity by increasing the accessibility of shared paths network within the HDB estates? Sir, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): Mr Speaker, the use of Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) has become increasingly common, and we have a responsibility to balance the safety, responsibility and clarity for all users on public paths. I hope MOT can further clarify the impact of this Bill on PMA users, road users and food delivery workers, as well as how the new measures can be enforced. Firstly, starting from June this year, mobility scooter users must obtain medical certification after completing relevant assessments by doctors or occupational therapists before they can own a mobility scooter. These users often depend on assistive devices for basic mobility, so this assessment must be affordable for them. Will the MOT coordinate with MOH and the MSF to ensure that existing and new mobility scooter users can easily access assessment services provided by doctors and occupational therapists at affordable prices? Will the authorities set a fee cap for this service to avoid opportunistic price hiking?[+4 sentences] Furthermore, the health condition of PMA users changes over time. They must be fit enough to operate mobility aids to reduce the likelihood of accidents. Even if they are assessed to own, does not mean they have the ability to operate. Therefore, users must meet basic requirements for vision, dexterity and mental state to safely operate assistive devices. Will the assessment for mobility scooters include evaluating whether patients can safely operate the assistive device? Considering changes in their health conditions and the effects of ageing, will assessments have time limits for safety purposes?[+15 sentences] For example, patients with serious chronic conditions might undergo reassessment every three years? Secondly, regarding effective enforcement of regulations. I believe most users will comply with regulations, but for those bad actors who repeatedly ignore advice, will the MOT consider implementing a demerit point system as a deterrent to ensure others' safety? Will the authorities consider installing speed detectors on footpaths, similar to enhanced speed cameras and traffic cameras on roads? Thirdly, regarding the livelihoods of food delivery workers. In 2019, after PMDs were banned from footpaths, some delivery workers switched to using PMAs. The new speed and registration regulations will likely cause delivery workers, who depend on these devices for livelihoods, to lose their income. During the transition period, they desperately need additional support. Will delivery workers who want to change careers receive employment assistance? Delivery workers who switch to PABs and PMDs will not be able to use pedestrian-only paths, causing difficulties when delivering in HDB estates. Can the Minister reveal what plans there are to improve the convenience and connectivity network of shared paths in HDB estates? With our rapidly ageing population, mobility aids will only become more prevalent. I hope this Bill can ensure that all Singaporeans can use our roads safely and conveniently. (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding these clarifications, I fully support the Bill. With the increasing prevalence of PMA use in our ageing population, I hope that this Bill enables safer and more accessible roads and paths for all Singaporeans.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Yip Hon Weng.
Mr Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang)1480 words
[+20 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, I am speaking on this Bill on behalf of Yio Chu Kang, a constituency with a significant and growing senior population. Many of my residents rely on PMAs to move around their estates safely and independently. For them, these devices are not a convenience, but an essential part of daily life. My residents want safer paths and fewer fires in our HDB blocks, but they also want a transport environment that is safe and inclusive. I support the Ministry's intent to tighten regulations, but legislation is only as effective as its implementation. When we move from policy papers to the pavements in our estates, the "how" becomes just as important as the "what". With that in mind, I would like to raise four clarifications on the Bill. Mr Speaker, Sir, my first point concerns the new requirement for a Certificate of Medical Need. We all agree with the intent. We have witnessed seemingly young and able-bodied individuals speeding on mobility scooters, treating them as casual transport. This endangers pedestrians and undermines confidence in genuine PMA use. However, for many of my elderly residents, a mobility scooter is a lifeline. It is the difference between being confined at home and being able to buy groceries or meet friends. While I note the exemptions for seniors aged 70 and above, and for subsidy recipients, I am concerned about what I term as the "sandwich class" of disability. These are residents in their 50s or 60s who may not meet a strict clinical definition of being unable to walk, but who suffer from chronic pain, arthritis or joint degeneration. They may manage short distances within their flats but cannot walk several hundred metres to essential amenities. At the same time, mobility needs are not always permanent. Some residents may require PMAs immediately after surgery or injury but later recover sufficiently. This raises important questions about how "temporary" medical need is defined and managed in a way that is fair, clear and not open to abuse. I seek three clarifications. First, will there be a fast-track or temporary certification process for residents who need a PMA after surgery or injury, ensuring rehabilitation does not become a compliance case?[+3 sentences] Related to this, how will the system manage the point at which a temporary medical need ends? Will they be assigned a deadline where they are expected to stop using the PMA? Must they undergo reassessment if their mobility issues persist beyond the expected recovery period, in order to continue using it? Second, with the rollout starting in mid-2026, I worry about bottlenecks at polyclinics.[+9 sentences] Can the Minister assure us that residents will not be left house-bound while waiting for certification? During the initial rollout, will enforcement officers prioritise helping residents comply rather than penalising them? Third, regarding digital inclusion, how does a non-tech-savvy senior who falls just below the age exemption prove their status? If verification relies on digital platforms, we risk creating anxiety. Simple, physical proof options still remain essential. Mr Speaker, Sir, my second point concerns the mandatory registration of mobility vehicles. I acknowledge the Ministry's efforts to reduce compliance burden through retailer-led registration for new devices and a phased transition for existing users. Registration strengthens accountability and accountability is necessary. However, residents fear that honest mistakes may be treated as offences. Section 28I creates an offence for using an unregistered vehicle and section 28M makes the register prima facie evidence.[+31 sentences] I have four questions. First, if a retailer makes a registration error, will the resident using the device in good faith bear the penalty? How can such errors be resolved simply, especially for seniors who may not have full documentation? Second, can the Minister clarify the costs involved? For low-income seniors, even modest fees can be a barrier. Will subsidies or waivers be considered? Third, are there implications for public rental tenants regarding insurance or tenancy rules? We must ensure registration does not disadvantage vulnerable residents. Fourth, with rules phasing in until 2029, how will residents be clearly and repeatedly informed of what applies at each stage? Mr Speaker, Sir, my third point concerns the new offence to keep unsafe PMA devices. This is a necessary shift. Many fires occur while devices are being charged at home. However, we must distinguish between willful offenders and residents who simply do not know how to dispose of old devices. I have four suggestions. First, unsafe devices need a "safe exit". If disposal is difficult, residents will hide these devices, keeping the risk inside the home. Any disposal framework should focus squarely on safe and accessible removal of unsafe devices. Second, we must be practical. Seniors cannot transport heavy devices to distant e-waste points. Town Council-level collection drives and bulky-item removal services will be essential and has to be supported by sustained public education. Third, online sales remain a weak link. A suggestion is to have all PMA device listings and categories to come with an advisory on compliant models and make it a reportable offence if the seller mislabels an illegal or modified vehicle as one that is compliant. Also, how will the agency combat sales through messaging platforms, like Telegram? Fourth, will the Ministry work with the Ministry of National Development to designate charging or parking spaces in suitable locations, such as void decks? This could minimise the risk of PMAs being parked or charged in corridors or lift lobbies. Mr Speaker, Sir, my fourth point concerns delivery riders, platform responsibility and enforcement. Residents are frustrated by fast-moving riders, but they want calmer paths, not just more summonses. Rider behaviour is shaped by platform incentives. I support deeming platform operators as employers for liability, but liability alone may not change behaviour. I seek five clarifications. First, how do we prevent contractual distancing, where platforms shift blame to riders without changing operational pressures? Second, why does the Bill not explicitly require training or delivery-time management, including algorithmic changes that do not reward speed at the expense of safety?[+9 sentences] Third, will success be measured by reduced accidents and complaints, or simply by enforcement numbers? Fourth, will enforcement data be used to redesign recurring conflict hotspots in estates? And fifth, will platforms share anonymised data to support safer estate planning? More broadly, I must raise a concern about enforcement. Many of these rules are sound on paper, but enforcement on the ground may be inconsistent and unpredictable. Errant users learn when and where to avoid officers. Only when enforcement is visible, consistent and credible will behaviour truly change. Otherwise, even well-designed laws risk becoming paper tigers. In conclusion, Mr Speaker, Sir, let me end with a moment that many of my residents will recognise from lived experience. On 4 November 2025, close to midnight, a fire broke out in the lift lobby of Block 641 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 4, involving a PMD.[+2 sentences] About 200 of my residents were evacuated. Four were taken to hospital. Electrical supply was disrupted and lifts were damaged. These disruptions were avoidable and they underline why prevention and enforcement matter.[+5 sentences] In such incidents, it is not just the user who pays the price. Entire blocks are disrupted. Neighbouring units suffer damage. Some families even lose beloved pets, or in the worst case scenario, their loved ones. This brings us to the heart of this Bill. On the Certificate of Medical Need, safety must never come at the cost of dignity.[+21 sentences] On mandatory registration, accountability must be paired with fairness. On unsafe devices, fire risks must be removed, not hidden. And on delivery riders and enforcement, safety must be real on the ground, not just written in law. This Bill matters because safety is not an abstract concept. It is not a statistic. It is the quiet confidence of a senior walking home. It is the assurance that a charging device will not put homes and livelihoods at risk. It is the belief that shared spaces belong to all of us and must protect the most vulnerable amongst us. My residents are not asking for perfection. They are asking for reassurance. They are asking for rules that are firm, but fair. For systems that protect, not intimidate. For enforcement that is real, consistent and visible. Mr Speaker, Sir, this Bill gives us the tools. But laws alone do not make communities safe. The choices we make in implementation do. If we choose compassion alongside enforcement, clarity alongside regulation and care alongside accountability, the measure of this Bill will not be found in the number of offences recorded. It will be found in fewer fires; in safer footpaths; in the vulnerable amongst us, who can move through their estates without fear. And for residents in Yio Chu Kang and for all Singaporeans across this island, that is not just good policy. It is the kind of society we are building together. With that, Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the Bill.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Edward Chia.
Mr Edward Chia Bing Hui (Holland-Bukit Timah)1633 words
[+8 sentences]Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. I focus my remarks on one central issue: how technology can allow us to manage traffic more intelligently, beyond relying primarily on pricing. Singapore is land scarce. Our road network cannot expand indefinitely and there are many competing demands on land – we need more housing, more parks, more cycling paths and so forth. For decades, ERP has been one of our levers for managing congestion. ERP has been effective. But as technology advances, the question is no longer how much we price road usage, but how intelligently we manage traffic as an integrated system. ERP 2.0 is often framed as a pricing upgrade, but this framing understates its broader potential. At its core, ERP 2.0 is also a data and sensing platform. The new OBUs generate richer, more granular and real-time data – both for motorists and the LTA.[+19 sentences] This creates an opportunity to move beyond passive congestion pricing towards active traffic management. Internationally, cities are already using real-time flow data to dynamically manage their road networks. In London, for example, the Split Cycle Offset Optimisation Technique (SCOOT) system uses live data from sensors and cameras to adjust traffic light timings. This increases green time in congested corridors and eases bottlenecks without expanding road usage. Drawing on such precedents, ERP 2.0 data can be integrated with adaptive traffic signal systems, incident responses and corridor-level optimisation. Real-time congestion data can enable more responsive traffic light timings, improve directional flow during peak periods and allow faster interventions at known choke points. Beyond day-to-day operations, ERP 2.0 data also offers a powerful planning tool. Instead of expanding roads broadly, planners and engineers can use longitudinal flow data to identify where capacity is genuinely constrained and where it is under-utilised. Such data can show which junctions, rather than entire corridors, are the true bottlenecks; and which lanes are consistently under-used and could be reallocated to other users, such as pedestrians and cyclists. This enables a shift from broad-based expansion to targeted, data-driven interventions, where minor redesigns, signal adjustments or directional changes could outperform the construction of new roads. Mr Speaker, it is also important to emphasise that ERP 2.0 should not be perceived as a system that only impacts private motorists. The same flow data can also be used to improve outcomes for public transport users, particularly bus commuters. ERP 2.0 data can support bus lane prioritisation, by identifying corridors where buses experience the most delays; better route design, based on actual congestion and demand patterns; transfer optimisation, improving coordination between bus services and MRT nodes; last mile connectivity planning, by highlighting short but congested links that disproportionately affect bus reliability. By embedding these insights into planning and operations, ERP 2.0 can directly enhance bus punctuality, reliability and journey times – strengthening public transport as an attractive and dependable choice. Mr Speaker, may I ask the Minister what ERP 2.0 data is already integrated today, and how it will be used in the medium and longer term to support smarter traffic management, such as adaptive signals, incident response and bus operations, beyond pricing alone? Turning to virtual gantries and network effects. The shift to virtual gantries under ERP 2.0 offers flexibility and reduces physical clutter. However, international experience suggests that flexibility must be accompanied by clear principles and guardrails. Mr Speaker, as we move towards virtual gantries, some of my Zhenghua residents are concerned that it may become easier to introduce more pricing points across the island. It is, therefore, important to consider the overall impact of more granular road pricing and to ensure that flexibility does not create uncertainty for motorists or lead to higher costs without real congestion benefits. So, may I ask the Minister whether there will be clear limits and transparent criteria for adjusting ERP 2.0 pricing zones, and regular public updates on congestion and travel times to ensure that flexibility delivers real improvements on the ground?[+14 sentences] Turning to user experience of OBUs. Early feedback on OBUs has raised concerns around aesthetics, usability and power consumption. Specific vehicle types or older car models face technical difficulties powering the OBU, given that it requires more energy than the previous In-vehicle Unit (IU). Mr Speaker, may I ask the Minister whether there will be carve-outs for vehicle types that face technical installation challenges, and if so, how would such users be made to pay ERP 2.0? With regard to user experience issues, other cities have addressed similar challenges through iterative design improvements and structured feedback loops. In Seoul, for instance, smart mobility systems were rolled out alongside continuous refinements, with user satisfaction explicitly tracked as a performance indicator. To that end, may I ask the Minister how is LTA is incorporating user feedback to refine the OBU experience? And beyond familiarity over time, what new features are planned to ensure ERP 2.0 becomes genuinely more intuitive and useful for motorists? Turning to active mobility, the Bill strengthens penalties and enforcement powers, particularly for PMAs. This is important for safety, but enforcement capacity must be sustainable. Cities, such as Paris and Amsterdam, increasingly rely on camera-based and automated enforcement to ensure consistent compliance without excessive manpower demands. Camera-based enforcement enables round-the-clock monitoring, unlike manpower-based enforcement, which relies on occasional checks and predictable hotspots due to inherent resource constraints. Leveraging technology in this way allows enforcement to scale with usage while maintaining fairness and predictability. Mr Speaker, may I ask the Minister what cameras are currently used for active mobility enforcement, how much manpower is presently deployed for this purpose and the associated man-hour labour costs of such enforcements? Further, with the expansion of rules and enforcements introduced by this Bill, what are the projected manpower requirements and costs going forward and what immediate plans are in place to scale up automated enforcement to manage these constraints?[+6 sentences] On the requirement for medical certification for PMA users, this is welcomed. From time to time, my residents in Zhenghua have been asking me whether certain types of PMA users should, in fact, be using PMAs, as some appear young and healthy. A certifiable medical requirement helps remove such suspicions and ambiguity. This is essential to foster trust and social acceptance within our community. At the same time, I wish to raise an issue of equity and access. Some PMA users come from lower-income households and even small administrative costs can become a barrier. To ensure this does not unintentionally exclude those who need mobility support the most, can the Ministry regularly publish a clear list of clinics offering certification and update together with indicative fees, to enhance transparency and keep the process affordable and fair?[+12 sentences] Mr Speaker, this Bill offers us an opportunity to move beyond a narrow conception of ERP as simply a pricing mechanism, towards a smarter, integrated mobility system. One that uses data to optimise traffic flow, guide infrastructure planning, improve public transport reliability and enhance user experience. Cities around the world show that pricing works best when paired with real-time traffic management, adaptive control and thoughtful use of data. I hope Singapore will continue to lead in this space, not just by pricing roads efficiently, but by managing them intelligently. Mr Speaker, as I conclude, I wish to stress that the concerns raised today in this debate are not abstract policy observations. They are the lived realities and anxieties of residents, workers, caregivers and persons with mobility challenges whom we meet on the ground every day. These views reflect a consolidated position of the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for Transport and fellow People's Action Party Members, shaped through extensive discussions within the Committee, engagements with Members and most importantly, direct feedback from residents across our constituencies who will feel the full impact of this Bill. Taken together, the GPC's views rest on three clear and urgent concerns. First, Members strongly support safety as the central objective of this Bill. Safer paths, safer roads and safer homes are not optional – they are essential. Residents want assurance that injuries, misuse, fires and unsafe modifications linked to increasingly powerful devices will be decisively addressed. At the same time, they expect safety measures, such as speed limiters, tougher penalties for dangerous alterations and smarter traffic management systems to deliver real, visible improvements on the ground, not just rules on paper. Second, while Members support the introduction of a Certificate of Medical Need to curb abuse, we must be clear-eyed about who we may have left behind.[+2 sentences] For many genuine users, those with temporary injuries, functional mobility challenges, caregiving duties or delivery riders relying on mobility aids for their livelihood, the Bill is not theoretical. It affects whether they can move, work or live with dignity. The GPC therefore urges that implementation be flexible, affordable and clearly communicated, so that administrative complexities, cost or narrow definitions do not unintentionally exclude or penalise those who depend on these devices the most.[+3 sentences] Third, Members emphasise the success of this Bill will ultimately be judged on enforcement. Residents are asking for enforcement that is consistent, credible and fair – not sporadic crackdowns or uneven treatment. This means sustained enforcement on the ground, better use of technology and clear accountability for platforms and marketplaces that profit from the usage and sales of these devices. At the same time, the GPC calls for a sensible transition period, one that prioritises education and understanding, and exercises discretion where users are acting in good faith and adjusting to new rules.[+3 sentences] Mr Speaker, these are calls to make it work for people it most directly affects. The GPC supports the intent of the Bill. We offer these views to ensure that implementation is firm yet fair, strong yet compassionate, so that safety is enhanced without losing sight of inclusivity and lived realities.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+1 sentence]Senior Minister of State Sim Ann.
The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Ms Sim Ann)1377 words
[+4 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank the Members for their interest and support for the Bill. Please allow me to address their comments on the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)-related amendments. Ms Joan Pereira and Ms Yeo Wan Ling asked about the regulatory and enforcement approach for foreign-registered heavy vehicles, vis-à-vis Singapore-registered heavy vehicles. Speed limiters are employed upstream to reduce the speeding risk before the offence occurs. In 2024, the speed limiter regime was expanded to include lorries with a maximum laden weight of between 3,501 kilogrammes and 12,000 kilogrammes.[+23 sentences] Singapore-registered heavy vehicles account for the bulk of daily heavy vehicle traffic on our roads. Installing speed limiters for these vehicles would therefore reduce the road safety risks associated with heavy vehicles very significantly. We also recognise the need to address the safety risks associated with foreign-registered heavy vehicles. We require them to comply with our road traffic laws and regulations, and we conduct on-road enforcement on them. Foreign vehicles that commit speeding offences will be dealt with in accordance with the law. We do not require them to install speed limiters, because they also ply in other jurisdictions with different speed limits from Singapore. It is worth noting that, since Singapore-registered lorries are already required to install speed limiters and, therefore, will be unable to speed, this allows the Traffic Police to focus speeding enforcement on all other vehicles on our roads, including foreign-registered heavy vehicles. To Ms Joan Pereira’s question on installing speed limiters for "higher-risk passenger cars", speed limiters are currently required for heavy vehicles as part of a targeted, risk-based approach. These vehicles pose higher risks due to their size, weight and operating characteristics. But the risks associated with passenger cars, on the other hand, arise primarily from driver behaviour, rather than vehicle attributes. These behaviours are more appropriately addressed through public education efforts and deterrent penalties, rather than through speed limiters. Members also asked about speed limits for heavy vehicles. Ms Yeo Wan Ling asked whether the speed differential between passenger vehicles and heavy vehicles gives rise to unsafe driving conditions. Ms Valerie Lee suggested that lighter vehicles with a maximum laden weight of 3,501 to 5,000 kilogrammes should be subject to a higher speed limit of 70 kilometres per hour, instead of the current 60 kilometres per hour. Let me clarify. On expressways, passenger vehicles may travel at speeds of up to 90 kilometres per hour, while heavy vehicles are subject to a vehicular speed limit of 60 kilometres per hour, enforced through speed limiters. But these differing limits should not be seen in isolation. They are paired with lane-discipline requirements, where slower vehicles are required to keep to the left lane, except when overtaking. The rationale for this framework is road safety. Heavy vehicles differ from passenger vehicles in terms of mass, braking distance, stability and blind spots; and when accidents occur, they can cause disproportionate harm. Speed control is, therefore, a critical safety lever to reduce the risk and severity of accidents involving such vehicles. To Ms Valerie Lee's suggestion, vehicles with a maximum laden weight of between 3,501 and 5,000 kilogrammes are subject to the same 60 kilometres per hour speed limit as vehicles above 5,000 kilogrammes because they pose similar road safety risks, such as longer braking distances and reduced manoeuvrability at higher speed. Sir, we are starting to see results from our policy. The number of speeding-related accidents, including fatal ones, involving heavy vehicles has decreased by 28% from 25 cases in 2024 to 18 cases in 2025, as more lorries installed speed limiters last year. We expect these figures to further decrease after all lorries install speed limiters by 1 July 2027.[+8 sentences] We also recognise that good lane discipline is essential where there are differences in vehicle speeds. The Traffic Police will continue to educate motorists on the importance of maintaining lane discipline and enforce against violations. Ms Yeo Wan Ling, Ms Valerie Lee and Dr Choo Pei Ling asked questions about the compliance burden on businesses and whether assistance is being provided to businesses to facilitate the installation of speed limiters. To Ms Yeo's query, the speed limiter requirement applies to lorries that continue to operate on Singapore roads. Where a vehicle is earmarked to be scrapped after its statutory installation deadline, the vehicle must be installed with a speed limiter in order to operate on the roads after the deadline. While I appreciate Ms Yeo's suggestion to exercise flexibility for those with firm scrapping plans, we will have to draw the line somewhere and there will always be lorries which are intended to be scrapped after the deadline. We have thus decided to maintain a consistent approach by not extending the deadline for any group. Lorry owners have been given adequate lead time to plan their installation decisions in accordance with their business and operational needs. On assistance provided to businesses, in this first phase of speed limiter installation, 94% of the lorries that needed to install by 1 January 2026 – or about 2,300 lorries – had completed their installation before the deadline.[+2 sentences] To support SMEs, Enterprise Singapore has expanded Productivity Solutions Grant support to cover speed limiters for eligible SMEs that install between 1 October 2025 and 31 March 2027. This recognises that speed limiters can also indirectly improve productivity by reducing downtime in the event of accidents. Beyond this, the Traffic Police has introduced UN ECE R89 as a third approved speed limiter standard.[+1 sentence] This expands the variety of approved speed limiters available in the market and provides more options for lorry owners looking to install speed limiters. The Traffic Police has also worked with the industry to significantly increase installation capacity, expanding the number of authorised agents more than six-fold since January 2025, to 70 currently.[+2 sentences] The industry has also been offering on-site installation and bulk discounts to encourage installation. Turning to the other proposals in the Bill, Mr Jackson Lam asked how fairness and public trust would be maintained in the context of increasingly automated enforcement systems. Ms Sylvia Lim asked for details about the outsourcing arrangement to private sector companies.[+1 sentence] Let me first clarify that clauses 74 and 79 of the Bill only allows for the administrative processing of straightforward violations to be carried out by authorised civilians, after an offence has been detected. These amendments do not involve the automation of enforcement decisions.[+12 sentences] They also do not change the current process for appeals, including the viewing of camera footage upon request, which will continue to be managed by the Traffic Police. These authorised civilians will assess traffic camera footage to determine if a traffic violation has been disclosed. This is based on an assessment framework provided by Traffic Police. For example, for footage captured by red light cameras, these civilians will view a series of photos to confirm that the vehicle had crossed the stop line after the traffic light had turned red. In short, the authorised civilians will not exercise enforcement discretion. The Traffic Police will continue to be responsible and accountable for enforcement policy and decisions. We are working out the procurement details and approach. That said, we agree with the Member that any use of automation or outsourcing must be subject to robust safeguards and oversight, to ensure fairness and public confidence in traffic enforcement. Finally, we thank Dr Hamid Razak for his support for measures to enhance road safety. Let me address Dr Hamid's suggestion to raise penalties and demonstrate stronger deterrence for dangerous and careless driving offences. The Ministry fully agrees with the need for adequate deterrence and appropriate punishment, commensurate with the culpability of the offender and the harm caused through the offending act. The maximum penalties set out in the Road Traffic Act reflect this calibrated approach. Building on this, MHA is working with the Sentencing Advisory Panel, chaired by Justice Tay Yong Kwang, to publish sentencing guidelines for the offences of dangerous and careless driving.[+4 sentences] The Ministry is studying further measures to shape responsible driving behaviour and improve overall road safety. Further details will be announced when ready. I thank Members for supporting the Bill. Mr Speaker, I seek to move and will now hand over to the officeholders from MOT to address amendments that are related to MOT.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+1 sentence]Minister of State Baey Yam Keng.
The Minister of State for Transport (Mr Baey Yam Keng)3257 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank the Members for their support of the Bill and their thoughtful questions. Let me first address the specific points that Members raised. At the outset, I wish to make clear that we are not banning the use of mobility scooters but safeguarding them for those who truly need them.[+1 sentence] Our intention is not to target any specific group, but to set ground rules that provide clarity and keep our paths safer for all. Several Members, like Ms Joan Pereira, Ms Choo Pei Ling and Dr Haresh Singaraju spoke about how medical needs will be assessed to allow for the use of mobility scooters. We will need the support of our doctors and occupational therapists (OTs), to assess the medical needs to determine whether a person's medical conditions lead to mobility challenges that require a mobility scooter.[+9 sentences] MOH has issued guidelines for healthcare professionals to conduct the assessment, including a non-exhaustive list of possible conditions. Some examples include cardiovascular diseases, such as severe heart failure; and musculoskeletal disorders, such as muscular dystrophies and rheumatoid arthritis. Members including Mr David Hoe, Mr Ng Shi Xuan and Dr Hamid Razak asked about the process to obtain a Certificate of Medical Need, validity periods and timelines. For the convenience of users and assessors, both digital and hard copy certificates will be possible. The doctor or OT may fill in a standard online form to submit the data to LTA or issue a hard copy of the standard form. Once the assessor completes the form, the certificate is granted. For the hard copy, the user is encouraged to take a photo and submit it to LTA so that it is stored in LTA's digital registry. As part of the certification, the doctor or OT will assess and indicate if the user's need for a mobility scooter is long-term or temporary. For the latter, the period that the Certificate is valid will be specified. The Government will maintain a registry of those with valid Certificates of Medical Need and those exempted from the requirement.[+13 sentences] Seniors exempted on the basis of age will not be in the registry. I know some seniors may look younger than their age, so if enforcement officers were to ask, their National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) year of birth just needs to show that they are 70 years old and above. As an example, for this year, everyone born in and before 1956 are automatically exempted. Enforcement officers will request the user's particulars to perform a back-end check on the spot. If the certificate has not been submitted online, the user just needs to produce the hard copy form for inspection. Individuals can also check their certification or exemption status on LTA's OneMotoring website. Dr Choo Pei Ling asked whether physiotherapists can grant the Certificate of Medical Need. We have worked with MOH to determine the groups of assessors for the certificate. Currently, mobility assessment, device prescription and user training are not part of the routine training of a general physiotherapist. Hence, MOH's position is that only doctors and OTs can assess and grant this certificate. MOH will continue to monitor demand if these competencies should be built into training for a wider pool of healthcare professionals. Members including Mr Jackson Lam and Mr Yip Hon Weng reminded us to streamline processes to minimise the burden on genuine users, particularly persons with disabilities and seniors. We fully agree. Risk-managed exemptions include seniors aged 70 and above, those who have already obtained Government-subsidised mobility scooters and those who have applied for MOH disability schemes to help with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs in "mobility" and/or "transferring".[+22 sentences] We are working to exempt more user groups with other relevant assessments where possible, such as applicants for other disability schemes. Members including Ms Yeo Wan Ling, Dr Wan Rizal and Ms Lee Hui Ying also asked about the cost to undergo the Assessment for Mobility Scooter (AMS), if polyclinics will offer the AMS and if subsidies will be extended. For those who need certification, we have engaged the healthcare sector to encourage private GP clinics to offer the AMS. We want it to be widely available and accessible, so that users can have affordable choices. As Dr Haresh Singaraju has emphasised, we encourage users to go to their regular doctor or regular OT, who already understand their medical history, to streamline the assessment process. All doctors, including polyclinic doctors, are allowed to conduct the AMS. However, doctors may decline to assess users who are not their regular patients, depending on the doctor's comfort level to conduct the certification. Healthcare subsidies will not be accorded for visits made solely to obtain the Certificate of Medical Need. However, as long as the patient is seeking healthcare services from a doctor or OT at public healthcare institutions or community care organisations, and the AMS is conducted as a clinically indicated part of their regular medical care, the overall care episode, including the AMS, can be given healthcare subsidies. Members, including Mr Cai Yinzhou, Mr Dennis Tan and Mr David Hoe, asked about specific plans to engage existing PMA users on the new rules, especially seniors and persons with disabilities. LTA will continue to work with the Agency for Integrated Care and SG Enable as well as relevant social service agencies, such as SPD, to reach out to seniors and persons with disabilities. LTA's public communications campaign on the new rules will also be rolled out in various languages. On the ground, enforcement officers will engage and educate PMA users on the upcoming rules. We will also reach out through grassroots channels, and I seek Members' support to raise awareness among your residents. Members including Ms Yeo Wan Ling and Ms Joan Pereira raised concerns on how the new PMA rules may affect platform delivery workers. We understand the concern on how the new rules could potentially affect the number of deliveries and thus the earnings of delivery workers. Only workers with mobility needs should use PMAs for their work. Such workers have to abide by the reduced speed limit and dimension limits for everyone's safety. This protects not just other path users but the PMA riders themselves. By going at a slower speed and using devices that are not oversized, they can navigate crowded paths and complete their deliveries safely. They reduce the risks of serious accidents, which would affect their earning stability. I thank Ms Yeo Wan Ling for sharing that the National Delivery Champions Association (NDCA) will provide financial assistance to help riders comply with the new rules. For delivery riders without mobility challenges, PMAs are not the right mode of transport for them.[+1 sentence] They should not misuse PMAs. They can continue their trade by switching to other devices or vehicles before 1 June 2026.[+2 sentences] We had engaged the Digital Platforms Industry Association and the NDCA last year. They expressed support for the new PMA rules, including the six kilometres an hour speed limit, in a joint statement. The platforms have committed to be inclusive in allocating jobs and providing earning opportunities for individuals from diverse backgrounds, including those with mobility challenges who rely on PMAs for their delivery work.[+21 sentences] Ms Gho Sze Kee and Mr Yip Hon Weng also asked about platforms incentivising faster deliveries that may lead to speeding. Platform companies are responsible for ensuring the safety and well-being of their delivery riders. This includes ensuring that their riders using active mobility devices on public paths have adequate third-party liability insurance coverage during the course of their work. We will continue to encourage food delivery platforms, rider associations and industry partners to promote safe riding practices and explore what more can be done to deter errant riding behaviour. LTA and the Traffic Police have also conducted campaigns, such as Be Safe, Be Seen, to promote safer riding habits with Grab, and safety talks and training sessions for delivery riders with foodpanda. Mr David Hoe raised a concern that the reduced speed limit could affect users' ability to travel upslope. Indeed, this was a concern that we had when developing the proposal. So, we spent some time studying the issue. Our studies support the calculations done by Mr Hoe's volunteers – that motorised PMAs will be able to travel upslope along public paths safely with a speed limit of six kilometres per hour. It is the motor power and not the speed that pushes the wheels upslope. Nonetheless, we understand the worries and LTA will improve awareness to reassure PMA users that six kilometres per hour is safe. Ms He Ting Ru asked whether scientific literature was considered for the Active Mobility Advisory Panel's (AMAP's) recommendation of the speed limit reduction. Ms Yeo Wan Ling, Mr Dennis Tan, Mr Fadli Fawzi and Mr Cai Yinzhou raised concerns that the lower speed limit would increase journey times and affect delivery riders' earnings. In accepting the recommendation to lower the speed limit to six kilometres per hour, our primary consideration was to peg the speed to brisk walking speed since PMAs are a replacement for walking. We acknowledge that the trade-off is that users travel more slowly. This is necessary to protect themselves and other path users. So, I thank Mr Foo Cexiang for citing the many jurisdictions internationally that use six kilometres per hour as the speed limit for PMAs based on brisk walking speed. On Ms He Ting Ru's suggestion, AMAP already comprises stakeholders across various interest and professional groups as well as academics. Ms He Ting Ru and Mr Cai Yinzhou asked if users would have sufficient time to comply with the new rules that will come into effect on 1 June 2026. Mr Speaker, it will almost be two years since the proposals were announced in March 2024. We have received strong calls to implement the rules swiftly to improve path safety. Affected stakeholders, including retailers and users, have had time to change to compliant devices before the PMA rules commence on 1 June 2026. But we will provide more time, until 1 January 2029, for existing mobility scooter users to register their devices and change to devices that comply with the new maximum device speed of six kilometres per hour.[+6 sentences] Mr Foo Cexiang and Mr Yip Hon Weng asked about the cost of registration and how mobility scooters can be transferred or sold. Retailers need to register the devices to their business before sale or ensure that the device is registered. Ahead of 1 June 2026, LTA will work with retailers to register their existing stock of compliant mobility scooters. Before the sale of the mobility scooter, retailers will check via OneMotoring website to ensure that the prospective owner is either granted a Certificate of Medical Need or exempted from the requirement. The sale should only be completed upon the successful transfer of ownership. We will be mindful that the cost of registration should be kept affordable so as not to place an undue burden on genuine users. As a comparison, the current cost of registering PABs is $50.[+4 sentences] Dr Hamid Razak suggested markers to visibly identify those with medical need for mobility scooters for ease of enforcement. On the other hand, Mr Foo Cexiang asked if registration and identification marks raised privacy concerns. We appreciate these concerns and we assure Members that the registration and enforcement processes will be handled sensitively. The registration system addresses both concerns. Registration and identification marks will display the device's unique identification number rather than personal details of the owner, similar to e-scooters, where it is a sticker. In addition, as a general rule, only individuals granted a Certificate of Medical Need or exempted from the requirement can register mobility scooters.[+12 sentences] The registration framework will allow families to share a single mobility scooter. Registration is for the mobility scooter to ensure device compliance. It is not an offence to ride a mobility scooter that is registered to another person as long as the user is granted a Certificate of Medical Need or exempted. This is no different from how vehicles can be driven by multiple drivers as long as each driver has a valid driving licence and the vehicle is insured accordingly. Several Members, including Ms Tin Pei Ling, Ms Joan Pereira, Mr Dennis Tan and Mr David Hoe, raised suggestions to strengthen enforcement of the new PMA rules, including expanding the use of cameras, increasing plainclothes operations and action against non-compliant retailers. To enforce the PMA rules, LTA has a comprehensive strategy. Active Mobility Enforcement Officers will patrol public paths and conduct checks on user and device compliance. They will be supported by volunteer Active Mobility Community Ambassadors to enhance engagement efforts. Ms He Ting Ru also expressed concern that enforcement officers will rely on casual visual perception of able-bodiedness. Enforcement officers will be trained to be sensitive in checking for the Certificate of Medical Need. Public tip-offs on errant users are gathered through LTA's website and social media today, as Members, such as Ms Poh Li San, Mr Ng Shi Xuan and Mr Cai Yin Zhou, have suggested. These complement other data sources to identify offence hotspots for targeted enforcement deployments. Closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs) focused on paths are already deployed island-wide to detect and deter offences, such as speeding.[+9 sentences] Some of the CCTVs are deployed permanently while others are deployed on a roving basis to allow us to respond quickly as new hotspots emerge. In addition to ground enforcement, LTA conducts targeted operations against retailers who display or sell non-compliant and unregistered devices or offer illegal modification services. Non-compliant devices are seized and enforcement actions taken against offenders. But we must acknowledge that no matter how many boots we put on the ground, enforcement officers cannot be everywhere, neither is it desirable to foster a culture where correct behaviour is dependent only on enforcement and penalties. It is better to also focus on education and awareness. This is why LTA works with the community through Active Mobility Community Ambassadors to promote awareness of active mobility rules. Members, such as Ms Gho Sze Kee, Ms Sylvia Lim and Ms Valerie Lee, asked about enforcement against unsafe devices. LTA will act on feedback received via official channels and social media, surveillance as well as day-to-day operations. Targeted enforcement checks will also be conducted where e-scooters are commonly used, including areas where such devices may be parked or kept. PMDs verified by LTA as non-UL2272 certified will be seized.[+19 sentences] LTA has the responsibility to enforce against such devices. As Ms Sylvia Lim has acknowledged, LTA already conducts enforcement operations at residential areas to seize non-compliant active mobility devices and will continue to do so, working with our partners. This Bill will allow us to go further. LTA can go beyond seizing the non-compliant device. The individual can also be prosecuted for the offence of keeping the unsafe device. This provides a stronger deterrent against fire hazards. Mr Cai Yinzhou and Ms Poh Li San asked about the disposal process for non-compliant devices. If needed, owners may utilise designated e-waste recyclers or collection drives organised by ALBA in collaboration with Town Councils. I thank Dr Wan Rizal and Ms Tin Pei Ling who expressed support for the new offence of keeping unsafe devices. They urged users to check that their devices meet safety standards and dispose of unsafe devices to keep their communities safe. For PMAs, we may not expect to see a large-scale wave of disposals. To meet the new maximum device speed limit, many existing devices can simply be adjusted. Those who do not qualify for a Certificate of Medical Need can resell their devices, provided they are compliant. Disposal will likely be limited to oversized units or devices that cannot be brought into compliance, such as those with more than one seat, which are considered PMDs, which have their own set of requirements. Beyond the provisions in this Bill, Members have asked about other measures to reduce the fire risks of active mobility devices. I will touch on these briefly as we plan to address some of these issues in a subsequent Bill later this year. Dr Hamid Razak asked for national guidelines for safe charging. Mr Cai Yinzhou suggested periodic inspections for PMAs in the absence of a mandated safety standard. While we continue to monitor the development of international standards for PMAs, LTA and the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) will remind the public of safe charging and usage practices when using motorised active mobility devices and against using modified second-hand devices and non-original parts. Today, periodic inspections are required for e-scooters to check that they remain compliant with the UL2272 standard and have not been illegally modified.[+4 sentences] The benefits of mandating periodic inspections for PMAs solely to check dimensions and speed limits must be weighed against the burden on users. Dr Choo Pei Ling and Mr Cai Yinzhou asked how online marketplaces can take responsibility to eliminate unsafe and non-compliant devices. Mr Yip Hon Weng suggested making it an offence for a seller to mislabel a device as compliant. Since we commenced the Active Mobility Act, the sale of active mobility devices and related services are now more common online. LTA actively works with major e-commerce platforms like Carousell, Lazada and Shopee to take down listings of non-compliant devices. We will look at how we can strengthen rules for online sales and advertising in our legislation.[+4 sentences] Mr Speaker, I thank Members for their many suggestions and clarifications raised. Due to time constraints, I have not addressed them all, but we will certainly study the points raised and continue to review how we implement the new laws in the Bill, as well as new measures needed. The proposals before us today represent more than new laws. We want to restore the original purpose of PMAs and ensure that they serve those they were truly intended for and protect all path users at the same time. With the Certificate of Medical Need, we distinguish genuine users from those who misuse mobility scooters.[+11 sentences] Through registration of mobility scooters, we create accountability and ensure users purchase compliant devices. By making it illegal to keep unsafe devices, we keep communities safer. As we conclude this debate, let us return to the fundamental principle that path safety is not merely a regulatory matter. While this Bill covers PMAs and non-UL2272 certified PMDs, it is a collective responsibility by users of all device types and all path users that will define us as a gracious society. Like Ms Valerie Lee, my heart goes out to Mdm Mala who was hit by a PAB rider. I have met her a few times in Tampines where she is a volunteer. But when I visited her in December at her home in Pasir Ris, she was unable to open her mouth. Since then, her husband has been updating me and I am heartened that she is recovering slowly but steadily, and I wish her well. Mr Speaker, the ultimate objective of this Bill is to foster a safe environment where gracious path sharing becomes second-nature, where the PMA user will travel at walking speed on a crowded path and instinctively slow down to give way to other users, where residents dispose of unsafe devices rather than endanger their families and neighbours, and where all path users prioritise mutual respect over rushing to their next destination, even when no enforcement officer is present. It is these actions of the responsible majority that will keep paths safe and inclusive. And all of us can play a part.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Acting Minister Jeffery Siow.
The Acting Minister for Transport (Mr Jeffrey Siow)1070 words
[+9 sentences]Mr Speaker, together with my colleagues at MOT and MHA, I would like to first thank fellow Members for their very thoughtful speeches on this Land Transport and Related Matters Bill over the past two days. There were 24 speeches in total by fellow Members. I confess, my colleagues and I were not expecting this much interest in our Bill. But we are humbled and appreciative, because the speeches reflect how land transport is always top of mind for Singaporeans and there are many stakeholders and many points of view. We have taken in Members’ feedback and suggestions to the best of our ability. Senior Minister of State Sim Ann and Minister of State Baey Yam Keng have addressed the points raised on enforcement and on active mobility. I will round up the debate on points related to ERP 2.0 and other amendments covered in this Bill. For other topics that are not within the scope of this Bill, I would like to invite Members to consider filing Parliamentary Questions at future sessions. Let me start with the comments made by Dr Choo Pei Ling, Ms Valerie Lee and Dr Hamid Razak on the decriminalisation of missed ERP payments. Indeed, most missed ERP payments are due to genuine oversight rather than an intent to avoid payment. This amendment would therefore make the penalties more proportionate to the offence.[+6 sentences] It is, in Dr Hamid’s words, a more mature regulatory approach. Dr Choo asked whether shifting the onus for missed ERP payments to vehicle owners instead of the driver would create complications for shared vehicles. LTA has discussed these changes with fleet operators and taxi operators. Today, vehicle owners are already responsible for obligations and fees such as road tax, so putting the responsibility of missed ERP payments on the owner would be consistent. We expect vehicle owners, such as shared fleet owners to establish their own arrangements with the drivers to recover missed ERP payments, if necessary. Dr Choo, Ms Tin Pei Ling, as well as Mr Melvin Yong also asked about plans for distance-based charging. As I mentioned yesterday, I do not intend to implement distance-based charging immediately.[+25 sentences] I would like the transition to ERP 2.0 to be as smooth as possible. So, it is best to let the situation stabilise and to have motorists get used to the new system before too many parameters, or new ones, are introduced. Distance-based charging is still an option for the future. We have to study this further, as there are many trade-offs involved, as many Members have pointed out. But if we decide to implement distance-based charging, motorists will have ample notice. Our desire to have a smooth transition is also why we are keeping the broad framework for ERP charges for now. I would like to assure Members that ERP rates will continue to be reviewed on a quarterly basis, using ERP 2.0 data, which will now be more accurate and reliable. The infrastructure light nature of ERP 2.0 does mean that we can more easily adjust locations where we can have road pricing. Therefore, we can react more quickly to mitigate traffic congestion at hotspots, including in areas where it may not be physically possible to add an ERP 1.0 gantry today. Mr Dennis Tan asked how we will manage ERP 2.0 data. This is a topic we have discussed before and have also discussed the use of Government data during the last Parliament Sitting, when we passed the Public Sector Governance Act. LTA adheres to all laws and Government-wide standards on data sharing with other agencies and this includes how we will manage ERP 2.0 data. As we have said before, LTA will use vehicle-specific data only for payment, charges and enforcement. And this will include non-payment of ERP charges and cross-border taxi enforcement. To prevent unauthorised access to the data, there are security measures and safeguards in place. For example, the design of the OBU is in line with the Federal Information Processing Standard level 4 security standard with cryptographic security keys. Mr Edward Chia spoke extensively on how ERP 2.0 data can result in smarter traffic management and transport planning. My colleagues at LTA strongly agree. LTA is indeed excited by this possibility, and we will use anonymised and aggregated ERP 2.0 data for traffic management and transport planning purposes For example, we are experimenting with merging or using this data to optimise the traffic light signal system, amongst other use cases that we are exploring. There is certainly great potential to improve traffic management using ERP 2.0 data. As we get better at doing so, it may well be feasible to create more capacity on our roads without taking up more land. Potentially this can allow us to have some future growth in our car population. As we move closer to completing the transition to ERP 2.0, we are also addressing the final technical difficulties preventing some vehicles from installing OBUs. For instance, some electric vehicle models are unable to provide a constant power supply to the OBU. To overcome this, LTA has developed an External Battery Device to allow for the installation of OBUs for these vehicles. Where technical problems cannot be resolved such as old cars on the Classic or Vintage Vehicle schemes, we will exempt them from the requirement to install an OBU.[+9 sentences] Owners of such cars will then have to pay a daily flat fee if they use their vehicles on ERP operational days. Mr Speaker, to conclude, I would like to thank Members once again, especially those from the GPC for Transport for their support and suggestions on this Bill. On safety and enforcement, this House is aligned on the need for deterrence, accountability and proportionality. On active mobility, we want to strike the right balance: to preserve the independence and dignity that PMAs provide for those with genuine needs, but also to act firmly against misuse and dangerous behaviour that puts others in jeopardy. This Bill gives us the stronger tools to do so, and we will implement them with utmost care and consideration. Mr Speaker, this Bill covers a range of different amendments, but it is united by one key principle. Mobility brings opportunity, but it must also come with responsibility. With the support of this House, this Bill will allow us to keep our transportation system safe, inclusive and ready for the future. Sir, I seek to move.
Mr Speaker96 words
[+2 sentences]Clarification for the Minister, the Senior Minister of State and the Minister of State? Excellent. Looks like the round-up speeches by the three officeholders are very comprehensive. .[+1 sentence] (proc text)]
Mr Speaker43 words
[+2 sentences]Order. I propose to take a break now. I suspend the Sitting and will take the Chair at 5.05 pm. Sitting accordingly suspended at 4.43 pm until 5.05 pm.[+1 sentence] Sitting resumed at 5.05 pm.
Clarification by Senior Minister of State for Manpower›Clarification2 turns · 150w
· 0 highlighted
clarification-2837
The Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon)133 words
[+7 sentences]Sir, thank you for your indulgence. Just a quick clarification to the reply given to Mr Pritam Singh earlier. I mentioned that only five workers or more being retrenched will need to notify, but that is wrong. Actually, it is that companies that have more than 10 workers will be required to notify the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) of any retrenchment within five working days. It is not five workers but within five working days. [Please refer to "Data on Companies with More Than 25 Workers Paying Retrenchment Benefits in Line with Tripartite Guidelines", Official Report, 4 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 16, Oral Answers to Questions section.] As long as the company has more than 10 workers, even if one worker gets retrenched, it would need to notify MOM. Thank you, Sir.
Mr Speaker17 words
[+2 sentences]Order. The Clerk will now proceed to read the Order of the Day and Notice of Motion.
The Deputy Leader of the House (Mr Zaqy Mohamad)23 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, on behalf of Leader I move that Sir, I move, "That Parliament do now adjourn."
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Denise Phua.
Ms Denise Phua Lay Peng (Jalan Besar)2068 words
[+4 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for the opportunity to speak on the topic of protecting resident well-being amidst commercial activity. It is a matter close to residents and I believe some of my fellow Parliamentarians in this House. This Adjournment Motion is not not in opposition to commerce, enterprise or progress. Nor is it an attempt to pit residents against businesses. Rather, it seeks to highlight: one, the situations faced by residents arising from commercial activities in their neighbourhoods; and two, how these disamenities may be addressed in a way that preserves both liveability for residents and also sustainability for businesses, especially for responsible business operators who play by the rules.[+23 sentences] I would like to first commend the agencies on the ground: the Housing and Development Board (HDB), the Singapore Police Force (SPF) – especially the Neighbourhood Police Posts and the Licensing Unit, Director Jarrod Pereira and their teams – the National Environment Agency, the Land Transport Authority, the Singapore Land Authority, Town Councils as well as partners such as the People’s Association staff and grassroots volunteers, who work tirelessly to manage disamenities on the ground. Their efforts often involve difficult trade-offs, difficult situations; and I thank them for navigating these with professionalism and care. I also wish to pay tribute to the late Dr Liu Thai Ker, who passed away on 18 January 2026 this year. Often described as the father of urban planning in Singapore, Dr Liu wisely reminded us that cities exist first and foremost to serve the people who live in them, not merely for aesthetics or for economic efficiency. Dr Liu emphasised quality of life, dignity and community well-being as the ultimate goals of urban planning. At the same time, he also recognised that a good city must support livelihoods and enterprise, not suppress them. Singapore’s residential neighbourhoods are meant to be safe and family-friendly environments, homes for our people, while at the same time remaining economically active and inclusive. Hope and reality. Many residents of ours embrace the vision of mixed-use neighbourhoods with shops, cafés and services such as preschools, Active Ageing Centers at their doorsteps. They hope for convenience, vibrancy and a more connected community. Indeed, when done well, such commercial activity adds value, creates jobs and strengthens neighbourhood life. However, when intensity, scale or behaviour crosses certain thresholds, tensions can arise, not because this mixed-use model is flawed, but because the safeguards have not kept pace with lived realities. Residents, of course, are not homogeneous. Some are more sensitive to disturbance than others and can make unreasonable demands. But many other residents recognise that well-run businesses add vibrancy and convenience to residential estates. However, when these commercial activities intensify without adequate planning or safeguards, even these residents experience persistent day-to-day challenges. Challenges such as noise and smell, continuous noise from exhaust fans, amplified music, late-night operations as well as cooking odours from kitchen vents, can travel into common residential areas and upper-floor homes, affecting residents’ rest and living comfort. Challenges such as safety. Residents have also raised concerns about how certain ground-floor businesses operate in close proximity to homes. During my house visits, for example in the Crawford estate, families and seniors shared that visible solicitation activities outside some massage establishments made walking home very uncomfortable. Not just the wives, but also the husbands felt uncomfortable. While some of these premises have since vacated, my residents at Crawford remain anxious about what types of businesses may subsequently replace or occupy these spaces. Many Members will also be familiar with the reported situation at Tanjong Pagar Complex under the hon Member Mr Foo Cexiang. This is a neighbourhood which is frequented by families for enrichment classes and daily necessities. It was reported that recent enforcement actions resulted in the closure of 10 massage and spa establishments offering illicit services, but only after an extended period of uncertainty and disruption for our residents and nearby businesses alike.[+13 sentences] Member Ms Cassandra Lee also had appealed recently for assistance to counter vice activities in licensed massage establishments. Challenges such as congestion and conflict. Finally, increased commercial footfall can lead to congestion and conflicts in shared spaces. Queues, waste disposal issues and competition for parking between residents and patrons can strain hygiene standards and create friction in otherwise peaceful neighbourhoods. When existing safeguards prove insufficient. I want to stress that these challenges that I have mentioned would have been far worse without the dedication of frontline agencies and responsible businesses who make genuine efforts to comply and be good neighbours. Many of these business operators also provide essential services and are even part of our Community Development Council Voucher Scheme. However, despite existing frameworks and good intentions on all sides, some disamenities persist. From conversations with residents, businesses and enforcement agencies, I see four underlying reasons why current safeguards fall short. Reason 1: legislative and regulatory gaps. Take massage establishments as one example. Under the Massage Establishments Exemption Order 2018, premises that provide massage services in full public view are exempted from licensing and any regulatory oversight. They are only required to notify the licensing officer of their name and address before commencing operations. Today, the number of such exempted establishments can run up to 2,000.[+4 sentences] Unlike fully licensed operators, they are not subject to the same operational conditions or compliance requirements. In practice, this regulatory light-touch has allowed a proliferation of outlets that contribute to neighbourhood disamenities, without adequate safeguards for residents or meaningful accountability. Reason 2: siloed and fragmented enforcement. Enforcement responsibilities currently are often divided across agencies: licensing authorities for food, entertainment or massage; building management and estate maintenance; environmental health for noise or odour; and urban planning bodies. The result is that no single agency has sight of the full neighbourhood impact. Issues are addressed sometimes in isolation rather than holistically. This fragmentation not only leads to gaps in enforcement outcomes but also risks inefficient use of public resources as agencies respond piecemeal to symptoms rather than root causes.[+18 sentences] Crucially, the cumulative neighbourhood impact is often insufficiently assessed. Reason 3: insufficient zoning granularity. While zoning controls exist, they tend to operate at a broad, area-based level. They may not adequately account for hyper-local conditions such as the over-concentration of certain commercial activities within a single block or single precinct. It is unclear whether licensing or landlord agencies consistently factor in business clustering effects when such approvals are granted. What may be acceptable in isolation can, when concentrated, significantly erode residential amenities and community well-being. Reason 4: consequences that do not deter poor behaviour. Finally, for some lucrative errant operators, fines or summons are simply treated as a cost of doing business. When penalties do not meaningfully affect business viability or impose operational consequences, there is little incentive for genuine behavioural or structural change. Without credible deterrence, enforcement risks becoming reactive and repetitive, penalising the same offenders without delivering lasting relief to our residents. I want to speak next about a balanced framework of prevention, governance and enforcement. Sir, unless more strategic and intentional measures are put in place, enforcement will continue to be reactive. It is a cat-and-mouse exercise that frustrates residents, burdens agencies and creates uncertainty for businesses. I therefore urge the Government to consider a more integrated framework of prevention, governance, enforcement – one intended to be practical and predictable, not punitive. It gives clarity to businesses upfront, supports early resolution between residents and business operators on the ground, and reserves enforcement for persistent non-compliance. Let me now outline a proposed suite of measures under prevention, governance and enforcement. First, prevention, getting things right early. Proposal 1: clearer use classes. For better zoning granularity, planning categories can be refined to better distinguish between low-impact neighbourhood businesses and higher-impact uses such as late-night food and beverage, massage establishments, bars and karaoke outlets.[+14 sentences] Factors such as operating hours, alcohol service, music amplification, likelihood of late-night congregation and proximity to homes or schools should be taken into account. This gives businesses clear signals upfront and allows planning decisions to better reflect lived reality at the block or precinct level, rather than broad zoning assumptions. Proposal 2: early, structured consultation. For higher-impact uses in residential areas, a simple, structured consultation at the pre-approval stage can help surface risks early. Many of us Members of Parliament have had to assist innocent business operators who unknowingly either signed tenancy agreements assuming licences were transferable or automatic; or they have committed substantial investments before being informed that their proposed use was already under heightened scrutiny or under policy review. A clearly scoped consultation process, similar in nature, in principle to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority's Long-Term Visit Pass consultation framework or checklist helps to clarify regulatory expectations upfront, reduce costly missteps for businesses, minimise future disputes with residents and lower the likelihood of enforcement, appeals, or litigation downstream. Early engagement is pro-business and pro-resident. It improves investment certainty and protects livelihoods for businesses, while also reducing distress for our residents and enforcement burdens for agencies. Proposal 3: closing legislative or regulatory gaps. Existing legislation should be reviewed to ensure that all commercial activities that affect residential amenity are subject to basic, enforceable standards. This is not about over-regulation, but about ensuring that regulatory light-touch does not become a blind spot. I just read in the papers, I am so glad that the Ministry of Home Affairs is currently looking into these gaps. Second, on governance, managing day-to-day realities on the ground. Proposal 4: good neighbour agreements. For higher-impact uses, operators could enter into a simple good neighbour agreement setting out expectations on noise, waste management, crowd control, solicitation behaviour and responsiveness to complaints.[+12 sentences] This provides a practical way to resolve issues early, without immediately resorting to enforcement. Good behaviour should also be recognised. At the community level, some of us already give out Good Neighbour Awards to residents. We should consider extending similar recognition to commercial neighbours who consistently demonstrate responsible behaviour and explore benefits such as greater flexibility in outdoor dining or longer renewal extensions for those with strong compliance records. This reinforces the message that good behaviour is rewarded, not just bad behaviour punished. Proposal 5: better coordination across agencies. Oversight today can be fragmented and siloed. A shared single case view across planning, licensing, environmental health, estate management and public order agencies would allow patterns to be seen earlier, rather than each issue being handled in reaction, in isolation. This improves fairness, reduces duplication and helps agencies act with consistency and institutional memory. My last proposal is related to enforcement – firm, but proportionate enforcement. Proposal 6: a transparent, graduated response. Enforcement should focus on repeated and substantiated non-compliance, not isolated lapses by responsible operators. A transparent, graduated framework would allow consequences to escalate only when problems persist – from tighter conditions or shorter renewal periods, to restrictions on hours or business activities and as a last resort, licence suspension or revocation.[+6 sentences] This approach provides certainty for businesses, protects well-run operators from unfair competition and allows agencies to focus on the small minority that repeatedly undermine neighbourhood liveability. In conclusion, Speaker, at its heart, this Adjournment Motion is not about opposing commerce, nor resisting vibrancy. Shops, cafés, services bring convenience, they bring jobs, they bring life to our estates. Many business operators invest their savings, employ local workers and genuinely want to be good neighbours. We should support, not penalise, these responsible businesses. And we should also not condone residents who are unreasonable. The residents that I and many of my colleagues here speak up for today are not calling for blanket bans or heavy-handed crackdowns. They are asking for something far more modest: clear rules, fair processes, early intervention and proportionate enforcement, so that liveability is not eroded. Done well, the six proposals I suggested in this Adjournment Motion can benefit responsible operators by creating predictability, levelling the playing field and ensuring that those who cut corners do not impose hidden costs on our residents or on their better-run business counterparts nearby. Speaker, a good city is not measured only by how lively it is at night, but by how liveable it remains at home. As Singapore continues to intensify and mix uses more closely, our governance tools must evolve accordingly.[+1 sentence] I look forward to the Government’s favourable consideration of the proposals that I have put up to protect our residents’ well-being while sustaining vibrant, responsible commercial activity in the neighbourhood.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+1 sentence]Senior Minister of State Sun Xueling.
The Senior Minister of State for National Development (Ms Sun Xueling)1282 words
[+21 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank the Member, Ms Denise Phua, for her Adjournment Motion on managing commercial activities in our residential neighbourhoods. Many residents value having shops, eateries and entertainment options close to home, as they bring convenience and vibrancy to daily life. A coffee shop downstairs can mean a quick bite anytime. Supermarkets provide easy access to daily necessities. Nearby entertainment options offer spaces for friends and families to gather and to socialise. These businesses play an important role in serving community needs and often add value to homes. However, I fully agree with the Member that because these activities operate close to homes, they need to be carefully managed to ensure that they remain compatible with residential living. Government agencies therefore work together to plan, regulate and license commercial activities to balance community needs and residents’ well-being. In some cases, such as commercially run shopping malls or privately-owned HDB shops, market forces determine the mix of shops while adhering to regulations. The Member has shared challenges faced by residents arising from noise, smell, hygiene and concerns on safety, caused by commercial activity. She has also proposed some measures with regard to legislative coverage, planning and enforcement. I will share how Government agencies plan, gatekeep and enforce rules for commercial activities to balance the needs of both residents and business operators. I will also respond to her recommendations. First, on planning. URA considers where and what type of businesses can be located, knowing that different businesses can affect residents differently. Most businesses benefit residents and cause little disturbance, like retail shops and medical clinics. URA will continue to plan for such types of commercial activity to better serve residents. There is also demand for other businesses, such as nightlife venues and massage establishments. Most nightlife establishments like bars and karaoke lounges are situated away from residential areas. Nightlife establishments are not allowed in both sold and rental HDB shops. New nightlife establishments are also not allowed within commercial developments integrated with residential units. Responding to the Member’s point to look at local concentration of such outlets, the URA and SPF have identified exclusion areas, including Jalan Besar, where new nightlife or massage establishments are not allowed due to the high concentration of existing outlets and complaints from residents.[+6 sentences] Government agencies will continue to work closely with grassroots advisors to manage local concentration issues and will not hesitate to turf out unsavoury operators who do not adhere to regulations or tenancy conditions. Massage establishments such as sports massage, chiropractor clinics and Traditional Chinese Medicine clinics, if properly regulated, provide wellness services that residents value, which is why they are allowed to operate in the heartlands. That said, HDB imposes planning and trade mix controls on heartland shops to strike a balance between having a vibrant commercial landscape and preserving the residential character of our HDB heartlands. HDB maintains a published list of allowable uses. Any change of use must first obtain HDB’s approval. For massage establishments, HDB sets quotas to regulate their numbers in each estate. Since September 2024, HDB has tightened the quota of licensed massage establishments in HDB estates.[+6 sentences] Beyond determining where businesses can locate, agencies also have approval mechanisms to assess who can operate and under what conditions. Licensing serves as a gatekeeping tool to assess operator suitability and establish operational requirements to manage and to mitigate potential disamenities. Nightlife establishments and massage establishments are regulated by the SPF and the licensing framework ensures that these venues are not misused for vice activities and to minimise law and order concerns. During the licence application process, SPF conducts background checks on applicants, including reviews of their general records for links to errant establishments. I note the Member’s comments on the disamenities caused by open concept massage establishments which are exempted from licensing. Her feedback is very timely. SPF is currently reviewing the massage establishment regulations to ensure that the regulatory regime is updated and fit for purpose.[+14 sentences] Industry consultation will be done in due course. Beyond licensing, agencies use tenancy conditions as an additional lever to mitigate disamenities. For example, food establishments such as coffee shops and small eateries are often located near residential areas to serve residents’ daily needs. For food establishments operating in HDB estates, HDB imposes tenancy conditions to manage potential disamenities. For instance, to minimise noise, HDB requires coffee shops to stop the use of outdoor refreshment areas by 11.00 pm. To control odour issues and to maintain hygiene, coffee shops are required to install appropriate exhaust systems and grease traps, and to implement proper waste management practices. Where new business models with new products and new service offerings emerge to challenge existing regulations and trade mix controls, agencies will review the relevant frameworks to strike a balance between protecting residents from disamenities and preserving business viability and entrepreneurship. Moving on to enforcement, there is no one-size-fits-all approach as it involves real-world operations with multiple stakeholders and varying circumstances. Agencies actively monitor businesses and take calibrated but firm action when issues arise. When repeated issues arise, we trigger tighter conditions and stronger enforcement action using planning, licensing and tenancy levers. I thank the Member for her suggestion on a more coordinated enforcement framework and a single case view. Today, agencies strive to work closely together on enforcement. For example, URA works with agencies to adopt a three-strikes approach to deal with problems. When a business flouts any rules or requirements, they will receive a warning letter. If a business operator gets three warning letters in total, the relevant authorities may cancel their licence or planning permission or refuse to renew it.[+5 sentences] For food establishments operating in HDB estates, HDB takes into account the feedback received by different agencies when assessing tenancy and tenancy renewals. For instance, HDB works with the National Environment Agency when there is feedback on noise and other environmental concerns. HDB also takes into account feedback provided to the SPF regarding law and order concerns. Most operators have been cooperative when HDB steps in to remind them of their tenancy conditions and the feedback received. Where warranted, agencies have taken firm joint enforcement action. For example, following joint raids by SPF and HDB on massage establishments in HDB estates, HDB and SPF worked with sold shop owners to evict close to 40 massage establishment operators in 2025.[+7 sentences] SPF will continue to conduct enforcement checks and ensure public entertainment outlets and massage establishments comply with the rules and regulations and take strict action against errant operators. On the Member's suggestion for structured pre-approval consultation, this is consistent with agencies' broader objective of providing greater clarity and transparency upfront. Today, applicants are provided with information on relevant planning parameters, licensing requirements and tenancy conditions. These set out the types of activities permitted and the operating standards expected. Agencies will continue to look at how to make these information clearer and more transparent upfront for applicants. We also thank the Member for her suggestion regarding Good Neighbour Agreements. We would encourage it at the grassroots level as a way to establish good social norms and community relations between local businesses and residents. Government agencies would rely on legally binding tenancy agreements and/or licenses but will take into account the feedback from the community when considering the amount of outdoor leasing space and rental renewals.[+2 sentences] To conclude, the Government is committed to maintaining liveable neighbourhoods through proper planning, careful gatekeeping and firm enforcement when needed. We want to achieve the best balance for both residents and business operators and we welcome the Member's suggestions to do this even better.
Mr Speaker91 words
Just before all of us go off, Members will be aware that we are approaching the annual Budget Statement and Committee of Supply (COS) Sittings. So, I would like to take this opportunity to inform Members that the online system for submitting your COS cuts is already operational. I would encourage Members to start preparing and submitting your COS cuts from today, using the online system.[+3 sentences] This is to avoid the rush and stress of meeting the closing deadline for cuts. On that note, Order, Order. Adjourned accordingly at 6.49 pm.
Grant to IMF's Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust›Motions19 turns · 8,894w
· 40 highlighted
motion-2838
Mr Deputy Speaker9 words
[+1 sentence]Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry.
The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan)193 words
[+4 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, on behalf of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister in charge of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), I move, "That this Parliament, in accordance with section 6A(2)(d) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act 1966, resolves that the maximum amount of grants that the Monetary Authority of Singapore may give, under a bilateral agreement (or its subsequent variations) to be made by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Singapore) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to support the IMF's Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT) is 21,000,000 Special Drawing Rights, approximately US$28,600,000." Sir, I will be moving a second Motion for a separate grant of SDR 4.48 million, approximately US$6.1 million to the IMF's Trust for the Special Poverty Reduction and Growth Operations for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (PRG-HIPC Trust), to support Sudan's debt relief. Sir, with your permission, I would like to propose that the substantive debate on both of these Motions takes place now, to allow the key considerations to be covered in a single debate. Subsequently, I will move the second Motion separately, in compliance with Parliamentary procedural requirements.
Mr Deputy Speaker12 words
[+1 sentence]Yes, I give my consent to one debate and then two votes.
Mr Alvin Tan1348 words
[+5 sentences]Thank you, Sir. Sir, as part of its mandate to ensure the stability of the international monetary system, the IMF provides financial assistance to countries experiencing balance of payments difficulties. To carry out this important function, the IMF relies on resources provided by member countries, including Singapore. This has allowed the IMF to respond to external shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, by stepping up financing support to member countries. The IMF has been stepping up its financial support for member countries to build resilience in an increasingly fragmented and fragile external environment. Since the pandemic, it has deployed US$1 trillion in global liquidity and reserves through lending and allocation of Special Drawing Rights (SDR).[+22 sentences] Notably, it made the largest SDR allocation of US$650 billion to its member countries in 2021. This SDR allocation was made to enable all members to address the long-term global need for reserves, build confidence and foster resilience of the international economy through a series of disruptive events. As required under the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the US$650 billion SDR general allocation was distributed in proportion to the quota shares of IMF's members and not according to the relative needs of its members. Singapore received 3.73 billion in SDR, notwithstanding that we did not require an augmentation of our resources. The IMF is now calling on members with strong economic fundamentals and ample official foreign reserves to channel some of their SDR to various IMF trusts and programmes to support more vulnerable IMF members. The amounts that Singapore has been asked to contribute are in line with Singapore's quota share at the IMF and a relatively small portion of the 3.7 billion SDR we received from the IMF in 2021. Singapore will also be providing these contributions as part of broader, multilateral effort to support IMF's capacity to assist vulnerable, low-income countries. Sir, the Bretton Woods Agreements Act enables the MAS to make grants through the IMF as part of international efforts to assist countries in need. This is subject to four conditions. First, the IMF requests Singapore to assist in support of a fund programme for the benefit of one or more countries. The PRGT and PRG-HIPC Trust are such fund programmes. Second, at least one other member country has provided or intends to provide similar financial assistance. This condition has been fulfilled, with a good representation of member countries pledging support or already contributing to the two programmes. Third, MAS publicly discloses key information about the financial assistance via a Gazette publication. Fourth, Parliament fixes by resolution the maximum amount of the grants. I will now explain the specific context and considerations for the two grants. First, Singapore's grant contribution to the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT). The PRGT supports the IMF's concessional lending to low-income countries. It plays a central role in debt resolution for distressed countries and provided emergency support to many low-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The IMF's annual lending commitments increased five-fold compared to the pre-pandemic period to 5.5 billion SDR per annum during 2020 to 2023. This surge in lending during the pandemic, coupled with the sustained high financing needs post-pandemic, driven by tighter financial conditions and rising food prices, have placed significant strain on the PRGT's finances. The IMF is hence seeking voluntary contributions from economically stronger member countries to support the PRGT's longer-term financial sustainability. The IMF has requested that Singapore provide a contribution of 21 million SDR, equivalent to US$28.6 million.[+12 sentences] Sir, Singapore's contribution will be part of a broader multilateral effort, with 45 member countries, including the United States (US), having also pledged to contribute to the PRGT. The quantum of our proposed contribution to the PRGT is commensurate with our quota share at the IMF, which stands at 0.82% today. Next, Singapore's grant contribution to the PRG-HIPC Trust to support Sudan's debt relief. Let me first provide some background on the broader PRG-HIPC Trust. The IMF and World Bank launched the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative in 1996. It is to ensure that no poor country faces an unmanageable debt burden. To be eligible for the HIPC Initiative, countries need to meet certain criteria and also to commit to policy changes to reduce poverty, and then demonstrate a record of doing so. In 2005, the HIPC Initiative was supplemented by the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative. This allows countries to receive 100% relief on eligible debts by the IMF, the World Bank and the African Development Fund after demonstrating sustained economic performance, implementing key structural and social reforms and also maintaining macroeconomic stability. IMF financing for the HIPC Initiative comes from bilateral contributions from members and IMF resources, mainly investment income on proceeds from the IMF's gold sales in 1999. However, resources in the PRG-HIPC Trust have been insufficient to finance debt relief to the remaining two HIPC countries with protracted arrears to the IMF – that is, Somalia and Sudan. The IMF has thus initiated separate fundraising efforts to mobilise the resources needed for it to cover its share of debt relief to Somalia and Sudan. In 2021, following Parliament's approval, Singapore contributed SDR 0.68 million, approximately US$0.93 million to Somalia's debt relief.[+6 sentences] There has been no request for further contribution to Somalia. Sir, turning to Sudan. Sudan is amongst the world's poorest countries, with an estimated two thirds of its population living in poverty. Its history is marked by political instability, internal conflict and isolation from the world economy. Following Sudan's efforts to re-engage with the international community in 2020, it met the necessary conditions to begin receiving debt relief under the HIPC Initiative. Completing this process would allow Sudan to regain debt sustainability and help it implement essential reforms to free up resources to tackle poverty and improve the social conditions for its people. For Sudan, the IMF has requested Singapore to contribute 4.48 million SDR, equivalent to approximately US$6.1 million.[+9 sentences] The quantum of our contribution is determined based on our quota share at the IMF. Similar to the PRGT, Singapore’s contribution towards the debt relief for Sudan is part of a broader multilateral effort, with 122 members also having pledged to contribute, including our ASEAN-4 neighbours: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand. Why should Singapore make these contributions to the IMF, considering today’s uncertain global environment? With multilateralism under threat, we should support multilateral institutions such as the IMF to help them to play their role in maintaining the stability of the global system. It is also in Singapore’s interest to do so, because we are a stakeholder in the international community and it is our role to support the IMF. As a small open economy with multiple connections to global markets, Singapore has an interest in supporting initiatives that promote global resilience to crises and to safeguard stability in the global monetary system. Singapore also joins a broader base of other countries in supporting IMF programmes. Sir, the impact of our contributions on our official foreign reserves (OFR) is not significant. As noted earlier, Singapore’s OFR increased by 3.73 billion SDR following IMF’s 2021 SDR allocation. Against this, our contribution to the PRGT will thus draw from Singapore’s allocation of the SDR, resulting in a reduction of MAS’ OFR by a relatively modest 21 million SDR, approximately US$28.6 million. The contribution to the PRG-HIPC Trust will be funded from Singapore’s share of IMF’s existing resources in IMF accounts and will not affect the size of MAS’ OFR.[+4 sentences] The proposed grant amounts are also proportionate to Singapore’s quota share at the IMF and are consistent with Singapore’s standing in the international financial system. Mr Deputy Speaker, MAS has issued a media release on 28 January 2026 to inform the public of its intention to participate in the package of contributions to the IMF, including the grants for which it would seek Parliament’s approval. Following Parliament’s resolution to fix the maximum amount of grants that MAS can allocate to the IMF’s PRGT and PRG-HIPC Trust, MAS will publish in the Gazette key information about the grants. Mr Deputy Speaker, I beg to move.
Mr Deputy Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Saktiandi Supaat.
Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh)1583 words
[+37 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to declare that I work in a foreign bank. Mr Deputy Speaker, the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for Finance, and Trade and Industry Members and I have worked to discuss on these two Motions. Our GPC Members for Finance, and Trade and Industry – Member Victor Lye, Shaun Loh, Ng Shi Xuan and Lee Hong Chuang – come from varied backgrounds including finance and investments, local business and industry. We will be sharing our concerns and clarifications as well as some suggestions on these two Motions. Mr Victor Lye will touch on global stability, prudence and Singapore’s national interest. Member Ng Shi Xuan will focus on careful examination of safeguards, proportionality and accountability in Singapore’s IMF contributions. Mr Lee Hong Chuang aims to provide a strategic, values-based case for multilateral engagement grounded in Singapore’s economic interests. Member Shawn Loh will touch on the longer-term picture of multilateral institutions like the IMF and asking what our strategy would be. Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise in support of both Motions. Singapore has always affirmed that contributing as a responsible member of the international community is in our national interest. Having once been a beneficiary of World Bank financing that supported our early infrastructure development between 1963 and 1975, we recognise that promoting stability, growth and debt sustainability in lower-income and vulnerable economies contributes to a more resilient global system, one that ultimately benefits a small and open economy like Singapore. However, I do have some clarifications and suggestions, which I would put in three main buckets. First, I wonder how much our world view has evolved, or needs to evolve, amidst the changing world order that we see today. The IMF is founded upon the United Nations and Bretton Woods system which has underpinned international economic relations for decades since World War II. On that basis, I am aligned with Minister Ong Ye Kung’s statement when we moved similar Motions in this House back in 2021, that “it is in Singapore's interest to be part of this international community where we work together, where we cooperate, where there are rules, there are norms, there are best practices that hold every country into account to ensure that we live peacefully together in a global village”. However, today we see that old multilateral world order is under threat, if not already consigned to history. Many countries are turning protectionist and focusing on narrow conceptions of national interest. So, the question I have is, do Minister Ong’s words in 2021 still hold true? It has been five years since. Do they still justify our continued contribution of significant amounts to uplift other countries in need? One of the safeguards that Parliament had implemented on our loans and grants to the IMF is that our contribution must be part of a multilateral effort. In the latest round of collective fundraising for the PRGT and for supporting Sudan’s debt relief efforts, how many countries are joining the efforts and who are they? Are there any notable omissions? The increasing fragmentation of the global world order also poses interesting questions for us. Just recently, we have seen news that the US has invited Singapore to join its “Board of Peace” to supervise the next phase of the Gaza peace plan. Commentators have observed that Gaza may just be a pretext for setting up a corporate version of the United Nations, where countries may buy themselves a permanent seat at the table for US$1 billion payable in case within the first year. How will we decide which organisations and international development efforts going forward to support as well? Mr Deputy Speaker, second, we must also carefully assess the sustainability of Singapore’s efforts to contribute to international development efforts. This applies especially when Singapore is asked to contribute monetary resources, in addition to the other specialised capacity building programmes that we run for government officials, representatives of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and other organisations. The Enhanced Technical Assistance Package for the Palestinian Authority is one example of the latter programmes that Singapore provides and has been useful. When countries including Singapore made a round of pledges to the IMF’s PRGT back in 2012, the IMF estimated that these additional resources would be able to sustain the PRGT lending to impoverished countries for two decades. Yet, today we need another injection into the PRGT. Would the PRGT eventually reach an amount that is self-sustaining, or will continual injections be required? In a 2024 IMF policy paper, one of the reasons given for the fundraising need is that there has been a post-COVID-19 surge in requests and demand for financial assistance by countries. Has this post-COVID-19 demand abated? When do we expect it to abate? Or do we expect this to set a new norm for the level of financial assistance expected by developing countries? The present Motions propose that the maximum amount of grants that MAS may give to the PRGT is 21 million SDR, or approximately US$28.6 million. Is this limit inclusive of the previous amount of 14.5 million SDR, approximately US$20 million, that this House passed in a 2016 Motion? More broadly, how have Singapore’s past contributions been utilised and how does our cumulative contribution compare with countries of similar size or income levels?[+5 sentences] Does our support translate into enhanced participation or influence in IMF committees, programme design, or technical assistance priorities? Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, given that these grants are ultimately made through the MAS, I would also like to seek clarification on how such contributions are treated from a reserves-management and balance-sheet perspective. I am aware that Minister of State Alvin Tan has shared some parts of it earlier, but please indulge me in some questions on this front. First, can the Minister of State clarify whether these grants are funded from MAS’ investment income or operating surpluses, and I think Minister of State Alvin Tan has mentioned that they do involve some direct draw, may not involve draw from Singapore’s OFR. This may need further clarification from Minister of State. Second is, how are these contributions accounted for within MAS’ balance sheet and what safeguards are in place to ensure that repeated contributions do not lead to structural erosion over time? Third, at what point, if any, would the cumulative size or frequency of such contributions be considered material from a reserves-management perspective, and does MAS apply internal thresholds or stress scenarios in this regard?[+2 sentences] Finally, can the Minister of State confirm whether these contributions fully comply with our constitutional and statutory framework governing Singapore’s reserves, including the protection of past reserves? Mr Deputy Speaker, in addition, MAS' recent media release on 28 January noted that Singapore will also support the IMF’s Resilience and Sustainability Trust (RST) through a loan arrangement, rather than a grant, which is separate from what is requested from this Motion. But as the RST is designed to provide longer-term financing for climate and structural resilience, can the Minister also clarify whether MAS expects Singapore’s loan exposure under the RST to grow over time and what internal limits or review mechanisms are applied to ensure that such commitments remain consistent with our overall reserves-management framework?[+3 sentences] These clarifications would help assure Singaporeans and Members of this House that while we remain a responsible global citizen, we continue to exercise prudence and discipline in managing our national resources. Third, Mr Deputy Speaker, we must heighten awareness among Singaporeans of our international assistance efforts – what we are doing, why do we do it and how are we doing it. This is especially since not many people would read the Government Gazette, where the Government is required to publish the key information of the assistance provided to the IMF under our Bretton Woods Agreements Act. While MAS would issue media releases for each of our contributions to ensure greater transparency and accountability, I am not sure how effective these media releases would be in reaching ordinary Singaporeans.[+12 sentences] Getting our citizens’ buy-in is important because there may be sentiments that we should help ourselves before helping others. In many other countries, this bitterness at “what could have been” has led to the rise of far-right movements and politics. These ideologies, which encompass xenophobia and identity politics, are deeply divisive and have triggered violence many a times. In this regard, I have a few suggestions. One, can we give more weight to the role of these international organisations and Singapore’s relationship with them in our national education syllabus? Speaking to Singaporeans today, some of them are surprised or unaware that Singapore had actually been a huge beneficiary of World Bank assistance when we were building from Third World to First. Second, we can celebrate these organisations and the work they do in more public roadshows or commemorative events. This is especially since we host many of these international organisations in Singapore, such as the IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute and the IMF Resident Representative Office. Mr Deputy Speaker, today, Singapore is in a privileged position to be able to contribute to help lower-income countries in their development. But beyond contributing financial resources in a prudent manner, we should also consider how Singaporeans can participate in the development and implementation of international assistance programmes on the ground. More and more Singaporeans are in fact interested in making a real difference to our world, as exemplified by Singapore charity Rahmatan Lil Alamin Foundation’s efforts for Gaza. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding the clarifications, I support both Motions.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Assoc Prof Jamus Lim.
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim (Sengkang)858 words
[+3 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, as many in this House are aware, I was for many years an employee at the Bretton Woods Institution, with which these two Motions are associated. I declare, however, that while I maintain personal and professional relationships with staff at the World Bank, as well as a small balance in its retirement fund, I have no ongoing financial interests in the institution. This speech is therefore delivered in my capacity as a Singaporean Parliamentarian. The Motions seek approval for grant support from the IMF's PRGT to the tune of around S$36 million for the trust fund, and a little less than $8 million for Sudan.[+17 sentences] The fund has been engaged in poverty reduction work for several decades now, and while I personally find that this smacks of mission creep, especially relative to its mandate versus the World Bank, I will concede that helping one of the poorest nations on earth need not be limited to the actions of one international agency alone. In previous Motions of this nature, I had argued in favour of transferring some of our additional surplus quota contributions to other countries that are in need, and this Motion is precisely along those lines. For this reason, I support the Motion. My contribution to this debate is threefold. First, I will seek more clarity on the choice of parameters for support; econd, I hope to obtain some additional context for the historical disbursements to the PRGT; and third, I will return to my call for a more institutionalised system for our nation's foreign assistance. My first clarification has to do with the $36 million and $8 million sort. As Minister of State Tan shared, the amount for the PRGT contribution was conveyed by the IMF and as is typical, is consistent with our nation's quota subscription at the institution. The amount for Sudan, under the auspices of the HIPC Initiative, is also presumably a proportional contribution to the total amount of debt relief that the country seeks. Still, I wish to ascertain that this is indeed how these specific amounts will arrive there. Second, I have no doubt that Sudan is in severe need for debt relief, with a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of about $1,250, the country is one of the poorest worldwide. The nation is faced with a debt of close to 2.5 times its annual income and recent analyses strongly suggest that this amount is unsustainable. Still, there are 39 countries listed on the HIPC list. This includes countries that are poorer, such as Afghanistan, Burundi, Malawi, as well as those with equally crushing debt burdens, such as Eritrea. And while all but two countries on the HIPC list have previously enjoyed that relief, Eritrea, like Sudan, have not. I would therefore like to understand the premise behind the selection of Sudan as the beneficiary of this round of relief. Of course, this may well have been recommended by the staff of the Fund, but as donors, I believe that it is incumbent on us to also question the institution's rationale. I am also aware that the amounts constitute maximums, which in principle, may turn out not to be fully assessed. To this end, I note that as of 2025, Singapore's pledges to the PRGT amounted to $1.25 billion.[+1 sentence] However, it is uncertain whether this amount has been fully disbursed. Would the Minister of State clarify the status of the prior pledged amounts, specifically, has part or all of the earlier $1.25 billion been drawn down already, which justifies this additional injection?[+10 sentences] Relatedly, how do the current grants relate to our earlier commitments? After all, $36 million is a minuscule share, just about 3% of the prior $1.25 billion pledge. Why not simply tap on the earlier pool if it has not been paid out in full? Or are the two buckets materially different, insofar as the $1.25 billion was a pledge that could be called on, whereas the present monies are grants that will, for sure, be tapped? Finally, Mr Deputy Speaker, I return to my call first made more than three years ago that our official foreign development assistance be institutionalised. The step would not even entail that much of a budgetary impact. This would simply collect our routine IMF and International Development Association subscriptions but also include a modest budget for a development fund to extend ad hoc aid, especially in the wake of economic crises or natural disasters. To avoid frivolous disbursements, we can roll over annual budget subscriptions that remain unspent with no stipulation to exhaust funds in any given year. Such a move would step away from arbitrary allocations and idiosyncratic motions, and subject such funding to our standard, and in my view, more professional budget scrutiny mechanisms, such as the Public Accounts Committee and the annual report of the Auditor-General. Sir, I previously explained, we have a history of efficiently running public agencies, which has plagued other agencies of this nature elsewhere and if run effectively, it will serve to further enhance our soft power in a global geopolitical environment where such power is in short supply, yet sorely needed.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Ng Shi Xuan.
Mr Ng Shi Xuan (Sembawang)424 words
[+4 sentences]Deputy Speaker, Sir, I support both Motions before the House, relating to grants to the IMF's PRGT and the trust supporting Sudan's debt relief. My remarks focus on how these grants are controlled and what Singapore expects in return. I will make four brief points. Unlike some IMF arrangements that involve lending or reserve assets, these two Motions involve grants, which are not repaid. The amounts are capped, specified and approved by Parliament, which is appropriate.[+5 sentences] But it is still important to be clear that these are direct transfers of public funds, not investments or loans. Can the Government clarify whether grants of this nature are expected to be occasional and case-specific, or whether they are likely to become regular or automatic over time? And what principles are used to keep them limited in size and scope? Second, on whether Singapore is doing more than its fair share. We understand that these grants sit outside domestic spending and do not reduce what Ministries receive through the Budget. Even so, Singaporeans may reasonably ask whether Singapore is giving more than others at a time when many countries are turning inward.[+3 sentences] Despite this narrative, as Minister of State Tan has shared, many countries are still contributing to these IMF trusts. That suggests countries still see value in doing so. But the question is whether Singapore's share is reasonable. Can the Government share how much other countries are contributing to these two trusts and how Singapore's contribution compares with theirs?[+11 sentences] Third, on what changes on the ground and how this is monitored. For the PRGT, and especially for Sudan's debt relief, Singaporeans will want to know what these grants are meant to achieve and whether there are adequate safeguards governing their use. Sudan does not have strong institutions and is embroiled in ongoing conflict. Debt relief may be necessary, but it also carries risks if money is not used properly. Does the governance structure ensure that the money is used where it is most needed? And will contributors receive updates on how the funds are used and what outcomes are achieved? Fourth, on flexibility if Singapore's own budgets come under pressure. While these grants are modest, they are still public funds. It is therefore reasonable to ask what flexibility Singapore has, if fiscal conditions tighten in the future. If Singapore faces tighter budgets, what options do we have to pause, reduce or recover overseas commitments, whether in the form of grants or loans, and how are these decisions made? Sir, I look forward to the Government's response.
Mr Deputy Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Lee Hong Chuang.
Mr Lee Hong Chuang (Jurong East-Bukit Batok)1137 words
[+6 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker. I will begin my speech in Mandarin, followed by English. There is a great philosopher Mencius who once said, "大舍前,齐天下". What it means is, "When successful, help the whole world." It means that once you have strength or prosperity, you should assist others. The underlying philosophy is that prosperity should lead to long-term stability, including for oneself. (In Mandarin): Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the motion to provide grant to IMF's Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT).[+9 sentences] At its core, this motion is not merely about an overseas financial commitment. It is about the kind of global partner Singapore chooses to be in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world. On the surface, this is resource support; at a deeper level, it reflects how we view risks, and how Singapore positions itself in an uncertain environment. I believe that supporting the PRGT is sound in principle, necessary in overall assessment, restrained and measured in the use of public funds and aligns with Singapore's long-standing position of supporting multilateral systems and international cooperation. Singapore is a small, open economy. Our prosperity depends on global stability, open trade and a resilient international financial system. When low-income countries are hit by shocks, whether from pandemics, climate events, debt distress or conflict, the effects do not remain local. They spill across borders through disrupted supply chains, financial volatility and regional instability. These risks can come fast, ultimately affecting jobs, investment and confidence here in Singapore, especially for SMEs. The PRGT plays a critical role by providing timely and concessional financing to vulnerable economies at the onset of crisis.[+16 sentences] This helps countries stabilise their macroeconomic conditions, protect essential social spending and undertake necessary reforms, preventing local crises from escalating into systemic ones. Seen this way, support for the PRGT is not simply aid; it is a form of early risk prevention. Mr Deputy Speaker, some may ask why this support should be channelled through the IMF and the PRGT. The answer lies in the strength of the mechanism. IMF programmes are grounded in rigorous assessment, clear policy conditions and strong monitoring, ensuring that funds are used to restore stability and confidence. Meanwhile, IMF also has ability to mobilise resources quickly and coordinate internationally, an essential capability during cross-border crises. In addressing international balance of payments and financial crises, IMF's expertise enables relevant arrangement can be implemented under stress. The concessional nature of the PRGT allows low-income countries to stabilise their economies without sacrificing people's basic needs. Mr Deputy Speaker, supporting the PRGT is also consistent with Singapore's long-standing commitment to a rules-based multilateral system. As a small state, we understand the value of clear rules. They make things predictable and allow small nations to have space and sense of security in the system. Our approach to international cooperation has always emphasised effectiveness, responsibility and systemic impact. Supporting PRGT reflects those principles. Of course, we must also address domestic concerns. It is understandable that some Singaporeans may ask why we should support efforts overseas when there are domestic needs. There are three points I would like to mention. First, our contribution is measured and controlled, and its impact is amplified through a multilateral framework.[+34 sentences] Second, this is not a zero-sum choice, external stability directly supports Singapore's economic resilience, investment and employment. Third, our own experience shows that external shocks can spread rapidly. Helping others stabilise their economies reduces the spillover risks that could otherwise reach our shores. Mr Deputy Speaker, today, many low-income countries face the combined pressures of high debt, weak growth and limited fiscal space. Without concessional financing, they may be forced into sharp cuts to essential services or disorderly defaults, creating broader financial and social instability. The PRGT is a vital tool to prevent such outcomes and to safeguard international financial stability by helping countries to stabilise their fundamentals at the most difficult times. (In English): Mr Deputy Speaker, in English, please. At its core, this Motion is not merely about an overseas financial commitment. It is about the kind of global partners Singapore choose to be in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world. Singapore is a small, open economy. Our prosperity depends on global stability, open trade and a resilient international financial system. When low-income countries are hit by shocks, whether from pandemic climate events, debt distress or conflict, the effects do not remain local. They spill across borders through disrupted supply chain, financial volatility and regional instability. These risks ultimately affect jobs, investment and confidence here in Singapore. The PRGT plays a critical role by providing timely and concessional financing to vulnerable economics at the onset of crisis. This helps countries stabilise their macroeconomics condition, protect essential social spending and undertaking necessary reforms, preventing local crisis from escalating into systematic ones. Seen this way, support from the PRGT is not simply about aid. It is a form of early risk prevention. Mr Deputy Speaker, some may ask why this support should be channelled through IMF and the PRGT. The answer lies in the strength of the mechanism. IMF programmes are grounded in rigorous assessment, clear policy conditions and strong monitoring, ensuring that funds are used to restore stability and confidence. The IMF also has the expertise and ability to mobilise resources quickly and coordinate internationally, and essential capability during cross-border crisis. Importantly, the concessional nature of the PRGT allowed low-income countries to stabilise their economics without sacrificing basic healthcare, education or social needs. Supporting the PRGT is also consistent with Singapore's long-standing commitment to a rules-based multilateral system. As a small state, we understand the value of clear rules, accountability and predictable frameworks. Our approach to international cooperation has always emphasised effectiveness, responsibility and systematic impact. This contribution reflects those principles. It is understandable that some Singaporeans may ask why we should support efforts overseas when there are domestic needs. There are three points I would like to mention here. First, our contribution is measured and controlled, and its impact is amplified through a multilateral framework. Second, this is not a zero-sum choice. External stability directly supports Singapore's economic resiliency and employment. Third, our own experience show that external shocks can spread rapidly. Helping others stabilise their economy reduces the spillover risks that could otherwise reach our shores. Today, many low-income countries face the combined pressures of high debt, weak growth and limited fiscal space. Without concessional financing, they have to be forced into shortcuts to essential services or disorder defaults, creating broader financial and social instability.[+5 sentences] The PGRT is a vital tool to prevent such outcomes and to safeguard international financial stability. Mr Deputy Speaker, this Motion reflects a long-term strategic judgement rather than a short-term gesture. Like in Mandarin, they say, "共同发展才能长久繁荣". Only through shared development that lasting prosperity can be achieved. For this reason, I support the Motion.
Mr Deputy Speaker15 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Lee, I hope you will get back your voice very soon. Mr Shawn Loh.
Mr Shawn Loh (Jalan Besar)742 words
[+14 sentences]Mr Deputy Speaker, I hope I also do not lose my voice. But I definitely support both Motions. Singapore has long benefited from today’s global order, which was built on multilateral institutions, such as the United Nations, the World Bank and the IMF. It is this global order that has pretty much allowed us to earn our living in the world. Our externally oriented economy can grow faster, and Singaporeans can access opportunities better, when global trade and financial flows increase and when more of such global flows flow through Singapore. This takes place when there are clear rules that countries abide by. It also takes place when more countries around the world experience economic development, financial stability and are plugged into the global economy. It is therefore in our national interest to ensure that the global economic environment remains conducive for Singapore to earn our good living, way into the future. For now, these multilateral institutions help us to do so. As responsible members of the global community, we have been contributing our fair share. I would, however, like to raise three points. First, can the Government track where Singapore’s contributions are used so that we can find ways to deepen economic relations with these countries? This would help both sides enjoy economically stable, win-win relations. And Singaporean companies can also benefit. Second, as noted by my colleague, Mr Saktiandi: although not required for Parliamentary approval, MAS has updated that 746 million of SDR will be loaned to the IMF’s RST. This does not seem like a small sum in both absolute terms and as a proportion of our total SDR on our balance sheet. According to the IMF’s website, only 23 countries have contributed to this trust.[+28 sentences] Coincidentally, it is equivalent to around US$1 billion, the same fee to have a long-term seat on the US’ Board of Peace, although the contribution to IMF’s trust would be a loan, whereas the Board of Peace requires an expense. As a loan, it remains as an asset on MAS’ balance sheet. Can the Government share more about the mechanism of this loan to the IMF and whether there are any risks from this loan? Finally, and most importantly for the long term, I hope the Government can address the bigger question, the elephant in the room. I am not so sure compared to my other Parliamentary colleagues: what should Singapore’s long-term strategy be, given the emergence of a more fragmented world order, divided into more adversarial blocs and driven by self-interest among states? We should not be naive. Countries will always be self-interested. It is almost always “me first”. And blocs will always form and disperse. We have seen this in the Non-Aligned Movement of the 1950s, the formation of BRICS in the 2000s and so on. But in most instances in the past, these blocs were combinations of developing countries and middle powers, attempting to challenge incumbent multilateral institutions and an order underpinned by developed countries, first and foremost among them, the US. But now, things seem different. The challenger is not another bloc of developing countries. It is the US itself, rebalancing its interests vis-à-vis these multilateral institutions. We should therefore expect institutions like the IMF to come under extreme stress. Perhaps, they will even be unable to perform the key, international functions they were set up to do, such as development support or liquidity in times of global crises. Some of our colleagues in the House have assumed that they will continue to do so in the future. I am not so sure. For example, consider the unthinkable. What if some member countries refuse to honour their obligations to supply their currencies as required by the Special Drawing Rights? How should we respond to these new developments based on our own national interest? Should we capitalise on the opportunity to take a larger role in re-shaping existing multilateral institutions? Or should we capitulate and follow the herd of other countries looking out for their own immediate self-interest, potentially re-organising into new blocs? Or should we just carry-on assuming business-as-usual? Mr Speaker, I do not expect the Government to provide a comprehensive answer at this juncture. But I thought to leave these questions as food for thought. Because as the old adage goes, if we do not have a seat at the table, then we might find ourselves on the menu. I support the Motion.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Victor Lye.
Mr Victor Lye (Ang Mo Kio)311 words
[+8 sentences]Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Motions to approve Singapore’s grants to IMF’s PRGT and the PRG-HIPC Trust under the HIPC Initiative. The key point is that, to many Singaporeans, these may sound very foreign and very distant. But they are indeed relevant to us because Singapore is a small, open economy, deeply connected to the global trade, to global markets and global supply chains. The key point is that when fragile economies collapse, the impact does not remain overseas. Such shocks and financial crises can quickly affect prices, jobs and business confidence in Singapore. Therefore, supporting these IMF trust funds is a form of reducing the likelihood of global shocks that would otherwise raise costs for households and businesses in Singapore. That said, I recognise that Singaporeans may have concerns. So, I seek three clarifications. First, I seek to clarify that these grants do not constitute a drawdown of Past Reserves, and they do not trigger the Reserves spending threshold.[+1 sentence] That they are funded from current resources and that no Reserves are being touched. Second, that these contributions do not replace or reduce domestic spending on healthcare, housing, education or cost-of-living for Singaporeans.[+1 sentence] That they are budgeted expenditures alongside and do not compete with our domestic priorities. Third, that these grants are not bilateral transfers to an individual government but are channelled through established IMF trust funds with clear governance, accountability and oversight.[+4 sentences] Mr Speaker, Singapore has long benefited from a stable, rules-based multilateral system. For a highly trade-dependent economy like ours, supporting global financial stability is a matter of national economic interest. At a time when commitment to multilateral rules is understrained globally, supporting well-governed institutions like the IMF is especially important for small states that rely on predictability rather than power. So, for these reasons and with the clarifications I have stated, I support the Motions.
Mr Speaker5 words
[+1 sentence]Minister of State Alvin Tan.
Mr Alvin Tan2129 words
[+16 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank Members for speaking and supporting the two Motions. Members have highlighted the importance for Singapore to contribute to the IMF and to help other vulnerable economies, especially in today’s volatile and fragmented global environment. Let me address some of the questions they have raised in the debate. First, they have asked whether Singapore should continue contributing to the international community in the current global environment. Mr Saktiandi Supaat and Mr Shawn Loh asked about Singapore's strategy in a more fragmented world and our interests as part of the global and international community. I agree with them. We do indeed face a very different global operating context today, with multilateralism under threat amid wars, rising protectionism and intensifying geopolitical tensions. Prime Minister Wong had emphasised that even as multilateralism comes under threat, Singapore must do our part to preserve multilateral frameworks that matter and to lay the foundation for a more stable global order to emerge in the years ahead. Mr Lee Hong Chuang put it well: this Motion concerns not just a financial commitment. It is about the kind of global partner Singapore chooses to be. And it is against this backdrop that Singapore must and will continue to support key multilateral institutions, such as the IMF. As a small city-state with an open economy and a global financial centre, Singapore has a strong interest in the continued stability of the international monetary system, which the IMF plays a principal role in safeguarding. I would also like to add, Mr Speaker, that the IMF's mandate and functions continue to receive broad support from across its 191 member countries, including that of its larger members. Mr Saktiandi also asked how the Government decides which organisations or international efforts to support. The Government assesses each organisation on its merits. Mr Saktiandi and Mr Ng Shi Xuan both asked how Singapore's contributions compare to other countries. Over 40 countries have so far pledged to the PRGT and more than 120 countries have pledged to the PRG-HIPC.[+24 sentences] The US and Japan have pledged to contribute to the PRG-HIPC as well. In our region, other than our ASEAN counterparts, China and Korea have also pledged contributions. Assoc Prof Jamus Lim asked how the amounts are ascertained. Sir, IMF's requests for members' contributions are generally commensurate with countries' respective quota shares. It is a point I made earlier on. These quota shares are determined by a country's relative position in the global economy, using a set of indicators comprising GDP, openness, economic variability and international reserves. Naturally, countries with larger quota shares are expected to contribute more. Assoc Prof Lim also asked whether our earlier contributions had been drawn down. Sir, our past contributions add to the common pool of resources for the PRGT and it is not attributable to individual contributing members. Mr Saktiandi also asked about the PRGT's self-sustainability. The IMF aims for the PRGT to be financially self-sustainable in the long run. In recent years, this has been challenging as overall demand for PRGT funding remained higher compared to demand pre-pandemic. This round of contributions is targeted at getting the PRGT closer to its goal of self-sustainability. The IMF has also approved a comprehensive package of policy reforms and financing measures. These reforms naturally need time to implement and to be assessed for its efficacy. This is to ensure that the PRGT's long-term self-sustainability may be reached. On a related note, Mr Ng Shi Xuan and Mr Saktiandi Supaat asked about future IMF grant requests. IMF's fundraising requests are informed by periodic assessments of the demand for its various facilities and initiatives. This in turn rests on the state of the global economy and the financial system, and the needs of poor and vulnerable members. Singapore last contributed to the IMF in 2016 and 2021, which the Members have alluded to, and these were brought to Parliament for approval. For any further request for financial assistance, MAS will carefully assess on a case-by-case basis the merits of the request and if the requested amount is reasonable. All proposed contributions to the IMF will also be assessed against the conditions under the Bretton Woods Agreements Act. Mr Saktiandi also asked about the financing and reserves implications of the contributions. The proposed limit does not include the previous contribution to the PRGT. The current limit of 21 million SDR that is before Parliament is a separate contribution.[+6 sentences] We previously contributed 14.5 million SDR to the IMF in 2016, following Parliament's approval. On reserves implications, which Members have raised, the proposed amount to the PRGT that will affect our OFR, as I mentioned in my original speech, is negligible relative to the size of MAS' OFR. The amount should be assessed against the backdrop of the 3.73 billion SDR that Singapore was allocated in the IMF's 2021 SDR General Allocation. I also mentioned that earlier. MAS takes into consideration the contribution request relative to the size of MAS' OFR. Our past contributions have not impeded MAS in carrying out its mission of ensuring monetary stability, nor do we foresee the current contributions impacting MAS' mission. Mr Victor Lye and Mr Saktiandi Supaat both asked if the grants will draw on our past Reserves or reduce domestic spending for Singaporeans. This set of contributions does not draw on our past Reserves, nor will it affect or reduce any domestic expenditure for Singaporeans.[+17 sentences] Mr Ng Shi Xuan, Mr Victor Lye and Mr Shawn Loh asked about governance and accountability. The IMF has institutionalised a set of procedures for the use of financing facilities. These involve safeguards, oversight and approvals by the IMF Executive Board, which represents the membership of the IMF. Singapore is represented on the Board through the Southeast Asia Voting Group. The IMF also imposes conditionalities on members' use of its financing facilities, requiring members to put in place appropriate programmes and implement reforms that will improve their macroeconomic conditions. The IMF has also a preferred creditor status and borrowing countries are expected to repay the IMF before other creditors. In addition, IMF regularly updates member countries, including Singapore, on the status and utilisation of our grant contributions. Sir, Assoc Prof Jamus Lim had also asked about the choice of Sudan under the PRG-HIPC initiative over other highly indebted countries. The IMF had provided debt relief to 38 out of the 39 eligible countries that Assoc Prof Lim had mentioned. Of which, Sudan is the last country to be eligible under this initiative. The IMF has a framework for countries to qualify for debt relief under this HIPC initiative. For instance, satisfactory performance under the programmes, implementation of the poverty reduction strategy and key structural reforms. Mr Loh also asked about the mechanism of Singapore's loan to the IMF's RST. This is included in MAS' media release last Wednesday. The RST is an IMF-administered loan-based trust to help low-income and vulnerable middle-income countries build resilience to external shocks and to ensure sustainable growth. It contributes to their longer-term balance of payment stability. After this Trust was established in 2022, the IMF sought contributions from 35 member countries with strong external positions, including Singapore. Last Wednesday, the IMF announced that Singapore will channel 746 million SDR from the 2021 SDR allocation to the RST. We will join 22 other countries in supporting the IMF to meet its initial fundraising target of 33 billion SDR.[+13 sentences] The contributions to the RST are considered loans and other financial assistance under the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, which do not require Parliament's approval. Mr Shawn Loh rightly pointed out that loans will continue to be recognised as assets on MAS' balance sheet and are not expenses – in contrast to the two grants that we are tabling today. Mr Loh also asked about the risks associated with this contribution. When Singapore provides a loan in support of an IMF programme, such as the RST, for the benefit of one or more countries, we are providing the loan to the IMF and entering into an agreement with the IMF. So, we take on the credit risk of the IMF, which is low, instead of the direct credit risk of the countries that the IMF lends to. As I shared earlier, the IMF has formal procedures for the use of its financing facilities, with safeguards and approvals, and conditionalities on members' use. As the IMF enjoys preferred creditor status, loans granted by the IMF must be repaid ahead of all other creditors. The IMF, with the advantage it has from its preferred creditor status and the sizeable reserves it can use to protect its members, has always repaid its own creditors. In addition, member countries' loans to the IMF under the RST are remunerated at the SDR interest rate. To Mr Saktiandi Supaat's question on the loan exposure under the RST, the recent contributions to the RST announced is a once-off. Any future requests will be similarly carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. As I highlighted earlier, our considerations will be based on the merits of the request, whether the amount sought is reasonable and, as Mr Saktiandi Supaat mentioned, the implications for our reserves. Mr Ng also asked about the options Singapore can exercise in the event of budgetary constraints. Singapore's loan agreements with the IMF include a safeguard that the IMF is obliged to immediately repay the loan in the event Singapore has a balance of payments need.[+16 sentences] I also thank Assoc Prof Jamus Lim's support for these Motions and his call for Singapore to do more. He has made this call in previous Sittings. It is in fact the sentiment that many of us share. We want to be a force for good in the world. I think it is heartening that Parliament has expressed that. Indeed, Singapore has benefited from funding provided by the World Bank in the early years of our infrastructural development, which Mr Saktiandi had mentioned earlier on. But even as we want to do good, we need to take a balanced approach. Our resources, as we have articulated many times in this House, are not infinite. Every dollar we commit abroad must be weighed against our needs at home – for our seniors, for our healthcare and our social safety nets. As I shared earlier, our contributions to the IMF are fair in that they are pegged to our quota share and assessed to be reasonable. It does not require Singapore to overextend ourselves even as we do good. Assoc Prof Jamus Lim made a suggestion that he has made previously about institutionalising foreign international assistance. Our approach first looks at what is commensurate with Singapore's resources, and which best leverages our specific strengths. Last year in April 2025, the Prime Minister announced the new unit in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, then called the Development Partnership Unit and now the Development Strategy Unit, to coordinate efforts across Government agencies to strengthen coordination and collaboration and focus on areas where Singapore can make a meaningful impact. We continue to extend capacity building and skills training to developing countries through our Singapore Cooperation Programme (SCP). To date, over 160,000 officials from 180 countries have attended our SCP. In other areas, we have also delivered international aid across the world, such as for Cyclone Ditwah in Sri Lanka last year and most recently, to Gaza. We are also a founding member of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the World Bank. We have used our unique position as a hub to be a force multiplier, hosting multilateral institutions, such as the ADB, the World Bank, the International Energy Agency, and as Mr Saktiandi pointed out earlier, the IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute and the IMF Resident Representative Office.[+7 sentences] In fact, we are doing more, but in a way that is effective, that makes the best use of our strengths and ultimately, that is in Singapore's best interests. Finally, Mr Speaker, Sir, I thank Mr Saktiandi Supaat for his suggestions to better inform Singaporeans of our IMF contributions through national education and also profiling the work of international organisations. We had discussed this particular point in the last debate in this House in 2021, as I have explained in my speech earlier. We will put out additional public communications, such as social media posts and others, on this. In fact, it is indeed important that Singaporeans appreciate, like Members of this House, the external environment we are in today and how that shapes Singapore's stature and posture in supporting and contributing to relevant multilateral initiatives. Mr Speaker, Sir, I believe I have addressed the queries from the Members and I thank Members – Member Jamus Lim and Members of the GPC for Finance and Trade – for their support. Mr Speaker, I beg to move.
Mr Speaker110 words
[+2 sentences]Are there any further clarifications for Minister of State Tan? Looks like there is none. [(proc text) Resolved, "That this Parliament, in accordance with section 6A(2)(d) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act 1966, resolves that the maximum amount of grants that the Monetary Authority of Singapore may give under the bilateral agreement (or its subsequent variations) to be made by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Singapore) with the International Monetary Fund to support the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust, is 21,000,000 Special Drawing Rights (approximately US$28,600,000)." – (proc text)]
Grant to IMF's Trust for Special Poverty Reduction and Growth Operations for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries›Motions3 turns · 249w
· 0 highlighted
motion-2839
Mr Speaker9 words
[+1 sentence]Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry.
The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan)118 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker Sir, on behalf of the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), I move, "That this Parliament, in accordance with section 6A(2)(d) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act 1966, resolves that the maximum amount of grants that the Monetary Authority of Singapore may give under the bilateral agreement (or its subsequent variations) to be made by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Singapore) with the International Monetary Fund to support Sudan's debt relief efforts via the Trust for Special Poverty Reduction and Growth Operations for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries, is 4,480,000 Special Drawing Rights (approximately US$6,100,000)". Mr Speaker, I beg to move.
Mr Speaker122 words
[+2 sentences]As a formality, are there any other Members wish to speak again? No? [(proc text) Resolved, "That this Parliament, in accordance with section 6A(2)(d) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act 1966, resolves that the maximum amount of grants that the Monetary Authority of Singapore may give under the bilateral agreement (or its subsequent variations) to be made by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Singapore) with the International Monetary Fund to support Sudan's debt relief efforts via the Trust for Special Poverty Reduction and Growth Operations for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries, is 4,480,000 Special Drawing Rights (approximately US$6,100,000)." – (proc text)]
Adjournment›Motions1 turns · 22w
· 0 highlighted
motion-2840
Speaker not recorded22 words
[+2 sentences]. (proc text)]
Impact of US Nutrition Policy Shift Towards Whole Foods to Singapore's Dietary Guidelines and Chronic Disease Management Approach›Oral Answers to Questions2 turns · 77w
· 0 highlighted
oral-answer-3998
Mr Yip Hon Weng55 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health in light of the US nutrition policy shift towards whole foods and limiting processed ingredients (a) whether the Ministry is assessing its relevance to Singapore’s dietary guidelines and chronic disease management; and (b) what impact, if any, will this have on current health policies.
The Senior Minister of State for Health (Dr Koh Poh Koon) (for the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health)22 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, this question has been answered in the written answer to Question No 19 at the Parliament Sitting on 3 February 2026.
Simplifying Administrative and Reporting Processes for Deputies Appointed under Mental Capacity Act›Oral Answers to Questions10 turns · 791w
· 11 highlighted
oral-answer-3999
Ms Denise Phua Lay Peng45 words
asked the Minister for Social and Family Development whether the Ministry will review the administrative and reporting framework for deputies appointed under the Mental Capacity Act, with a view to simplifying procedures and easing the compliance burden, while maintaining safeguards for the persons they serve.
The Minister of State for Social and Family Development (Mr Goh Pei Ming) (for t he Minister for Social and Family Development )127 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, under the Mental Capacity Act, Court-appointed deputies must submit an annual report to the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG). This report is an important safeguard against potential abuse as it requires deputies to set out how they have discharged their responsibilities under the Court order, which includes accounting for decisions made on behalf of the mentally incapacitated persons and how they have managed such persons’ property and affairs. The Ministry for Social and Family Development (MSF) has been working to reduce the burden for deputies, including online submission of reports and a built-in finance tracker. OPG organises monthly workshops to guide deputies to fulfil responsibilities and requirements for the annual reports. And for deputies who require help with filing, OPG also provides personalised support.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Phua.
Ms Denise Phua Lay Peng (Jalan Besar)210 words
[+14 sentences]I thank the Minister of State for his response. On the ground, we have heard recurring feedback from families and these are not just families with persons with disabilities, but also with seniors who, for some reason, have lost some of their capacities. My Parliamentary Question arises from all these recurring feedback. There were two sets of issues normally cited. Despite what the Minister of State mentioned that OPG has been doing. The first set is around the difficulties when they apply for deputyship. Usually, many of these families have limited access to knowledge and guidance, they do not even know where to go. Despite a simplified process, it is actually not so simple. Most applicants, especially those who are not so educated or not so proficient in English, do require hands-on guidance. And without it, the process is quite daunting. Also, for deputyship, unlike the Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA), it is more costly and administratively burdensome as well. There are also difficulties after deputyship orders are made. Like the Minister of State mentioned, the annual report; it is not so easy for people to even fill up. Some of my volunteers, including lawyers who help them, find it is not so straightforward for those post deputyship burdens —
Mr Speaker10 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Phua, do you want to ask your supplementary question?
Ms Denise Phua Lay Peng74 words
[+2 sentences]Yes. Also, their banking constraints as well. The banks are not very consistent in supporting these families. So, my supplementary question would be this: would MSF take a lead in setting up a small, maybe inter-agency work group, even including volunteers, to look into these problems that are really faced by the deputies who are family members and try to coordinate the efforts to assist them.[+1 sentence] And then, make the information available for them.
Mr Goh Pei Ming132 words
[+7 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank the Member for her supplementary question. I believe the Member can appreciate that the scope of responsibility required of a deputy is much broader. The Member made comparisons to the LPA process. Indeed, for deputies, they do have to exercise quite a lot more responsibilities and these can vary quite widely depending on what the Court decides upon. Having said so, I acknowledge the comments and feedback from the Member. We thank the Member for the feedback. We welcome that. We regularly and continuously engage key stakeholders, including deputies and prospective deputies, as well as members of the public. We will continuously review how we can improve both the application process and the reporting process, as well as the overall user experience in going through the deputyship journey.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Patrick Tay.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan (Pioneer)174 words
To add on to the Member's point: the resources required to do a deputyship is a couple of thousand dollars, and time and effort.[+1 sentence] It is especially problematic when it comes to having to deal with amounts of those who have lost mental capacity and the amounts may not be a lot of money, but you need it for sustenance or maybe to settle some debts or some payments, particularly of caregivers, relatives, friends, even neighbours. Is there a way to set some threshold where we allow maybe a statutory declaration or something else, rather than a full deputyship, to be able to handle this?[+3 sentences] Because now, increasingly, you have cases of dementia. We may be doing a lot of efforts at LPAs, but there are those who fall outside of it. This is a suggestion for MSF to look at, but can we set some thresholds with banks and financial institutions where we are able to withdraw those monies to pay for simple bills, rather than be in debt which then rolls on?
Mr Goh Pei Ming14 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker, we note the Member's suggestion. We will take a look at it.
Remaining Vacancies in Secondary Schools following DSA Exercise and Affiliated Admissions›Oral Answers to Questions8 turns · 560w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4000
Ms Gho Sze Kee48 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) whether Direct School Admission (DSA) offers reduce the Secondary 1 quota available for students from non-affiliated schools; and (b) whether there have been cases where a secondary school had no remaining slots for students from non-affiliated schools after DSA and affiliation admissions.
The Senior Minister of State for Education (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Education)202 words
Since the 2019 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has required affiliated secondary schools to reserve at least 20% of places of their Secondary 1 cohort for non-affiliated students. This requirement is applied to each posting group, so that our schools remain open to students of different backgrounds. Overall, over the past five years, non-affiliated students have comprised about half of the Secondary 1 cohort of affiliated secondary schools. The total number of Secondary 1 places offered in each school is the sum of planned places offered under the Secondary 1 Posting Exercise and the Direct School Admission (DSA) exercise. While the DSA admissions does not reduce the number of Secondary 1 places available in a school, non-affiliated students admitted via the DSA exercise will be considered as taking up reserved places for non-affiliated students. In the past five years, there have been only two instances where an affiliated secondary school filled all the reserved places for non-affiliated students in one posting group via DSA, and no non-affiliated students were posted for that posting group during the Secondary 1 Posting Exercise. However, non-affiliated students in the other two posting groups were still admitted via the Secondary 1 Posting Exercise.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Gho.
Ms Gho Sze Kee (Mountbatten)76 words
[+3 sentences]Mr Speaker, I think it would be very helpful if schools were to publish the number of DSA offers made this year and the number of affiliated students admitted in the previous year, and also, the incoming cohort size. With these three metrics, I think it would allow parents and students to make better informed choices when deciding which school the students should apply for, for the Secondary 1 admission exercise. Will MOE consider this suggestion?
Dr Janil Puthucheary89 words
[+4 sentences]Mr Speaker, I thank Ms Gho for her suggestion. We will consider it. Perhaps, an opportunity to explain that in deciding whether to publish such details, we would have to consider whether the information would help parents make an informed decision. In other words, does the historical data have low variance and help to predict what will happen next? Or it has a high variance in which case it is not so helpful for the family to make the decision this year.[+1 sentence] But we will certainly study her suggestion.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Assoc Prof Jamus Lim.
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim (Sengkang)91 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, on the matter of affiliation, I wonder if the Senior Minister of State will be willing to share if MOE provides guidelines or imposes stipulations on how wide the differential between an affiliated and non-affiliated student may be. I ask this because I understand the principle behind wanting to encourage affiliated students to attend their given secondary school, but I have seen reports that this difference can be quite wide – as much as 10 points within the given posting group – which seems to undermine this principle of meritocracy.
Dr Janil Puthucheary48 words
[+4 sentences]Sir, I thank Prof Lim for the question. I do not have the data with me. This Parliamentary Question (PQ) that was filed by Ms Gho was about the DSA exercise. I would suggest that he file a PQ on the issue of the affiliation and non-affiliation data.
Managing Public Health and Food Safety Risks with New SAFE Framework›Oral Answers to Questions16 turns · 2,310w
· 14 highlighted
oral-answer-4001
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin51 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) how the new Safety Assurance for Food Establishment (SAFE) framework that will be implemented from 19 January 2026 is expected to address public health risks more effectively; and (b) what metrics does the Government plan to use in order to evaluate this.
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin67 words
asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) how will transparency and authenticity of the food safety grading under the new Safety Assurance for Food Establishment (SAFE) framework be assured, given that physical decals will be replaced by digital disclosures from 19 January 2026 onwards; and (b) how will consumers who are less digitally savvy still be able to easily access the food safety grading information.
Mr Yip Hon Weng66 words
asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment regarding the new Safety Assurance for Food Establishments (SAFE) framework (a) whether the shift to self-regulation and reduction in regular inspections is being driven by manpower constraints; (b) what is the revised inspection frequency; and (c) whether relying on track records risk making the system reactive, where food safety standards may slip unnoticed until a major lapse occurs.
Ms Poh Li San57 words
asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment with the new food grading system announced on 7 January 2026 (a) how will small businesses with limited resources be assisted to meet the additional requirements; and (b) what is the transition duration as well as the resources required by SFA to complete inspections under the new grading system.
The Senior Minister of State for Sustainability and the Environment (Mr Zaqy Mohamad) (for the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment)22 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, may I have your permission to take oral Question Nos 4, 5, 6 and 7 in today's Order Paper, together?
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Please proceed.
Mr Zaqy Mohamad694 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker, these four Parliamentary Questions (PQs) relate to the Safety Assurance for Food Establishments (SAFE) framework. The SAFE framework is a food safety grading system that communicates food establishments’ food safety performance more clearly to consumers, so that they can make informed choices. It is part of the Singapore Food Agency's (SFA’s) science- and risk-based food safety regime, which aims to keep the number of foodborne illness cases related to foodborne outbreaks low. It will be implemented in two phases, with the first phase implemented on 19 January 2026.[+6 sentences] Under the SAFE framework, food establishments fall under two categories, based on their level of food processing or preparation. Category 1 food establishments are those with a larger scale of food processing or preparation, such as food manufacturers, caterers, central kitchens and large restaurants. The majority of food establishments such as hawker stalls, small restaurants and bakeries fall under Category 2. These have a smaller scale of food processing or preparation. Food establishments are graded "A", "B" or "C" based on their food safety track record from SFA’s inspections. They do not have to fulfil any additional requirements, unless they are Category 1 food establishments that wish to attain Grade A. Such establishments will need to implement a Food Safety Management System (FSMS) and appoint an Advanced Food Hygiene Officer (AFHO) to provide better food safety assurance to consumers. Those that commit a major food safety lapse and are convicted in court or suspended after accumulating 12 demerit points from food safety lapses will be downgraded to Grade C, regardless of their existing grade.[+9 sentences] Downgraded establishments will need to build up and maintain good food safety track records, before they can move back to a higher grade. Compared with the annual snapshot assessment under the previous grading regime, the one that we are all very familiar with, the new SAFE framework considers a food establishment’s year-round food safety track record from its history of inspections, including any involvement in food-borne incidents. This encourages food establishments to consistently maintain good food safety practices. SFA will continue to conduct regular inspections of all food establishments under its targeted, data-driven regime. Food establishments with a larger scale of food processing or preparation, as well as those with Grade C, will be inspected more frequently. For small businesses in Category 1 that wish to implement the additional requirements and maintain their Grade A status, government support is available. Individuals who apply for the AFHO training course will receive SkillsFuture Singapore subsidies of up to 70%. Food businesses can send existing staff to be trained. So, there is no need to hire additional staff, you can use existing staff to do this. As for FSMS implementation, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can receive up to 50% support under EnterpriseSG's Enterprise Development Grant to implement and certify their FSMS.[+8 sentences] This grant specifically supports local SMEs for their first-time certification and adoption of standards, and covers qualifying project costs such as consultancy and certification fees for FSMS standards. Ms Nadia Samdin also asked about how the transparency and authenticity of the SAFE grades can be assured with the shift away from physical decals and how less digitally savvy consumers will be able to access information on SAFE grades. Under the previous system, physical decals were updated annually, once a year, following inspections and they may not follow real-time changes. By scanning the QR code on a food establishment’s licence, consumers can be assured of the most up-to-date, real-time and accurate information on the food establishment’s grade and track records. This mitigates the risk of outdated decals being displayed at the premises. Under the Environmental Public Health Act, food establishments must display their licence at a conspicuous and accessible position at their premises. Consumers who are less digitally savvy or without smart devices can request the grade from the stall operator or seek assistance from a fellow diner with a smart device. To better support such consumers, SFA has also partnered with the Infocomm Media Development Authority on the Seniors Go Digital programme to teach seniors on how to use their phone cameras to scan the SAFE QR codes at food establishments.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Nadia Samdin.
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin (Ang Mo Kio)186 words
[+10 sentences]Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the Senior Minister of State as well. I have three follow-up supplementary questions. The first is really on the last point about accessing the food safety grading. While I understand that the new regime will provide more up-to-date grading, I think there is also something about a physical decal making it front-and-centre for consumers to be able to consider. So, will the Ministry consider including a physical decal requirement to be updated as and when the grade may change? My second one is, I had asked about the measurement of the effectiveness of this change in regime. Could the Ministry elaborate whether there will be any outcome-based indicators beyond inspection performance? For example, outbreak severity or recurrence rates that will be checked alongside these compliance indicators? My third and final one is, while SAFE strengthens assurance at the food establishment level, food safety risks can also originate earlier on in the chain – from import to processing to storage and distribution. I hope to understand how SAFE fits within the broader food safety and public health architecture, if possible.
Mr Zaqy Mohamad479 words
[+3 sentences]I thank the Member for her questions. For the first one, for now, I think the critical point is to get the information out in real time. The regime has changed significantly. With the risk-based regime, we are able to now do inspections more frequently for outlets that are found to be of higher risk or who perform poorly.[+19 sentences] The QR code enables us to change the grading as and when one performs poorly or one has improved performance, rather than waiting once a year. But having said that, when you scan the QR code, it is part of the licence that you have to show or display. So, there is a display of the licence and the QR code. A quick show and you can actually see whether it is a Grade A, B or C. So, it is quite clear to whoever who needs to use it. Having said that, nothing stops the outlet from also printing it themselves and pasting it up. But we will not make it compulsory or mandatory for now, but we will see how this goes and we hope that we can educate more to use the new format. The Member's second question on the effectiveness, we will look into this. This is one way in which we also want to measure effectiveness of the system as well. But as it has just been launched and rolled out, give us a bit of time to assess the performance, how the ratings change. Because we do not have enough data now to see how it changes in the new system, so, give us a bit of time. Certainly, one way in which we hope to see is to see improved performances over time. As food and beverage (F&B) outlets find that they are being monitored more in real time, they are more encouraged to keep performance up and keep food safety at a high standard. The third question on whether we are able to trace back, down to the food source. I think we have to take a very risk-based approach. Firstly, we have about 45,000 licensees under this regime, both Category 1 and Category 2; and therefore, it is not possible to track every single one. But certainly, when there is an outbreak or when we think that there is a risk to the system, like I said, we do take a very risk-based approach especially for those who have large volume or large networks, or those have outbreaks or poor performance, and that is where we have to then assess the sources. As part of the FSMS requirement, we will then also take a look at their records that they have to do for safekeeping. But I would also encourage F&B operators and all those licensees to really trace and track, and keep up the standards with the new grading system.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Yip Hon Weng.
Mr Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang)114 words
[+7 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. The new framework is called SAFE. But for many Singaporeans, the real concern is whether it remains safe in practice or becomes unsafe when lapses go unnoticed. A heavy reliance on past track record makes oversight reactive rather than preventive. Could the Senior Minister of State explain what early warning indicators SFA uses to detect deteriorating food safety standards before a serious lapse occurs and how these safeguards protect consumers upstream rather than after harm has been done? And secondly, in addition, what independent verification or audit measurements are in place to ensure that self-reported compliance accurately reflects on-ground practice?
Mr Zaqy Mohamad342 words
[+7 sentences]I thank the Member for his questions. As I shared, our inspection regime adopts a targeted and data-driven approach. This enables us to also track proactively, which basically means, those under the Category 1, for example, larger kitchens, those with poor track records, they will be inspected more proactively. And of course, those who are doing better, we can do less. And therefore, as an overall, we will not have any less inspection than we have today. What we want to do is to be more proactive, take a risk-based approach. With the gradings being monitored in real time, I think that encourages a lot of operators to monitor and ensure that they keep up their safety standards, because they are monitored in real time and whenever they have downgrades, I think there is impact. Government procurement is one good example in which there is a minimum of Grade B in the criteria to be procured under Government contracts.[+2 sentences] So, in some contracts in some Ministries, I also am aware that if the gradings change, they will also review the contracting requirements, the contracting conditions. These are ways in which the Government also sets the standard to ensure and keep our food providers and caterers on their toes. To the Member's second question on audits, for Category 1 and Category 2 classification as an example, there is no self declaration required.[+6 sentences] Technically, the data is based on licensee. So, in terms of audit, most of the data is already with us and we already assure them by licensing. And for grading, I think that comes as part of SFA's inspections. So, when it comes to audits as example, as part of inspections, we will inspect various things, whether it is your sources, whether your AFHO certifications are in place, whether you have a pest-free environment, and so forth. These are things in which our officers will look for which will go into your grading and risk profiling. So, there is data analytics involved, in short, and we will take a risk-based approach.
Mr Speaker7 words
[+2 sentences]Last supplementary question. Ms Poh Li San.
Ms Poh Li San (Sembawang West)115 words
[+4 sentences]Thank you, Speaker and the Senior Minister of State. My supplementary question pertains to those establishments with poor performance, especially now that the decal is not being displayed. These establishments with poor performance would likely expect more frequent inspections and that means there will be disproportionately more resources on SFA's side to keep inspecting these few outlets. In that case, if they consistently do not perform, would SFA consider a safety time-out for these food establishments to protect the interest of consumers, especially if the decal is not even displayed and most people would not take the trouble to check, so how would they know that these are the frequent ones that do not improve?
Mr Zaqy Mohamad101 words
[+2 sentences]I thank the Member for her question. It is certainly a valid concern. For SFA, we have a Point Demerit System. So, the moment that triggers, you will face suspension and therefore, this safeguards public safety, the consumer safety.[+1 sentence] Food safety and hygiene is top priority and top of mind for us. In the case of court conviction as well, suspensions will kick in as well.[+1 sentence] So, rest assured that there are measures under our food safety regulations and the Food Safety and Security Act to ensure that we maintain high food standards here in Singapore and for all our consumers.
Health Insurance Claim Disputes Filed with MAS or FIDReC and Proportion Resolved in Favour of Policyholders›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 930w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4002
Dr Hamid Razak71 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) whether the Ministry has data on how many disputes relating to health insurance claims were filed with MAS or the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (FIDReC) in each of the past three years; (b) what proportion of such disputes were resolved in favour of policyholders; and (c) whether there has been an increase in disputes involving claim rejections, exclusions or post-treatment coverage.
The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan) (for the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance)93 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, I refer the Member to the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS') response to Mr Liang Eng Hwa and Mr Ng Shi Xuan for the Parliament Sitting on 4 November 2025. Over the same three-year period of between 2022 and 2024, the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (FIDReC) completed an average of 246 annual mediation and adjudication claims related to disputes on insurance claim liability and amounts awarded. Of these, an average of 95 were health insurance claims. Independent assessors ruled in favour of the policyholders in 4% of the health insurance claims.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Dr Hamid Razak.
Dr Hamid Razak (West Coast-Jurong West)121 words
[+6 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for the reply. Given the very low percentage of adjudicated claims being in favour of the policyholders, has the Minister of State assessed why this is the case? For example, is this due to clearer policy terms or perhaps there are structural disadvantages that policyholders face? Because there has been ground feedback from healthcare providers that policyholders face delays or rejections, even at the pre-authorisation stage or even post-treatment, due to retrospective interpretations of policy terms. So, I would like to ask if MAS has safeguards in place to ensure that insurance companies adjudicate claims transparently, consistently and do not disadvantage policyholders, especially when there are clear clinical indications for treatment.
Mr Alvin Tan642 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, I thank Dr Hamid Razak for his questions regarding the safeguards for consumers where they potentially face so-called unreasonable rejections of claims and pre-authorisation. The onus is on the insurers themselves to demonstrate that the non-disclosure of the health condition to a question asked in the application form is material to the underwriting outcome before they reject a claim for non-disclosure.[+6 sentences] And both MOH and MAS expect insurers to process these claims fairly, according to the policy terms. MAS will take action against insurers who fail to do so. Consumers who, nonetheless, believe that their claims have been unfairly rejected, should, first, contact their insurers who are required to handle these complaints independently, effectively and promptly. If a satisfactory resolution cannot be reached, consumers may file for mediation and adjudication at FIDReC, which offers independent, partial and low-cost dispute resolution services. But I thought it is also important to put that 4% into context and take a look at the overall denominator. If you look at the numbers in perspective, every year, insurers naturally process and pay out claims in large numbers, large volumes. The numbers of disputes and complaints that eventually end up in FIDReC or MAS, respectively, represent less than 0.01% of all insurance claims. So, if we think about this one out of every 10,000 claims end up as disputes or complaints, which FIDReC or MAS then addresses.[+11 sentences] But the vast majority, 9,999 of these 10,000 are processed and they are paid out. This indicates that for the vast majority of cases, the process works and most people settle their claims without needing any third-party help. But when a case does go into adjudication, as in that 4%, it is usually because it is complex or difficult. Think about our Meet-the-People Session cases, when they come to us, it is already quite complex. But these cases fall into two broad categories, which I thought is important to share with the Member. First is on policy terms. If the adjudicator found that the insurer followed the specific terms and exclusions of the policy, that is one case; and even as the policyholder may disagree with the result. Second is when there is an event of a non-disclosure. And this happens when the policyholder leaves out certain medical history that he thought was not important at the start but actually was. For example, to make it concrete, a person might not mention that he or she has a stomach condition when they apply for an insurance policy, and that if they later try to claim for a stomach-related issue, the adjudicator may rule that the insurer was right to exclude it because the information should have been shared from the start. But while there is only a small number, which the Member mentioned, 4%, that result in an award for policyholder, I wanted to share with the House that there is a silver lining. Because we are seeing that the total number of cases needing adjudication has been dropping over the last few years.[+6 sentences] This indicates that maybe the insurers and consumers are getting better at speaking to one another and resolving issues early through mediation and negotiation, rather than the alternative of letting things escalate. But behind every statistic is a person. And when a claim is rejected, it can be distressing. So, we have designed our system to address these issues to ensure fairness. First, MAS expects insurers to pay legitimate claims promptly. If an insurer falls short of this, MAS will step in and can require them to review the earlier decision or to pay back the consumer. Second, if you cannot agree with your insurer, FIDReC is there.[+1 sentence] It is independent, impartial and low cost. And over 85% of their cases are resolved through mediation or adjudication, and it remains a very effective channel for Singaporeans.
Considerations for Athletes who Peak Later in Sport Excellence Potential and Other Programmes›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 817w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4003
Assoc Prof Kenneth Goh52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth (a) how programmes such as the Sport Excellence Potential (spexPotential) account for sports where athletes peak later, including how long athletes can be supported before reaching senior representation; and (b) how the Ministry ensures such athletes are not disadvantaged by early progression benchmarks.
The Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth (Mr David Neo)412 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, in high performance sports, every sport, and for that matter, every individual, is different, including the ages at which athletes peak their performance, and therefore, at what age and for how long they must be supported. Because our aim is to make sure every athlete fulfils their fullest sporting potential, Sport Singapore’s High Performance Sport Institute (HPSI) designs our support for athletes based on their current performance and assessed potential, rather than solely age. And we do not place a limit on how long athletes can be supported as long as they meet performance and potential criteria.[+2 sentences] Our Sport Excellence (spex) framework provides comprehensive support for athletes across different stages of their sporting journey. It seeks to retain athletes early in the developmental pathway and also, long enough for them to realise their aspirations and achieve their full potential. The spexPotential programme, in particular, provides targeted financial and programmatic support to athletes with the potential to achieve gold medal success at the Southeast Asian Games (SEA Games).[+1 sentence] It bridges our athletes’ journey towards the spexScholarship programme and sporting success at the Asian and world levels. The spexPotential programme also supports athletes based on their developmental stage of their sport’s high performance pathway and it applies to athletes of all ages.[+2 sentences] The framework of spex programmes – spexScholarship, spexPotential and spexCarding – also allows us to calibrate the level of support during various stages of an athlete’s sporting career. This means athletes will be supported throughout their sporting journey, even if their performance fluctuates from time to time. The spex framework also supports late bloomers or athletes who switch sports.[+3 sentences] For example, we would be familiar with Theresa Goh, our Paralympian swimmer. She is also a late bloomer for para shooting. She took up the sport recently and won a gold and a silver at the recent ASEAN Para Games. As a swimmer, she was supported by spexCarding from when she was 14 years old and was awarded the spexScholarship when she was 27 years old. Now as a shooter, she is supported by spexCarding at 38 years old.[+3 sentences] Once again, our aim is really to help every athlete achieve their fullest sporting potential. To do so, we work very closely with our partners, especially the National Sports Associations (NSAs) to develop our athletes. Together, we establish multiple pathways to account for differences in athletes’ development pathways and the characteristics of each sport, so that we can really support all our athletes.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Assoc Prof Goh.
Assoc Prof Kenneth Goh (Nominated Member)257 words
[+8 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the Acting Minister for his response. It is reassuring to know that within our sporting framework, that we are an inclusive system, not just in terms of athletes who are differently abled, but also across different ages as well. I bring up this question, because at the recent SEA Games it was reported that one of the sprinters who won a gold medal was not on the spex programme, despite him having been a former SEA Games medalist, having also competed in the Asian Games and in the Commonwealth Games. And so, my understanding was that these performances, while exemplary and something that we celebrate, fell outside of the window for consideration in awarding the spexScholarships and the spex grants. So, my question to the Acting Minister is whether the Ministry would consider extending the window for consideration of these spex grants, especially in relation to older athletes? And one reason for that is because as older athletes have different and more varied life circumstances. If you are talking about younger athletes, I think their life circumstances are more homogeneous – they go to school and they participate in sport. With older athletes, they work, they take care of family, they have a variety of responsibilities and that takes them off the high performance track. And so, in considering a broader window for these spex grants, I was wondering if that is something the Ministry will consider, to better hang on to our athletes and support them throughout their careers.
Mr David Neo93 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, I thank the Member for the supplementary question. I believe I know the athlete in question and actually, he was supported by our spexCarding programme, and the spexGLOW programme, which allowed him to train full-time for a specific period of time.[+1 sentence] I think to the Member's suggestion, for sure, because our focus is on helping every athlete achieve their fullest potential and therefore, we are definitely open to looking at the wider windows, different data points, but it is all with the view of how do we support our athletes better.
Information for Parents about Preschools' Safety Violations and Enforcement Action Records›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 689w
· 11 highlighted
oral-answer-4004
Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik60 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether ECDA will introduce policy measures to increase transparency about preschools with safety violations and enforcement actions taken; (b) whether parents can access information about preschools' safety records and ECDA's regulatory actions; and (c) what safeguards exist to ensure parents are informed when serious safety violations occur at their children's preschools.
The Minister of State for Social and Family Development (Mr Goh Pei Ming) (for the Minister for Social and Family Development)240 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) takes a serious view towards child safety issues. In cases of a regulatory breaches, ECDA will not hesitate to take firm action against errant operators. This may include revoking the preschool's licence where breaches are severe and systemic, or when the preschool can no longer provide services in a manner that is safe for children. Under the Early Childhood Development Centres Act and Regulations, preschools are also required to notify parents immediately when there is a serious incident or illness that affects their child, and to also report such incidents to ECDA. ECDA has released statements regarding incidents of serious safety violations in preschools and the corresponding enforcement actions taken. However, ECDA does not generally name the preschools, to ensure that the identities of children involved are protected, especially in cases where gag orders are imposed in court proceedings.[+1 sentence] We recognise that parents are concerned about their children's well-being and safety in preschools. Parents can make informed decisions about preschools by considering the centre's licence tenure, which all preschools are required to display at a prominent location that is accessible to the public and which is also available on LifeSG platforms.[+1 sentence] The licence tenure serves as an indication of a centre's quality and performance. For example, a 24-month licence indicates that a centre has met all key licensing requirements, while a six-month licence indicates that the centre has several areas for improvement.
Mr Speaker4 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Muhaimin Abdul Malik.
Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik (Sengkang)84 words
[+4 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. With reference to the 2023 molestation case involving the three victims, ages one to two years old, that are under a gag order imposed by the Courts, I have two supplementary questions. The first question: were the parents of the other unaffected children informed of the safety violations? Question two: while ECDA and the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) have restricted new enrolment into the preschool, were parents of these new children informed of the recent safety violations?
Mr Goh Pei Ming301 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, I thank the Member for the question. I think the question that the Member has raised is specific to the 2023 incident. I do not have the details of the incident and cannot respond to this case.[+1 sentence] I think how ECDA responds to every incident will depend on the context, and what the Court rules and decides on. If it is in the interest of all parents and the public to know about the incident, and the Court has not imposed a gag order, we will make a deliberate decision whether or not to release such information. But in this case, like what the Member has mentioned, there was a gag order and therefore, in such cases, we will typically not share information.[+9 sentences] I want to reiterate the fact that, especially for parents who are concerned about safety, we do note the importance, and that all parents want a safe, nurturing and conducive environment for all our children to grow up in. ECDA's mission is exactly that. We regulate the sector through the Early Childhood Development Centres Act. We have a Code of Practice, which is regularly updated and stipulates the minimum licensing requirements, regulatory requirements to ensure safety and well-being of our children. We cover aspects from safety to health, to nutrition, hygiene, curriculum, incident management, staff deployment, even administrative processes. A most recent addition was the requirement for closed-circuit television to be installed in the centres. I think these are done in consultation with the industry, as well as taking into consideration international best practices. These are what we do to ensure that we have a tight regime and control, to ensure safety in all our preschools. We also come together regularly as a sector to share best practices and also take feedback from all our operators.
Balloting and Placement Data for 2025 Secondary School Posting Exercise›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 520w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4005
Ms Gho Sze Kee62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) how many students were subject to balloting in the 2025 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise; (b) of this number, how many were unsuccessful and consequently considered for their next choice of school despite having met the cut-off points of their higher-order choice; and (c) since 2021, how many students have been similarly unsuccessful in balloting each year.
The Minister for Education (Mr Desmond Lee)200 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, the Secondary 1 Posting Exercise operates on merit, with students achieving a better Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) score receiving priority for their preferred schools. Under the Achievement Levels (AL) scoring system, more students will have identical scores. When two or more students have identical scores and are competing for the last available vacancy at a school, the Ministry of Education (MOE) applies tie-breakers in the following order: the student's citizenship status, then the student's ranking of that school in their choices and finally, computerised balloting if needed. In the 2025 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise, around one in 10 students underwent computerised balloting.[+1 sentence] This has been stable over the last few years. MOE does not track the number of students who were not successful despite meeting the cut-off point for a school, as this number can vary widely for individual schools each year, depending on students' choice. Instead, MOE tracks the percentage of students who were placed in a school amongst their top six choices. Since 2021, more than eight in 10 students were posted to a school within one of their top three choices, and more than nine in 10 to a school within their six choices.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Gho.
Ms Gho Sze Kee (Mountbatten)118 words
[+5 sentences]Mr Speaker, I noted the Senior Minister of State's answer to my earlier Question No 3. I just wanted to be clear. If there is a compression of available places for non-affiliated students because Direct School Admission (DSA) for non-affiliated students do eat into the minimum quota of 20%, as we have just learnt, is this a contributing factor to student who have just met the cut-off point and nevertheless still be balloted out? That is my first question. The second question: would MOE consider setting up a hard quota for non-affiliated and non-DSA admissions? So, this would ensure a meaningful and predictable number of places that remain available to students applying through the Secondary 1 admissions exercise.
Mr Desmond Lee138 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, for the first question, the cut-off point, there are two – one is the historical cut-off point, which is the cut-off point from the last balloting exercise, and then the cut-off point for the current exercise, which is dependent on the number of students applying and their scores, and then you look at the last available student going in, and then you derive that cut-off point. It varies, could be varied by one to two points, depends on each year's exercise. So, in a way, each school's balloting rate depends ultimately on school choices and students' decisions, and DSA numbers and the kinds of students and numbers of students they admit each year. Having said that, it is linked to the Member's second point, and the Ministry will certainly study all of these suggestions and more.
Trend of SingPost's Compliance with Postal Quality of Service Standards and Feedback Received on Service Improvements›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 421w
· 8 highlighted
oral-answer-4006
Ms Hany Soh67 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information over the past three years (a) what has been the trend of Singapore Post Ltd’s (SingPost) compliance with the Postal Quality of Service (QoS) standards set by the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA); (b) whether the IMDA has received feedback for service quality improvement by SingPost; and (c) if so, what are the three highest categories of feedback received.
The Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information (Mr Tan Kiat How) (for the Minister for Digital Development and Information)64 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, SingPost has consistently met the Postal Quality of Service (QoS) standards over the years. Data on this compliance is published on the Infocomm Media Development Authority's (IMDA's) website. In 2025, last year, IMDA received 23 pieces of feedback on postal service quality, all of which were related to misdelivered letters and delays in letter delivery. Similar trends were observed in 2023 and 2024.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Hany Soh.
Ms Hany Soh (Marsiling-Yew Tee)134 words
[+6 sentences]I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. In this regard, I have two supplementary questions. One is pertaining to a recent feedback that I have received from my Woodgrove residents. In fact, it is about misdelivery or missing letters that they were supposed to receive, inviting their children to attend our Woodgrove's Edusave ceremony. This is a rather unfortunate incident and we wondered how does the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) intend to ensure that there is continuous improvement to SingPost's services; bearing in mind, in the Senior Minister of State's earlier reply, it was mentioned that, indeed, some of the feedback has already been brought to the Ministry's attention. The second supplementary question is, can MDDI share about SingPost's QoS standards in comparison with other countries' services standards?
Mr Tan Kiat How153 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, firstly, may I say that I am sorry to hear about that incident at Woodgrove. I know Edusave Awards mean a lot to parents and their children. And hearing this, I will ask my IMDA colleagues to take a look into this particular case.[+2 sentences] Secondly, on the issue of the how we assess SingPost's compliance with the QoS framework, IMDA gets an external, independent assessor to do a simulated letter test on a quarterly basis to determine whether SingPost has met the QoS requirements. And the results are published on IMDA's website. In terms of the comparison of our QoS standards with other countries, in fact, Singapore has one of the most stringent QoS requirements compared to many other countries. For example, in Hong Kong, for Hongkong Post, letters are typically delivered within one to three days. And for many other countries the letters are generally delivered between two and five days.
Including Input from Singaporeans Who Graduated Overseas in Fresh Graduates Employment Data›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 930w
· 8 highlighted
oral-answer-4007
Mr Saktiandi Supaat50 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) whether Singaporeans who graduated overseas were included in the fresh graduate employment data published by the Ministry in September 2025; (b) of these graduates who found employment, how many were underemployed; and (c) how have recent labour market conditions affected these graduates' employment outcomes.
The Minister for Manpower (Dr Tan See Leng)214 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, Sir, the fresh graduate employment figures published by the Ministry in September 2025 covered graduates from the local autonomous universities and did not include Singaporeans who graduated from overseas universities. Based on the internationally recognised measure of time-related underemployment, which refers to part-time workers who prefer full-time employment, the underemployment rate among residents aged 25 to 29 who graduated from overseas universities was 0.8% in 2025. This is about 0.1%, slightly above the 0.7% recorded for graduates from local autonomous universities. Overall, the employment outcomes for graduates aged 25 to 29, remain generally strong for both local autonomous universities and overseas universities graduates, with around nine in 10 employed.[+4 sentences] Even so, graduates from local autonomous universities continue to have slightly more favourable outcomes on balance, and this is reflected in their lower unemployment as well as higher median wages. We will continue to support all of our fresh graduates' entry into the workforce. Students and fresh graduates from our Institutes of Higher Learning (IHLs) can access Education and Career Guidance services within the IHLs. All students and fresh graduates, including those from overseas universities, may also make use of the career matching and coaching services offered by Workforce Singapore (WSG) and the National Trades Union Congress' (NTUC's) Employment and Employability Institute (e2i).
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Saktiandi Supaat.
Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh)143 words
[+8 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have three quick supplementary questions. I thank the Minister for the answers. The first supplementary question is whether the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) intends to publish overseas graduate employment outcomes separately on a regular basis and how the Ministry ensures that these graduates are not systematically under-represented in headline fresh graduate statistics. The second supplementary question is whether existing graduate employment support schemes – I think Minister shared some of the schemes nationally – are adequately calibrated for overseas educated Singaporeans? And whether MOM has observed different placement or wage outcomes, compared to locally educated graduates? The third one is mainly from a sectoral perspective. Whether weaker hiring conditions in certain sectors have disproportionately affected overseas educated graduates, who typically return to Singapore later or maybe earlier in the hiring cycle and separate from the autonomous universities graduates?
Dr Tan See Leng520 words
[+6 sentences]I thank the Member for his supplementary questions. For his first point on publishing more data related to fresh graduates from overseas universities, MOM tracks as well as monitors the employment outcomes of graduates across various types of institutions and these include overseas universities, as well as our local private educational institutions. This is reflected through our comprehensive Labour Force Survey. The key findings from the survey are published in MOM's annual report on Labour Force in Singapore. We will continue to review the data collected and published, because we also want to be able to go sectorally and adopt a more differentiated and develop more precise and laser-focused insights into some of these problem areas. For the second point, with regard to how well some of the overseas graduates are supported, we constantly work with the industry partners, with the advisory chambers and panels, as well as the trade associations and chambers, to calibrate many of our training, reskilling, upskilling policies. What we have seen from last year, which I want to share with Members, from the employment rate in 2025, the local autonomous universities graduates, as well as the overseas universities graduates, employment rate was at above 90%. The differential between overseas universities graduates versus the local autonomous universities graduates is just slightly over 1%.[+7 sentences] If you look at the proportion of those in permanent employment – so we are talking again, juxtaposing the local university graduates versus the overseas university graduates – it is also above 90%. Again, that delta is 1%. So, we do not think that at this particular point in time, that there are issues of concern between the two sets of graduates coming in. And moving forward, we will also be publishing which are the sectors that are still hiring. And we will try to show what the type of jobs graduates are looking for, versus the sectors that are hiring. Very often, it is also about matching the expectations versus what is available. If I may also refer the Member to the Labour Market Advance Release for the fourth quarter in 2025 that we have just released, I believe it was last week. For the entire year, for 2025, the total employment growth, which is about 57,300, was stronger than a year ago, in 2024, which was about 44,500.[+2 sentences] The unemployment rates in December of 2025 were broadly unchanged from a quarter before. And looking ahead, for this particular year, for the first quarter of 2026, business expectations suggest that the labour market will continue to expand, albeit amidst increased hiring caution. Another slight note of optimism, the share of firms expecting to hire in the next three months only edged down slightly – from 44% in September 2025, to 43% in December 2025. But if you compare this at the same time, a larger share of firms expects to raise wages over the same period, rising from 19% to about 26%.[+2 sentences] So, actually, the market, notwithstanding the cautious optimism, does somewhat point to slightly improving business outcomes and continued competition for labour in certain areas. I hope that reassures the Member.
ComCare Applications Rejected Due to Applicants' Non-compliance with Employment Action Plans›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 671w
· 11 highlighted
oral-answer-4008
Mr Kenneth Tiong Boon Kiat61 words
asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) in the past three years, how many ComCare applications were denied citing non-compliance with employment action plans; (b) whether applicants are given the opportunity to provide evidence of their engagement with partner agencies before such denials; and (c) whether the Ministry will ensure applicants are heard before being denied on such grounds.
The Minister of State for Social and Family Development (Mr Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim) (for the Minister for Social and Family Development)163 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, Sir, ComCare Short-to-Medium Term Assistance (SMTA) helps clients with their basic living expenses as they work on improving their financial situation. Our Social Service Office (SSO) officers work closely with clients to develop suitable action plans to achieve this. Clients are informed at the very outset that they must adhere to these action plans. However, should they face genuine difficulties meeting them or if they need more time, the action plans can be reviewed. Based on the household's adherence to action plans and progress towards self-reliance, the amount and duration of the SMTA may be adjusted while ensuring dependants' basic needs are being met. The Ministry for Social and Family Development (MSF) family coaches, who are working with the families, will also get them help from the community, for example, with the provision of milk and diapers, if necessary. We do not track the number of applicants who were not given ComCare because they did not comply with their action plans.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Tiong.
Mr Kenneth Tiong Boon Kiat (Aljunied)158 words
[+9 sentences]Thank you, Speaker. One supplementary question. It has been represented to me – and these are the facts, as I understand them – that a young married constituent with young children, unemployed and living in a rental flat, was denied ComCare because he did not follow up with e2i. But he has WhatsApp records that e2i messaged him on 15 December, asking him if he was still looking for work and he replied "yes" on the same day. He followed up on 24 December, asking about jobs with hours compatible with sending his children to school. And as far as I can tell, e2i did not respond to either messages. The SSO rejection letter arrived before anyone asked him for evidence of his engagement. So, without pre-judging things, my question is, does SSO take e2i's or other employment partner agencies' word, unconditionally, before rejecting an applicant for non-engagement? Is the applicants given a chance to present their side?
Mr Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim287 words
[+2 sentences]Mr Speaker, Sir, I thank the Member for the supplementary question. I will say this: for each family and each applicant, they face various unique circumstances and challenges. For this particular case, SSO is aware and is currently considering the appeal.[+2 sentences] And actually, for this particular family, it is a known family and the family coach has helped the family in other ways as well, including provision of food rations, infant milk powder and diapers. Having said that, this cessation of financial assistance or the tapering off of it, is not something that SSO takes very lightly. SSO reviews it with the help of the Social Assistance Officer (SAO), who has embarked and partnered with the applicant family on the action plan, which would help them to improve their financial situation. And so, the SAO will contact the applicants for an interview and at the stage of assessment of the SMTA, the SAO will also get information from the family coach, from other sources of information as well, to ensure that they look at the entire assistance that is required by the family. And rest assured, for the Member, that every applicant for SMTA will be able to get financial assistance by SSOs and we will look at how to help them meet their basic living needs and also journey with them on this journey for self-reliance so that they can improve their financial situation.[+2 sentences] That is the purpose of the action plan. I ask all Members in this House, if they know of any residents or they know of any applicants, partner with the SSOs so that we can embark on this action plan with them together on the path towards self-reliance, not just financial assistance.
Data on Companies with More Than 25 Workers Paying Retrenchment Benefits in Line with Tripartite Guidelines›Oral Answers to Questions17 turns · 1,872w
· 10 highlighted
oral-answer-4009
Mr Pritam Singh41 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower for each year from 2020 to 2025 for companies with more than 25 workers, how many have paid retrenchment benefits at (i) above and (ii) below the prevailing tripartite guidelines governing retrenchment payouts respectively, to workers.
The Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon) (for the Minister for Manpower)28 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, my reply will also address Question No 46 for written answer, raised by Mr Patrick Tay in today's Order Paper, as the subject matter is similar.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Go ahead.
Dr Koh Poh Koon65 words
Based on Mandatory Retrenchment Notification (MRN) data submitted by companies with 10 or more employees, around nine in 10 eligible employees received retrenchment benefits from 2020 to 2025. Among them, around eight in 10 received retrenchment benefits of at least two weeks’ salary per year of service, in line with the norms stated in the Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment (TAMEM).
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Singh.
Mr Pritam Singh (Aljunied)321 words
[+10 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. Sir, the second half of 2025 saw a raft of reports on retrenchments in Singapore, ranging from foreign and local companies, affecting both professional, managers, executives and technicians (PMET), and rank and file workers. In one case, a unionised company did not inform the Ministry of its intentions, leaving workers in the lurch, while there are reports of another company including a clause in its severance agreement to disentitle workers from retrenchment benefits if they report the retrenchment to the authorities. My first supplementary question is this. Will the Government mandate that all retrenchments by companies, regardless of size, be it more or less than 25 workers, would have to be reported before an exercise is carried out? And second, that a company that includes punitive and unreasonable clauses with respect to retrenchment, like the one I referred to earlier, can at minimum expect to have its Work Pass privileges revoked, in addition to other penalties? My second supplementary question: I note Senior Minister of State's reply and the differentiating factor was companies with 10 or more employees, and my Parliamentary Question covered companies with 25 or more employees. I use the number "25" because the recent Workplace Fairness Act created a differentiated regime based on this number of employees. Companies with more workers were deemed to have more resources to comply, while those with less were exempt, even though they still have to comply with the spirit of the law through the Tripartite Guidelines for Fair Employment Practices. In view of the reply given by the Senior Minister of State, would the Government similarly consider a differentiated guideline on retrenchment benefits, requiring an increase in benefits for companies with more than 25 workers, above the Government's prevailing retrenchment guidelines, rather than having a one-size-fits-all guideline that extends the same recommended retrenchment benefits to companies, both big and small, so that our workers receive equitable retrenchment benefits?
Dr Koh Poh Koon642 words
[+3 sentences]I thank the Member for his three supplementary questions. His first question pertains to whether we can mandate companies of all sizes to notify the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) of retrenchments. I think there is no real right or wrong answer to this, whether it should be companies of a certain size to notify MOM. At this moment, our requirement for mandatory retrenchment is for companies that retrench five or more workers to notify MOM – and not specific to company size per se.[+11 sentences] The reason for this is that we want to understand if a company has a sizeable retrenchment of more than five workers, MOM would want to know and we want to extend early support to these workers who may be losing their jobs. So, notification is not necessarily related to company sizes per se. But to require every single company to notify MOM of just one worker being retrenched, I think that would impose a lot of extra burdens. So, we want to just size it where we can make a meaningful contribution to helping workers who may be in need without imposing excessive legislative demands on companies. On the issue of punitive clauses, I believe there was a Parliamentary Question that was asked about the specific company, and I have addressed it in a previous Parliamentary reply. So, I will not go into further details on this particular instance, on the punitive clauses. The Member can check the answer for that previous Parliamentary reply. His third question is whether companies of different sizes, especially those which have more than 25 workers, can be mandated to give more retrenchment benefits, rather than what he calls a "one-size-fits-all" requirement. I think, when it comes to retrenchment, we must understand that companies retrench workers for various reasons. And the tripartite partners have actually deliberated extensively on whether to make retrenchment benefits mandatory at all, regardless of company sizes – just the idea of a retrenchment benefit being made mandatory. And in fact, to also think about whether we should specify the minimum quantum in legislation. So, the questions of minimum quantum and mandatory retrenchment benefits have been deliberated extensively by the tripartite partners. And we concluded that a balanced approach to protect workers, while at the same time providing businesses flexibility, would achieve better outcomes for both workers and businesses.[+5 sentences] Because there are many reasons why a retrenchment exercise takes place. Imposing strict conditions, such as legally mandating retrenchment benefits, may affect the viability of companies who are already in financial difficulties and put existing employees, other employees who may still be in employment with the company, at risk of also being retrenched, if the company then gets into further financial difficulties by the fact that we mandate a certain requirement for monetary compensation that actually makes it difficult for them to even continue. The second reason, of course, is that mandatory retrenchment benefit may also result in employers becoming more hesitant to offer long-term or permanent contracts to employees. And stipulating a minimum retrenchment benefit quantum in law will likely result in that quantum becoming the norm itself, such that even when companies are able to give more, they may then say, "if this is the only thing that is required by the law, let us just do the minimum as required and not go beyond that". So, this will not benefit workers in situations where the employers are able to pay higher amounts. The tripartite partners agreed on a balanced approach to issue guidelines instead, which stipulate the prevailing norms for retrenchment benefit quantum and as mentioned in my reply, most employees today already receive retrenchment benefits in line with these tripartite guidelines.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Singh.
Mr Pritam Singh152 words
[+7 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. Two quick questions for the Senior Minister of State. The first one is, when was the last time the tripartite partners deliberated on retrenchment benefits and the legislation of retrenchment benefits, or the appropriate amount that ought to be set for these benefits? The second question, I may have not heard the Senior Minister of State accurately at the beginning. My question pertains to companies that pay out retrenchment benefits at the prevailing guidelines and those above the prevailing guidelines. Because that will give us a sense of whether there could be some adverse selection arising from setting one fixed guideline, which then forces companies instead of paying more, they just pay the lowest amount. So, the question is, do we have data on how many companies pay above that guideline and how many companies pay at the prevailing guideline, which was the Parliamentary Question that was asked?
Dr Koh Poh Koon318 words
[+2 sentences]Sir, I refer to my main reply, which said that for companies with 10 or more employees, around nine in 10 eligible employees received retrenchment benefits and among them eight in 10 received retrenchment benefits of at least two weeks' salary per year of service. But I do not have the breakdown of how many among these eight in 10 received more than two weeks per year of service, because the difference also arises from whether this is a company where the employees are unionised. In general, for unionised companies, if they have a collective agreement, the prevailing norm in unionised companies with a collective agreement is one month per year of service.[+5 sentences] So, depending on whether the worker is a union member, whether this company is unionised, workers who were retrenched could get at least two weeks, maybe even more, per year of service. And there are instances in which certain companies actually value their long-term workers who may have been with them for longer and give in excess of a month per year, up to a month and a half, sometimes with a lot more ex gratia as well. So, that is why I said it is a balanced approach, given flexibility to the company and for companies which may have better financial means where the number of workers retrenched are lesser, they could lean forward a lot more and support the workers a lot more. But for companies who are in financial distress, where they have to lay off a large number of workers, they may not have the financial wherewithal to go beyond that two weeks per year of service quantum, and they have to then spread the financial support to a lot more of their workers who are being retrenched. I hope the Member understands where that kind of flexibility afforded to the workers and to the company is important in such instances.
Mr Speaker6 words
[+2 sentences]Okay, last supplementary question. Mr Singh.
Mr Pritam Singh26 words
[+2 sentences]It is not a supplementary question. It is the question that I asked prior, with regard to when was the last time the tripartite partners deliberated.
Mr Speaker5 words
[+1 sentence]Your first supplementary question, yes.
Dr Koh Poh Koon67 words
[+3 sentences]Sir, I am afraid I do not have the detail of the exact date in which we did this review, but I would say TAMEM, I think, there was a recent update, probably just around the period of the COVID-19 crisis. So, I will have to check back on that. But the Member could also maybe check on the website and see when that guideline was revised.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Patrick Tay.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan (Pioneer)64 words
Just one supplementary question for the Senior Minister of State on retrenchment benefits payout. I have noticed anecdotally some multinational companies set retrenchment benefit caps. They are lower than the prescribed benchmark set in TAMEM.[+2 sentences] In that, we have 25 years, but some may have set lower, for example, 12, 15, especially for the PMEs that are affected. Is MOM doing anything about this?
Dr Koh Poh Koon128 words
[+4 sentences]Sir, I think this is something that we will have to continue to engage with companies on, because some of these multinational companies may follow certain norms that they bring over from their operations in other jurisdictions or their home country. But in general, we do encourage our unions to continue to engage with multinationals, and many of them do engage with these multinationals. And through a more interactive understanding between the unions and the companies, we hope to socialise them to the norms that are here. And in general, many of these companies, once they understand the different tripartite environment in which they operate here in Singapore, many of them, over time, will consider moving closer to that kind of norm, especially in a collective agreement setting.
Data on Persons with Autism Spectrum Disorder on Waitlist for Placement at Day Activity Centres›Oral Answers to Questions8 turns · 1,346w
· 12 highlighted
oral-answer-4010
Ms Kuah Boon Theng63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) how many persons with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are currently waitlisted for placement with a Day Activity Centre (DAC); (b) what is the average waitlist time before an applicant with ASD is offered a place at a DAC; and (c) are there any plans to make more DAC places available for persons with ASD.
The Senior Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Social and Family Development (Mr Eric Chua) (for the Minister for Social and Family Development)69 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, there are eight Day Activity Centres (DACs) that specialise in serving clients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); 130 are on the waitlist for placement in these centres and the average waiting time for enrolment is nine months. The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) is ramping up DAC capacity by 500 places to address the demand for DACs, as announced in MSF’s Committee of Supply in 2024.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Kuah.
Ms Kuah Boon Theng (Nominated Member)372 words
[+3 sentences]I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for his answer. I should declare, first of all, that I am a parent with a child with ASD, who would be classified as requiring high support needs. I am grateful for the data that has been supplied. My understanding, though, is that average number or wait time, can vary widely depending on which type of DAC we are referring to. And in some of the larger ones with more facilities, I understand, that the wait time can be up to five years or more.[+7 sentences] Is that correct, may I ask? And really, I have two main supplementary questions. The first is whether there are any concerns that what we see on the waitlist may not really be a true reflection of the actual demand and need for these services. And I say this for two factors: one, parents with ASD children want predictability in terms of the arrangements for their care, the environment that they are in. And sometimes, when they are on the waitlist for too long, they can decide to take the child off the waitlist because the child has gotten used to being kept at home, even though it is not ideal. So, that is one factor. The other factor is that DAC costs for ASD, in particular, are quite high. I know that there were announcements less than two years ago that with the fee caps introduced, families that earn $2,800 or less will have their costs managed. But those who earn more than $2,800 a month can pay up to $1,900.[+3 sentences] So, if you have a family that has a household income of $5,000, they are being asked to commit 40% of the household income to pay for DAC. So, there is a concern that the waitlist does not look so bad because it is not affordable. So, that is the first question. The other question I have is, are there any plans to work and collaborate with private providers of special education for young adults with ASD, to explore if more places can be made available to address the short- to middle-term critical shortage of DAC places and possibly to extend subsidies to help more families afford those fees.
Mr Eric Chua641 words
[+12 sentences]Sir, I thank the Member for her supplementary questions. I think we most certainly look at the issue of capacity, not just in the uni-dimension of number of places alone. We do look at the different disability types, the demand under each category, and also we take an island-wide view of where the availability of these centres are for each of these disability types. It is a more nuanced approach than my main reply would suggest. But at the back-end with MSF and also with SG Enable, we do work very closely with our partners, with our colleagues in SG Enable as well as our social service agencies to understand, drill down to what are the real needs in terms of the heat map around the island. So, rest assured that we are doing a much more nuanced analysis than just capacity alone. With regard to whether we are prepared to work with private providers, the short answer is yes. We are looking at options to see how we can vary the different service models that we are looking at today. I think one of the key principles that I really want to hark back to is to take a step back to see what is our end objective for persons with disabilities, persons who are living with autism. And one of the key objectives is to make sure that they can continue to live in the community with the families for as long as possible. That is to say we want to delay institutionalisation for as long as possible. Hence, that is why in the past few years, we have worked vigorously on various pilots. Pilots like the Enabled Living Programme, the Home Support Programme, which will start in the second half of this year. These provide community living options for persons with disabilities and special needs. And then, there is the Enabling Services Hub (ESH), for which we have set up three across the island now.[+1 sentence] Progressively over the next few years we will be setting up more of these ESHs to make sure that we can provide community connections through the provision of social activities, caregiver support, as well as referral services. Because we are not dealing with a situation where there is a lack of services for persons with disabilities; rather, sometimes is that navigation of this quite complex landscape that is the issue. And also the Enabled Enabling Skills for Life Programme (ESLP) which is fundamentally a new service model that we are looking at which integrates the current DAC, as well as shelter workshop models to provide and equip persons with disabilities for independent living, for community participation, as well as for employability.[+6 sentences] It sounds like there are many pilots and there indeed are. But the end goal is this: that we want our persons with disabilities and special needs, we want them to not just make do in life, but we want them to be able to thrive and flourish. On the related issue of affordability, rest assured that through the inter-agency task force that is currently headed up by Minister of State Goh Pei Ming, we are looking at that deeply in terms of affordability of services, not just the availability of services. And I think I want to close by making a call to our Members of this Chamber, as well as to the larger society, that our vision is for our persons with disabilities to flourish, to thrive and not just to survive in the community. We can be closer to our vision when more in our society can embrace our fellow workers, our fellow students, fellow members of a community. I call upon all Members of this Chamber to be part of this movement so that we can move the needle towards making Singapore a more caring and inclusive society.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Ms Kuah.
Ms Kuah Boon Theng147 words
[+7 sentences]Just a quick further question. I appreciate the Senior Parliamentary Secretary's point about understanding different needs. But the question I raised was actually specifically for those who require high support needs. And although every parent wants to see their child learn to be more independent, the reality is that for those with high support needs, that is the most challenging category, they are going to need a lot more care. And yes, we all want to delay institutionalised care, but the earlier we are able to get them into a DAC where they are stimulated and they are exposed to activities, the better. So, at the end of the day it does come down to capacity and I know that we have a shortage of people willing to work in this area. I do hope that the Ministry will do more to provide more resources for that.
Mr Eric Chua50 words
[+2 sentences]Sir, I thank the Member for her supplementary question. We are in agreement, total agreement. As I mentioned, we will increase DAC spaces by 500 over the next few years by 2030; and we are prepared to ramp up even more if there is an assessed need to do so.
Tracking Food and Beverage Outlet Closures and Common Reasons for Closures›Oral Answers to Questions5 turns · 620w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4011
Mr Saktiandi Supaat63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry (a) whether the Ministry tracks food and beverage outlet closures each year from 2015 to 2025; (b) the breakdown between standalone outlets, local chains and foreign chains; (c) common reasons for closures; and (d) whether measures exist to preserve the unique local area heritage through a mix of food and retail offerings.
The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan) (for the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry)176 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) tracks and publishes information on the formation and cessation of all business entities. The Government does not track the breakdown of cessations between standalone outlets, local chains and foreign chains. The food services sector is highly competitive due to low barriers of entry, high product substitutability and rapidly shifting consumer preferences. Between 2015 and 2025, there has been a net increase of 42% in the number of food and beverages (F&B) entities, with formations outpacing cessations in most years.[+1 sentence] The Government values Singapore's local heritage and takes steps to preserve and sustain it in our F&B landscape. Senior Parliamentary Secretary Dr Syed Harun, shared yesterday about our efforts to support heritage businesses under the Inter-agency Task Force for Heritage Businesses, Traditional Activities and Cultural Life.[+2 sentences] Enterprise Singapore also supports initiatives that protect and enhance local heritage through curated F&B and retail experiences. An example is, of course, New Bahru, a creative cluster that blends heritage conservation with a curated mix of contemporary local F&B and lifestyle businesses.
Mr Speaker3 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Saktiandi Supaat.
Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh)148 words
[+5 sentences]Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would like to thank Minister of State for his answer. I have three supplementary questions. One is for the granular data that the Minister of State mentioned the Government does not collect, whether there is a possibility going forward that there will be the collecting granular data, in particularly in mature heartland estates, so that we can have a feel of the shifts? Second is whether the Ministry has observed whether the closures disproportionately affect independent operators compared with chain outlets and how this may shape the character of neighbourhood centres over time? The last supplementary question is in relation to the independent operators, if they face difficulty, is it possible for SME Centres and maybe the consultants within these SME Centres to be more proactive to help these independent operators before they fold, especially some of those who are heritage independent operators?
Mr Alvin Tan230 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, I thank Mr Saktiandi Supaat for his supplementary questions. We do not track those data, so we will take his suggestion into consideration.[+1 sentence] With regard to the support for many of these independent operators or SMEs, or even heartland shops, I would like to assure the Member that, in fact, in addition to the SME Centres, Enterprise Singapore works very closely with heartland shops as well as SMEs on a variety of programmes. Every year, in Budget 2023, 2024, 2025, we have announced new measures to help SMEs.[+1 sentence] We have also new programmes that help them. Recently, we have the food services productivity report, which allows for SMEs to benchmark themselves with their peers to see what are the best practices, for example. Then, we have the Food X Programme, for example, that enables them to maybe outsource some of the more operationally difficult or expensive parts of their operations.[+3 sentences] And then, we also have a Process Optimisation Programme which helps them to adopt new technology to help to streamline their businesses. At the same time, we work very closely with the trade associations and commerce; for example, the Restaurant Association of Singapore and the Singapore Retailers Association. In fact, I just met them earlier this week to speak about these as well as other issues to help to raise the competitiveness of our SMEs and our heartland merchants.
Proposal to Use Life Expectancy Factor of 83.5 Years When Calculating CPF Savings for Property Purchases›Oral Answers to Questions4 turns · 494w
· 9 highlighted
oral-answer-4012
Mr Foo Cexiang47 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development whether the CPF Board will consider aligning the life expectancy factor with the Department of Statistics Singapore's reported average of 83.5 years when tabulating how much CPF savings can be used to purchase a property, instead of the existing 95 years.
The Minister for National Development (Mr Chee Hong Tat)69 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, our rules on Central Provident Fund (CPF) usage for property purchases are intended to encourage Singaporeans to buy a home for life, which safeguards their housing and retirement adequacy. Under the current Home for Life condition, the remaining lease must cover the youngest owner till at least age 95. So, if we set the requirement at 83.5 years, many seniors would live longer than this average lifespan.
Mr Foo Cexiang (Tanjong Pagar)226 words
[+8 sentences]Thank you, Speaker. I thank the Minister for his response. And I acknowledge that there are many seniors who are living beyond 83.5 years. At the same time, there are also many others who do not live till 83.5. And in my interactions with several of my residents, I have met a couple of categories who are unable to get onto the home ownership journey but who have extenuating circumstances that I think may merit a deeper look into this requirement. The two groups of residents are: one, they are renting on the open market, typically mid-career, hit by some midlife crisis, perhaps career, perhaps marriage. Their incomes are too high to rent Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats, but at the same time they cannot own in the private sector. So, therefore rising rental cost in the private market is a big concern for them. The second category are those who have been renting HDB flats for a long time and they have been making good income, working hard, trying to get out of the rental spiral. However, because of this 95-year-old requirement, they are a couple of years short of a lease tenure of a price that they will be able to afford to own their own HDB flat.[+1 sentence] So, I seek HDB's consideration to review whether we can do something for these categories.
Mr Chee Hong Tat152 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Speaker, I understand where Mr Foo is coming from. And the two groups of residents that he spoke about, I think many of us would have encountered them in our constituencies too. So, certainly I think the Ministry of National Development and HDB will take a look and see what are some of the appropriate ways that we can help these individuals. But I would say that in helping them, we got to be also mindful that we are helping them not just to find a house for the immediate period, but also for a home that can last them for life. And that is why I think this safeguard of ensuring that the remaining lease can last them till at least age 95 is an important one. If there are other ways in which we can help them, I think we are open to reviewing and looking at different possibilities.
Headcount Retention and Technology Transfer for Citizen Workforce of Singapore-based AI Company Recently Acquired by Meta›Oral Answers to Questions6 turns · 569w
· 8 highlighted
oral-answer-4013
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower regarding the recent acquisition of Singapore-based AI start-up Manus (a) what percentage of the company's core workforce comprised Singapore citizens prior to the acquisition; (b) whether the acquisition terms include guarantees for local headcount retention or technology transfer; and (c) how the Ministry ensures that foreign-founded start-ups benefitting from Singapore's business environment facilitate skills transfer to local workers.
The Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon) (for the Minister for Manpower)169 words
[+1 sentence]Sir, the acquisition of Manus is a commercial agreement between parties involved. The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) does not intervene in such acquisition agreements. The Government does not disclose details of the workforce demographics of individual companies in line with confidentiality obligations, and all foreign companies operating in Singapore are expected to comply with Singapore's manpower laws and fair hiring practices. The Economic Development Board (EDB) works closely with foreign companies and startups to facilitate skills transfer, training and capability development for the Singapore workforce, ensuring that Singaporeans benefit from the presence of such companies in our business environment. For example, EDB has rolled out initiatives such as the Enterprise Compute Initiative (ECI) to support skills transfer and capability development. ECI partners major cloud service providers such as Microsoft to help Singapore-based companies build dedicated local AI teams.[+1 sentence] These companies can also tap on reskilling and upskilling support from Workforce Singapore and SkillsFuture Singapore to equip our Singaporeans with the capabilities needed to take on new growth job roles.
Mr Speaker2 words
[+1 sentence]Mr Low.
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre (Non-Constituency Member)157 words
[+8 sentences]Thank you, Speaker. I have three supplementary questions for the Senior Minister of State. Just to set the context, Manus AI is an example of a company that was redomiciled to Singapore from another jurisdiction. The timeline was they were launched in March of last year, moved to Singapore in around the middle of the year and the acquisition was announced in December. So, one cannot help but feel that Singapore's business environment was taken advantage of opportunistically to achieve certain aims and then now, being cast aside. So, my three supplementary questions are: regarding redomiciled companies, are they subject to any targets on hiring Singaporeans? The second follow-up supplementary question: if they are, what timelines are they expected to comply with in order to meet these targets, after redomiciling? And finally, does MOM have any considerations to discourage companies from using Singapore as a flag of convenience, without accruing any benefits to the Singapore labour force?
Dr Koh Poh Koon116 words
[+2 sentences]Thank you, Sir. I am mindful that time is running out, so, I will keep my reply short. In general, we do not treat new, redomiciled or existing companies any differently in terms of hiring practices.[+1 sentence] All companies operating in Singapore ought to comply with Singapore labour laws. Any arrangements that occur as a result of acquisition or restructuring is something that is a commercial arrangement between companies.[+1 sentence] The Government will not intervene in it. But we will make sure that when it comes to hiring or retrenchment, as we have discussed in an earlier Parliamentary Question, the laws will protect the rights of our workers and make sure that they are treated fairly and equitably.
Mr Speaker62 words
[+2 sentences]End of Question Time. Senior Minister of State Koh, I believe you wanted to make a clarification. [Pursuant to Standing Order No 22(3), provided that Members had not asked for questions standing in their names to be postponed to a later Sitting day or withdrawn, written answers to questions not reached by the end of Question Time are reproduced in the Appendix.]
Regulation for Protection of Consumers Affected by Fraudulent Transactions Involving Third-party Payment Platforms›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 276w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21876
Mr Gabriel Lam54 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance whether clearer regulatory guidance can be issued to protect consumers by setting out (i) how liability is determined when fraudulent transactions involve third-party payment platforms such as digital wallets and (ii) whether banks can disclaim responsibility by attributing losses from fraudulent transactions to such platform interfaces.
Mr Gan Kim Yong (for the Prime Minister)222 words
[+8 sentences]Existing regulatory guidelines, such as the E-Payments User Protection Guidelines, set out duties for financial institutions (FIs) that operate bank accounts or issue personal payment accounts containing e-money (e-wallets), which, in turn, govern the responsibility for losses arising from unauthorised transactions. Examples of such duties include imposing a 12-hour cooling off period after a digital token is activated on a device or after a login to an e-wallet account on a new device and sending real-time transaction notification alerts. When fraudulent transactions occur involving several FIs, like a bank and e-wallet provider, customers should report promptly to the involved FIs. The Monetary Authority of Singapore expects each FI to investigate the matter and consider whether its individual obligations were fulfilled and whether customers acted responsibly in the context of their individual account relationships with the FI. An FI may not disclaim responsibility solely by citing the involvement of another FI, and should consider the specific circumstances of each case. Should customers disagree with the outcome of the FI's investigation, they may approach the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (FIDReC) for mediation and adjudication. FIDReC is an independent and impartial institution that provides a low-cost dispute resolution service for FIs and their customers. FIDReC will independently consider all available information and whether each party has fulfilled their responsibilities in determining recourse for customers.
Consumer Risk Assessment for Overseas Fraud Victims and Regulatory Guidelines for System Alert Delays and Consumer Loss Liability›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 250w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21877
Mr Gabriel Lam71 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) whether MAS has assessed the risk to consumers when victims of fraudulent transactions are overseas or are unable to receive SMS alerts on a timely basis; and (b) whether regulatory guidelines can be provided on (i) how banks shall account for such cases and (ii) whether consumers shall bear losses arising from system delays of transaction alerts in circumstances beyond their control.
Mr Gan Kim Yong (for the Prime Minister)179 words
[+9 sentences]The Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS') E-Payments User Protection Guidelines require banks to provide real-time transaction notification alerts by way of SMS, email or in-app notification. Major retail banks generally offer parallel notifications through at least two channels, with in-app and email notifications being the common default channels. Customers currently receiving notifications by SMS can check if they are also receiving notifications via in-app and email notifications. If not, we strongly encourage that customers opt to do so with their banks, so that they have more channels to be kept informed promptly, even when they are overseas. When notified of a scam, banks will look into each case. MAS expects banks to treat customers fairly and they must consider if they have fulfilled their obligations. This would include looking into whether notifications were sent in a timely manner. Each incident involves unique circumstances that banks will have to evaluate carefully. If a scam victim is not satisfied with the bank's determination, he or she has the option of approaching the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre for mediation and adjudication.
Rate of Commercial Viability of RIE-funded Deep Tech Projects and Implementing Outcome-linked Grant Funding Models›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 249w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21878
Mr Kenneth Tiong Boon Kiat51 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what proportion of Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE) funded deep tech projects achieve commercial viability; (b) whether the Ministry has studied Israel's model where innovation grants are repaid only upon commercialisation success; and (c) whether RIE2030 will introduce similar outcome-linked funding mechanisms.
Mr Gan Kim Yong (for the Prime Minister)198 words
[+8 sentences]Investing in deep tech is a complex endeavour that takes years. There is no single or simple metric of commercial viability that applies. The Government uses a range of indicators for Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE)-funded projects, such as Intellectual Property (IP) licensing, capability and knowledge building, growing startups and catalysing private sector investment. For example, in RIE2025, of the corporate laboratories that support partnerships between public researchers and companies to co-develop technologies for industry, about 80% are expected to generate licensing revenue from jointly created IP. Singapore keeps abreast of good practices in deep tech commercialisation from other countries, including Israel. The objectives behind our support schemes and mechanisms for deep tech commercialisation have broad similarities to those of other countries, but the governance and funding structures have been adapted to meet the needs of our RIE ecosystem. We capture value from RIE through various means, including licensing revenue generated when commercial partners license IP from research institutions or returns from equity stakes when startups built around these technologies achieve commercial success. In addition, research collaborations with both global and local industry partners help anchor them in Singapore, thereby contributing to a more dynamic and competitive economy.
Breakdown of Singapore's Foreign Currency Reserves Protected against Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Safeguards to Prevent Excessive Hedging Activity›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 193w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21879
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what proportion of Singapore's Reserves invested in foreign currencies is currently hedged, disaggregated by the five main currencies; (b) how has the average cost of United States-dollar hedges changed over the past five years; and (c) whether there exist internal thresholds beyond which state investment agencies must cease or scale back such hedging activity.
Mr Jeffrey Siow130 words
[+6 sentences]Our investment entities, namely GIC and Temasek, invest their portfolios in accordance with their mandates, with the primary objective of achieving sustainable long-term returns. In doing so, they take a holistic view of portfolio risks, including foreign exchange risk, and will take the necessary measures to mitigate these risks. Market pricing for hedging the United States dollar to the Singapore dollar has increased steadily over the past five years. These costs are one of several factors that our entities consider when managing their portfolio risk exposures. Decisions on such risk mitigation strategies are made by GIC and Temasek in a dynamic manner and may vary across asset classes and market conditions. For commercially and market sensitive reasons, they do not disclose details of their hedging positions or internal risk thresholds.
Data Collection for Household Sector Balance Sheet at Household and Income Decile Levels›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 78w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21880
Mr Cai Yinzhou36 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry whether the Ministry will consider collecting data for the Household Sector Balance Sheet at the household level and disaggregating the data by household income deciles.
Mr Gan Kim Yong42 words
[+2 sentences]In line with international practice, the Singapore Department of Statistics compiles the Household Sector Balance Sheet using aggregated data from firms and institutions. As such, it would not be possible to disaggregate the Household Sector Balance Sheet data by household income deciles.
Strengthening Legislation on Vapes by Extending Classification of Etomidate and Related Analogues as Class C Controlled Drugs›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 93w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21881
Mr Ng Shi Xuan42 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs whether the Ministry plans to extend the classification of etomidate and its analogues as Class C controlled drugs pending the Ministry of Health strengthening existing legislation to deal with vapes.
Mr K Shanmugam51 words
[+2 sentences]The Ministry of Health (MOH) is finalising its proposed legislative amendments and will table it in Parliament within the first half of 2026. The Ministry of Home Affairs will extend the listing of etomidate as a Class C drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act, until MOH's Bill comes into force.
Usage Statistics of AEDs in HDB Towns and Plans for Expansion to Private Developments›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 170w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21882
Mr Pritam Singh54 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) since their installation, how many automated external defibrillators (AEDs) located in Housing and Development Board towns have been used to assist individuals suffering from medical conditions; and (b) whether there are plans to expand the availability of AEDs to private developments.
Mr K Shanmugam116 words
[+5 sentences]The Save-a-Life initiative was launched in August 2015 with the aim of installing one automated external defibrillators (AED) at the lift lobby of every two Housing and Development Board (HDB) blocks across Singapore. By end-2025, over 5,000 AEDs had been deployed under this programme. These AEDs have been used more than 4,500 times. The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) partners with community partners and Residents' Networks on the installation of AEDs in private residential developments, including landed estates and condominiums. SCDF is also working with the Singapore Heart Foundation to maintain a registry for all publicly accessible AEDs, engage businesses to install AEDs on their premises, and encourage registration of these devices on the national registry.
Regulatory Requirements for Commercial Landlords and Enforcement Measures for Premises Conducting Vice Activities›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 163w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21883
Ms Elysa Chen63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) what are the regulatory obligations for landlords of commercial properties to exercise due diligence regarding the nature of businesses operating on their premises; and (b) what enforcement action will the relevant authorities take against landlords when their premises are found to be used for illegal vice or sex trade activities.
Mr K Shanmugam100 words
[+4 sentences]All property owners are expected to exercise due diligence when leasing out their premises to ensure that they comply with the relevant laws and regulations. This includes ensuring that their properties are not used for vice activities. If such premises are found to be used for vice activities, property owners are criminally liable under section 148(4) of the Women's Charter unless they can show that they had no knowledge and could not, with reasonable due diligence, have ascertained the premises were used for vice activities at the point of entering into tenancy agreements. Police will take enforcement action where warranted.
Rationale for Singapore Citizen Minors' Applications for New or Replacement Passports Without Parental Consent›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 138w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21884
Mr Chua Kheng Wee Louis38 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs why Singapore Citizens aged 16 and above and are still considered minors can apply for a new or replacement passport on their own without parental consent.
Mr K Shanmugam100 words
[+2 sentences]The Passports Regulations 2007 requires a passport application to be accompanied by parental consent only when the child is below 16 years of age. The age cut-off is consistent with section 361 of the Penal Code which criminalises kidnapping from lawful guardianship, if a minor below 16 years of age is removed from a lawful guardian without the guardian's consent. This age cut-off seeks to strike a balance between requiring parents to consent (when applicant is below 16) and giving parents the discretion within family arrangements to allow their children to apply for a passport (when aged 16 and above).
Exploitation of Youths Involved in Vaping Offences as Distributors or Intermediaries and Rehabilitation Pathways for First-time Youth Offenders›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 157w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21885
Mr Jackson Lam51 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) whether youths involved in vaping offences are increasingly being exploited as distributors or intermediaries; (b) how such cases are assessed to distinguish users from organised sellers; and (c) what diversion or rehabilitation pathways exist for such first-time youth offenders.
Mr Ong Ye Kung106 words
[+4 sentences]We are not seeing an increasing trend of youth being involved in the supply or sale of e-vaporisers. We impose stiff penalties against supply and sale of e-vaporisers to ensure sufficient deterrence and protect Singaporeans from the harms of e-vaporisers. In the course of investigations, the Health Sciences Authority takes into account several factors, including the quantity and types of illicit products involved, as well as evidence of intent to sell or supply to others, to determine the nature of the offence. Factors, such as their age or number of past offences, will also be taken into consideration by the Courts when determining the appropriate sentences.
Unsubstantiated Complaints Lodged against Healthcare Workers in Last Three Years and Enforcement Measures to Deter Repeat Offenders›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 218w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21888
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim69 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) over the last three years, how many complaints lodged against healthcare workers, including nurses, are found to be frivolous and vexatious after investigations; (b) whether investigations are conducted against such complainants, especially in cases where the complaints are lodged anonymously; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider enhancing enforcement actions against repeat complainants to deter such behaviour.
Mr Ong Ye Kung149 words
[+11 sentences]The Ministry of Health and Public Healthcare Institutions have established systems to process complaints appropriately. For complaints that are frivolous, a polite reply may be issued. Complaints that raise serious concerns are investigated, even if they are submitted anonymously. In cases where complainants become abusive, we disengage from further communication. However, we do not specifically track the number of frivolous, vexatious or anonymous complaints. For complaints lodged with the Professional Boards, there are procedures in place to investigate these complaints and dismiss those that are unsubstantiated. In the past three years, 32% of complaints were dismissed this way. The Professional Boards do not initiate investigations against frivolous complainants. However, measures are in place to deter frivolous and vexatious complaints. For example, individuals making complaints against registered healthcare practitioners are generally required to make a statutory declaration concerning their complaint. Action may be taken against complainants who make false declarations.
Data on PREDICT Programme Screening and Plans to Expand Outreach of Programme›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 171w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21890
Dr Choo Pei Ling67 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health regarding the PaREnthood genetic DIsease Carrier Test (PREDICT) Programme (a) how many couples have been screened; (b) how many screenings have been conducted before and during pregnancy respectively; (c) how does the Ministry reach out to couples to publicise screening availability; (d) whether the programme be expanded to all obstetric clinics; and (e) if so, when.
Mr Ong Ye Kung104 words
[+4 sentences]The Parenthood Genetic Disease Carrier Test (PREDICT) programme is an ongoing pilot programme to screen parents for autosomal recessive genetic conditions such as Pompe disease and spinal muscular atrophy, which are not covered in existing prenatal screening tests. The pilot was started in 2024 by KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH). As at end 2025, a total of 674 couples has undergone screening during the pre-conception phase at KKH. The Ministry of Health will work with KKH to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of the pilot when the results are available to determine if the PREDICT screening tests should become a mainstream service.
Update on Development of Potential Dengue Vaccine and Patient Support Service for Dengvaxia Vaccine›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 174w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21893
Ms He Ting Ru43 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) for an update on the development of potential dengue vaccines or drugs; and (b) what assistance or support is available to recovered dengue patients contemplating whether to take the Dengvaxia vaccine.
Mr Ong Ye Kung131 words
[+8 sentences]Dengvaxia is currently the only licensed dengue vaccine in Singapore. The supplier has decided to discontinue it due to low global demand. It is therefore only available for individuals who have already initiated the three-dose series. There are two other dengue vaccines approved in other countries – Qdenga and Butantan-Dengue Vaccine. These vaccines are however not approved for use in Singapore. One had withdrawn its application following a review by the Health Sciences Authority on its submitted scientific data and there is no application for the other. Another dengue vaccine candidate, V181, developed by MSD, is currently undergoing Phase 3 clinical trial. The Ministry of Health and relevant agencies will continue to monitor the development of dengue vaccines and therapeutics as part of a multi-pronged approach to dengue control in Singapore.
Usage of Blue and Orange CHAS Card for Discounted Products and Services at Non-healthcare Retailers›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 94w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21894
Mr Chua Kheng Wee Louis51 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health whether the Government has conducted a study on the number of retailers and types of sectors outside of healthcare that have adopted the Community Health Assist Scheme Blue and Orange cards as a basis to offer discounted products and services.
Mr Ong Ye Kung43 words
[+3 sentences]Some retailers have chosen to use Community Health Assist Scheme cards to offer special benefits or discounts to targeted customer segments. These are private initiatives and unrelated to Government subsidies for healthcare. As such, my Ministry does not collect data on such uses.
Data on Women in Elective Egg Freezing Programme by Participation Numbers and Age since July 2023, and Average Cost of One Complete Cycle at Public Hospitals›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 108w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21895
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan55 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) how many women have undergone elective egg freezing since its implementation in July 2023; (b) what is the age breakdown of these women; and (c) what is the average total out-of-pocket cost for one complete cycle of elective egg freezing at public hospitals.
Mr Ong Ye Kung53 words
[+3 sentences]Since the introduction of elective egg freezing (EEF) in June 2023, more than 800 women have undergone EEF (as of 31 December 2025). Approximately 57% of them are 35 years and above, 39% between 30 to 34 years, and 4% below 30 years. An egg freezing cycle at public hospitals costs approximately $10,000.
Impact of US' Withdrawal from International Organisations on Singapore and Resultant Contribution Changes›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 124w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21896
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs following the United States' (US') withdrawal from certain international organisations in January 2026 (a) what is the assessment of the impact on Singapore; (b) whether Singapore's annual financial contributions to these international organisations will increase as a result; and (c) whether the Government intends to deepen its investment in these organisations or adopt a more cautious approach.
Dr Vivian Balakrishnan61 words
[+1 sentence]This question for written answer has been addressed by an earlier response to Question No 98 on the Order Paper for 3 February 2026 [Please refer to "Impact of US' Withdrawal from International Bodies on Singapore's Interests", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.].
Plans for Adequate Designated Public Fishing Zones›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 86w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21897
Mr Cai Yinzhou52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) how does the Ministry measure whether there are adequate designated fishing zones for the public; (b) whether there are plans to open more designated fishing zones; and (c) whether there are any public consultation in town planning and design to incorporate fishing zones.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien34 words
[+1 sentence]The Public Utilities Board does not actively plan for fishing zones, but will assess requests for recreational fishing along waterways and reservoirs, based on safety considerations and with input from relevant land planning agencies.
Publicly Accessible Monitoring Registry Tracking Removal Status of Asbestos from Older Buildings›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 179w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21898
Dr Choo Pei Ling60 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment regarding asbestos in older buildings (a) whether the Ministry has an updated registry of such buildings that is accessible to the public; (b) if so, what measures and incentives are available for owners to remove asbestos; and (c) how the Ministry monitors and manages asbestos exposure risks for visitors to these buildings.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien119 words
[+6 sentences]There is no central register of asbestos in buildings. Building owners are responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements relating to work involving asbestos in their buildings. Under the Ministry of Manpower's (MOM's) Workplace Safety and Health (Asbestos) Regulations, asbestos surveys need to be conducted prior to carrying out building works in buildings built before 1 January 1991. The need to remove asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) depends on the condition of the material. ACMs in buildings pose minimal health risks if the materials are in good condition and are not damaged. However, if the ACMs are damaged or likely to be disturbed due to building works, building owners must engage an asbestos-removal contractor approved by MOM to remove the ACMs.
Licensing Criteria and Approval Processes for Central Kitchens in Shophouse Units›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 144w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21899
Ms Diana Pang Li Yen47 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) whether shophouse units may be licensed as central kitchens; (b) what criteria apply to such licenses; and (c) whether existing safeguards sufficiently address food hygiene and safety across such operations and their distribution to food and beverage establishments.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien97 words
[+4 sentences]Central kitchens must generally be located within designated food zone areas or in approved food factories with the infrastructure in place to support the food processing operations. In view of the nature and scale of the use, central kitchens are not allowed in shophouses. Central kitchens are involved in significant food handling and have a larger scale of distribution than other food and beverage establishments. They are therefore subjected to more frequent inspections by the Singapore Food Agency based on factors, such as the food safety risk of food they prepare and their food safety track record.
Bass Noise Assessment of Shophouse Pubs and Discos to Address Disturbance Reports by Surrounding Units›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 154w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21900
Ms Diana Pang Li Yen71 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) whether National Environment Agency (NEA) will adopt standards to measure low-frequency bass sounds such as from pubs and discos on the first floor of shophouses, which may not be captured by decibel meters, to address disturbance reports from residents on upper floors and nearby homes; and (b) whether NEA will coordinate with Urban Redevelopment Authority and Singapore Police Force to address this.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien83 words
[+4 sentences]Nightlife establishments, such as pubs and discotheques, are required to comply with noise control requirements as stipulated in the licensing conditions in their Public Entertainment licence issued by the Singapore Police Force (SPF). Where necessary, these establishments may also be required to implement additional noise mitigation measures. The National Environment Agency (NEA) does not regulate nightlife establishments. Upon feedback from residents, NEA will work with SPF and other agencies to engage these nightlife establishments to take further mitigation measures as far as practicable.
Coverage Selection Criteria for Project Wolbachia in Private Estates and Possible Expansion towards Changi Division›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 157w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21901
Ms Valerie Lee65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) what other factors, besides Aedes mosquito population, historical dengue prevalence and estate size and landscape, are considered for the selection of estates for Project Wolbachia releases; (b) what percentage of households in private residential estates is currently included in Project Wolbachia; and (c) whether there are plans for Project Wolbachia to be expanded to Changi Division.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien92 words
[+4 sentences]Site selection for Project Wolbachia is based on the assessed dengue risk of the area, and the main considerations are the historical dengue situation, current Aedes aegypti mosquito population and the size and landscape of the area. Currently, Project Wolbachia covers 35% of private landed estate households. The National Environment Agency (NEA) has announced that Project Wolbachia will be expanded to the Housing and Development Board estate in Pasir Ris, which includes parts of Changi division, from March 2026. NEA will announce new sites for further expansion of Project Wolbachia when ready.
Data on DigitalAccess@Home Scheme Household Support and Measures to Increase Take-up Rate›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 170w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21902
Mr David Hoe70 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) how many households have been supported with subsidised broadband and device packages since the launch of DigitalAccess@Home Scheme in April 2023; (b) whether the scheme is on track of (i) its target to support 60,000 households and (ii) the allocated budget of $80 million; and (c) if not, what steps will be taken to increase the take-up rate among eligible households.
Mrs Josephine Teo100 words
[+4 sentences]The DigitalAccess@Home scheme has supported over 30,000 assistance packages to low-income households since its launch in 2023. The figures cited by the Member represent resources provisioned to meet demand from qualifying households, rather than predetermined targets to be achieved. Nonetheless, the Infocomm Media Development Authority works together with Government agencies, such as the Ministry of Social and Family Development and the Ministry of Education, and social sector partners (for example, Social Service Agencies, Family Service Centres) to raise awareness of the scheme and streamline applications processing. We will continue to promote the scheme to ensure inclusive digital access for all.
Government Call Verification Measures to Protect Seniors against Scams›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 343w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21903
Ms Valerie Lee57 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether the Government has assessed the impact of heightened scam vigilance on agencies' ability to contact residents, especially seniors; (b) what measures are in place to help residents verify Government agencies' calls; and (c) when will a permanent nationalised caller ID system identifying Government-assistance related calls be implemented.
Mrs Josephine Teo286 words
[+11 sentences]The Member is right to be concerned that vigilance against scams may discourage residents from receiving legitimate calls from public officers. Having heard about scammers who impersonate Government officials, they may feel it is safer not to engage with anyone who claims to represent a public agency. Thus far, this problem has not significantly affected public service delivery. Nonetheless, the Government is exploring ways to help the public identify genuine calls from public agencies. This has been addressed in our reply to the question on "Additional Measures to Tackle Increase in Cases of Government Officials Impersonation and Phishing Scams" published after the Sitting of 23 September 2025. [Please refer to "Additional Measures to Tackle Increase in Cases of Government Officials Impersonation and Phishing Scams", Official Report, 23 September 2025, Vol 96, Issue 3, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.] In the meantime, we have issued advisories to remind the public that Government officials will never ask them to transfer money, disclose bank log-in details over a phone call or install mobile applications from unofficial app stores. We recognise that such messages take time to be internalised. We will continue to feature them prominently through various communication channels, including websites, mobile applications, social media, physical letters, collaterals and digital display panels. If in doubt, members should call the 24/7 ScamShield Helpline at 1799. The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore and the Ministry of Home Affairs will also be piloting a National Simulated Scams Exercise, focusing initially on Government Officials Impersonation Scams. Members of the public can register to take part at https://go.gov.sg/NSSE to experience the scam tactics in a safe environment and learn how to avoid falling prey.
Assessment of AI Technology Uptake among Singaporean SMEs Versus MNCs, and Individuals›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 99w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21904
Mr Chua Kheng Wee Louis43 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information whether the Government has conducted studies on the adoption and active usage of artificial intelligence software by (i) companies with a breakdown between small and medium enterprises versus multinational corporations and (ii) individuals in Singapore.
Mrs Josephine Teo56 words
[+3 sentences]The Government tracks artificial intelligence (AI) adoption as part of broader efforts to develop the digital economy. Since 2023, the Infocomm Media Development Authority has been publishing the annual Singapore Digital Economy Report, which contains data on AI adoption by companies of different sizes and workers in Singapore. The Member may wish to refer to it.
Bus Services Fare Hike at Pathlight School and Analysis of Participants in Tender Exercise›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 128w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21905
Ms Gho Sze Kee68 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) whether the Ministry has any information on the circumstances of the tender exercise for school bus services at Pathlight School that led to the 40% to 50% increase in bus fares; (b) if so, what are the circumstances; and (c) whether the number of bidders who participated in the tender exercise and the quote of the next-lowest unsuccessful bid can be shared.
Mr Desmond Lee60 words
[+1 sentence]This question has been addressed as part of the Ministry of Education's reply to Oral Question No 74 on 3 February 2026. [Please refer to "Number of Bidders for School Bus Service Contracts for SPED Schools", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.]
Addressing Challenges and Strengthening English Language Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 244w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21906
Mr David Hoe64 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) what is the Ministry's current approach to teaching English language in primary schools, particularly in balancing contextualised communication with explicit instructions on grammar and vocabulary; (b) whether the Ministry has observed declining grammatical accuracy or knowledge of the English Language as pedagogy shifted over recent decades; and (c) what challenges does the Ministry face in strengthening these outcomes.
Mr Desmond Lee180 words
[+10 sentences]In our primary school classrooms, English Language teachers adopt a balanced approach of contextualised and explicit teaching of English. Our students learn English through engaging stories and texts, complemented by direct instruction in grammar and vocabulary. Reading and writing are interwoven with oracy activities where students get to speak more extensively than in the past. The shifts in pedagogy over the decades and wider use of English in homes have led to increased confidence in spoken communication and stronger reading literacy among our students. Our Primary 4 students' reading literacy scores in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) have shown steady improvement over the past 20 years. However, enjoyment of reading among our students has declined based on the PIRLS Study between 2016 and 2021. This trend is also observed globally. Reading widely and for enjoyment is important for language development. Broader shifts from reading to other forms of entertainment are challenges to sustaining the reading habit. The Ministry of Education will continue to partner schools, public libraries and parents to sustain the joy of reading in students.
Breakdown of GCE "O" Level Results' Grade Distribution for Past Three Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 77w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21907
Mr Foo Cexiang26 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education for a breakdown of Singapore-Cambridge General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level results by percentage of grades for the past three years.
Mr Desmond Lee51 words
[+2 sentences]The percentages of General Certificate of Education "O" Level students who obtained grade C6 or better in the core subjects of English Language, Mother Tongue Languages and Mathematics have remained consistently high from 2023 to 2025. In each of these subjects, about nine in 10 students achieved grade C6 or better.
Breakdown of GCE "N" (Academic) Level and "N" (Technical) Level Results' Grade Distribution for Past Three Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 147w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21908
Mr Foo Cexiang31 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education for a breakdown of Singapore-Cambridge General Certificate of Education Normal (Academic) and Normal (Technical) Level Examinations results by percentage of grades for the past three years.
Mr Desmond Lee116 words
[+3 sentences]The percentages of General Certificate of Education (GCE) "Normal" (Technical) (N(T)) Level students who obtained grade D or better and GCE "Normal" (Academics) (N(A)) Level students who obtained grade 5 or better in the core subjects of English Language (EL), Mother Tongue Language (MTL) and Mathematics have remained consistently high from 2023 to 2025. About nine in 10 GCE N(T) Level students achieved grade D or better in EL and MTL respectively, while about eight in 10 achieved grade D or better in Mathematics. More than nine in 10 GCE N(A) Level students achieved grade 5 or better in EL and Mathematics respectively, while more than eight in 10 achieved grade 5 or better in MTL.
Extension of SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance for Clinical Mental Health Counselling Training›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 139w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21909
Dr Charlene Chen57 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) whether the SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance can be selectively extended to support accredited postgraduate training for clinical mental health counselling, which has a shortage of trained professionals; and (b) if so, whether any such allowance will also be available during clinical placement periods that form part of the training and accreditation.
Mr Desmond Lee82 words
[+5 sentences]The SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance supports mid-career substantive training up to the undergraduate degree level. There are no plans to extend the Training Allowance to postgraduate programmes at this juncture. We will continue to monitor the need for postgraduate upgrading and adjust our level of support accordingly. Mid-career Singaporeans can use their SkillsFuture Credit (Mid-Career) of $4,000 to offset the out-of-pocket training fees for postgraduate programmes offered by the Autonomous Universities. Individuals can also apply for sectoral sponsorships and school-based study awards.
Expansion Plans for International Schools with Singaporean Curriculum in Southeast Asia›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 151w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21910
Ms Elysa Chen47 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education whether the Government is exploring the expansion of international schools with Singaporean curriculum in Southeast Asia under the premise that international schools can support inter-regional talent mobility and work opportunities for Singaporeans as well as expansion of Singaporean businesses into regional markets.
Mr Desmond Lee104 words
[+6 sentences]The Ministry of Education (MOE) has no plans to set up new international schools with Singaporean curriculum in Southeast Asia. When Singaporeans move abroad, their children can apply for Leave of Absence from their school. While they are overseas, they can access online learning resources to keep abreast with the local curriculum. This can ease their eventual transition back to our education system. When they return to Singapore, they can be readmitted to the school directly. For those who need to apply to the next level of school (for example, secondary school or junior college), MOE also supports their placement into our mainstream schools.
Statistics on School Gastroenteritis Cases by Food Source from 2022 to 2025›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 102w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21911
Ms Lee Hui Ying43 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education from January 2022 to December 2025, what is the number of gastroenteritis cases in schools due to food consumed by the students from (i) central kitchen caterers (ii) canteens and (iii) general food and beverage outlets in schools.
Mr Desmond Lee59 words
[+1 sentence]This question has been addressed as part of the Ministry of Education's oral reply to Question Nos 14 to 20 on 3 February 2026. [Please refer to "Enhancing Food Safety Measures Following Recent Gastroenteritis Cases at Primary Schools and Incentives for Operators of School Canteens", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Oral Answers to Questions section.]
Timeline Status for Multi-Agency Task Force on Invisible Disabilities in Justice System›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 423w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21912
Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Law (a) whether the multi-agency task force to support persons with invisible disabilities in the justice system has been convened; (b) if not, what is the expected timeline for its formation; and (c) if it has been convened, when will the task force publish its findings and recommendations.
Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai371 words
[+11 sentences]On 26 March 2025, the Ministry first announced its commitment to a taskforce to better support persons with “invisible disabilities” in the criminal justice system at the inaugural Access to Justice Symposium hosted by Pro Bono SG. The organising committee for the Symposium was led by Ms Peggy Yee, Managing Director of PYLegal LLC and advocate for persons with “invisible disabilities”. Since then, the Ministry has been working with Ms Yee and other key stakeholders and community partners on foundational steps for the taskforce's work: bringing together representatives with the right expertise and experience, identifying the taskforce's preliminary scope and the potential areas that it may study and establishing the necessary administrative and support structures. The formal launch of the Inclusive Justice Taskforce was announced on 8 January 2026.1 The taskforce is co-led by Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Law and Social and Family Development Mr Eric Chua and Ms Yee. It comprises a multi-disciplinary group of representatives from across the private and public sector, including lawyers, policymakers, law enforcement officers, social service professionals, healthcare experts, community partners and caregiver representatives. It will examine how our society can better support individuals with disabilities and mental health conditions who are at risk of offending or may interact with Singapore's criminal justice system, including accused persons, victims and witnesses. A thorough and consultative review process will be undertaken to ensure that the taskforce's recommendations are well-considered and practical. The taskforce has started its work and will provide an update on its progress or recommendations in due course. The Ministry looks forward to the taskforce’s contributions as part of our ongoing commitment to strengthen our legal system and advance access to justice to all, including those who are vulnerable. This launch is the latest instalment in the Ministry's extensive efforts to ensure that our legal system remains effective, accessible and inclusive. These include our efforts to make laws, legal processes and Court procedures easier to understand and navigate, the provision of civil legal aid and criminal defence aid to lower-income beneficiaries by the Legal Aid Bureau and the Public Defender's Office, and our partnerships with Pro Bono SG, the legal fraternity and social service agencies to provide more holistic socio-legal support to those in need.
Expansion of Legal Aid Scheme for Persons With Special Needs Ineligible for Pro Bono Legal Services›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 151w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21913
Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik37 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Law whether the Ministry will consider expanding existing legal aid schemes or introducing new targeted legal support initiatives for persons with special needs who do not currently qualify for pro bono legal services.
Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai114 words
[+4 sentences]The Legal Aid Bureau and the Public Defender's Office provide legal aid to Singapore Citizens and Permanent Residents, including those with special needs, who satisfy the means and merits tests. Applicants with special needs who do not meet the means test criteria but have extenuating circumstances will also have their applications reviewed by an independent Means Test Panel for possible support. Pro Bono SG provides legal assistance at their Community Law Centres and various legal clinics across Singapore. They run schemes, such as the Ad Hoc Pro Bono Scheme, which accepts referrals for needy or vulnerable individuals who do not qualify for other legal aid schemes but require legal help due to exceptional circumstances.
Streamlined Neighbour Dispute Resolution Outlets for Failed Community Mediation Cases›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 512w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21914
Mr Shawn Loh59 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Law whether the Government can consider reducing the barriers for neighbour dispute cases to seek recourse through the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (CDRT) such as by empowering the Community Mediation Centre, on the advice of agencies, to refer cases involving failed mediation to the CDRT without the need for a fresh application or additional costs.
Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai453 words
[+22 sentences]The Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (CDRT) is an avenue of last resort for addressing neighbour disputes, after all other amicable options such as mediation, have failed. As a Court of law, the CDRT must adhere to certain basic principles to ensure the fair and proper administration of justice. For example, CDRT claims must be supported by evidence, and the respondent must be given the opportunity of a fair hearing. At the same time, the CDRT framework is intended to be affordable and accessible. First, fees and costs ought not to discourage genuine cases. CDRT filing fees are kept low. In addition, individuals with demonstrated financial need can apply for an upfront fee waiver. Those who succeed in their claim may recover the filing costs from the respondent. Second, the CDRT’s processes are much simpler than other litigation proceedings. Residents can file and manage a CDRT claim online through the Community Justice and Tribunals System (CJTS). The CJTS allows residents to commence or respond to a claim using plain English forms, and also leverages on Singpass to auto-populate personal particulars. Third, CDRT claims are heard using simplified processes. CDRT Judges take an active role in managing the case, such as by posing questions to parties or asking them to produce supporting evidence. Parties are not expected to, and generally cannot, engage legal representation. In the review leading to the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Act 2024, the Ministry considered empowering the Community Mediation Centre (CMC) to refer unsuccessful mediation cases to the CDRT. However, this is difficult to implement for various reasons, including the fact that the CMC is not able to share detailed case information with the CDRT as the mediation process is private and confidential. Additionally, parties may be more reluctant to attempt mediation or engage in frank discussions if the CMC is able to refer cases or provide detailed information to the CDRT. Nonetheless, parties who attend mediation at the CMC are informed of other avenues to seek further recourse, including filing a CDRT claim if mediation is unsuccessful. For completeness, under the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Act 2024, officers from the Community Relations Unit (CRU) are empowered to investigate cases, collect evidence, and submit the same to the CDRT. The CRU is currently being piloted in the Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates of Tampines Town for serious noise and hoarding cases. In addition, we are working to operationalise an enhanced process to enable the Director-General of the CRU to apply for a dispute to be heard by the CDRT. Individuals who require assistance with filing their CDRT claims or have questions regarding a fee waiver may visit the State Courts Service Hub, located at Level 2 of the State Courts.
Study on Labour Impacted by AI in SMEs and Plans to Support Workers Substituted by AI›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 239w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21915
Mr Shawn Loh63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower with SMEs employing 70% of the workforce (a) whether the Government can consider conducting a study to better estimate for whom artificial intelligence (AI) is complementary and for whom AI is a substitute for their labour; and (b) whether there are differences between SMEs and MNCs so that the Government can have more targeted plans for those substituted.
Dr Tan See Leng176 words
[+6 sentences]The Government is studying the impact of the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) on Singapore's labour market, including how AI may substitute or complement different groups of workers. While we recognise that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and multinational corporations (MNCs) operate in different contexts, with varying structural complexities, risk appetites, organisational capabilities and resources, the impact of AI on workers and firms depends more on the nature of business activities and job roles than on firm size. Accordingly, the Government's workforce transformation programmes support all firms to redesign jobs and reskill workers in tandem with AI adoption. Our programme partners tailor the level of support provided to meet firms' needs, offering closer guidance for those undertaking larger and more complex workforce transformation projects. The Government remains committed to helping all workers prepare for AI and stay relevant, regardless of the type of jobs or firms that they are in today. For workers displaced by AI, we will also work with companies to support their transition into new roles through workforce transformation and reskilling programmes.
Data on Distribution of Singaporean Workers in Outward- and Domestic-Oriented Sectors of Years 2015 with 2025›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 150w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21916
Mr Shawn Loh52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what is the number and proportion of Singaporean workers in (i) outward-oriented sectors as compared to (ii) domestic-oriented sectors, for the most recent year compared to ten years before that; and (b) whether the employment distribution trend, if any, is expected to continue in the future.
Dr Tan See Leng98 words
[+4 sentences]In December 2025, outward-oriented sectors1 employed 1.25 million residents (or 50.5% of all employed residents), compared to domestic-oriented sectors2 which employed 1.21 million residents (or 48.7%).3 These distributions closely mirror the distribution observed 10 years ago, when outward-oriented sectors employed 1.14 million residents (or 50.4%) and domestic-oriented sectors employed 1.10 million residents (or 48.6%). Business transformation and technology adoption will continue to change the nature of jobs. The distribution of resident employment between outward-oriented and domestic-oriented sectors may evolve. The Government will continue to work with tripartite partners to equip Singaporeans with the skills needed for future jobs.
Regulatory Measures against Systematic Base Fare Cuts by Platform Companies after Implementation of CPF Contribution Scheme›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 245w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21917
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what is the monthly median change in net take-home pay for platform workers who opted into the CPF contribution scheme since January 2025; (b) whether the Ministry has detected any systematic reduction in base fares or incentive premiums by platform operators that offsets the operator’s required share of contributions; and (c) what measures are implemented to prevent such practices.
Dr Tan See Leng180 words
[+6 sentences]Between January and September 2025, the monthly median change in net-take home earnings1 for platform workers who opted2 to increase their CPF contributions beyond the mandatory MediSave contributions ranged from a decrease of 12.7% to an increase of 8.2%. No consistent trend was observed, as monthly earnings fluctuate depending on factors, such as hours worked and the seasonality of demand and supply. We have not received any feedback from platform workers and Platform Work Associations that suggests systemic reduction in fares or incentive premiums due to CPF contributions. In September 2025, the Platform Workers Trilateral Group – comprising the Ministry of Manpower, the Ministry of Transport, the National Trades Union Congress and major platform operators – released a set of industry-wide principles that establish baseline expectations for platform operators when setting and reviewing their fares and incentives. These principles include fair and transparent earnings for platform workers, as well as visibility on structural changes to incentive schemes. Platform workers may seek assistance from their registered Platform Work Associations if they have concerns with the way fares and incentives are set.
Five-Year Trend Analysis of Disguised Retrenchment Cases Reported to MOM and TAFEP›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 67w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21918
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan32 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower for each year from 2021 to 2025, how many complaints of disguised retrenchments have the Ministry and Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) received.
Dr Tan See Leng35 words
[+2 sentences]From 2021 to 2025, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) received fewer than 10 complaints each year on disguised retrenchment. This represented less than 1% of total complaints received each year.
Ten-Year Statistics on Employment Pass Exception Approvals and Assessment Criteria›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 145w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21919
Mr Chua Kheng Wee Louis49 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) for each of the last 10 years, what is the total number of Employment Pass applications that have been granted which do not meet the qualifying salary, broken down by industry sector respectively; and (b) what factors are considered when granting such flexibility.
Dr Tan See Leng96 words
[+4 sentences]Over 2016 to 2025, the Employment Pass (EP) qualifying salary has increased from $3,300 to $5,600, while the number of EPs has increased from 192,300 to 202,100. Table 1 provides the number of EPs issued that did not meet the EP qualifying salary over this period. The Ministry of Manpower works with the Ministry of Trade and Industry and economic agencies to provide targeted flexibilities in support of our national priorities. These flexibilities support Singapore's economic growth and transformation and promote job creation for locals, such as in courting new investments and supporting research and innovation.
Disqualification Criteria for Hiring Live-in Migrant Domestic Workers›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 120w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21920
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan34 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what criteria currently disqualify individuals from hiring migrant domestic workers; and (b) whether individuals with criminal convictions for violent offenses are prohibited from hiring live-in migrant domestic workers.
Dr Tan See Leng86 words
[+4 sentences]Employers can be debarred from hiring migrant domestic workers (MDWs) if they commit serious offences against an MDW. These include physical or sexual abuse, non-payment of salary, inadequate provision of food or rest and instructing their MDW to perform unsafe tasks. The debarment period varies with the severity of offences committed, and the Ministry of Manpower will assess the suitability of the household to hire MDWs before lifting the debarment. Egregious offenders, such as those who inflict violent harm on their MDWs, will be permanently debarred.
Distribution of Local Employees Retrenchment Benefits from 2023 to 2025›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 124w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21921
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan60 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower for each year from 2023 to 2025, (a) how many eligible local employees received retrenchment benefits; (b) of these, how many received retrenchment benefits equivalent to two weeks to one month's salary for each year of service; and (c) if such data is not available, whether the Ministry will conduct a survey on retrenchment benefits.
Dr Tan See Leng64 words
[+2 sentences]Based on Mandatory Retrenchment Notification (MRN) data submitted by companies with 10 or more employees, around nine in 10 eligible employees received retrenchment benefits from 2020 to 2025. Among them, around eight in 10 received retrenchment benefits of at least two weeks' salary per year of service, in line with the norms stated in the Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment.
Raising Renewal Age Limit for Migrant Domestic Workers Aged 60 Years and above for Long-term Family Employment›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 130w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21922
Mr Liang Eng Hwa36 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower whether the Ministry will consider raising the renewal age limit for migrant domestic workers beyond 60 years for those who have worked with the same family for 20 years or more.
Dr Tan See Leng94 words
[+3 sentences]We understand that employers value their migrant domestic workers' (MDWs) experience and dedication, and some employers may wish to continue employing their MDWs beyond 60 years old. The age limit is to ensure that MDWs can continue to meet the various demands of household needs as well as the impact of additional medical costs on households, which generally increase with age. Balancing between these considerations, on appeal, the Ministry of Manpower may approve the renewal of work permits beyond the age limit, taking into account the MDW's health, experience and the employer's household needs.
Compliance Rate of Mandatory CPF Contributions and Enforcement Actions Taken against Non-compliance›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 204w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21923
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre41 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what is the compliance rate of platform operators regarding mandatory CPF contributions since the commencement of the Platform Workers Act; and (b) what is the total number of enforcement actions taken for non-compliance to date.
Dr Tan See Leng163 words
[+8 sentences]Non-compliance cases are defined as instances of late or underpayment of Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions. Since the implementation of the Platform Workers Act in January 2025, we have seen a high level of compliance where the vast majority of payments have been made on time. A small number of late payments cases were encountered, and they were resolved within two weeks after a reminder notice was issued. On underpayment of CPF contributions, the CPF Board has taken action against four platform operators by demanding payment and charging late payment interests. These cases were due to administrative lapses, such as incorrect calculation of earnings. They have since been resolved. To help familiarise platform operators with the new process of paying CPF contributions for platform workers, the CPF Board has provided them with a guide on good practices. Platform workers also receive CPF contribution alerts when their CPF contributions are credited, which allow them to monitor and verify the accuracy of their CPF contributions.
Data on Platform Workers CPF Transition Support Scheme Uptake, Disbursement and Rejection›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 108w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21924
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) as of January 2026, how many platform workers have qualified for the Platform Workers CPF Transition Support (PCTS) scheme; (b) what is the total value of PCTS offsets disbursed to date; and (c) what percentage of applications were rejected and the primary reasons for these rejections.
Dr Tan See Leng56 words
[+3 sentences]In 2025, close to 24,000 lower-income platform workers qualified for the Platform Workers CPF Transition Support (PCTS) scheme, and over $4 million was disbursed in total. Data for January 2026 is not yet available. The Central Provident Fund Board automatically assesses platform workers' eligibility for PCTS every month and no application is required from platform workers.
Data on Migrant Domestic Workers' Assault Reports to MOM and/or SPF, and Employer's Prosecution and Permanent Bans in Past Five Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 144w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21925
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower in each of the past five years (a) how many migrant domestic workers have reported cases of (i) physical assault and (ii) sexual assault against their employers to MOM and/or SPF; and (b) of these cases, how many resulted in (i) prosecutions, (ii) convictions and (iii) permanent bans on the employer from hiring future domestic workers.
Dr Tan See Leng83 words
[+5 sentences]All reports of Migrant Domestic Worker (MDW) abuse are referred to and investigated by the Police. From 2021 to September 2025, an average of around 300 reports of MDW abuse by employers or household members of the employers were made each year. The majority of these cases were unsubstantiated. A total of 30 employers were prosecuted during this period, of which 14 were convicted and permanently debarred from hiring MDWs. In addition, an average of 70 employers were issued with warnings each year.
Data on Pet Deaths and Injuries at Pet-related Businesses for Past Three Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 100w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21926
Ms Gho Sze Kee43 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether the Ministry maintains records of pet deaths or injuries linked to incidents at licensed pet-related businesses, including grooming establishments; and (b) if so, what are the figures recorded in each of the past three years.
Mr Chee Hong Tat57 words
[+1 sentence]This question was addressed in the Ministry of National Development's reply to the questions asked by Ms Jessica Tan on 14 January 2026. [Please refer to "Review of Enforcement Measures Against Pet Groomers and Proposal for Mandatory CCTV Recordings in Pet Grooming Facilities", Official Report, 14 January 2026, Vol 96, Issue 14, Oral Answers to Questions section.]
Data on HDB Household Leaders Aged 65 and Older and Breakdown of Seniors Living in HDB Households from 2018 to 2024›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 151w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21927
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development with regards to the HDB survey released in November 2025 (a) what is the actual number of HDB-dwelling households in 2024 whose principal flat decision-maker was aged 65 or older; (b) how many seniors aged 65 and above are in these households; and (c) how have both of these numbers changed in absolute terms since 2018.
Mr Chee Hong Tat89 words
[+5 sentences]A senior household is one where the household decision maker is aged 65 years and above. For Housing and Development Board (HDB) sold flats, they must be the owner, co-owner or their spouse. For HDB rental flats, they must be the registered tenant or their spouse. Based on the 2023/2024 HDB Sample Household Survey (SHS) findings, the estimated number of senior households rose from around 260,000 in 2018 to 340,000 in 2023/2024. HDB does not collect information on the total number of seniors in these households in the SHS.
Status of Quantitative Noise Thresholds Review for Residential Boundary Noise›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 164w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21928
Mr Kenneth Tiong Boon Kiat68 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) what is the status of the review on quantitative noise thresholds for residential boundary noise, which the Community Advisory Panel recommended in 2022; (b) whether the review has considered WHO guidelines of 50 to 55 decibels and lower thresholds in Germany, Korea and Japan; (c) whether the Ministry will clarify that NEA's industrial noise standards do not apply to household disputes.
Mr Chee Hong Tat96 words
[+3 sentences]We had completed the review in May 2024 and replied to a similar Parliamentary Question in October 2024. [Please refer to "Implementing Distinct Quantitative Noise Thresholds for Evening Period in Residential Areas", Official Report, 16 October 2024, Vol 95, Issue 144, Written Answers to Questions section.] The Member may also refer to the Municipal Services Office’s website, as well as the Second Reading of the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Bill in 2024, for more details. The National Environment Agency’s industrial noise standards are set for a different purpose, and do not apply to neighbour noise disputes.
Waiving MOP for HDB Flat Owners Seeking to Sell in View of Neighbour Disputes and Measures to Ensure Fairness and Consistency›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 142w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21929
Dr Hamid Razak54 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether HDB has established clear criteria for when neighbour disputes, including noise or harassment, rise to a level that justifies waiving the Minimum Occupation Period (MOP) for HDB flat owners who are seeking to sell; and (b) how are such cases assessed to ensure fairness and consistency.
Mr Chee Hong Tat88 words
[+5 sentences]The Housing and Development Board assesses all appeals for a waiver of the Minimum Occupation Period on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of the flat owners and their families. When neighbours are involved in a dispute, our priority is to bring them together to find a mutually acceptable solution. Most neighbour noise disputes are resolved this way. Many of the remaining disputes are resolved after mediation at the Community Mediation Centre. As a last resort, residents can consider seeking recourse from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals.
Breakdown on Outcomes of MENDAKI Financial Assistance Applications for Muslims of Non-Malay Descent in Last 10 Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 126w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21930
Mr Fadli Fawzi49 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs in each of the last 10 years, how many Muslims of non-Malay descent have (i) applied for and (ii) successfully received financial assistance, respectively, from any of the financial assistance schemes under MENDAKI, broken down by the race listed on their NRIC.
Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim77 words
[+4 sentences]As a self-help group for the Malay/Muslim community, MENDAKI offers various financial assistance schemes, including study loans and bursaries, to all Malay/Muslim students. These schemes ensure that no Malay/Muslim student will be denied higher education because of their financial difficulties. Based on latest available data, an average of about seven in 10 non-Malay/Muslims were successful in their application for MENDAKI's financial assistance schemes from 2022 to 2025. This is comparable to the success rate for Malay/Muslim applicants.
Response to Peak-Hour Congestion at Clementi MRT Station Link Bridge and Future Cross-Island Line Interchange Capacity Planning›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 139w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21931
Mr David Hoe61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport whether LTA will (i) consider improving pedestrian flow and safety at the Clementi MRT station link bridge to Clementi Mall through near-term measures given significant peak-hour foot traffic build-up and (ii) make longer-term infrastructure upgrades to the link bridge and access routes to increase capacity, given anticipated higher footfall with Clementi’s future Cross-Island Line interchange.
Mr Jeffrey Siow78 words
[+3 sentences]Two additional entrances and link bridges had already been built at Clementi station in 2015 to relieve pedestrian crowding along the two existing link bridges. During peak hours, service ambassadors are deployed to guide commuters and facilitate safe pedestrian flow along the link bridge to Clementi Mall. As part of the Cross Island Line project, the Land Transport Authority plans to replace the existing link bridge with a new, wider link bridge to meet the anticipated higher footfall.
Investigation Findings of Accident Involving Autonomous Vehicle on 17 January 2026›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 117w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21932
Mr Fadli Fawzi63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport in an accident involving an autonomous vehicle on 17 January 2026 (a) whether the Ministry is aware of (i) the vehicle's response when it detected a small object on the road and (ii) whether the accident was caused by human error during the manual takeover or the vehicle's response; and (b) if so, what is this information.
Mr Jeffrey Siow54 words
[+1 sentence]This question was addressed in the reply to Question 59 during the 4 February 2026 Parliament sitting. [Please refer to "Managing Teething Issues of Autonomous Vehicle Shuttle Implementation in Punggol", Official Report, 4 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 16, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.]
Impact of Aircraft Altitude Reduction on Residential and School Areas in Yio Chu Kang and Measures to Mitigate Noise and Safety Risks›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 160w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21933
Mr Yip Hon Weng57 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport (a) whether there has been a lowering of aircraft flight altitudes over residential and school areas in Yio Chu Kang in the past six months; (b) what are the current minimum altitude restrictions; and (c) whether the Ministry will review flight path and altitude limits to mitigate noise and safety risks.
Mr Jeffrey Siow103 words
[+3 sentences]Aircraft have not been operating at lower altitudes over Yio Chu Kang than before in the past six months. The current minimum height restriction around the Yio Chu Kang area is about 210 metres to ensure safe takeoffs and landings at Seletar Airport, based on requirements set by the International Civil Aviation Organization. The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore has put in place measures to mitigate noise arising from civil aviation for residents, including routing aircraft away from residential areas when wind conditions permit, and disallowing flights between 10.00 pm and 7.00 am at Seletar Airport, except for medical evacuation and emergency flights.
Addressing Noise Fatigue from Prolonged, Cumulative Exposure and Infrastructure Works and MRT Operations in Yio Chu Kang›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 192w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21934
Mr Yip Hon Weng59 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport regarding noise from North-South Corridor works and MRT tracks in Yio Chu Kang (a) whether noise mitigation efforts account for residents’ noise fatigue from prolonged, cumulative exposure; (b) what is the maintenance regime for existing noise barriers; and (c) whether barriers will be proactively installed along MRT tracks to support rising population density.
Mr Jeffrey Siow133 words
[+7 sentences]Noise mitigation measures are put in place to ensure that cumulative noise levels from construction sites and MRT viaducts are within the National Environment Agency’s guidelines for prolonged exposure. Noise barriers are installed along MRT viaducts that are very close to residential developments. These barriers undergo regular maintenance to ensure they remain effective. For construction sites such as for the North-South Corridor, contractors are required to carry out localised noise impact assessments prior to new construction works. Where necessary, they must deploy noise barriers, noise enclosures and fit mufflers on machinery to reduce noise levels. The impact of railway noise is monitored through regular noise measurements and in response to feedback from residents. Where noise levels are found to have exceeded guidelines, further mitigation measures such as additional noise barriers will be implemented.
Breakdown of Private-Hire Drivers' Profiles across Gender, Age and Educational Qualifications›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 64w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21935
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan30 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport as of 31 December 2025, what is the profile of registered private-hire drivers by (i) gender, (ii) age and (iii) highest educational qualification attained.
Mr Jeffrey Siow34 words
[+3 sentences]The average age of the private hire car drivers is 52 years. The majority of them are male, and have secondary level education or below. Less than one-third of all drivers have tertiary education.
Breakdown of PDVL and TDVL First-time Approvals and Renewal Patterns for Past Five Years›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 116w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21936
Ms Yeo Wan Ling65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport for each year over the past five years (a) what is the number of first-time (i) Private Hire Car Driver's Vocational Licence (PDVL) and (ii) Taxi Driver's Vocational Licence (TDVL) approvals; (b) what is the number of (i) PDVL and (ii) TDVL renewals; and (c) what is the distribution by the number of times each license has been renewed.
Mr Jeffrey Siow51 words
[+2 sentences]The number of first-timer Private Hire Car Driver's Vocational Licence (PDVL) and Taxi Driver's Vocational Licence (TDVL) approvals is as follows: The number of PDVL and TDVL renewals is as follows: The number of times each licence has been renewed is as follows. Each licence is valid for three years.
Safety Measures and Systems for Bus Captains during Route Diversions and Navigation Support Tools›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 149w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21937
Ms Valerie Lee56 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport (a) what measures and systems are in place to support bus captains in navigating safely during route diversions when route familiarity is disrupted; and (b) whether the Ministry will consider enhanced tools, such as real-time GPS navigation prompts or in-vehicle guidance systems to better assist bus captains during such diversions.
Mr Jeffrey Siow93 words
[+4 sentences]Bus captains can request real-time guidance and support through voice communication with their Operations Control Centre during route diversions. Bus captains are also given briefings and route maps of the diverted route prior to starting the journey. The Land Transport Authority will work with bus operators to evaluate and deploy technological solutions to support bus captains during route diversions. For example, SBS Transit has deployed a mobile navigation app to support bus captains who are driving less familiar routes, such as when they are involved in bridging bus operations during a rail disruption.
Impact of Defaults and Fleet Sales on COE Prices and Used-Car Market and Measures to Control Problematic Financing Practices in Coordination with MAS›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 178w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21938
Ms He Ting Ru61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport in light of reports of high debt levels in the car-leasing sector (a) what stress-testing has been done on the impact of defaults or fleet sales on COE prices and the used-car market; and (b) whether, in coordination with MAS, steps will be taken to curb in-house financing or over-trade practices that circumvent loan-to-value limits.
Mr Jeffrey Siow117 words
[+7 sentences]Private hire cars account for around 15% of the car population, and the five largest car-leasing companies own around 3%. The remaining private hire cars are owned by smaller car-leasing companies and individuals. Defaults or fleet sales are unlikely to have a significant effect on COE prices or the used car market over the long term. Motor vehicle loans granted by financial institutions must abide by the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS') motor vehicle financing restrictions. Alternative financing arrangements extended by car dealers are not regulated by MAS. Buyers are strongly advised to obtain loans through regulated arrangements. The Government is monitoring the situation and will tighten regulations to manage the abuse of such regulations if necessary.
Impact of Marginal Bidders in COE Auctions Disproportionately Influencing Clearing Prices across Categories A and B›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 209w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21939
Ms He Ting Ru57 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport (a) whether the Ministry has analysed the marginal bidder effect in COE auctions, including how a small number of relatively price-insensitive corporate bids, supported by tax treatment or in-house financing arrangements, may disproportionately influence clearing prices across Categories A and B; and (b) if so, whether further details will be shared.
Mr Jeffrey Siow152 words
[+6 sentences]The Certificate of Entitlement (COE) bidding is a uniform price auction, with the clearing price set at the highest unsuccessful bid plus $1. Across bidding exercises in 2025, three in four Category A and B COEs were won at bids within 5% of the eventual clearing price. This is also why a Pay-As-You-Bid (PAYB) bidding system, which is often suggested, will not bring down COE prices, as all bidders pay the clearing price regardless of what they bid. There is evidence to suggest that corporates are, in fact, price sensitive when bidding for COEs. In the most recent bidding exercise that ended on 21 January 2026, the rise in COE prices for Category A and B saw a significant drop in the proportion of bids won by car-leasing companies to 4% in Category A and 5% in Category B. In 2025, car-leasing companies won around 10% of Category A and B bids.
Data on Outcome of SpexGLOW Grant Applications and Reasons for Rejections›Written Answers to Questions2 turns · 271w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-21941
Mr Chua Kheng Wee Louis53 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth since inception (a) how many applications for spexGLOW (Grant for Loss of Wages) have been (i) made and (ii) rejected respectively; (b) what are the reasons for these rejections; and (c) how many athletes under spexGLOW have gone on to medal at major games.
Mr David Neo218 words
[+9 sentences]TeamSG athletes who aspire to train full-time and have performed well at major competitions or demonstrate the potential to do so are awarded Sport Singapore's (SportSG's) spexScholarship or nurtured under the spexPotential programme and given monthly stipends to support their living expenses. There are also TeamSG athletes under SportSG's spexCarding programme pursuing non-sporting full-time careers and may wish to take no-pay leave before major competitions to train full-time. We support them through the spex Grant for Loss of Wages (spexGLOW) scheme. SportSG works closely with athletes and their respective National Sports Associations on their training and competition plans. spexGLOW operates through this collaborative planning process to identify athletes who wish to take no-pay leave to train and compete before each competition campaign, assess their eligibility and needs and determine the support required. This approach ensures that all qualifying athletes who require support and apply receive spexGLOW assistance. Since 2018, we have supported 216 applications for the spexGLOW programme. At the recent 2025 SEA Games, 39 athletes who received spexGLOW support won medals. Notable medallists include Calvin Quek, who won Singapore's first SEA Games gold in 60 years in the 400-metre hurdles, and Siti Khadijah, who won bronze to become Singapore's first woman's wushu sanda medallist. Members of the silver medal-winning netball team also benefitted from the spexGLOW support.
Data on Caseloads Handled by Community Outreach Teams and Community Intervention Teams, and Ensuring Professional Credentialing as Teams are Expanded›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time3 turns · 174w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21867
Dr Hamid Razak65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) in each of the past three years, what have been the (i) average caseloads (ii) session frequency and (iii) duration of cases, handled by Community Outreach Teams (CREST) and Community Intervention Team (COMIT) workers, respectively; and (b) how does the Ministry ensure workloads remain safe and sustainable as demand for their services rises.
Dr Hamid Razak53 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) what proportion of allied health professionals in Community Outreach Teams (CREST) and the Community Intervention Team (COMIT) are registered with their respective professional bodies; and (b) what plans are in place to ensure appropriate professional credentialing as these teams are expanded.
Mr Ong Ye Kung56 words
[+1 sentence]These questions have been addressed in the written answer to Parliamentary Question No 16 at the Parliament Sitting on 3 February 2026. [Please refer to "CREST and COMIT Referral Statistics by Source in Past Three Years and Assessment on Appropriate Care Tiers", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions section.]
Plans for Alternative Stadium with Higher Capacity than Jalan Besar Stadium›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 163w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21942
Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik58 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth whether the Ministry has plans to construct or designate an alternative stadium with a capacity significantly higher than the 6,000-seater Jalan Besar Stadium to serve as a backup venue for major international football matches, given that the National Stadium has been unavailable for regional tournaments due to scheduling conflicts.
Mr David Neo105 words
[+4 sentences]The NS Square and Toa Payoh Integrated Development are currently undergoing construction and are due to be operational by 2027 and 2030 respectively. With stadium capacities of 30,000 and 10,000 respectively, we will have more options to host major international football matches and other major events. In the meantime, we have and will continue to employ innovative solutions. One example is the Asian Football Confederation Champions League Two's Final between the Lion City Sailors and Sharjah last year, when three spectator stands were added to Bishan Stadium, temporarily increasing its capacity to 10,000 and allowing more Singaporeans to cheer for our Singapore Premier League club.
Measures to Protect Workers and Prevent Mass Casualties in High-impact Road Accidents›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 261w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21943
Miss Rachel Ong69 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport in respect of cases where workers were thrown from lorries during high-impact collisions, (a) whether new measures will be implemented to prevent mass casualties during such accidents; (b) if so, what measures; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider mandating passenger restraints, speed-triggered emergency alerts or other measures to protect workers sitting at the rear of lorries, particularly against high-impact accidents on expressways.
Mr Jeffrey Siow192 words
[+8 sentences]We regularly review measures to improve the safety of workers on lorries. Some of these have been implemented in recent years, including requirements for lorries to be fitted with canopies and higher protective side railings, have lower speed limits and to meet minimum space requirements for workers at the rear deck. Lorries with maximum laden weight between 3,500 kilogrammes and 12,000 kilogrammes are also required to install speed limiters by 1 July 2027 to cap their maximum speed at 60 kilometres per hour. The Land Transport and Related Matters Bill 2026, introduced in the January Parliament Sitting, includes heavier penalties for speed-limiter related offences. Altogether, these measures help reduce the occurrences and severity of high-impact collisions, which improves the safety of worker transport. We have consulted industry and academia extensively on the feasibility of fitting seatbelts on the rear decks of lorries. Such restraints would have to be retrofitted on existing lorries which may compromise the structural integrity of the lorry and create new safety risks. There are also liability issues, as manufacturers will not fit seatbelts onto the rear deck of new lorries, nor vouch for the safety of such lorries.
Coordination with International Partners to Address Regulatory and Enforcement Gaps in Dealing with Illegal Shipping Practices›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 303w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21944
Mr Edward Chia Bing Hui52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport in light of reports that shadow fleet vessels engaging in illegal or deceptive shipping practices for the facilitation of circumventing sanctions often operate just beyond Singapore's territorial waters, what steps is the Government taking to coordinate with international partners to address regulatory and enforcement gaps arising.
Mr Jeffrey Siow251 words
[+12 sentences]Given that these alleged illicit activities take place beyond Singapore's territorial waters, we need international cooperation to address them. In the Straits of Malacca and Singapore, our agencies work closely with neighbouring countries to combat illicit maritime activities. For example, we share information and conduct coordinated patrols with Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand through the Malacca Straits Patrol. We have cooperation mechanisms with international partners to exchange information, which can aid investigations on breaches of our domestic regulations. Our agencies also work with international partners to conduct regular industry engagements with the business, maritime and financial communities on sanctions imposed by other countries, including associated secondary sanctions risks. Singapore is one of the Vessel Traffic Service authorities for the Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. In the areas under our purview, we closely monitor vessel movements and provide information to ensure safety of navigation. Any contraventions of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO's) conventions and instruments are reported to the vessels' Flag State for their follow-up actions. Singapore fully implements the United Nations Security Council resolutions and does not condone illegal or deceptive activities by shadow fleet vessels. All vessels that do not comply with our domestic legislation and requirements, as well as the relevant conventions and instruments of the IMO may be denied entry into or detained in Singapore. This is an important and complex issue that the Singapore Government pays close attention to. We will continue working closely with international partners to address these challenges effectively.
Managing Teething Issues of Autonomous Vehicle Shuttle Implementation in Punggol›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 128w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21945
Ms Poh Li San40 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport in view of the recent accident involving an autonomous vehicle (AV) shuttle in Punggol, how will LTA manage teething issues of AV shuttle implementation in Punggol while ensuring commuters safety and meeting implementation timeline.
Mr Jeffrey Siow88 words
[+4 sentences]This incident highlights the importance of the familiarisation phase in allowing the autonomous vehicles to adapt to local conditions and for safety officers to get used to the behaviour of the autonomous vehicles. The Land Transport Authority (LTA) and ComfortDelGro have jointly reviewed the operating procedures on transitions between autonomous and manual driving. LTA will continue to work with fleet operators to ensure that autonomous vehicles are deployed in a safe manner. The Member may wish to refer to LTA's 29 January 2026 news release for more information.
Feedback on Bus Captains' Handling of Passengers with Strollers or Prams on Public Buses›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 138w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21946
Ms Hany Soh61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport (a) in the past three years, what is the number of feedback cases received by LTA pertaining to public bus captains' handling of passengers who use strollers or prams on board public buses; and (b) whether LTA will consider implementing or enhancing training for bus captains at the Singapore Bus Academy to address such matters.
Mr Jeffrey Siow77 words
[+3 sentences]From 2023 to 2025, the Land Transport Authority received an average of about one complaint per month regarding bus captains' handling of passengers travelling with strollers or prams. New bus captains receive training from the Singapore Bus Academy on how to assist passengers who may need special assistance, including passengers travelling with strollers. Such skills are also part of refresher programmes attended by in-service bus captains, to keep them up to date on the latest best practices.
Number of PMA Users Certified by Registered Medical Professionals›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 79w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21947
Ms Lee Hui Ying24 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport how many personal mobility aid users have been certified by registered medical professionals for each year since 2019.
Mr Jeffrey Siow55 words
[+3 sentences]Certification of medical need to use a mobility scooter under the Active Mobility Act has not yet begun. From 27 February 2026, users can undergo the Assessment for Mobility Scooter conducted by doctors and occupational therapists. The Member may refer to the Second Reading of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill for more details.
Expected Improvements to Travel Times, Traffic Resilience and Connectivity with Completion of Loyang Viaduct›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 136w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21949
Mr Sharael Taha34 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister for Transport how the Loyang Viaduct is expected to improve travel times, traffic resilience and connectivity for commuters and businesses travelling between Pasir Ris, Changi and the Airport Cargo Complex.
Mr Jeffrey Siow102 words
[+4 sentences]The Loyang Viaduct is an integral part of the ongoing infrastructural developments along Changi Northern Corridor to support the industrial, business and aviation growth in the Loyang, Pasir Ris and Changi regions. It will serve as an alternative road corridor and decant some traffic from the existing roads. It will also add resilience to the road network in those regions. Motorists and bus commuters travelling from Tampines Expressway and Loyang Avenue junction to Nicoll Drive during the morning peak hour can expect travel time to be reduced from approximately 22 minutes to 16 minutes on average, saving about 30% in travel time.
Data on Pilgrims Who Have Cleared Medical Screening for Upcoming Haj›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 163w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21950
Dr Wan Rizal52 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs (a) whether the Government has data on the percentage of pilgrims who have cleared the medical screening for the upcoming Haj; and (b) whether the Acting Minister can share how the Government or MUIS will be assisting those who did not clear the medical screening.
Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim111 words
[+6 sentences]Of the applicants who have undergone medical screening for this year's Haj pilgrimage, about 98% cleared the medical screening. As for the remaining applicants, the Fatwa Committee has provided guidance based on their medical circumstances. For those who are unable to perform Haj due to health reasons, they may defer their Haj participation to a later year. For those who are suffering from chronic conditions and are unlikely to recover, they may appoint a proxy to perform Haj on their behalf (Haj Badal). However, if this cannot be fulfilled despite all efforts, the Haj obligation is lifted for them. MUIS will provide further details on the Haj Badal arrangement when ready.
Discrepancies in Immigration Entry and Exit Records›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 120w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21951
Ms Gho Sze Kee65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs in view of the recent cases of long-term overstayers discovered after many years (a) how many discrepancies between immigration entry and exit records are there currently on ICA's records, where individuals have no record of exiting Singapore when they should; and (b) whether the median length of overstay has been increasing since 2019.
Mr K Shanmugam55 words
[+3 sentences]Based on the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority's (ICA's) records, there are currently 500 to 600 overstayers whom ICA is trying to track. This is less than 0.001% of our annual visitor arrival numbers. The median duration of foreigners who overstayed and were arrested each year has remained stable since 2019, averaging at about three months.
Statistics on Motorists Booked for Failing to Keep Left and Plans on Intensifying Public Education and Enforcement›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 107w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21952
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong66 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) how many motorists were booked annually since 2021 for failing to keep left; and (b) whether the Traffic Police will intensify public education and enforcement efforts to ensure heavy and logistics vehicles and slower motorists occupy leftmost lanes when available, to improve road efficiency and address persistent road hogging despite speed limiter regulations.
Mr K Shanmugam41 words
[+2 sentences]Between 2021 and 2025, the Traffic Police (TP) issued about 1,930 summonses on average annually for the offence of failing to keep left. TP will continue to enforce against such behaviour and educate motorists on the importance of maintaining lane discipline.
High Speed Pursuits Initiated by Police and Safety Protocols for Public Safety›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 187w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21953
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song74 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) in each of the last three years, (i) how many high speed pursuits on Singapore roads were initiated by the Police and (ii) how many resulted in traffic accidents; (b) whether the Ministry will review the safety protocols for such pursuits to prioritise public safety; and (c) what methods are used to track fleeing vehicles as alternatives to high speed chases.
Mr K Shanmugam113 words
[+7 sentences]The Police do not specifically track the number of high-speed pursuits initiated by the Police, or the number resulting in traffic accidents. Safety is important in Police protocols on vehicle pursuits. There is specific training for officers on high-speed vehicle pursuits. As a general rule, only officers who have undergone such training engage in high-speed vehicle pursuits. Officers who have not undergone such training engage in vehicle pursuits with stricter safety limits. Officers will use sirens and blinkers to alert other road users during the pursuit and will terminate the pursuit if it becomes too dangerous. We do not disclose details of the Police's capabilities to track fleeing vehicles due to operational reasons.
Strengthening Monitoring Systems to Prevent Abuse of Prescription Drugs›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 247w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21954
Dr Choo Pei Ling61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs how will the Ministry work with the Ministry of Health to (i) strengthen the monitoring systems to prevent abuse of prescription drugs (ii) expand prescription drug addicts' rehabilitation and support services and (iii) enhance inter-Ministry coordination, including public education efforts, to address any emerging trends in prescription drug abuse.
Mr K Shanmugam186 words
[+9 sentences]The Ministry of Health and the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) oversee registered health products, which include prescription drugs. All prescription medicines require approval by HSA before they can be legally supplied in Singapore and companies licensed to import or distribute prescription medicines are regularly audited. There are multi-agency enforcement operations to curb the illegal import, manufacture and/or supply of unregistered health products in Singapore, including prescription drugs and illicitly manufactured cough syrup. The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA), Central Narcotics Bureau and Singapore Police Force (SPF) share information and work closely with HSA to strengthen investigation and enforcement against such activities through multi-agency joint operations. For example, SPF refers to HSA any cases of unregistered health products that are detected during Police operations and subsequent investigations. ICA also works closely with HSA to detect and disrupt illegal imports of health products at the Checkpoints. Such operations are publicised, where appropriate, to enhance public education and deterrence. The Ministry of Home Affairs is not involved in the provision of rehabilitation and support services for prescription drug addicts. Our efforts are focused on supporting abusers of controlled drugs.
Issuing Implementation Directive under OCHA to Detect and Remove Moneylending Advertisements on Social Media that Target Migrant Domestic Workers›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 193w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21955
Mr Kenneth Tiong Boon Kiat68 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) whether the Ministry has considered issuing an Implementation Directive under the Online Criminal Harms Act requiring social media platforms to detect and remove unlicensed moneylending advertisements targeting migrant domestic workers; and (b) why the approach taken for impersonation scams has not been extended to illegal moneylending advertisements that facilitate harassment of workers and their employers.
Mr K Shanmugam125 words
[+5 sentences]The Police work with online platforms, like Meta and TikTok, to strengthen upstream measures to prevent unlicensed moneylending through pre-emptive detection and blocking of accounts. Between 2023 and 2025, the Police flagged more than 10,900 online accounts and advertisements involved in unlicensed moneylending to online platforms for termination. Implementation Directives under the Online Criminal Harms Act are issued when there is an urgent need to put in place a specific measure to address the proliferation of an offence or possible immediate impact. The Ministry of Home Affairs has issued Implementation Directives when there was limited cooperation from the platforms involved. In the context of unlicensed moneylending, the existing collaboration between the Police and online platforms is assessed to be adequate to deal with the issues.
Regulating Fees Charged by Driving Centres›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 195w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21956
Mr Fadli Fawzi80 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) whether the fees to learn to drive, such as enrolment and theory lesson fees, are regulated by Traffic Police or any other Government agency and (b) if not, whether the Ministry has conducted any assessment to determine if the recent increase in fees by the three driving centres represents anti-competitive behaviour; and (c) whether the Government will take any action to manage costs of learning to drive.
Mr K Shanmugam115 words
[+6 sentences]Driving schools are required under the Road Traffic Act to charge fees for instruction that the Traffic Police (TP) considers fair and reasonable. Such fees include enrolment, theory and driving lesson fees. Recently, the three driving schools had submitted separate fee increase proposals to TP. TP had assessed each proposal on its own merit and noted that the intent of the fee increases was to keep up with rising operating costs and raise the wages of driving instructors to improve recruitment and retention. As part of the fee increase, the driving schools have committed to increase the wages of driving instructors. This is expected to increase the supply of driving lessons and reduce wait times.
Studying Correlation between Lower-income Households and Diet-related Chronic Diseases›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 185w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21961
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre44 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) whether the Ministry studies the correlation between lower-income households and diet-related chronic diseases; and (b) whether current subsidies for healthier food options are sufficient to ensure nutritional security for bottom-percentile income households.
Mr Ong Ye Kung141 words
[+6 sentences]Studies around the world have consistently shown that lower income households have a higher risk of developing chronic diseases, which are associated with unhealthy diets. To counter this, the most critical public policy is to ensure universal access to healthcare, education and housing, which are the key risk drivers of poor health. Healthier SG, in particular, ensure access to evidence-based preventive care to all Singaporeans aged 40 and above. In addition, the Ministry of Health and the Health Promotion Board (HPB) have implemented specific initiatives to improve access to healthier food options. Under the Healthier Dining Programme, healthier meals are accessible across different settings, enabling availability for all, including at hawker centres, coffee shops and food courts. HPB also works with supermarket chains under the Healthier Choice Symbol Programme to increase the variety of healthier and more affordable house brand products.
Cases Registered through Healthcare Mediation Scheme and Mediation Agreements Signed›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 64w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21962
Mr Pritam Singh45 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health (a) how many cases were registered through the Healthcare Mediation Scheme from 2020 to 2025; and (b) for the same time period, how many mediation agreements were signed by consenting parties through the scheme.
Mr Ong Ye Kung19 words
[+2 sentences]Between 2020 and 2025, 50 cases were processed under the Healthcare Mediation Scheme. About 31 cases were successfully mediated.
Data on Real-term Growth in Tourism Receipts after Accounting for Inflation›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 181w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21964
Mr Edward Chia Bing Hui35 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry whether the Ministry can provide information on the real-term growth in tourism receipts between 2019 and 2024, after accounting for inflation during this period.
Mr Gan Kim Yong146 words
[+8 sentences]While tourism receipts declined by 4.3% in real terms between 2019 and 2024, after accounting for inflation, we are seeing a positive trend in spend per visitor. In the same period, spend per visitor increased 10.7% from about $1,630 in 2019 to $1,800 in 2024, in real terms. We are also seeing an uptick in tourism receipts in the past two years. In 2024, tourism receipts reached $29.8 billion for the full year. From the nine months between January to September last year, tourism receipts reached $23.9 billion. This represents a 5.8% growth compared to the same period in 2024, in real terms. Singapore Tourism Board will continue to pursue high-growth visitor segments and markets with higher propensity to spend, by developing compelling experiences and supporting our tourism companies and workers to enhance their capabilities. This shows that our Quality Tourism strategy is delivering sustainable results.
Accounting for Potential Volatility in Global Energy Markets in Singapore’s Energy Transition Strategy›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 529w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21965
Mr Edward Chia Bing Hui45 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry (a) how does Singapore's energy transition strategy account for potential volatility in global energy markets; and (b) what safeguards are in place to ensure medium-term decarbonisation goals remain on track despite short-term price fluctuations.
Mr Gan Kim Yong484 words
[+25 sentences]Diversification of energy sources is critical for our energy transition efforts in the face of global volatilities and uncertainties. We will continue to decarbonise our power sector across our four switches of natural gas, domestic solar deployment, low-carbon electricity imports and low-carbon alternatives. Within each switch, the Government has also implemented strategies to ensure that we continue to press forward on greening our energy supply. Today, around 95% of Singapore's electricity generation comes from natural gas. We must ensure secure and diversified natural gas supplies. To this end, we are developing a second liquefied natural gas terminal that will allow us to import gas from more countries and mitigate supply disruption risks. For solar, we will continue to maximise domestic deployment. We are making good progress towards meeting our target of two gigawatt-peak (GWp) of solar deployment by 2030, having achieved over 1.7 GWp of installed solar capacity as of June 2025. We will continue to find new ways to accelerate and maximise solar deployment. The Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore had previously estimated that we can deploy about eight GWp of solar if we cover every viable space in Singapore with solar photovoltaic and with technological improvements. However, maximising solar at eight GWp is only expected to meet up to 10% of Singapore's electricity demand by 2050. To supplement solar, we are pushing forward with our plans to import low-carbon electricity from the region. We are building a portfolio of projects that are diversified across energy types and source countries. To date, the Energy Market Authority has awarded conditional approvals and licences to more than eight gigawatts equivalent of electricity imports projects from Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Australia. Project developers remain interested in supplying low-carbon electricity to Singapore and are working with the relevant authorities abroad to get the necessary approvals. We are also building our capabilities in other low-carbon energy sources, including hydrogen, advanced geothermal and advanced nuclear. These technologies could become cost-competitive options in the long run. The Government is prepared to provide support to mitigate the risks of strategic low-carbon energy projects. Such projects often require significant upfront capital. Geopolitical and commercial risks, coupled with energy price volatility, reduces private investment appetite to fund these projects. We established and injected $10 billion into the Future Energy Fund to support strategic low-carbon and energy supply security projects. We also established Singapore Energy Interconnections Pte Ltd to invest, develop, own and operate subsea interconnectors to transmit low-carbon electricity into Singapore. In addition, we have implemented the carbon tax to ensure the cost of emissions are appropriately priced. Revenue collected from the carbon tax will be channelled to support decarbonisation efforts and help companies invest in low-carbon and energy-efficient solutions. As we push forward with decarbonisation, we will continue to closely monitor global developments and take into consideration international climate efforts, to ensure that our energy transition trajectory is wearable and sustainable.
Update on Negotiations with US on Tariffs and Economic Restrictions›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 136w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21966
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim38 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry whether the Ministry can provide an update on the negotiations with the United States regarding tariffs and economic restrictions, including but not limited to semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
Mr Gan Kim Yong98 words
[+6 sentences]Singapore's exports to the United States (US) are currently subject to a "reciprocal" tariff rate of 10%. The US has also imposed various Section 232 sectoral tariffs, such as on imports of steel and aluminium, copper and lumber. There are other section 232 investigations ongoing, including into semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, which are currently exempt from the 10% "reciprocal" tariff. We are still in discussion with our US counterparts on the tariffs. We are also engaging industry, including the semiconductor and pharmaceutical sectors, to assess and manage the potential impact on Singapore. We will provide an update when ready.
Programmes or Grants for Media Startups Producing Local Content›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 73w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21969
Mr Ng Shi Xuan48 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether there are any Government programmes or grants available to media startups that are producing local content, including content featuring local culture, customs and traditions; and (b) if not, whether the Ministry will consider introducing such programmes or grants.
Mrs Josephine Teo25 words
[+2 sentences]The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) supports local media companies, including startups, in content creation and capabilities development. Information can be found on IMDA's website.
Sufficiency of Current Cooperation with Neighbouring Countries to Safeguard Network of Submarine Cables›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 192w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21970
Mr Lee Hong Chuang51 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information in view of Singapore's plan to double its 26 submarine cables (a) whether the current cooperation with neighbouring countries is sufficient to safeguard the network of submarine cables; and (b) whether Singapore shall further invest in alternative transmission pathways, such as satellite-based systems.
Mrs Josephine Teo141 words
[+7 sentences]The Infocomm Media Development Authority chairs the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Working Group on Submarine Cables, which focuses on enhancing the resilience of our regional submarine cable network through capacity-building engagements and information exchange. The Working Group has developed the Enhanced ASEAN Guidelines for Strengthening Resilience and Repair of Submarine Cables. This was endorsed at the ASEAN Digital Ministers' Meeting in January 2026. The Guidelines spell out best practices ASEAN member states can adopt to strengthen the protection of submarine cables and expedite repairs to damaged cables. The Ministry of Digital Development and Information recognises the importance of enhancing the resilience of our cable networks. We will continue working with ASEAN member states to build up regional capabilities and cooperation on this front. Singapore will also continue to explore new ways to enhance our digital connectivity, including through satellites.
Review of IPS Study's Findings on Public Messaging Regarding Citizens' Versus Foreigners' Contributions to Economic Growth›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 221w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21971
Ms He Ting Ru64 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether the Ministry has reviewed the January 2026 Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) findings on public messaging regarding citizens' contributions and what insights it has drawn; (b) whether the whole-of-Government communication frameworks ensure balanced portrayal of locals' versus foreigners' contributions; and (c) whether the Ministry will review its communication strategies to better reflect Singaporeans' contributions.
Mrs Josephine Teo157 words
[+9 sentences]The member refers to a study initiated by the Government, in partnership with the Institute of Policy Studies, to trial new public engagement modalities on challenging topics, including local-foreign integration. One of the study's findings was that Singaporeans' contributions be appropriately recognised. We agree this is important. Where opportunities arise, the Government recognises Singaporeans' contributions and accomplishments across multiple fields. National campaigns regularly spotlight local entrepreneurs, innovators and community leaders. During the SG60 celebrations last year, we celebrated the achievements of Singaporeans who embodied SG60 values, such as resilience, boldness and multiculturalism. Another example is our "Together in the Lorongs" digital series, which has featured ground-up community efforts in the community. The annual National Day Awards also honour Singaporeans from different walks of life, whilst our Pioneer Generation and Merdeka Generation packages explicitly recognised the foundational contributions of our senior citizens. We always aim to do better and welcome suggestions from members as well as the public.
Correlation between Higher Phase 2A Take-up Rates in Primary 1 Registration Exercise and Socio-economic Clustering in Schools›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 241w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21972
Mr David Hoe63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) whether the higher Phase 2A take-up rates in Primary 1 registration have been found to be contributing to socio-economic clustering in some schools; (b) whether the Phase 2A priority have been assessed to impact perceptions of fairness in access to schools; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider further refinements to Primary 1 registration in this regard.
Mr Desmond Lee178 words
[+9 sentences]Our schools provide common spaces for students of different backgrounds to interact with one another, learn together and forge shared formative experiences. These help to undergird the foundations of a "we first" society in Singapore. While the majority of primary schools have a good distribution of students from different backgrounds, some schools may have a larger proportion of students from similar backgrounds. For some, this could be due to the neighbourhood where the school is located. For others, it might be due to alumni priority of parents under Phase 2A. As a result, children in these schools may have fewer opportunities to interact and learn with children from other backgrounds. To this end, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has been studying ways to support social mixing among students across schools. In a 14 January Parliamentary reply, MOE had shared how we have introduced cluster-based co-curricular activities to bring together students from different schools to pursue common interests. We are also reviewing the Primary 1 Registration Framework to enhance access to our primary schools for students of different backgrounds.
Reasons for Increase in Lack of Full-time Employment Offers by Polytechnic Graduates›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 394w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21973
Mr Fadli Fawzi64 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education in relation to the Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey (a) what are the main reasons why the percentage of students who have applied for jobs but have not received any full-time permanent job offers has increased since 2023; (b) whether any courses of study are overrepresented among these students; and (c) what actions are being taken to help these students.
Mr Desmond Lee330 words
[+12 sentences]My response will also address written Question No 49 in the Order paper for the Sitting on 3 February 2026. [Please refer to "Rise in Involuntary Part-time or Temporary Employment among Fresh Polytechnic Graduates from 2023 to 2025", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions section.] Employment rates are affected by various factors, including economic and labour market conditions. Some fluctuations in employment rates year-on-year are to be expected. In the last ten years, polytechnic graduate outcomes have remained stable, with around nine in 10 graduates securing employment within six months after graduation. The proportion of polytechnic graduates in involuntary part-time or temporary employment has also remained stable at about 3% over the past ten years. That said, 2022-2023 marked a high in the employment rate for polytechnic graduates, in line with a post-pandemic surge in hiring. The number of job vacancies has moderated from the post-pandemic peak, driven by reduced churn and slower hiring and reflects a more cautious hiring sentiment amid broader economic uncertainty and geopolitical developments. While there continue to be entry-level job opportunities for fresh graduates, some outward-oriented sectors, such as information and communications, saw more subdued hiring compared to previous years due to the uncertain global economic environment. In comparison with other course clusters, the information and digital technologies and engineering course clusters had a marginally higher percentage of students who applied for jobs but did not receive any full-time permanent job offers within six months after graduation. The polytechnics will continue to support graduates who have difficulties securing employment through the provision of education and career guidance support services, such as career coaching and employment facilitation support. Graduates can also approach Workforce Singapore and National Trades Union Congress' Employment and Employability Institute career centres for additional assistance. Sectoral initiatives, such as the Infocomm Media Development Authority's TechSkills Accelerator for Institute of Technical Education and Polytechnics Alliance, will also provide graduates with industry-relevant training that will enhance their employability.
Successful Applicants of Phase 2B with No Prior School Affiliation and Proportion of Children of Alumni›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 181w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21975
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim67 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education over the five years from 2020 to 2024, for schools that conducted Phase 2B balloting, (a) how many successful applicants in those schools had no prior school affiliation; (b) what proportion of applicants in those schools entered as children of alumni under Phase 2A; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider reserving at least 40 places for unaffiliated families under Phase 2B.
Mr Desmond Lee114 words
[+3 sentences]The Primary One Registration Framework balances a number of factors, including the convenience of having the younger sibling attend the same school as the older sibling, ties that the parents have to the school, proximity to home and providing access to those without ties to the school. From 2020 to 2024, in schools that balloted at Phase 2B, on average about one-third of their primary one cohort were admitted via Phase 1, one-third via Phase 2A and the remaining one-third via Phases 2B and 2C. As I had shared recently in an interview, Ministry of Education is reviewing the Primary 1 Registration Framework to enhance access to primary schools for students of different backgrounds.
Median Starting Salary for Engineering Graduates Compared with Those in Other Disciplines›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 202w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21977
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) what is the median starting salary for engineering graduates in 2023 compared to other competitive disciplines; (b) how many engineering graduates entered non-engineering roles within three years of graduation in the past five years; and (c) what measures have been implemented since 2020 to close remuneration and career progression gaps between engineering and other high-demand professions.
Mr Desmond Lee140 words
[+6 sentences]Based on the Graduate Employment Survey, the median starting salary for Engineering graduates was $4,400 and $2,800 for autonomous university and polytechnic graduates, respectively, in 2023. This is higher than the median starting salary of $4,295 for autonomous university graduates in general and comparable to the median starting salary of $2,800 for polytechnic graduates in the same year. The Ministry of Education does not track the number of Engineering graduates who entered non-engineering roles within three years of graduation. Remuneration and career progression opportunities in any sector reflect the market demand for specific skillsets. The respective sector agencies will continue to work with industry to build up their talent pipelines and address sector-specific manpower needs. Our institutes of higher learning will work with these agencies and industry to ensure that the curriculum remains industry relevant and support the upskilling initiatives.
Proposal for SkillsFuture to Partner AUs to Provide Subsidised Courses in High-demand Sectors and Implementing Consolidated Lifelong Learning Accounts›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 293w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21981
Mr Yip Hon Weng49 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education whether the Ministry will refresh the SkillsFuture model by (i) formally partnering with the Autonomous Universities to provide subsidised courses in high-demand sectors; and (ii) implementing consolidated lifelong learning accounts to facilitate structured, long-term skills progression instead of the current fragmented usage of credits.
Mr Desmond Lee244 words
[+9 sentences]Under SkillsFuture, our autonomous universities deliver training programmes with funding from the Ministry of Education (MOE) and SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG) to meet different upskilling and reskilling needs. These include curated, short training programmes that focus on emerging skills, SkillsFuture Career Transition Programmes, as well as full qualifications and stackable micro-credentials. To tighten the nexus between skills demand and training supply, SkillsFuture Singapore regularly monitors labour market skills needs and provides jobs and skills insights, tools and resources through the Jobs-Skills Portal. SkillsFuture Singapore provides a range of training support, to help Singaporeans develop to their full potential throughout life. At the age of 25, all Singaporeans receive an opening SkillsFuture Credit of $500, which does not expire and can be used for a wide range of skills-based courses. When they reach 40, Singaporeans receive further training support under the SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme, in the form of additional credits and the Training Allowance, to pursue a substantive skills reboot, to help them stay competitive in a rapidly changing economy. This structured approach to training support recognises that learning needs may evolve throughout one's career. The Career and Skills Passport, a joint career health initiative between Ministry of Manpower and MOE/SSG, also serves as a personal skills account for every adult Singaporean to track his acquisition of skills through upskilling and work experience. SSG has started to develop personalised training advisories based on this passport, to provide structured guidance to the individual throughout his working life.
Guidelines for Proportion of Work To Be Completed In School and At Home›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 231w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21982
Ms He Ting Ru48 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education (a) whether the Ministry conducts assessments on implementing guidelines regarding the proportion of schoolwork and homework that should be completed (i) in-school and (ii) as take-home assignments across pre-school, primary, secondary and tertiary levels; and (b) if so, what are the Ministry's findings.
Mr Desmond Lee183 words
[+10 sentences]The Ministry of Education (MOE) does not dictate the proportion of schoolwork to be done in school or at home. Based on the teachers' professional judgement and the students' learning needs, teachers may include class work as part of a lesson or assign work to be done at home to reinforce learning. Schools have homework guidelines to keep homework purposeful and manageable. MOE monitors the implementation of these guidelines at the system level. Based on our findings, all schools have a homework policy which articulates the objectives of homework and how homework load is monitored and regulated. Schools review their homework guidelines regularly to calibrate homework load, with due consideration for student learning and well-being. For pre-schools, the involvement of families in their children's learning is key. As such, home-based activities, such as take-home activity kits, may be provided in preschools. This encourages families to extend their children's learning at home and to foster family bonding and interactions. Our Institutes of Higher Learning also have their respective academic policies and guidelines to ensure that student workload is appropriate and aligned to learning outcomes.
Longer-term Support for SMEs to Maintain Employment and Wages of Older Workers›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 233w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21986
Mr Shawn Loh64 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower whether more longer-term support, including through wage support and reducing employment-related costs, such as insurance, can be provided to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to maintain employment and wages of older workers, so that the impact of decreasing productivity of some older workers as a result of structurally faster technology cycles can be shared between employers and the Government.
Dr Tan See Leng169 words
[+7 sentences]Senior workers bring a wealth of skills and experience accumulated over their careers. We want to enable senior workers to contribute productively to the economy and support employers in reaping the benefits of an experienced workforce. The Government encourages employers to hire senior workers through the Senior Employment Credit, or SEC. Under the SEC, employers, including the small and medium enterprises, can receive wage offsets of up to 7% for Singaporean employees aged 60 and above, earning less than $4,000 a month. The Government has recently extended the SEC to end-2026 while we conduct a more fundamental review of our senior employment strategy. In this regard, the Government and tripartite partners have convened a Tripartite Workgroup on Senior Employment to review and refresh our policies to support senior employment. In particular, the Workgroup is studying how to help employers build capabilities to manage a multi-generational workforce and empower senior workers to remain productive and employable. More updates will be provided when the Workgroup releases its recommendations later this year.
Monitoring of Areas where Foreign Domestic Workers Congregate›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 257w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21988
Ms Diana Pang Li Yen62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) whether the Ministry monitors recurring congregation hotspots of foreign domestic workers on rest days; (b) what measures will the Ministry take to address persistent complaints involving noise, littering and noise-generating activities such as recording TikTok dances that have affected residents living near typical gathering hotspots; and (c) whether alternative gathering spaces can be provided or designated.
Dr Tan See Leng195 words
[+7 sentences]The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) monitors locations where migrant domestic workers (MDWs) congregate during their rest days and works with agencies and partners in the community to manage any disamenities that may arise in these areas. For example, we engage town councils and residents' committees in these locations to co-create solutions that address noise and littering disamenities, while balancing the MDWs' social and recreational needs. Since 2025, we have been piloting the use of community spaces in Clementi and Paya Lebar to provide MDWs with accessible and conducive resting spaces on Sundays. We invite non-governmental organisation partners to conduct recreational activities and training programmes at these spaces so that MDWs can spend their rest days meaningfully. We also share information with MDWs on this via channels, such as MOM's MDW WhatsApp channel. MOM will continue to work with agencies and our partners to expand the number of alternative gathering spaces for MDWs to rest and unwind. Even as we encourage MDWs to be considerate when using public spaces and endeavour to provide alternative gathering spaces for them, we do need to recognise that public spaces are shared by everyone, including MDWs on their rest days.
Dedicated Mental Health Support Services Beyond Helplines for Migrant Domestic Workers›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 350w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21989
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what dedicated mental health support services beyond helplines are currently available for migrant domestic workers; (b) how many migrant domestic workers have utilised these services in each of the past five years; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider conducting a needs assessment directly with migrant domestic workers to understand their mental health needs and barriers to accessing support.
Dr Tan See Leng285 words
[+11 sentences]The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) takes a multi-pronged approach towards mental health support for Migrant Domestic Workers (MDWs), starting with upstream touchpoints to pre-emptively identify and address mental health and well-being concerns. All first-time MDWs attend the settling-in programme on arrival, which provides guidance on stress management and the avenues to seek help. MDWs are also required to undergo the six-monthly medical examination, which serves as another channel for doctors to detect any signs of distress. Employment agencies conduct welfare checks within three months of MDW's placement while the Centre for Domestic Employees (CDE), a non-governmental organisation (NGO), conducts two interviews on behalf of MOM with all first-time MDWs in the first year of their employment. Besides these interviews, CDE also conducts recreational activities for MDWs on their rest days and runs a 24/7 helpline for MDWs in distress. Beyond MOM's MDW helpline, MDWs that require mental health support can contact NGOs, such as CDE and Brahm Centre, which also operate helplines and provide counselling services. Serious cases will be escalated for medical attention and treatment. Additionally, MOM partners the Alliance of Domestic Employees to scale and train "Care Sisters", who serve as a peer support network, in psychological first aid, suicide prevention and mental well-being support to fellow domestic workers. The Care Sisters network comprises MDWs of various nationalities, ensuring that peer support is delivered in their native language and in a manner suited to their cultural backgrounds. MOM does not collect data on MDWs' utilisation of mental health support services in Singapore. Nonetheless, a MOM-Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Institute of Mental Health study in 2024 showed that most MDWs were able to seek help when faced with emotional issues.
Ensuring Sufficient Budget Meal Offerings for Those with Genuine Need›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 123w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21993
Ms Poh Li San34 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development with the implementation of optional budget meals in coffee shops, how will HDB ensure that there are sufficient budget meal offerings for those who cannot afford regular-priced meals.
Mr Chee Hong Tat89 words
[+1 sentence]The Member may wish to refer to the combined reply given by the Ministry of National Development on 3 February 2026 to similar questions posed by Assoc Prof Terence Ho and Ms He Ting Ru on budget meals in Housing Development Board's coffee shops. [Please refer to "Reduction in Budget Meal Options for Lower-income Residents with Scrapping of Budget Meal Initiative at HDB Coffee Shops", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.]
Appeals by Foreign Spouses of Singaporeans to Purchase BTO HDB Flats›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 152w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21995
Mr Foo Cexiang44 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) in the past three years whether HDB has received appeals by Singapore-foreigner spouses for permission to purchase BTO HDB flats other than BTO 2-room Flexi flats; and (b) if so, how many of these appeals were successful.
Mr Chee Hong Tat108 words
[+5 sentences]Singaporeans with non-resident spouses who have a Singaporean or Singapore Permanent Resident (SPR) child are treated as Singaporean families for the purposes of access to Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats. They can purchase flats of any size from HDB, subject to other eligibility conditions. Singaporeans with non-resident spouses and no Singaporean or SPR child can purchase a 2-room Flexi flat from HDB, if the Singaporean is a first-timer aged 35 and above. From 2023 to 2025, HDB received 16 appeals from such couples to purchase flats other than 2-room Flexi flats from HDB. HDB did not accede to these appeals because the appellants had alternative housing options.
Average Time Taken from HIP Announcement to Polling of Residents and Start of Construction Works›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 142w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21996
Ms Valerie Lee68 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development regarding Home Improvement Programme (HIP) projects over the past three years (a) what is the average time from the HIP batch announcement to polling and start of construction; (b) what are the major reasons for any variations in timeline; and (c) what are the measures taken to compress the timeline so that residents are better able to plan their own self-funded renovations.
Mr Chee Hong Tat74 words
[+1 sentence]This question was addressed in the Ministry of National Development's reply to the questions asked by Mr Ng Shi Xuan and Mr Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik on 3 February 2026. [Please refer to "Allowing E-polling via Singpass for Home Improvement Programme and Extending Programme to HDB Blocks Built After 1997", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.]
Empowering HDB and Town Council Officers to Issue Mediation Orders and Provide Admissible Statements in Areas Where Community Relations Unit Do Not Operate›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 182w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21997
Mr Shawn Loh41 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development whether HDB and Town Council officers can be empowered to issue mediation orders and provide statements that are admissible to the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunal in areas where the Community Relations Unit does not operate.
Mr Chee Hong Tat141 words
[+7 sentences]The Minister-in-charge of the Community Relations Unit has the power to appoint public officers and employees of statutory bodies to issue mediation directions (MDs). These include Housing and Development Board (HDB) officers and Town Council officers. We are piloting the Directed Mediation framework in Tampines and HDB officers and officers from the Community Relations Unit are authorised to issue MDs for neighbour noise disputes. We will expand the MD framework to more towns. Given the nature of MDs and that non-compliance can result in a fine of up to $1,500, non-public officers have not been appointed to issue MDs. The Community Disputes Resolution Tribunal (CDRT) may consider any information that is relevant to the resolution of a CDRT claim. In this regard, the CDRT can ask a HDB or Town Council officer to provide information for the purposes of its proceedings.
Reasonable Asking Price for Flats in EIP Buyback Scheme›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 232w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-21998
Ms Elysa Chen67 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether pegging asking price to non-Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP)-constrained flats would fail to meet the reasonable asking price requirement under the EIP buyback scheme, implying a mandatory discount; (b) how the reasonableness of asking price is determined; (c) whether HDB's buyback valuation includes an EIP-related discount; and (d) if so, what is the calculation methodology and rationale for such discount.
Mr Chee Hong Tat165 words
[+7 sentences]The Housing and Development Board (HDB) provides a range of assistance measures for flat owners who face genuine difficulties selling their flats when the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP) quotas have been reached. This includes buying back flats from eligible EIP-constrained flat owners. HDB will assess requests for buyback assistance on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the household's specific circumstances, including whether they have tried to sell the flat at a reasonable asking price for at least six months. HDB will refer to prices of recently transacted flats with similar attributes to determine if the marketed price is reasonable. All past transaction prices are published on the "Check Resale Flat Prices" e-service on the HDB InfoWEB. For flat owners who are eligible for buyback assistance, HDB will appoint a professional licensed valuer to value the flat based on established valuation principles and make an offer for the flat at a fair price. Flat owners can take up to three months to consider HDB's buyback offer.
Privacy Concerns of Residents of Landed Properties Located Near Towering BTO Projects›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 128w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22000
Ms Diana Pang Li Yen56 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether HDB accounts for privacy concerns of residents in landed property estates whose homes risk being overlooked onto by new Build-to-Order (BTO) projects; (b) what architectural or design measures are mandated to address such privacy concerns; and (c) whether clearer standards will be issued or strengthened in this respect.
Mr Chee Hong Tat72 words
[+5 sentences]All Build-to-Order projects are designed and constructed in accordance with prevailing building codes. This includes guidelines on building setbacks to ensure adequate spacing from adjacent developments. The Housing and Development Board also adopts designs that are sensitive to surrounding developments. These include the strategic placement and orientation of buildings, as well as landscaping along common boundaries. For instance, dense and tall trees are typically planted to enhance privacy and provide visual screening.
Establishing Government-operated Adult Disability Homes and Day Activity Centres to Complement Social Service Agency-run Ones›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 324w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22001
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong61 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether the Ministry has evaluated the feasibility of establishing Government-operated Adult Disability Homes and Day Activity Centres to complement the existing Social Service Agency-run model; and (b) how the Ministry plans to address the current waiting list durations for these facilities, particularly for adults with high support needs whose caregivers are ageing.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M263 words
[+11 sentences]The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) appoints and funds Social Service Agencies to operate Adult Disability Homes and Day Activity Centres. We tap on these service providers' specialised knowledge of disabilities, operational expertise and community networks, to deliver services tailored to the needs of persons with disabilities and their caregivers. Appointed service providers are required to abide by service model requirements and standards. Additionally, the Social Residential Homes Act was passed in 2025, establishing a common regulatory framework for social residential homes and codifying the good practices that have been established in raising the quality of care in our homes over the years. At this point in time, we do not have plans to establish Government-operated Adult Disability Homes and Day Activity Centres. MSF closely monitors the demand and supply across disability programmes to ensure needs continue to be met. For Adult Disability Homes, MSF will be adding a new facility by 2030 to expand capacity. SG Enable also works with the appointed Social Service Agencies running the homes to optimise placements and ensure cases with urgent needs are prioritised. In parallel, we are piloting community-based support services to provide alternatives to residential care, such as the Enabled Living Programme. For Day Activity Centres, MSF is progressively increasing the capacity by 500 places by 2030, up from the current 1,800 places. For suitable individuals on the waitlist, SG Enable facilitates referrals to other facilities with available capacity and supports continued engagement through activities at the Enabling Services Hubs and the Supported Transition and Engagement Programme for graduates of special education schools.
Update on Inclusive Support Programme Pilot›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 283w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22002
Mr Foo Cexiang44 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) for an update on the Inclusive Support Programme (InSP) pilot; and (b) whether the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) is considering the inclusion of environmental adjustments, such as providing frequency modulation (FM) systems, at preschools.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M239 words
[+10 sentences]The Inclusive Support Programme (InSP) serves children requiring medium levels of early intervention (EI) support, and who are suited to receive EI in a preschool group setting. The InSP evaluation study found that children with developmental needs in InSP preschools made significant progress in all domains of their development, narrowing the gap with their typically developing peers. Typically developing children in InSP preschools also demonstrated significant cognitive gains. In the inclusive environment, more meaningful interactions between children and greater acceptance of peers with different abilities were observed. Given these promising findings, the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) will progressively add about 600 more InSP places from 2026 onwards. As part of the InSP, ECDA sets general guidelines on environmental modifications in preschools, such as therapy rooms and accessible toilets, to cater to children with developmental needs. Beyond these, InSP preschool operators can make specific modifications based on children's individual needs, such as providing frequency modulation systems to children who are deaf or hard of hearing. ECDA provides funding for InSP preschools to facilitate their provision of such modifications. Beyond the funding provided to InSP preschools, families can also tap on the Ministry of Social and Family Development's Assistive Technology Fund, which provides a means-tested subsidy of up to 90% of the cost to acquire, replace or repair assistive devices. Families can also tap on Child Development Account funds to purchase, maintain or repair assistive technology devices from approved providers.
Day Activity Centre Clients with Primary Caregivers Aged Above 65›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 298w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22004
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) how many clients of Day Activity Centre (DAC) have primary caregivers aged 65 or older; (b) what demand projections exist for Adult Disability Homes (ADH) as this caregiver cohort ages; (c) whether ADH capacity is adequate to meet projected demand; and (d) what support is available to families planning the transition to residential care.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M235 words
[+9 sentences]About one-third of individuals enrolled in day activity centres, or around 500 individuals, have at least one caregiver aged 65 and above. Our aim is to enable persons with disabilities to live and age in the community for as long as they are able. Thus, we are piloting community-based support services to provide alternatives to residential care, such as the Enabled Living Programme pilot launched in 2025 and the upcoming Home Support Programme pilot. Through the Enabling Skills for Life Programme proof-of-concept, we also aim to support persons with disabilities to access living skills and vocational training and build up skills for independence. Admission into adult disability homes is considered as a last resort for adults with disabilities who have no alternative accommodation. As of December 2025, over 1,000 persons with disabilities reside in 11 Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF)-funded adult disability homes, most of which operate at utilisation rates of over 80%. MSF continues to monitor and plan ahead with our partners to ensure that we have sufficient capacity to meet projected demand. More information and support for future care planning can be accessed through SG Enable, including via the Enabling Guide, which serves as a first-stop online resource for information on disability in Singapore. Caregivers may also tap on community support networks, such as CaringSG, and a range of caregiver-led initiatives supported by SG Enable for peer support and practical guidance.
Tracking of Food Insecurity Prevalence in Singapore›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 233w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22006
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre55 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether the Ministry tracks the prevalence of moderate to severe food insecurity in Singapore using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale or an equivalent metric; (b) if so, what is the trend over the last five years; and (c) if not, how is food insecurity officially quantified.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M178 words
[+9 sentences]The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) does not systematically track the prevalence of food insecurity in Singapore. There are some occasional global publications, such as the Food Insecurity Experience Scale by the Food and Agriculture Organization. The measured levels for Singapore are comparable to those of high-income economies, although like the experience of other economies, there has been an increase in recent years. Our approach is to ensure the availability of financial support if households are in need. Social Service Offices (SSOs) provide ComCare assistance to support families to meet basic living needs, including food-related expenditures. SSOs may also link applicants up with other forms of support, including those that do not qualify for ComCare. There are also efforts by food charities, volunteer groups, grassroots organisations and corporates to provide food support to households in need. That said, MSF regularly reviews the range of measurements it tracks, in order to better identify needs and groups that need more support. We will include food security as one of the possible areas to consider for more systematic measurement.
Monitoring of Donees and Deputies Appointed under Mental Capacity Act for Compliance with Fiduciary Duties›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 288w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22007
Ms Diana Pang Li Yen62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) monitors donees and deputies appointed under the Mental Capacity Act for their compliance with fiduciary duties; (b) how does OPG address non-performing deputies who refuse or fail to act; and (c) whether OPG will introduce stronger oversight such as periodic reporting, targeted audits or sanctions.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M226 words
[+8 sentences]The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) requires deputies appointed by the Courts under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) to submit annual reports. The reports must provide an account of decisions made by the deputies for the mentally incapacitated person including how they have managed the property and affairs. This will be used to assess the deputies' compliance with the Court orders and whether they have fulfilled their responsibilities under the MCA. If OPG suspects potential ill-treatment or abuse of persons who have lost mental capacity, whether through the deputy reports or through whistleblowing, it will investigate and conduct further checks as necessary. This includes assigning a Board of Visitor, comprising of medical professionals and elder care practitioners, to assess the person's condition and standard of care. Donees or deputies who do not adhere to good practices in managing the property and affairs of the person under a Lasting Power of Attorney or deputyship are placed under closer supervision by OPG, to ensure compliance with their responsibilities. Where there is evidence of fraud or financial mismanagement, OPG may apply to the Court to suspend or revoke the appointment of the errant donee or deputy and require him or her to make restitution to the mentally incapacitated person who has suffered loss. OPG may also refer appropriate cases to the police for criminal action to be taken.
Update on Hawker Centres and Food Retail Establishments with Smoking Corners›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 206w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22008
Mr Ng Shi Xuan63 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) whether the Ministry can provide an update on the number of hawker centres and food retail establishments with smoking corners; and (b) whether the Ministry will take more proactive action to eliminate such corners, including requiring the removal of such corners as a condition of renewal of the licences of the food retail establishments.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien143 words
[+7 sentences]The National Environment Agency (NEA) has stopped accepting applications for new smoking corners in retail food establishments since June 2017. Existing smoking corners will be phased out when the licences of the establishments are terminated or cancelled. For existing hawker centres, NEA has been engaging local stakeholders, such as the Hawkers' Associations and Town Councils, on the progressive removal of smoking corners when opportune, such as during repairs and redecoration works. In June 2017, there were about 1,000 smoking corners across hawker centres and retail food establishments. This decreased to about 600 when we last updated Parliament on this issue in October 2022. As of December 2025, the number of hawker centres and retail food establishments with smoking corners has further reduced to about 10 and 270 respectively. There are no current plans to require their removal as a condition for licence renewal.
Additional Costs Incurred by Government and Public Waste Collectors to Transport, Sort and Incinerate Contaminated Recyclables›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 225w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22009
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong62 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) what is the estimated additional cost per tonne incurred by the Government and Public Waste Collectors to transport, sort and subsequently incinerate contaminated recyclables from blue bins; and (b) for the tracking contamination rates, whether the Ministry will transit from aggregated national-level data to estate-level data for more targeted, community-specific interventions and accountability.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien163 words
[+8 sentences]The National Environment Agency (NEA) appoints Public Waste Collectors (PWCs) through open tenders to provide refuse and recyclables collection services for domestic and trade premises. The Government does not incur additional cost for the collection and incineration of contaminated recyclables from blue bins as such costs are included in the overall fees paid to the PWC. However, PWCs do incur additional costs to segregate the recyclables and channel the contaminated recyclables for incineration. These costs will vary depending on each PWC's specific sorting processes and operational efficiency. Contaminated recyclables also contribute to additional demand on our waste management infrastructure and lost potential revenue from recycling. Currently, sampling for contamination of recyclables is done at the Materials Recovery Facilities on an aggregated basis. NEA will continue to explore ways to strengthen our data collection to provide more targeted, community-specific interventions. We urge all residents to be mindful of depositing only recyclables in our blue bins to make a positive contribution to our sustainability effort.
Summonses Issued to Individuals Who Leave Refuse Bags at HDB Void Decks Next to Refuse Bins›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 183w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22010
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) how many summonses have been issued by NEA in 2025 to individuals specifically for leaving refuse bags at HDB void decks next to refuse bins; (b) whether enforcement against such littering is the responsibility of Town Councils or NEA; and (c) whether there are plans to deploy dedicated ground level surveillance cameras to identify these offenders.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien118 words
[+4 sentences]Leaving refuse bags beside the litter bins constitutes a littering offence under the Environmental Public Health Act 1987 and it is enforced by the National Environment Agency (NEA). NEA does not track the number of enforcement actions taken for specific ground littering scenarios, such as leaving refuse bags next to litter bins. For persistent cases of litter being left beside litter bins in Housing and Development Board (HDB) void decks, NEA works with Town Councils, which manage cleaning of HDB estates, to educate residents on proper disposal practices. NEA also works with Town Councils to deploy or make use of existing surveillance camera systems to gather video evidence to facilitate NEA's investigations and enforcement of the littering offences.
Assessing Need for Sixth Desalination Plant›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 155w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22012
Ms Hazlina Abdul Halim59 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (a) what factors are being considered in determining the need for a sixth desalination plant; (b) how will projected water demand and climate risks affect this assessment; (c) what are the estimated capital and operating costs; and (d) how are operating costs likely to affect water tariffs for households and businesses.
Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien96 words
[+5 sentences]The Public Utilities Board (PUB) plans ahead and invests in water infrastructure to meet Singapore's growing water needs from its population and economic activities. This includes building up our weather-resilient sources, such as desalinated water. PUB is thus carrying out a feasibility study for a potential new desalination plant, the costs of which will be determined only after the study. PUB will continue to price water to reflect the cost of supplying the next drop of water. This allows PUB to finance its long-term investments sustainably to meet future water demand and safeguard Singapore's water security.
Increasing Quantum of Benefits and Grants for Large-family Households›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time2 turns · 177w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22015
Mr Ng Shi Xuan60 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance in light of the introduction of the Large Families Scheme in 2025, whether the Government will consider increasing the quantum of other benefits and grants given to each such large-family household, such as U-Save utility bill rebates and GST vouchers, in support of the proportionally higher household expenditure of such larger families.
Mr Jeffrey Siow117 words
[+6 sentences]The Large Families Scheme was introduced to support married couples who have, or aspire to have, three or more children. It builds on other marriage and parenthood measures and subsidies for preschool and education, which already provide support on a per-child basis. This means that families with more children already receive significantly greater support. Other social schemes are designed differently for their specific purposes. For example, the Goods and Services Tax Voucher scheme is means-tested so that more support is given to lower-income households and resources are directed towards those with greater need. The Government will continue to regularly review our social schemes to ensure that households in need of greater help will receive the appropriate support.
Measures to Ensure Safe, Nutritious and Affordable Food in Schools›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time3 turns · 175w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22017
Ms Hazlina Abdul Halim65 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education in light of concerns over the Central Kitchen Meal Model and recent gastroenteritis cases at River Valley Primary School (a) what new measures will be in place to ensure that school meals are safe and nutritious, if any; and (b) what recourse is available to parents, schools and students when catering companies are found to have breached food safety standards.
Ms Lee Hui Ying39 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Education given the challenges of retaining or finding new school canteen stallholders, whether the Ministry will consider providing support for schools to partner local businesses or hawkers in selling food to students at affordable prices.
Mr Desmond Lee71 words
[+1 sentence]These questions have been addressed in my response on the school canteen and Central Kitchen Meal Model at the Parliamentary Sitting on 3 February 2026, which will be made available on the Ministry of Education's website. [Please refer to "Enhancing Food Safety Measures Following Recent Gastroenteritis Cases at Primary Schools and Incentives for Operators of School Canteens", Official Report, 3 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 15, Oral Answers to Questions section.]
Developments and Considerations for Assessing US Invitation to Join Board of Peace›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time4 turns · 154w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22018
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song58 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs (a) what specific developments since October 2025 have prompted the formal assessment of the US invitation to join the Board of Peace; (b) whether the Ministry assesses this initiative as a shift toward an alternative US-led international order; and (c) whether Singapore will coordinate with ASEAN partners for a unified regional response.
Ms Hazlina Abdul Halim47 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs (a) what are the Ministry's considerations in assessing the invitation to the Board of Peace; and (b) what is the Ministry's plan to engage Singaporeans who want to play a part in the humanitarian efforts aimed at reconstructing Gaza, if any.
Mr Liang Eng Hwa32 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs what are the Government's (i) assessment and (ii) considerations with regard to the invitation by the United States for Singapore to join the Board of Peace.
Dr Vivian Balakrishnan17 words
[+1 sentence]The Singapore Government is assessing the invitation from the United States to join the Board of Peace.
Expansion of and Training for Mental Health Counsellors Workforce›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time3 turns · 373w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22019
Dr Charlene Chen73 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health for Tier 3 of the National Mental Health and Well-being Strategy's Tiered Care Model (a) how does the Ministry assess the adequacy of current postgraduate training pathways for mental health counsellors; and (b) how does it work with Agency for Integrated Care, public healthcare institution and community partners to strengthen training capacity, supervision and structured transition-to-practice pathways into community mental health services.
Dr Charlene Chen70 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health in support of the National Mental Health and Well-being Strategy, what are Ministry plans, if any, for the mental health counsellor workforce over the next five years, including (i) plans to address projected needs across healthcare and community settings and (ii) how supervised practice placements, clinical supervision capacity and entry-level roles will be expanded to support newly trained counsellors.
Mr Ong Ye Kung230 words
[+8 sentences]The Minister of Health (MOH) does not actively track manpower data on counsellors. Based on data from the Singapore Association for Counselling (SAC), the number of counselling practitioners who voluntarily registered with SAC increased from 969 in 2022 to 1,838 in 2025. The social service agencies and public health institutions continuously review their individual service needs and recruit additional counsellors to meet these demands. Newly trained counsellors receive support, such as supervision, structured induction, professional development, peer networks and administrative guidance, though structures vary by organisation. Under the SAC's constitution, entry-level counsellors working towards registration must receive clinical supervision from a Registered Counsellor or Registered Clinical Supervisor. The SAC membership provides access to professional development opportunities, research publications, networking and updates on landscape developments through Government and regional collaborations. In addition to the National Mental Health Competency Training Framework that guides mental health practitioners, including counsellors, in developing competencies aligned with the Tiered Care Model, counsellors can also refer to the Skills Framework for Social Service for the required core skills and competencies, as well as the counselling career trajectory map. Counsellors could also enhance their capabilities through postgraduate courses and specialised skills training, such as Master's degrees in counselling offered by the Singapore University of Social Sciences and the National Institute of Education at Nanyang Technological University or postgraduate diplomas in counselling provided by the College of Allied Educators.
Monitoring Commercial Rental Trends and Tenant Composition in Heritage Conservation Zones, Suburban Towns and Neighbourhood Centres›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time3 turns · 179w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22020
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin50 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether the Government monitors commercial rental trends and tenant composition in heritage conservation zones such as Kampong Glam; and (b) what impact rising rents have on the retention of longstanding or culturally significant retailers and on the overall cultural character of these districts.
Mr Saktiandi Supaat70 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Minister for National Development in view of increasing rents in the heartlands (a) whether the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) tracks changes in retail rents in suburban towns and neighbourhood centres, given that its Retail Rental Index reflects only Central Region leases; (b) if not, why not and (c) what measures are in place to mitigate the displacement of long-standing heartland businesses with heritage value due to rising rents.
Mr Chee Hong Tat59 words
[+1 sentence]This question was addressed in the Ministry of National Development's reply to the questions asked by Ms Denise Phua Lay Peng and Mr Fadli Fawzi on 3 February 2026.
Data on "Buy Now, Pay Later" Transactions and Updating Practice Code to Reduce Purchase Limit for Those Below 21›Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer Not Answered by End of Question Time3 turns · 364w
· 0 highlighted
written-answer-na-22021
Mr Cai Yinzhou56 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what is the total value of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) transactions in 2025; and (b) whether MAS will consider collecting data on the number of Singaporeans who are unable to repay their debts incurred via BNPL services on time with breakdown by age and income ranges.
Mr Cai Yinzhou66 words
[+1 sentence]asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) whether MAS will consider updating the Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) Code of Conduct to lower the maximum purchase limit for those below 21 years old; and (b) whether MAS will consider coordinating across BNPL providers such that a unified spending limit is applied per individual customer and the total sum shared between all accredited BNPL platforms.
Mr Gan Kim Yong (for the Prime Minister)242 words
[+12 sentences]Let me first reassure the Member that there are safeguards in place to limit the risk of consumers getting into unsustainable debt. All "Buy Now, Pay Later" (BNPL) firms operating in Singapore have committed to implement protections in line with the BNPL Code of Conduct. A user's BNPL facility will be suspended once a payment is overdue. The BNPL firms have committed to cap late payment fees, disclose them clearly and not subject outstanding amounts to compound interest. The BNPL firms also cannot grant customers a limit over $2,000 without additional credit assessments, including BNPL credit bureau checks. While growing, BNPL transactions remain small. It accounts for less than 2% of the value of total credit card and debit card payments in the first half of 2025. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is collecting information from BNPL firms through surveys to monitor the use of their services and assess if they pose a concern. From our survey, 1.5% of BNPL firms' customers are below 21 years old. The median BNPL user with missed payments had outstanding amounts below $400 in aggregate across all BNPL firms and the vast majority have outstanding amounts below $1000. Rather than charging interest, the industry typically charges a late fee that is disclosed up front. While there is no need for further measures at this time, MAS will continue to monitor the situation and will review how to enhance our surveys to better monitor the sector.
Clarification by Senior Minister of State for Manpower›Correction by Written Statement3 turns · 326w
· 0 highlighted
written-statement-2843
Speaker not recorded38 words
[+1 sentence][(proc text) The following statement was made by the Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon) during a clarification at the end of Question Time for the Parliament Sitting of 4 February 2026: (proc text)]
The Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon)188 words
[+9 sentences]Sir, thank you for your indulgence. Just a quick clarification to the reply given to Mr Pritam Singh earlier. I mentioned that only five workers or more being retrenched will need to notify, but that is wrong. Actually, it is that companies that have more than 10 workers will be required to notify the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) of any retrenchment within five working days. It is not five workers but within five working days. As long as the company has more than 10 workers, even if one worker gets retrenched, it would need to notify MOM. Thank you, Sir. [Please refer to "Data on Companies with More Than 25 Workers Paying Retrenchment Benefits in Line with Tripartite Guidelines", Official Report, 4 February 2026, Vol 96, Issue 16, Oral Answers to Questions section.] I wish to make the following factual correction to my clarification at the end of question time for the Parliament Sitting of 4 February 2026. My statement should read as follows:
The Senior Minister of State for Manpower (Dr Koh Poh Koon)100 words
[+7 sentences]Sir, thank you for your indulgence. Just a quick clarification to the reply given to Mr Pritam Singh earlier. I mentioned that only five workers or more being retrenched will need to notify, but that is wrong. Actually, it is that companies that have 10 or more workers will be required to notify the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) of any retrenchment within five working days. It is not five workers but within five working days. As long as the company has 10 or more workers, even if one worker gets retrenched, it would need to notify MOM. Thank you, Sir.